Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
News

Pirates Thwarted by Sonic Weapon 599

Kristian Hermansen was one of dozens to submit a story about would be pirates attempting to take control of a cruise ship of the coast of Africa, only to be twarted by some sort of sonic weapon known as an LRAD, or Long Range Acoustic Device.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Pirates Thwarted by Sonic Weapon

Comments Filter:
  • by mdobossy ( 674488 ) on Tuesday November 08, 2005 @11:17AM (#13979212)
    And if it wasn't for you pesky kids and your LRAD, I would have gotten away with it too!
    • by Overly Critical Guy ( 663429 ) on Tuesday November 08, 2005 @11:54AM (#13979646)
      You're all units in my game of Civilization IV. Those "pirates" were the barbarian Galleon unit trying to take on my uber destroyer unit. I used my Future Tech to take it out.
      • by identity0 ( 77976 ) on Wednesday November 09, 2005 @12:51AM (#13986327) Journal
        Dear Player,

        We, the residents of your game of Civilization IV, would like to air some grievances with you.

        Yes, you have been managing our tribe, "Americans", very well, and we have you to thank for our endless bounty of TV reality shows. However, there are still some problems that we humbly ask you to address.

        First, while the government type "Theocratic Mock Democracy" has raised our citizen's morale, we think it is high time that we switch to a more advanced one, such as "Secular Humanist Republic" or "Constitutional Democracy". Many of us are afraid that we are regressing to the government type of "Monarchy", and possibly even "Despotism". Please note that we have the Statue of Liberty Wonder, we will not incur the usual series of rioting and violence when we switch governments, and your citizens will be happier for several turns if we choose a real Republic or Democracy!

        Secondly, we are told by experienced players that reasearching the discovery of Intelligent Design is a bad idea, as it leads to a dead end in the tech tree. It only gives the Wonder of the Dunce Cap of Kansas (-5 research in the city it is built), and the unit "Preacher-teacher", which gives +1 happiness and -1 research in every city it establishes a school in. We recomment instead reasearching Darwainism(2 free tech. advances), with the goal of Genetic Engineering, which makes available the Wonder of Cure For Cancer(1 happy citizen in every city). It is much more useful in the long run, and the other tribes won't be laughing at us as we destroy our future research abilities.

        Third, please note that even in a Theocratic Mock Democracy such as the one we live in currently, keeping troops stationed more than 5 squares away from our cities can lead to morale problems, and requires 2 shields of upkeep per unit. You have kept many of our units in the cities of the Babylonians to keep down the unrest and maximize the trade points from their Oil resource squares, and it is costing our own cities very much. Isn't it about time to move those units back to their home cities?

        Fourth, our city of New Orleans has recently gone from population 8 to population 1, because of a combination of natural disaster and mismanagement. We do not seek to point blame at anyone, but please, for the love of Sid Meier, have the Engineer units fix the Levee city improvements and check the flood preparatioin of other cities on rivers and coasts. As well, if you had not used the Engineers to drain the Marsh squares near the city to increase trade points, we might have been better off. Also, some belive if you had not been so stingy with your upkeep for the Levee city improvements(2 coins per turn), this whole mess might have been prevented.

        We thank you, dear player, for listening to our grievances and we kindly beseech thee, benevolent mouse-mover, to look upon us with kindness as we go about, living our lives turn by turn.

          Signed, The Civs

        P.S. We have heard the cities of the French, under Emperor Jacques Chirac, is undergoing Revolt because their citizens happiness was mis-managed. Don't let this happen to you!

        P.P.S. Now would be a good time to use our military to take over the French, or at least their capital of Paris. It has the Eiffel Tower Wonder(improves diplomacy with other nations), as well as many city improvements.

        P.P.P.S. When are we going to get our own game, "The Civs"? It would be just like the Sims, but with more bloodthirsty combat! It would be great! Let's show those wussies at Maxis what a REAL party (orgy & gladiators at the colosseum) and city disaster (riot + stealth bombers + alpine troops + barbarian horde + spies) are!
    • by queenb**ch ( 446380 ) on Tuesday November 08, 2005 @12:42PM (#13980103) Homepage Journal
      I'd like to test the effects of this when it's used to play Wayne Newton instead of the high piched sonic squeal. Although, there may not be much difference...

