An Audio Sampler Rube Goldberg Would Love 141
Thiago writes "Here is an audio sampler I made with 4 IR LEDs and 4 IR sensors. When something reflective goes by one of the sensor/LED combos, it triggers an event on the computer. On the videos, I mount the device on a turntable and use coins to trigger sound samples of my choice. I'd also like to make the project open-source (or whatever applies to hardware) but know nothing about licenses for this."
Video Links... (Score:4, Informative)
make it public domain to prevent licensing BS (Score:1, Funny)
GPL cripple-licensed or propriety licenses are step down from public domain.
Re:make it public domain to prevent licensing BS (Score:1)
Prior art (Score:5, Funny)
Worked fantastically well, until the damn RSPCA turned up.
Told me it would have been fine if I'd only used poodles.
Re:Prior art (Score:1)
Because they never complain?
Re:Prior art (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Prior art (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Prior art (Score:1)
BallDroppings in hardware? (Score:4, Interesting)
So this is like a physical version of the curiously addictive BallDroppings [balldroppings.com], then?
Re:BallDroppings in hardware? (Score:1)
interesting (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:interesting (Score:1)
Sure, it's something of a triviality, but kinda neat nonetheless...
By the way, I highly recomend COSI if you're ever in the area. It's a great place to teach kids about engineering, science, and the like...
[Disclaimer: They couldn't pay me enough to work there every day with all those anoying little kids though]
Re:interesting (Score:1)
Re:interesting (Score:1)
Re:interesting (Score:5, Interesting)
Anyway, they had this great setup with basically what you are describing, except that the samples were controlled by some 10-15 laser beams that shot right out from the back of the stage. When you broke a beam, a sample started or stopped. They could control it either by having the sample playing while the beam was broken, or start/stop the sample by quickly breaking the beam and "let it through" again.
It made for an extremely good show.
They also had a giant kind of a marimba [wikipedia.org], that was perhaps 8 meters tall and 15 meters wide, with two guys standing by the ceiling and playing.
The last number of the show was all 5 guys playing in sync with Gene Krupa (perhaps the greatest drummer ever) showing him doing the number on a projector at the back of the stage.
All in all, a great show.
Re:interesting (Score:2)
Well, that's pretty cool, but I doubt it would wow the crowds at a Jean-Michel Jarre light show. I thought the whole point of a laser-harp was that you could *see* the beams.
On the other hand....
"Man, Jarre's new stuff really sucks!"
"I don't think he's actually playing anything; he looks like he's warming up his hands on the laser harp"
BTW,
Re:interesting (Score:2)
Re: interesting (Score:2)
We bought a helium-neon laser (this was when they were new), used an array of microscope slides to split the beam into 8, set up a large frame with 8 optical sensors mounted at the top, lined it all up, and fed the signals into a BBC Micro's parallel port, which then triggered a Music 500 synth module.
It wasn't terribly bright, and we had to use a smoke machine to make it more visible, but it worke
Dimension Beam (Score:2)
A company called Interactive Light (now defunct) used to sell an infrared MIDI instrument called the Dimension Beam, sometimes referred-to as the "D-Beam".
The D-Beam emitted an egg-shaped infrared field which could consist of up to three distinct regions radiating from the core outward; one could define distinct MIDI parameters for each region. I believe Roland licensed the technology for the HPD-15 HandSonic [rolandus.com].
Need
Re:Dimension Beam (Score:2)
Re:interesting (Score:1)
There was a program for the Amiga back in the "Workbench 1.2 is pretty cool" days that could be hooked into one of the then-new (and incredibly expensive) real-time video digitizers. (Not something like DigiView.)
I think the digitizer was a precursor to the NewTek Video Toaster; it was an Amiga 1000 expansion block; there was nothing for the new 500 or 2000 machines to match it for a while.
Anyway; the program... I seem to recall
Awesome (Score:5, Interesting)
Now, I'm not sure that this is something your local DJ Sixpack would use, but I'm pretty sure you could turn this into a toy for children:
Imagine a record with holes you can fill with plastic pins - spin the record, and hear what you just made! It would exercise the children's sense of rythm and logic. Hell, make it a standalone unit while you're at it, and make cardridges that hold the samples. Drums, guitars, voices, bird sounds, car sounds, etc.
As for the license, it depends on what you want in return. Good karma or money? Or both?
Re:Awesome (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Awesome (Score:1)
Re:Awesome (Score:1)
Re:Awesome (Score:2)
Re:Awesome (Score:1)
Building on your idea (Score:4, Interesting)
Imagine a record with holes you can fill with plastic pins - spin the record, and hear what you just made! It would exercise the children's sense of rythm and logic.
