Planet Simpson 176
| Planet Simpson: How a Cartoon Masterpiece Defined a Generation | |
| author | Chris Turner |
| pages | 464 |
| publisher | Da Capo Press |
| rating | 7 |
| reviewer | Michael Fiegel |
| ISBN | 0306813416 |
| summary | An exploration of The Simpsons and its impact on society (and vice versa) |
Perhaps in keeping with the counter-cultural, DIY, anti-authoritarian attitude of The Simpsons itself, the book is decidedly unauthorized, the back cover stating for the record that it was "not prepared, licensed, approved or endorsed by any entity involved in creating or producing The Simpsons." In fact, although episodes are referred to by their official production codes (e.g., 9F11, or "Selma's Choice"), Matt Groening and others associated with the show are quoted only second-hand, through reprinted excerpts of old interviews.
Illustrating clearly that this is his personal take on The Simpsons, Turner opens the book with a moment in time: Thursday, January 21, 1993 at around 8:20 p.m. EST in a campus pub called Alfie's at Queen's University in Kingston, Ontario. There, in a room crowded with people in various stages of inebriation, the author watches Act 3 of Episode 9F11 ("Selma's Choice") of The Simpsons, and relates how the room explodes into laughter after a series of jokes about Duff Beer and its effects (e.g., beer goggles). I don't even remember this episode, but for the author and his friends it was a moment to be remembered. The point is that The Simpsons is full of such "moments," and these, reflective of society and recited ad infinitum by fans, help us see not only the way the series has shaped our world, but the way our world has shaped the series.
Off On a Rant
The book bills itself as "the first trade book to take a look at The Simpsons as a microcosm of the Western culture that it has both influenced and reflected." But author Chris Turner never goes so far as to establish a cause-effect relationship between The Simpsons and our world. In the author's own words: "...this is, in the end, my version of The Simpsons. The show's canvas is far too broad, and the culture it reflects far too diverse and fragmented, for me or anyone else to be able to offer a completely comprehensive or definitive analysis." Rather, he places the two side-by-side and views each through the mirror of the other, usually without taking his theses too far.
There are a few moments, though, where the narrative approaches the point of hyperbole -- for example, when Turner states that The Simpsons "...was the Beatles and the Stones. It was Elvis and Chuck Berry. It was that big, that unprecedented, and that important" or that "If there is a common cultural currency, it's got Homer Simpson's picture on it." Sometimes this hyperbole gets him into a bit of a pickle, as when he refers to episode 1F13 "Deep Space Homer" as "second to none", and on the same page places it second to 9F15 "Last Exit to Springfield." This has naught to do with inaccuracy, however, and everything to do with the fact that sometimes the author's love for the show sometimes clouds his vision in tints of rose. He is, at times, a sort of Anti-Comic Book Guy, chanting "Best. Episode. Ever." as he recalls his favorite moments. Is The Simpsons truly the glue that holds postmodern society together? Or is it just one brand on the shelf (albeit perhaps the best-selling brand)? Perhaps it depends on how big a fan you are; clearly, the author is a big fan.
In other places, Turner's points are a little harder to swallow, particularly in the chapters which focus on specific characters and what they represent. I can easily buy that Homer Simpson can be compared to the nature of mainstream America, with "its hopes and dreams and insatiable appetite," but I have a harder time grasping how Bart Simpson is evocative of the style and ethos of the punk rock movement's mainstreaming. Sometimes a brat is just a brat. And does Lisa Simpson truly represent the re-emergence of progressive activism in the West, or is she just a younger sister who's smarter and nicer than her brother? Later, the author (correctly) attributes the use of the phrase "I, for one, welcome our new [fill-in-the-blank] overlords" to The Simpsons, but also claims that the use of *tumbleweed blows by* on sites like Metafilter and Slashdot can be traced to The Simpsons. This latter I have a little trouble buying at face value, and I think it's overreaching a tad.
The author also has a habit of unapologetically spiralling off into a tangential rant, a la Dennis Miller. The entire book is written in this style, with point A being related to point B suddenly being compared to point Z, and the author is quite aware of it: one of the subheads in Chapter 2 is titled "A Short, Frank Discussion (Actually More Like a Longish Rambling Examination) of Homer's Extraordinary Id." In most places, this style works for the book; in others, it nearly breaks the narrative as we sputter over a side point for a few pages.