      2 cents,

      Queen B
  • Dupe (Score:5, Funny)

    by grahams ( 5366 ) * on Tuesday November 08, 2005 @11:17AM (#13979216) Homepage
    How many times are we going to have to read stories about music labels putting up false album tracks containing dreck such as Ashlee Simpson in place of Metallica? We get it, the labels don't like pirates....
  • by technoextreme ( 885694 ) on Tuesday November 08, 2005 @11:18AM (#13979217)
    I think it would be more effective than just giving them a headache.
    Pirate:Argggg we've popped our pants. Run.
    • by slavemowgli ( 585321 ) on Tuesday November 08, 2005 @11:53AM (#13979640) Homepage
      That's just an urban legend [wikipedia.org].
      • by drinkypoo ( 153816 ) <drink@hyperlogos.org> on Tuesday November 08, 2005 @12:04PM (#13979752) Homepage Journal

        Other researchers have noted flaws in the methodology of the experiment. Rather than test the entire spectrum below 20 Hz, the MythBusters tested only three specific frequencies: 5, 7, and 9 Hz. In addition, the strategy of surrounding the subject with speakers without accounting for phase effects would have resulted in a loss of effective power being transmitted, especially at the geometrical centre of the speakers.

        Your very own link suggests that the experiment may have been flawed.

        The rumor that I've heard most often is that it's a specific frequency next to 8Hz, and that it's sort of a universal resonance frequency. (ObDisclaimer: I believe in the fractal nature of the universe.) See also: Schumann [wikipedia.org] Resonance [www.oulu.fi].

      • Yeah, good idea (Score:5, Insightful)

        by tgd ( 2822 ) on Tuesday November 08, 2005 @12:11PM (#13979835)
        Anyone who uses Mythbusters as a real source of proof of something working versus not working either don't watch the show, or don't understand the things they're testing.

        Its entertainment, not science. The fact that it could be used as a source to declare something an urban legend is a sign of the risk using Wikipedia as an authoritative source.
    • Pirate: Earrrg! Swab the poop deck! Hell, swab the whole deck! With bleach!
    • How does that skit go... oh yea..

      Setting: on a pirate ship, A Captain, a lookout, a cabin boy.

      Lookout: Captain, there be one ship off the port bow.
      Captain: How many guns?
      Lookout: twelve guns.
      Captain: Prepare for battle! Cabin boy, get me my red jacket.

      --after the battle, a while later--

      Lookout: Captain, three ships off the starboard bow.
      Captain: How many guns?
      Lookout: 6, 12, and 8.
      Captain: We can take them... Prepare for battle! Bring me my red jacket!

      --after the battle...--

      Cabin Boy: Sir, why do you ask
  • by illtron ( 722358 ) on Tuesday November 08, 2005 @11:18AM (#13979220) Homepage Journal
    I imagine that the RIAA is calling the Navy about how it can get some sonic anti-piracy weapons of its own.

    I find that most of the music put out by major labels these days is a painful enough torture, but hey, that's just me.
  • Oooooh! (Score:3, Funny)

    by HepCatA ( 313858 ) on Tuesday November 08, 2005 @11:18AM (#13979222)
    This is kind of like death metal to hippies!
  • Celine Dion (Score:3, Funny)

    by karvind ( 833059 ) <karvind@NoSPAM.gmail.com> on Tuesday November 08, 2005 @11:18AM (#13979225) Journal
    I wonder if they were playing Celine Dion to scare away the pirates.. she just goes on and on and on and on ....

    Or may be Neil Diamond..

  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 08, 2005 @11:19AM (#13979238)
    Global Warming is having a direct and measurable impact on the endangered pirate population according to The Flying Spaghetti Monster theory,
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying_spaghetti_mons ter [wikipedia.org]
    "Global warming, earthquakes, hurricanes, and other natural disasters are a direct consequence of the decline in numbers of pirates since the 1800s. A graph showing the inverse correlation between the pirates and global temperatures was also provided. This component of the theory highlights the logical fallacy of correlation implying causation. "
  • by Stradenko ( 160417 ) on Tuesday November 08, 2005 @11:19AM (#13979240) Homepage
    I sure hope the pirates didn't record the noise made by the LRAD for sale as bootleg CDs on the asian market...
  • by hal2814 ( 725639 ) on Tuesday November 08, 2005 @11:19AM (#13979247)
    Didn't know Doctor Who was battling pirates now.
  • ..I was not aware that pirates like that even existed. Anyone know anything on the subject? You don't hear much about them here in St. Louis, MO....
    • Weekly piracy report (Score:5, Informative)

      by __aagctu1952 ( 768423 ) on Tuesday November 08, 2005 @11:28AM (#13979352)
      Oh yes. Pirates are as active as ever. Only nowadays they have machine guns and RPGs instead of blunderbusses and cannons...
      Just read IMB's Weekly Piracy Report [icc-ccs.org] for an idea of how active and how dangerous modern pirates are.
    • Re:interesting... (Score:3, Interesting)

      by afidel ( 530433 )
      Pirates are a major concern from the horn of Africa to SE Asia.

