Amazon's Special Thank-You 175
theodp writes "To commemorate its 10th Anniversary, Amazon.com announced that on July 16th customers will receive a special thank-you - a concert featuring Bob Dylan and Norah Jones. Of course, customers will be squinting at streaming video while Amazon employees actually attend the concert at Seattle's Benaroya Hall, but isn't it the thought that counts?"
hey, thanks jeff (Score:4, Funny)
Re:hey, thanks jeff (Score:2, Funny)
I just patented playing with my self! SO hahah BITCH!
Re:hey, thanks jeff (Score:2)
You know (Score:4, Insightful)
Wow Streaming Video! (Score:5, Funny)
I'd rather celebrate... (Score:1, Interesting)
Amazon? (Score:2)
Re:Amazon? (Score:3, Informative)
Some sites embed it in their own pages (like this [tyco.com]) and others just point to the remote URL, (like this [corporate-ir.net]). Obviously, Amazon has done the latter.
Re:Amazon? (Score:2)
WOW!! (Score:2, Insightful)
Seriously wouldnt offering free 2 or 3 day shipping on all items for the weekend have been better?
Yes, but.... (Score:2, Informative)
Streaming a video, on the other hand, only costs them about $50 in bandwidth.
Re:Yes, but.... (Score:1)
Re:Yes, but.... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Yes, but.... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Yes, but.... (Score:2)
Bob Dylan? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Bob Dylan? (Score:4, Insightful)
The times they are A-changin indeed
MOD UP (Score:2)
Dylan was really at his best in his early years. After his tragic motorcycle accident all of his albums steadily declined in quality. He was easily the most influential singer/songwriter of the 60s.
I almost died when I saw him do those horrible Klein commercials. Or was it the GAP?
Bob Dylan. Sellout.
That's all I gotta say.
Re:MOD UP (Score:4, Interesting)
Worse. [victoriassecret.com]
Re:MOD UP (Score:2)
My brain hurts.
Re:MOD UP (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:MOD UP (Score:2, Interesting)
Asked in 1965 what might tempt him to sell out, Dylan replied: "Ladies undergarments".
Re:MOD UP (Score:2)
Ouch Gap and "Straight male fashion designer Calvin Klein" commercials
Jeeesh
Its really quite sad
Being a poster boy.. (Score:1)
Re:Bob Dylan? (Score:2)
I'm sure a lot of
Re:Bob Dylan? (Score:5, Interesting)
Never never never base copyright on someones death (Score:5, Insightful)
Let me say that again. You never never never want to base the length of copyright on someones death. There are enough things that makes passing on hard enough. We don't need to put the added stress on people with the idea that "every day I stay alive is another residue check my family can receive." Or worse "if we unplug dad from the respirator out estate has to give up our copyright." Linking financial matters (even more than we already have) with the process of dying is inhuman. This is one of those cases where something sounds like a good idea but the consequences are disgusting.
Re:Never never never base copyright on someones de (Score:2)
Where's the logic in extending the copyright 70 years past the author's life? This seems like the other extreme.
Re:Never never never base copyright on someones de (Score:2)
Where's the logic in extending the copyright 70 years past the author's life? This seems like the other extreme.
It was originally somewhat less, but the idea is that you don't want to make killing off an author a profitable thing. Otherwise, someone might off Crichton or Ludlum and start selling their books on the cheap.
Re:Never never never base copyright on someones de (Score:2)
Re:Bob Dylan? (Score:3, Insightful)
Girl of the north country. Who killed Davey Moore? Fourth time around.
What's common to those? They all borrow heavily from earlier works. The first two are basically rewritings of standard folk songs (which Simon & Garfunkel sang as "Scarborough Fair" and "Sparrow" respectively). The third is a take-off on the Beatles' "Norwegian Wood" -- he'd never get away wi
Re:Bob Dylan? (Score:2)
Oh no? [telegraph.co.uk]
Screw em (Score:3, Interesting)
That's one thing I hate, corps rewarding their employees and making it seem like they're doing it for the consumer. Why don't they post pictures of the company picnic too.