For example, in Chapter 2, "Homer's Odyssey," there's a two-page aside where the author talks about Aunty Goethe's Peachy-Mango Love Pain juice, Space Jam, Edward Munch, PBS Documentaries and several other seemingly unrelated matters. Ultimately his point about American society is clear, but it gets a little thick toward the middle, and hard to see the forest for the trees. At another point in the same chapter, a discussion of Springfield's hysterical masses turns into five-and-a-half pages devoted to the Y2K bug, getting back to The Simpsons just in time for the chapter to end. Relevant? Perhaps, but I found myself at one point wanting more Simpsons and less substance.
Similar tangents appear throughout the book, each encompassing between several paragraphs and several pages, and covering topics such as: Kurt Cobain, Quentin Tarantino, Nike, The Onion, Radiohead, William Gibson, Bowling For Columbine, John Lennon, the WELL, Tuvalu, Cyberjaya, a website named "oo," a Portuguese bus ride, Lemonwheel, The Truman Show, and Wilco's song "Misunderstood." And perhaps, viewed all together like that, those references do make a certain sort of sense as a representation of the past 15 years, but individually they occasionally seem jarring.
Mmmmm, Pizza
The book reads, at times, like a collection of essays rather than a continuous narrative. Turner at one point discusses the show's distinctive animation style, which mixes cartoonishness and realism, as follows: "(Homer) falls like a cartoon, but he lands like a real person." This book feels like that, opening in a much more fannish, cartoonish fashion and ending in a way that's a bit more thick and scholarly. The unevenness isn't ruinous, though. Consider a pizza with a few lumps and bubbles in the dough, and maybe all the pepperoni is off to one side and there's way too many mushrooms in the middle. It's still a tasty pizza, and everyone can probably find a slice they'll enjoy.
Chapter 1, "The Life & Times of The Simpsons, serves as an introduction to both the book and the series. It first retells the series' creation myth -- that it was dreamed up in 1987 by then 33-year old Groening in about 15 minutes, so he wouldn't lose the rights to Life is Hell -- before moving on to other key points, such as its April 19, 1987 debut as a sort of Anti-Cosby Show, and its first full episode on Sunday, Dec. 17, 1989 (The Christmas Special). It discusses how the show built up its creative team of writers and voice actors, the rise (and fall) of Bart-Mania in 1989-1990, and its ascent to its "Golden Age" in the mid 1990s before reaching the current "Long Plateau."
The author attributes this rise (and ensuing gentle decline) to the show's shift from typical cartoonishness into a tendency to "riff" on real-world events, reflecting society and culture in a way that audiences could relate to. "Entertain and subvert," said Groening on several occasions about the show's mission, unabashedly showing us cartoon versions of our real world's "corrupt authorities, clueless leaders and rapacious businessmen" that we could not only laugh at, but understand. "It's funny because it's true," goes the saying.
The next five chapters are, at least in name, focused on specific characters. Chapter 2, "Homer's Odyssey," and Chapter 3, "Bart Simpson, Punk Icon," are the most focused on their particular topics, with the others tending to sprawl a bit more, bringing in related minor characters and more tangents.
For example, Chapter 4, "Citizen Burns," touches not only on how Monty Burns represents corporate America (reflected through a parody of Citizen Kane), but also mentions Pimple-faced Kid, Sarcastic Middle-Aged Man, Lindsay Naegle, Jack Larson, Mayor Quimby and Chief Wiggum. Chapter 5, "Lisa Lionheart," discusses not only Lisa's many faces -- Genius, Little Kid, Activist -- but goes off on several tangents about Activism in general, Culture Jamming and Politics. Chapter 6, "Marge Knows Best," is perhaps the greatest misnomer in the book. While it does present Marge as the moral center of a show that repeatedly and blatantly denies the presence of a moral center, large sections cover the Flanders family (with special attention to Ned's "unbearable piousness"), battles with the Catholic Church and suicide-prevention groups, Abe Simpson and Homer's mom. The material is all related, but I felt Marge got a little shorted. And no mention of Maggie anywhere!
The last five chapters take a different spin, focusing not on specific characters and their relation to society, but on societal events and their relation to The Simpsons.
Chapter 7, "The Simpsons in Cyberspace," documents appearances of the Internet on The Simpsons (and vice versa) as the Internet rose from nothingness to ubiquity. It discusses "Freeze Frame Fun" (the quick jokes you can only catch if you tape and play back the show in slow-motion), alt.tv.simpsons and The Simpsons Archive (www.snpp.com), which the author cites as one of his major resources used in the writing of the book. This latter discussion includes mention of how an online critic of the show ultimately led to Comic Book Guy's infamous line in episode 4F12 "The Itchy and Scratchy and Poochie Show": "Worst. Episode. Ever." Life imitating art imitating life, as it were. Though this is interesting reading, it's also one of the more unfocused chapters, starting off talking about The Internet on The Simpsons and closing with a discussion about societal change and global warming. Slashdot readers will also be amused to see an incorrect citation of Moore's Law on page 304. But I digress.