      Seaborne piracy against transport vessels remains a significant problem (with estimated worldwide losses of $13 to $16 billion USD per year)

      More info can be obtained form Wikipedia [wikipedia.org].
    • by fdiskne1 ( 219834 ) on Tuesday November 08, 2005 @11:58AM (#13979693)

      You don't hear much about them here in St. Louis, MO

      That would be because there aren't many of them in St. Louis MO. I'm not sure, but it could be the lack of high seas. ;-)

    • by Sycraft-fu ( 314770 ) on Tuesday November 08, 2005 @12:28PM (#13979987)
      Because of the Coast Guard. US waters are essentially free of pirates. Now I suppose that could depend on your definition, some peopel considder smugglers that use ships to be pirates and we do have drug smugglers that come in by sea, but in terms of pirates attacking ships it's essentially zero. The Coast Guard has a very active presence and there's little that can be done about them. An attack on a Coast Guard ship is an act of war and they then can (and will) scream to any navy ships in the area for support, and they navy will come and sink your ass (also some CG ships have reasonably large deck guns).

      However in many areas of the world, particularly Africa but also South America and Asia to an extent, where there's not sucha powerful sea patrol, it's more common than you'd think.
  • by pogofish ( 514289 ) on Tuesday November 08, 2005 @11:20AM (#13979264) Homepage
    Oddly enough, my wife has one of those built in.
    • did you stack the plates like I asked you?
      did you clean out the kitty-litter box?
      did you forget to buy the toothpaste?
      will you rub my feet?
      will you take the trash out? ...

      one of these days Alice... *POW* straight to the moon...
      • by anthonyclark ( 17109 ) on Tuesday November 08, 2005 @11:50AM (#13979613)
        Yeah it must be so terrible, such torture to have a partner and responsibilities in life.

        Sorry for the snark, but 5 minutes rubbing feet and 10 minutes cleaning a cat box? That's not exactly a long time away from your WoW auctions, is it?

        Not to jump on the GTD bandwagon, but if it takes 10 minutes or less, just do it right now, you'd be amazed at how much easier your life becomes :-)

        (oh, and use lotion on those feet, peppermint body shop foot lotion work wonders on sore female feet)
  • *** ZAP!!!! ***

    (i hate the lameness filter)
  • I call B.S. (Score:2, Interesting)

    by tkrotchko ( 124118 ) *
    Sounds like an ad placement by the company making/selling them. No quotes, nobody identifiable. Same as that lady who microwaved her cat, or the kids who found razor blades in the halloween goodies, or that toilets flush the other way below the equator.

    And even if true, next time, won't the pirates just wear earplugs?
  • I wonder if rioters will be next for this type of weapon?

    On a related note, could these sonic weapons cause any other damage besides hearing? Could it affect things like the heart or other organs?
    • Re:Rioters are next? (Score:3, Informative)

      by plover ( 150551 ) *
      Israel has used sonic weapons on a violent mob. It was reportedly more effective than tear gas and rubber bullets.

      Wikipedia says that most "lethal sonic weapons" are science fiction, although they note that underwater sonic weapons are definitely lethal. High powered sonar has killed fish and whales, and there is speculation that some whales may use sound to stun prey.

  • Just a point.... (Score:3, Interesting)

    by FreakyControl ( 751781 ) on Tuesday November 08, 2005 @11:22AM (#13979286)
    Only to be thwarted by? From TFA, "The subsidiary of Carnival Corp. was investigating whether the weapon was successful in warding off the pirates, he said. The ship's captain also changed its course, shifted into high speed and headed out into the open sea to elude the pirates, who were in two small boats, he said. He had no further details."

    I'm sure it certainly contributed, but they're not even sure it actually was the reason why the pirates weren't able to catch them.
  • by PaxTech ( 103481 ) on Tuesday November 08, 2005 @11:22AM (#13979287) Homepage
    We simply cannot afford to kill any pirates, since the worldwide decline in the number of pirates is clearly responsible for global warming [venganza.org].
  • The "tune" played at such a "high-pitched, piercing tone" was Lovin, Huggin, Squeezin by Journey.

    Freeking Pirates.