Re:Screw em (Score:1)
Re:Screw em (Score:2)
I'll pass on that but I did a search of Norah Jones on images.google.com. Feel free to take photos at the concert in case there are any wardrobe malfunctions.
Hmm.. that reminds me. I think the last book I bought from amazon was on concert photography and that was years ago before I moved. I started becoming skeptical of women that are taller than me and didn't want them to have my new address.
Re:Screw em (Score:1)
Why would you ever do otherwise? Amazon's prices aren't so much better than brick and mortar stores (and being in WA state, I have to pay sales tax at Amazon like I would in a local store), and you don't have to pay shipping and handling if you buy locally. Maybe you don't
Re:Screw em (Score:1)
Re:Screw em (Score:1)
Ah, you've mistaken me for an anti-corporate hippy. I could see how you could come to that conclusion bas
Re:Screw em (Score:3, Interesting)
The selection sucks. You can't get Maison Ikkoku DVDs or Video Girl Ai books around here, for example.
Of course, for those I'd go directly to Viz' website, but still, those are two examples where, if I could find them locally, would happily buy them locally.
Re:Screw em (Score:5, Insightful)
However:
1. Neither of them come even close to the range of computing books I need. Even the larger store is almost entirely beginners books, or Windows-focused stuff, none of which is useful to me.
2. Amazon.co.uk generally ship stuff to me for the next day, and with enough of a discount that it wipes out S&H.
3. Travelling to the larger store is more expensive than S&H anyway, not to mention generally not wanting to spend an hour travelling to buy a book or two.
SImple answer, if you really want to help locals. (Score:3, Informative)
"Hey, can you order title X,yan z for me?"
BOokstores are 90% of the time willing to order books they dont have in stock for you, espscially the smaller ones. Yeah, its not gonna beat amazon on price or speed, but at least youre helping out someone besides a faceless corporation.
Re:Screw em (Score:2)
Which is well and good if you read the sort of books Borders or B&N have in stock. But if you want to, say, read the latest Charlie Stross novel, you're screwed (I have a Borders and B&N within a mile of my house; neither carry anything other th
Re:Screw em (Score:1)
Perhaps in America you can get anything you want at a bookstore, but here in Australia there are plenty of American authors that I'm unable to get [deep-magic.net] locally.
Re:Screw em (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Screw em (Score:1, Insightful)
Wow. So when Amazon decides to reward their employees, it's ok. When they try to share this with the world as well, it's arrogant? It's a concert for Christ's sake! They're streaming a (formerly) private concert and showing to the whole world, and you're complaining? Don't tune in then!
It's amazing how people can spin such a simple gesture into some sort of grudge-worthy action. I can only imagine what sort of hatemongering you'll engage in at the bookstore.
Re:Screw em (Score:2)
Re:Screw em (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Screw em (Score:2)
Re:Screw em (Score:2)
From now on I'll continue to buy all my books from Amazon, filter through the selection using their website and order effortlessly and easily from home. Oh, and I'll first sit down and go over the books using their preview feature whilst enjoying my tea (I hate coffee) and access the internet until I decide on my purchaes. And I'll get my stuff at a 25% or more discount (usually).
But yeah, you support an unnecessary anachronism.
but isn't it the thought that counts? (Score:1)
If I want to see the damn concert I would download the bootleg file on bittorrent.
You never know...people on
why is this so kind? (Score:2)
Maybe Enron could release footage of their last stockholders party so we can look at streaming footage of the champagne being quaffed?
Dont get me wrong, I'm a fan of amazon, but if this was microsoft, people would be shouting them down.
Re:why is this so kind? (Score:2)
Re:why is this so kind? (Score:2)
Re:why is this so kind? (Score:2)
Re:why is this so kind? (Score:1)
Bob Dylan and Norah Jones.... (Score:5, Funny)
Er, thanks? (Score:2)
"Amazonian" Exotic Dancers anyone? (Score:2, Funny)
Well you know... (Score:1)
How do they afford this? (Score:2, Interesting)
From a purely business perspective, how on Earth are Amazon able to afford this?