Chapter 8, "The Ugly Springfieldianite," documents how The Simpson family's travels across America and around the world reflect U.S. actions in world affairs, the global reach of The Simpsons, and the way in which stereotypes are presented in the cartoon. Material such as trips to Australia, Canada and Africa are documented and analyzed, and "ethnic" characters such as Bumblebee Man, Apu and Groundskeeper Willie (including his infamous "Bonjourrrr, you cheese-eating surrender monkeys!") are covered in detail.
Chapter 9, "The Simpsons Go Hollywood," covers the various appearances of celebrities on the show and how for the most part such appearances satirize the very stars themselves. It documents in-person appearances by Tony Blair and Tony Bennett, as well as celebrity voice acting by Kathleen Turner as Stacy Lovell (creator of Malibu Stacy) Elizabeth Taylor as Maggie's first word ("Daddy"), and Johnny Cash as a Space Coyote spirit. It also covers, in some detail, repeat appearances by stars such as Jon Lovitz, Albert Brooks, and the late Phil Hartmann (Troy McClure and Lionel Hutz), as well as the notion of celebrity within The Simpsons itself (Krusty, McBain, etc.). As a whole, this is probably the most solid and focused chapter in the book.
On the other hand, Chapter 10, "The Simpsons Through the Looking Glass," is probably one of the weakest. Still interesting reading, it's a bit unfocused, as if that looking glass were a little bit clouded. It discusses the notion of the mediascape as a vast wasteland, irony, parody, self-reference, satire, hysteria and media saturation, with special attention on the shows inside the show (Krusty, Itchy and Scratchy, etc.) and anchorman Kent Brockman. Perhaps it's a bit too broad of a topic to try and cram into one chapter, especially since many of the same points are made in other sections of the book.
Planet Simpson
The book ends with Chapter 11, "Planet Simpson," in which the author attempts to bring together the disparate ideas presented throughout the book. He discusses the notion of "what is" vs. "what should be," the amusing case of Fox nearly suing itself over Episode ABF09, "Mr. Spritz Goes to Washington" (in which The Simpsons ran a fake news crawl on the bottom, satirizing Fox News), and brings his thesis to a head with this statement:
"Planet Simpson is a state of mind, a loose realm of shared consciousness. It is a place populated by folks who watch The Simpsons every week or even twice a day, who maintain Simpsons fan sites, who never lose at The Simpsons trivia board game, who used to watch it every chance they got, even if these days they don't watch it as much as they used to."
As a member of a generation raised on Saturday Morning cartoons, a person who grew up watching The Simpsons and who now regularly visits websites like Fark, Metafilter and Slashdot where Simpsons references run thick, I can't disagree with the author's notion of a globally-shared Simpsonian philosophy. It's clear that the show has affected our culture (or, at the very least, our Internet subculture), and that American culture has had an impact on the show in return.
Turner's book does a good job of looking at both sides of that coin and presenting his points in a way that is generally interesting and fun to read. Though there are times in the book where I found myself scratching my head, or wondering how he could have missed a favorite quote (Where, oh where, are the dogs who shoot bees from their mouths?), overall this is a solid piece of writing. Anyone who's enjoyed the show will find this enthralling reading, whether you're looking for a bit of Simpsons history, a deeper analysis of the show's impact in the present, or an idea of where the show might go in the future. The book is at times weaker, at others strong; at times unclear, at others startlingly focused; at times funny, and at other times quite serious. But then, that describes The Simpsons as well.
You can purchase Planet Simpson: How a Cartoon Masterpiece Defined a Generation from bn.com. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews. To see your own review here, carefully read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.
yes Virgina, there is a mirror (Score:1)
Re:yes Virgina, there is a mirror (Score:2)
Re:yes Virgina, there is a mirror (Score:2)
Note the spelling in the grandparent(my post) and the spelling in the great grandparent.....it was a joke....
Nancy Cartwright, voice of Bart (Score:5, Informative)
ObMangledQuote: (Score:4, Funny)
Re:ObMangledQuote: (Score:2)
Re:ObMangledQuote: (Score:2)
Re:ObMangledQuote: (Score:1)
oops... read it as "krusty wanks out!" haven't seen THAT ep.