  • I personally had thought that cruise ships in contested areas would want to carry a very small contingent of military personell that would take the fight to pirates. I would think that a few stories about high-seas pirate ships being sunk by an RPG or two would probably help deter further incidents.
  • by ottffssent ( 18387 ) on Tuesday November 08, 2005 @11:23AM (#13979294)
    Pirates, man! I mean, a real actual honest-to-$deity story. On Slashdot. About pirates! I mean, PIRATES. The ones with hats. And parrots. I never thought I'd see the day.
    • Re:Pirates?! Rawk! (Score:3, Informative)

      by rnelsonee ( 98732 )
      I know - I was surprisded to learn that pirates cost our company moeny (albeit indirectly) - we build large devices that are used on ships, and once in a while we test our systems in African waters. Apparantly pirates will come along in rafts armed with AK-47s and board the ship. They open up our devices, with hundreds of thousands of dollar's worth of components, only to look for and steal batteries. As a result, my company is forced to pay very high premiums for insurance for this.

      In any event, we're

      • Re:Pirates?! Rawk! (Score:3, Insightful)

        by fatcatman ( 800350 )
        In any event, we're told to just do whatever the pirates say, and don't try to act like a hero.

        Screw that. That just encourages them to continue attacking. If people would fight back, maybe this would end.

        I mean, look: These [bbc.co.uk] are the pirates - and their pirate "ship" - that attacked the cruise ship. The news is calling this a "speedboat". It looks like the ratty, $500 fishing boat the poor people down the street from me own.

        Don't tell me you couldn't fend off these rascals with the appropriate weapons. I kno
  • by xenicson ( 214967 ) on Tuesday November 08, 2005 @11:23AM (#13979302)
    I really was hoping that a LRAD was going to be a giant Airzooka.
  • You know, I personally find it sad that when I read "Pirates" in the title, my first thought was illegal downloaders rather than actual pirates.

    I guess that the *AA propaganda really works, in that the common usage of the word pirate is what they want it to be, rather than what it actually is.

  • ...and Pirates all go deaf, can't think, and slink away.

    All joking aside, that's kind of cool. I know I run from any irritating noise. I wonder if the same weapon could be used to stop rioters, or other civic disturbances. It could, in theory, prove cheaper and cleaner than tear-gas, tazers, or foam.

  • Instead of the siren from a smoke detector, use a tape loop of my 20 month old crying becase we won't let her continue to throw things down our stair case. Or maybe some britanny spears really loud, or any boy band music at all (NYKOB for teh win).
  • other news stories (Score:2, Informative)

    by WillAdams ( 45638 )
    Looking at news.google.com one can find a bit more detail from more familiar sources:

    http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/africa/11/07/somalia .pirates.sonic.ap/ [cnn.com]

    The 100 mile figure is that that's how far off the coast the cruise ship was --- the weapons used don't have near that sort of range.

    William
  • by Anonymous Coward
    Some suggest arming cruise ships. But being armed on the high seas itself, sadly, can be considered an act of hostility. For example, would we want armed boats anywhere in our vicinity .. even if they technically were in international waters? Only lightly armed? .. but they have to be long range enough to deter or eliminate threats.. correct? The problem is, which boats can be armed and not considered threats? And no you can't just go by flag or registration (which can be stolen/faked). Also you can't tell
  • Ba dum bum (Score:5, Funny)

    by DarkHand ( 608301 ) on Tuesday November 08, 2005 @11:26AM (#13979334)
    So a pirate walks into a bar with a steering wheel and an active LRAD device on his crotch. The bartender says: "There's a steering wheel and an LRAD device on your crotch!" The pirate says: "Yar, I know! They're both driving me nuts!"
  • "And now...we shall defeat you with the awesome power of SOUND."

  • by MaestroSartori ( 146297 ) on Tuesday November 08, 2005 @11:29AM (#13979369) Homepage
    ...this didn't result in anyone getting an Angry Pirate [encyclopedia-of-sex.com] :D
  • by AxsDeny ( 152142 ) on Tuesday November 08, 2005 @11:30AM (#13979381) Homepage Journal
    Timbers Shivered by Shivering Timbres
  • LRAD (Score:2, Informative)

    It's application by the military and police is controversial because of ethical questions, but this seems an ideal use of this technology in private sector. Commercial ships at sea cannot use heavy weapons by international treaty. The Long Range Acoustic Device, or LRAD, is a so-called "non-lethal weapon" developed after the 2000 attack on the USS Cole off Yemen as a way to keep operators of small boats from approaching U.S. warships. The 45-pound, dish-shaped device belongs to a developing arsenal of techn
    • by rsborg ( 111459 ) on Tuesday November 08, 2005 @12:03PM (#13979739) Homepage
      Since you're just cutting and pasting portions of your content from wikipedia, why don't you just paste the link [wikipedia.org]?