Okay, so it is 10 years since they were founded, but in that time, how much of a profit have they turned? I understood that there were hundreds of millions of dollars worth of sunk costs with the company, where the only possible return is in the stock price, but I thought that Amazon was still producing negative returns on the balance sheet.
If I was one of the VC firms that initially funded Amazon I would have dragged Bezos o
Re:How do they afford this? (Score:2)
Re:How do they afford this? (Score:4, Funny)
Re:How do they afford this? (Score:2)
Re:How do they afford this? (Score:1, Informative)
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/is?s=AMZN&annual [yahoo.com]
Re:How do they afford this? (Score:2)
Maybe if you had a look at their Quarterly Results [corporate-ir.net] then you might know? But then again this is Slashdot and so nobody actually bothers to research their posts.
Re:How do they afford this? (Score:1)
At least Amazon.com is using the proceeds from that copy of "I, Robot" I bought to throw a party. I'd be really upset if the money I spend on science fiction books was going towards missile defense and the planned invasion of Canada...
Self Reply (Score:2)
Yeah, so it's bad form to reply to one's self, but it seems the best way to address the comments brought up.
Before people flame me for wild ass guesses, note that I said 'I thought...', not 'Amazon is definitely...', so they are opinions based on common media reporting.
Okay, 2 years of profitibility in 10, and only the most recent two. Congratulations, so they now have a viable business model. I doubt that many companies can repeat their ability to absorb 8 years of losses before turning a profit. Ye
Re:Self Reply (Score:2)
The most common reasons for failure are under-capitalisation (i.e. never establishing a viable cash flow) and over-capitalisation (not wisely reinvesting the profit), so the fact that Amazon could pull this off is amazing.
It might have something to do with Bezos being an investment banker.
Re:How do they afford this? (Score:2)
Well, last year alone, half a billion dollars net.
Granted, they had a VERY rocky start, but they have become the online store. Sure, you have other niche stores like NewEgg, and electronic versions of physical stores like WalMart.com, but when most people think to themselves "Can I get that cheaper online", they go straight to Amazon.com.
And now that shopping online has grown into more than just a faddish thing we geeks do, that means huge profits for Amazon. It
Re:How do they afford this? (Score:2)
Which makes me wonder if people are looking at the prices when they use Amazon. Amazon seems to be charging cover price on most paperbacks now, and their CDs are about the same price as Circuit City and Best Buy -- and t
Re:How do they afford this? (Score:2)
In general, I try to support small and/or local businesses. And I'll always try to spend my money with them first... But as you mention, for selection, no physical store can possibly compete.
As for price...
For CDs, I agree, most of what Amazon has costs pretty much the same as anywhere else. But for books...Perhaps we buy totally different
Thanks Amazon (Score:2)
Hey Mister... (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Hey Mister... (Score:5, Funny)
That's not a bandwidth problem, you're listening to the William Shatner cover.
Re:Hey Mister... (Score:2)
Anyone else reminded of this [amazon.com]. Spooky... I can almost hear it!
Re:Hey Mister... (Score:2)
On that page ("The Transformed Man, William Shatner"), below: "3 people recommended Has Been instead of The Transformed Man" :)
Re:Hey Mister... (Score:2)
If it made sense, it wouldn'r be Dylan.
Harry Potter (Score:2)
Thanks for nothing... (Score:1)
What's with the Amazon bashing? (Score:5, Insightful)
For real, why is everyone bashing Amazon? I buy stuff from them all the time. The prices are very competitive on most items, and the selection of stuff is hard to beat. I've been a pretty loyal customer since 1998, and unless something is significantly cheaper somewhere else, I almost always buy anything I need that they sell there.
If you don't like Bob Dylan or Norah Jones, then don't watch the frickin' concert! Jesus, you'd think that they were having John Ashcroft in concert or something, the way everyone is reacting! ("Let the eagle soar!..." Ugh.)
My company, a large Fortune 100, does this periodically. For special occasions, it will sponsor a concert for the employees and VIPs. Chances are that Amazon was going to have the concert anyway, and decided to Webcast it just to be nice, so give 'em a frickin' break, already!
Sheesh, talk about no good deed going unpunished...