One question... (Score:4, Funny)
"The title of Planet Simpson: How a Cartoon Masterpiece Defined a Generation says it all."
So we shouldn't read the rest of the long review then?
Defined a generation (Score:5, Insightful)
But of course, you don't sell books with a title of "How 'The Simpsons' was a really fun show to watch"
Re:Defined a generation (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Defined a generation (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Defined a generation (Score:5, Insightful)
They could always bounce back. I've found the last couple of seasons somewhat hit-and-miss. I thought last weeks episode was pretty good (Homer with his diamond studded "Snitch Life" necklace - "What's the matter, you never seen bling bling before?")
I wish Fox had have given Futurama the same chance, that show had a lot more potential, it seems easier to keep the Futurama world "fresh" than that of the Simpsons. It seems the pulled the plug too early, when the characters and themes were just starting to take shape.
Just my opinion though.
Re:Defined a generation (Score:1)
Stark Raving Dad - Homer's commited for wearing a pink shirt, big white guy that thinks he's the little black guy...
Ms Lisa Goes to Washington - Lisa wins an essay contest and goes to nationals and finds out Sen Bob Arnolds little secret...
When Flanders failed - Flanders opens a left handed shop and Homes wishbone wish for failure comes true
Bart the Murderer - Bart is implicated for the murder of Principal Skinner buy his mobs
Re:Defined a generation (Score:5, Insightful)
No kidding. There was actually plot development in Futurama. Nothing ever really happens on The Simpsons, and at least a couple seasons ago, the formula was "Insert Homer doing something random, pointless, and mildly amusing here". Sadly, Fox execs were looking for the same-old formulaic crap in Futurama, and couldn't get a handle on it when Groening and Cohen didn't deliver what they wanted.
To be honest, I think the title of the book should be reworked:
"Planet Simpson: How a Cartoon Masterpiece Defined a Generation and Killed Another Cartoon Masterpiece by the Same Creator Before Its Time"
Re:Defined a generation (Score:2)
Re:Defined a generation (Score:2)
"Futurama" had real character development, deeper stories, and some great philosophy along with the breakneck speed, great sight gags, ass jokes and sharp satire that it shares with its predecessor.
Re:Defined a generation (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Defined a generation (Score:1)
Re:Defined a generation (Score:1)
Re:Defined a generation (Score:1)
Re:Defined a generation (Score:2)
Re:Defined a generation (Score:3, Insightful)
"What's this? Some people think Jewish people are naturally adept at finance, but that's not necessarily true? Time to update my worldview!"
"My goodness, there are stereotypes that some idiots apply to a particular ethnic group? And members of said group might be offended if an idiot attempts, however ignorantly, to perpetuate
Re:Defined a generation (Score:2)
Re:Defined a generation (Score:2)
Re:Defined a generation (Score:2)
Re:Defined a generation (Score:2)
I don't know about it being "banned".. very little is "banned" from pay to play services.
They just don't consider it sane to broadcast some things.
Re:Defined a generation (Score:2)
It has been more than a show, and even though it's maybe "Jumped the Shark" this season, that doesn't make it a less significant force in the 1990s.
Sounds like the the title should be (Score:3, Funny)
Where might I find these? (Score:5, Funny)
I for one would like to welcome our new cartoon overlords so they might tell me where I could find one of these Simpsons references on Slashdot.
Re:Where might I find these? (Score:2)
Here you go
Re:Where might I find these? (Score:2)
Re:Where might I find these? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Where might I find these? (Score:2)
Re:Where might I find these? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Where might I find these? (Score:2)
Re:Where might I find these? (Score:2)
finally, a story (Score:4, Insightful)
Personally, I like the line "and so as the rat's milk is returned to the sewer, the circle of life is complete." Which if you think about it, is really a metaphor for the overall trajectory of the series and ourselves. The show began weakly (though not in ratings), grew strongly and quickly, plateaued, and is now in decline, until it dies, merely hinting at it once was.
Re:finally, a story (Score:2)
Might be slumping, but what a legacy. Can't think of a single show where the writing stayed so good for such a long stretch.
"Here's to alcohol, the cause of, and solution to, all life's problems." -Homer Simpson
Re:finally, a story (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:finally, a story (Score:2)
somebody quick! call up tom delay and get congress to stop them from pulling the plug on the show!
Re:finally, a story (Score:4, Interesting)
Bart: Hey, Dad, how come they're taking The Cosby Show off the air?