The first thing that popped into my head was that gadget/toy that consists of a rectangular frame filled with small parallel metal rods; the rods can move in Y (but not in X) to make 3-D images of objects. Often they are used to make replicas of people's faces. What the heck are they called?? Grrr.
Anyway, picture a record-like disc of these movable rods. The child can move the rods, fix them in place and then play the creation. This fits with your idea: the disc would be heavier but the rods would be captive (and thus much harder for the child to lose them)
Hell, make it a standalone unit while you're at it, and make cardridges that hold the samples. Drums, guitars, voices, bird sounds, car sounds, etc.
With a simple process for converting the audio to a sound file and a USB port for exporting the child's music.
Re:Building on your idea (Score:2)
"Zem", usually. Or am I thinking of mattresses?
Re:Awesome (Score:1)
plastic pins (Score:2)
And good job, you just made your first contribution to a hardware GPL project!
Re:Awesome (Score:1)
The kids can put plastic pins in a grid (maybe 10 x 10) where the 10 verticle columns dictate the sound played, and the 10 horizontal rows dictate when to play the sound. In the exhibit, you drag your 10 x 10 grid across the optical pickup, and you can get many different songs. They have simple song sheets (mary had a little lamb), for kids to use for an example.
Re:Awesome (Score:1)
[oblig]
1. Build another noisemaking device to give to children
2. ???
3. Profit!
[/oblig]
Re:Awesome (Score:2)
Fun idea! (Score:4, Insightful)
Whats special here? (Score:1)
No, you shut up! (Score:2)
It's cool hardware hack. Why it should be useful?
Re:Whats special here? (Score:1)
Many DJs use sequencers/drum machines, this allows them to add the versatility of the table to the sequence, scratch, tweak the speed with the tables pitch control, doubletime instantly -- all things that can be done with computer sequencers, but now with the analog variations that come w
A bit of background (Score:4, Informative)
Re:A bit of background (Score:2, Informative)
Ask and you shall receive... (Score:5, Informative)
Remember, anything you read here about open source licensing is only an opinion. Educate yourself!
Re:Ask and you shall receive... (Score:2)
But he already knows something about open source licenses that you apparently missed: they apply to software, not hardware. He's asking how to make his hardware design "open source". Which I will now answer, though you should keep in mind that this is just the understanding of some guy you don't know on slashdot...
It is not necessarily meaningful to talk about "open source" in reference to a hardware design. There is no form of the design for this thing you could give me that would let me build it, but
Numba 1 (Score:1)
Creative Commons (Score:3, Insightful)
How exactly is this a sampler? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:How exactly is this a sampler? (Score:1)
Definately (Score:1, Informative)
This isn't sampling at all. Sampling would be capturing the signal at a specific [sampling] rate (often in analog form), like sound cards use DACs to capture sound at 44.1 or 48KHz for exam
Re:How exactly is this a sampler? (Score:2)
Re:How exactly is this a sampler? (Score:2)
That's a new one on me, but this isn't a sampler by that definition either. As another person commented, this isn't really even a sequencer... it's just a controller.
Re:How exactly is this a sampler? (Score:2)
But I didn't know that. For all I know this is some new hip-hop term that I'm just not cool enough (or is that phat enough) to know. Apparently that isn't the case, but I didn't know it when I posted.
Reminds of Alesis's products (Score:1)
hardware "license" (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:hardware "license" (Score:5, Informative)
In the USA, you have a year after publication to file for a patent.
The first call you make... (Score:1, Funny)
WARNING: Do not look directly into LED sensors. Eye injury may occur. Contains small circular parts that can cause choking. Not intended for children under 8.
Re:The first call you make... (Score:2)
Man, I could play with that for HOURS.
Its neat but... (Score:2, Funny)
Finally, a midi guitar that doesn't suck (Score:3, Interesting)
Brilliant... (Score:2)
pitch bends (Score:2)
Yeah, copyright your idea, whatever
Total Misrepresentation of a Rube Goldberg Concept (Score:4, Insightful)
Optical Turntables (Score:1)
Has anyone here... (Score:2)
Because this type of device, using IR beam sensors, reflective IR sensors, or even frickin' visible laser beams (sorry, no sharks though) is in use in probably half the science museums around the world.
Neat hack? Sure. Original? Not in the slightest. I can say that one from personal experience, having designed and built several that are currently in use in museums here in the US.
Re:Has anyone here... (Score:1)
So... (Score:3, Interesting)
What would be interesting if it wasn't all digital signal, and he threw in an A/D converter so he could detect the IR light brightness, so a dull coin would produce a different sound than a nice and shiny coin... so you have more combinations.