It's corporate version of public masterbation. (Score:2, Interesting)
Imagine it on a personal level. Imagine that your wife or whoever your significant other is comes home, and you invite them into the bedroom. Tell them "This is to
Re:It's corporate version of public masterbation. (Score:3)
and more with any company that publically masterbates in front of a croud
But clearly you have no problems with a thousand geeks masturbating in front of you everyday or you wouldn't be here.
Re:What's with the Amazon bashing? (Score:2)
I think they do pretty good otherwise.
Blah blah blah... (Score:2)
Blah blah blah patent blah blah...
Okay fine, hate them for the patent stuff, that's a valid answer to my question. But that's not what everyone was complaining about. A quick search on the front comment page for the word "patent" picked up three comments about it. All the others are stuff like this:
A free concert I can't goto and with 2 people I probably wouldn't go see anyway...
Why don't they post pictures of the company picnic too.
Re:Blah blah blah... (Score:2)
Amazon.com is calling this a "Thank You" to it's customers. The title of the press release is "Amazon.com to Thank Customers with 10th Anniversary Event Featuring Bob Dylan, Norah Jones, and Bill Maher"
They're kind of creating an anniversary special like you would see for some TV shows. But if someone like David Letterman creates an anniversary special, he's going above and beyond to deliver a better product (TV show) to his co
Re:Blah blah blah... (Score:2)
Well, like I said, I didn't mean to pick on you, but I do disagree with the attitude that what they're doing is aggrandizing.
First of all, everyone seems to be assuming that they're holding a big-time concert for the employees, and as long as they're doing that, maybe they can make a few brownie points (and extra sales) with customers by Webcasting it, too.
I don't think that's necessarily a valid assumption. According to the promo site, "Amazon.com is pleased to invite you to help us celebrate our 10th
Re:What's with the Amazon bashing? (Score:3, Funny)
<rant style="color:political; rant-type:offtopic;">
I [am] Jesus and I like John Ashcroft's singing, you insensitive clod!
If you were Jesus, you never would have let anyone in America even know who John Ashcroft is. I will still always remember him neither as the Attorney General of the United States nor as the number one runner up to Shatner's "I Want to Sex You Up" as the biggest earbleed of all time, but as the guy who lost his senate seat [cbsnews.com] to a dead guy.
Two words (Score:1)
Get over yourselves! (Score:5, Insightful)
This isn't deserving of thanks or, 'gee look how kind they are' -- I think of it as an extra service provided by a company. Some will enjoy it, some won't. Why is it deserving of such scorn?
When AOL did this several times over the past years, with the Rolling Stones, for example, did that deserve scorn?
Music is highly subjective, but it's the height of adolescent immaturity to slag off Bob Dylan and Norah Jones as crap if you don't like their style of music.
Get the fuck over yourselves.
(It was time to burn the karma anyway)
Re:Get over yourselves! (Score:3, Insightful)
Amazon treats its employees to a picnic but tries to frame it as some kind of service to the customers.
"We're taking your sister to Six Flags -- don't worry, we'll show some pictures of some of the rides, aren't you excited?"
but that's the point (Score:2)
It is a service. Some people will enjoy it, and thus they win, and Amazon wins.
Others will be cynical about any form of marketing and pissed off that people actually like this sort of thing. They take comfort that in In The New Geek World Order, das ist verboten! They re-read the GNU manifesto and tear up.
And the greatest number are those that don't care either way. No harm, no foul.
Re:Get over yourselves! (Score:3, Interesting)
Also, that music doesn't suck - it's just that it's not good enough to offend much of anyone. I argree that it sucks, and that the opportunity to watch a video of the concert is a suck-ass gift. It's like giving lottery tickets as a gift. "Surprise, I probably didn't get you anything! Happy father's day!"
For the record, all of those "free concerts" are a load of crap.
It's Official: Dylan is a One-click (TM) sellout. (Score:2)
K-Changin' (Score:2)
Streaming isn't there yet... (Score:2)
This is okay... (Score:2)
Re:A-fucking-men. (Score:1)
Re:A-fucking-men. (Score:2)
Re:A-fucking-men. (Score:1)
Re:WTF? (Score:1)
oh, no, wait, read the summary again.