Homer: Because Mr. Cosby wanted to stop before the quality suffered.
Bart: Quality, schmality! If I had a TV show, I'd run that sucker into the ground!
Homer: [patting Bart on the back] Amen, boy. Amen.
That was in 1992. I can never criticize the Simpsons for sticking around too long, because that's exactly what they said they'd do. Still, who would have imagined they'd make it past 15 years?!
Longest book review, ever. (Score:1, Redundant)
Re:Longest book review, ever. (Score:1)
I've written several book reviews for Slashdot that are quite a bit longer.
I think Homer said it best .... (Score:1)
Book o' Quotes (Score:2)
I get the impression there are quite a few quotes in there. I don't know. I don't really want to buy a book that has a lot of Simpsons quotes, unless they relate to the topic at hand. I'd be glad he didn't include my favourite quote -- if I wanted that, I could watch the episode. I don't really like people r
Quotes (Score:1)
Chappelle Show quotes do indeed grow old quickly, but with something like the Simpsons, where the list of quotes is so large that you can literally hold entire conversations using nothing but memorable quotes, it's not quite as bad as all that. There's pretty much a Simpsons quote for every occasion, which reduces the "grow old" factor as none of them get overused.
Assuming your quoter is a true fan, of course, and ca
He gave it a 7 (Score:1, Funny)
obscure humor (Score:3, Funny)
I can remember browsing the humor books in the mall bookstores in 1987 and finding the "* is Hell" series and thinking it was pretty wild.
Mmmmm...Unauthorized Biography...(drool) (Score:1)
A problem (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:A problem (Score:2)
Don't worry, you're even harder to understand.
Satire Sans Agenda (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Satire Sans Agenda (Score:1)
Mod the parent up. I think you've managed to summarize the appeal of The Simpsons (and also Futurama) right there.
Mod this parent up, too. I think you've managed to summarize the appeal of the grandparent post (and others like it) right there.
Re:Satire Sans Agenda (Score:5, Funny)
Mod this parent up, too. I think you've managed to summarize the appeal of the grandparent post (and others like it) right there.
Mod this parent up, too. I think you've managed to summarize the appeal of recursive mod point begging right there.
Re:Satire Sans Agenda (Score:5, Funny)
If I weren't, in fact, the great-great-grandparent poster, I'd mod you up for managing to summarize the complete pointlessness of this thread...right there.
Re:Satire Sans Agenda (Score:2)
Re:Satire Sans Agenda (Score:2)
The Truth! (Score:2, Funny)
Re:The Truth! (Score:1)
-We were eating rotissere chicken.
or
-Something like Poochie, but more pro-active.
-Poochie OK with everyone?
-yep, yep
There's a Simpsons quote for EVERY situation.
Re:The Truth! (Score:3, Interesting)
It also reminded me that there have been recent trends in episodes of subtle and not-so-subtle jabs at the most common Internet criticisms of the show. The best one seems to be that many have latched on to claiming that recent seasons have featured what detractors refer to as "Jerkass Homer," with less family focus and the like. A couple of episodes recently have explicity used the phrase "Jerkass Homer" or a very close variation.
Also, the last couple of season
Wish they'd end it already (Score:3, Insightful)
The long stories with no continuity, even when they are good tend to turn to crap sooner or later. In anime that'd be Ranma, Inuyasha, Dragon Ball Z (eew). The Simpsons seem to be dying a slower death, but I already don't bother watching it and read slashdot instead.
Re:Wish they'd end it already (Score:1)
It's really all about the quality of the writing staff. Not just any bozo with a powerbook can write good comedy. People seem to think the best episodes were all in seasons 3-5, then it got worse. It's not that the show ran too long, it's that Conan O'Brian left.
Re:Wish they'd end it already (Score:2)
I'd say the problem is just that it's hard to come up with new stuff in the same setting when there lots of things that were done already. At this point, I find most episodes rather unsurprising. Bart behaves as Bart and Homer as Homer, and seeing Homer strangle Bart for the 128th time ju
Re:Wish they'd end it already (Score:2)
Now, I'm not saying they should cancel it right now, just that I wish for a proper end instead of a long and painful descent into mediocrity.