Just having 4 on/off signals isn't that impressive right now, but it does have potential (of course, after a while you'd probably want to migrate to the serial port for speed and complexity).
Easily amused... (Score:2, Funny)
Get a life... (Score:3, Funny)
News flash: not every piece of freely available information has to be open-source! If you want others to be be able to use/improve your idea, publish the technical specifications and tell (clearly) how you did it. If you don't, don't tell anyone about it and maybe file a patent. It's that simple.
Open source licenses for hardware.... now I've heard everything.
Re:Get a life... (Score:2)
Re:Get a life... (Score:2)
Creative Commons? (Score:2)
Thought of something similar (Score:2)
One more thing on the list...
Surround a stage with laser beams and dance... (Score:2)
She beat you by 55 years (Score:2, Informative)
Re:She beat you by 55 years (Score:1)
By Now (Score:2)
I'm sure you do by now...:^)
This is a similar software solution (Score:2)
great idea. (Score:1)
Prior art: Raymond Scott's Circle Machine (1950s) (Score:2)
Re:Prior art: Raymond Scott's Circle Machine (1950 (Score:3, Informative)
So, to repeat: this 1950s contraption used a photocell at the end of a rotating arm: " The intensity of each light in this circle is individually adjustable. At the tip of the arm there is a photo cell. This cell is a part of an electronic sound generating system, so adjusted that the more light the cell 'sees' the higher the pitch of the sound produced. The cell also moves around in a circle at adjustable speeds. One of the controls, above th
This seems similar to the Drum Buddy project... (Score:1)
doesn't keep time too well :/ (Score:2)
Re:You don't need to open-source it. (Score:2)
Re:You don't need to open-source it. (Score:1)
Re:You don't need to open-source it. (Score:2)
Re:You don't need to open-source it. (Score:5, Interesting)
Which is why WD-40 is not patented. They would have to tell the world what is in their product and they don't want to do that.
And before anyone remarks that I'm wrong, I just called the WD-40 corporation to verify this. I had heard about this a long time ago and wanted to confirm this information before I posted.
Re:You don't need to open-source it. (Score:1)
Re:You don't need to open-source it. (Score:3, Funny)
WD-40 has undesirable side-effects... (Score:2)
WD-40, whatever its specific formula is, does have solvent properties which unfortuantely, are counter productive. The solvent properties tend to displace more permanent forms of lubrication, and then it evaporates. It's a very temporary solution to a lubrication problem-- good for freeing up frozen bolts perhaps, or possibly drying out a distributor cap after steam cleaning, but not for general lubrication purposes such as in locks or hinges, as it will make the problem worse. WD-40 is also quite flamma
Re:You don't need to open-source it. (Score:2)
Cryptic product names involving numbers are often explained away as having been inspired by the Nth attempt at formulating a product (or its name). Hence legend has it that the manufacturer of Bib-Label Lithiated Lemon-Lime Soda, after the first six tries at selecting a less cumbersome name proved unsatisfactory, finally threw in the towel and opted for the simple choice of "7-Up" instead. And if a cleaner is called "Formul
Patents in a perfect world (Score:1, Insightful)
IANAL, but as long as you tell people about how it works it can't be patented...
...in theory. That's never stopped the USPTO from approving patents for well-known ideas before.
Re:You don't need to open-source it. (Score:2)
Too late to patent it (Score:2)
Even if you did publish it.
Of course, this is only theoretical, in a world where patent office DID check for prior art.
Re:Too late to patent it - only in Europe (Score:1)
In the USA, you have a year after publication to file for a patent. Assuming it was you who published it in the first place.
Re:You don't need to open-source it. (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:My God, a real Geek story (Score:5, Funny)
or SCO claims that the IR LEDs are using a technology they developed but cannot be released; it's a trade secret!
but can Gentoo load and play the samples more quickly thanks to its more streamlined and modern kernel?!
(ps: I'm just kidding. We all know that Apple already developed this technology and there's is far cooler and superior thanks to its scroll wheel.)
Re:Licence (Score:2)
Re: Nitpick (Score:2, Interesting)
1. If I create a trade group.
2. I invite everyone who wants my improvements to join my group.
3. No one outside my group gets the improvements.
Q.I'm not externally releasing the improvements, and am not obligated to release the code, am I?
Re: Nitpick (Score:2)
You are obligated to release the code to everybody in the group, then everybody in the group can release the code outside the group. You can't set rules for the group which restrict this either, since that would violate the GPL.
Re:Not quite (Score:1)
However, if you employ someone you can forbid them to distribute the code outside a certain circle, by threatening t
Interesting line of thought... (Score:2)
Re:Imagine.......... (Score:1)