Re:Wish they'd end it already (Score:2)
The Simpsons is an invaluable guide... (Score:5, Funny)
Good Review. (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Good Review. (Score:2)
Re:Good Review. (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Good Review. (Score:2)
Yeah, good study. (Score:1)
Overrated (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Overrated (Score:2)
Merchandising (Score:2)
Simpsons did it (Score:5, Insightful)
Kinda sounds like The Simpsons And Society: An Analysis Of Our Favorite Family And Its Influence In Contemporary Society [amazon.com]
Just like The Simpsons and Philosophy: The D'oh! of Homer [amazon.com]
Seriously, I [heart] the Simpsons, but I'd like to [club] pseudo-intellectual wanna-bes who think they can pose as avant-guard by doing a serious analysis of something as frivolous as a cartoon. Guess what? It's been done! They aren't breaking new ground; they don't challenge our ideas about culture.
Baseball players on steroids isn't news. (Seriously, did you think Mark Mcguire's neck looked like a roast beef naturally?) Avril Lavigne isn't punk. And leeching off of Matt Groening's genius and writing a book on the Simpsons isn't interesting or insightful.
Re:Simpsons did it (Score:2, Funny)
You seem unhappy; maybe you should read The Gospel According to The Simpsons: The Spiritual Life of the World's Most Animated Family [amazon.com] to find peace.
(just joking)
Re:Simpsons did it (Score:2)
And just a P.S., I'm not against serious examination of elements of popular culture. I'm against using pop culture as a short cut past doing good work.
I've read a couple of these books, and they just were not well written. And from reading the reviews on Amazon, I have no desire to read futher in this area.
Maybe in the English dept. of the local community college analyzing the Simpsons over rehashing the late
Don't believe the hype! (Score:2)
Argh! Straying off topic for a moment, I'd like to corner Brokaw and needle him about his so-called 'Greatest Generation.'
Certainly he looks at a period of time with many great individuals and great accomplishments, but we shouldn't forget, after these brave men and women fought for freedom in Europe, Asia, and Africa, they cam
Tumbleweeds and other sight gags (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Tumbleweeds and other sight gags (Score:2)
This is a test, only a test.
Say something! Explain yourself! Your tongue's flappin' but no noise is coming outta your big mouth!
If you grew up with Foghorn, you're probably laughing now and searching the net for the sound files of his classics. Someone, somewhere must have done a sociological study on this character. He's brilliant!
Re:Tumbleweeds and other sight gags (Score:2)
South Park? (Score:3, Insightful)
What about the "South Park Republican"?
As the show's co-creator, 32-year-old Matt Stone, sums it up: 'I hate conservatives, but I really f--ing hate liberals.'"
As a voting libertarian, I looked at the entire Terry Schiavo incident exactly as the SP creators did, seeing hypocrisy in the way conservatives viewed "playing God". I think if anything, South Park alone might contribute to destruction of the Republican Party as one of only morals, and might even get it back into shape as representing the small-government advocates it once did.
Or one can hope, anyway.
Infinite Loop Syndrome (Score:2)
Other Best. Shows. Ever (Score:2)
Our overlords (Score:2, Interesting)
From Slashdot subculture [wikipedia.org]:
Re:Perfect Compliment.. (Score:1)
I don't know many true Simpsons fans who aren't sharp as heck. Shoot some actually can read, but how many are going to sit down and actually read a book for *gasp* pleasure?
That's why Jeebus invented TV.
Re:Cheaper from Amazon (Score:3, Informative)
And the reason Slashdot doesn't link to Amazon.com is over the one-click patent thing. Silly, maybe, but at least they're sticking up for a principle.
Re:Cheaper from Amazon (Score:1)
I feel dirty just having read that sentence.
Even dirtier that it makes sense to me and I agree with it.
Re:Cheaper from Amazon (Score:1)
Re:amazon = evil (Score:2, Informative)
Because Amazon.com's servers transmitted the image containing a paybox and your name within the paybox directly to your browser software, the site owner never saw the paybox or your name and never received any information about you
So Amazon gives the site a piece of code that they put on their page. When your browser displays it your Amazon cookie is sent to Amazon, who knows your name and inserts it into the text as an attention getter.
So, to repeat this, they did NOT give the site
Re:YES! (Score:3, Funny)
Re:YES! (Score:1)
Re:Freeloaders (Score:3, Funny)
Now I know you are lying with that "Friends" gimmick. (The imaginary girl you watch pr0n with in your parents' basement doesn't count.)
Re:The first 15 seasons? (Score:1)
Re:The first 15 seasons? (Score:2)
Futurama (Score:1)
Re:Southpark (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Just in time... (Score:2)
No, it was creatively degenerate. (Going down...)
Re:Planet Simpson is the second book... (Score:2)