      Something you left out from the wiki content:
      "At maximum volume, it can emit a warning tone that is 151 decibels (1000 W/m) at 1 metre, a level that is very capable of permanently damaging hearing."

      I'm not sure I'd call that "an ideal use of this technology in private sector" as you put it... ethical concerns don't just go away if you're "private sector".

    • It's application by the military and police is controversial because of ethical questions, but this seems an ideal use of this technology in private sector. Commercial ships at sea cannot use heavy weapons by international treaty. The Long Range Acoustic Device, or LRAD, is a so-called "non-lethal weapon" developed after the 2000 attack on the USS Cole off Yemen as a way to keep operators of small boats from approaching U.S. warships.

      That's the stupidest thing I've ever heard. The USS Cole was bombed by

      • A 150 decibel noise seems like a pretty minor convenience compared to blowing yourself up.

        So does putting them in jail but it's still effective if you can manage it. Just because someone is willing to die doesn't mean that they are willing or able to endure pain.
  • This is not only good for pirates, it also should be helpful against Utsusu Mojoro. /first thing I thought off.
  • by Jherek Carnelian ( 831679 ) on Tuesday November 08, 2005 @11:34AM (#13979440)
    Has anyone had a chance to play with one of these? (Or been played with by someone with one of these like at the 2004 republican convention in NYC? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LRAD [wikipedia.org])

    Since it is just sound, and apparently high-frequency sound (thus relatively low-energy vs low-frequency sound) I wonder if something as simple as noise-cancellation headphones would provide significant protection against LRAD usage.

    Will we see pirates wearing Bose noise-cancellation headphones and listening to pirated music while they pirate real ships now?
    • by Reverberant ( 303566 ) on Tuesday November 08, 2005 @11:46AM (#13979574) Homepage
      I wonder if something as simple as noise-cancellation headphones would provide significant protection against LRAD usage.

      Noise cancelling headsets (and noise cancelling technologies in general) don't work all that well for high-frequency sounds since the impinging noise and the 180-degree shifted sounds need to be perfectly aligned at the ear to cancel each other out. That's difficult to do with high-frequency sounds because of the relatively small wavelengths involved.

      Now passive hearing protectors (e.g. ear plugs) work very well at high frequencies. However, the best ear plugs reduce sound by 20-30 dB at high-frequencies. If the LRAD literature is true, and it can produce sound levels of 150 dB, than ear plugs can reduce it to 120 dB, which is still uncomfortably loud.

  • 150 decibels (Score:3, Informative)

    by xenomouse ( 904937 ) on Tuesday November 08, 2005 @11:34AM (#13979454)
    "It can be as loud as about 150 decibels..."

    According to this decibal chart [gcaudio.com], that's somewhere between "jet at 100 feet" and "death of hearing tissue." I used to go to a summer camp near an air force base, and A-10 warthogs would frequently fly overhead. I doubt they were any closer than a few hundred feet, but they were still incredibly loud. It was near impossible to hear anyone speak/yell until the aircraft had passed. As for this weapon, my guess is that the pain of the sound it produces (while the most noticeable of the effects) is probably no more important than the fear and confusion it imbues.
  • Be Greedo (Score:5, Interesting)

    by dada21 ( 163177 ) * <adam.dada@gmail.com> on Tuesday November 08, 2005 @11:38AM (#13979490) Homepage Journal
    A bit OT but fun to know...

    Pirates do exist, and account for nearly $16b in losses annually. If you're interested in a career like Han Solo, piracy is an option.

    Most pirates today work between Eritria and Mumbai. Seychelles is very casual about accepting boats without valid port histories. The pirate ships are often large yachts with fast ciggy boats for docking. Glocks and Kalishies are the norm. The dress is much like the old pirate look -- bandanas, beards, loose shirts, etc.

    Pirate robbers make the news often, yet most pirates are smugglers (food, drugs, medicine and health equipment). Countries with US/UN embargoes pay well -- 400% over the white market rate.

    Cuba was easy money until 9/11, now we have our Coast Guard pretending to fight terrorism but actually destroying the free market in smuggling.

    Malaysia has a growing piracy need as the government gets more religious. Somalia and Sri Lanka both ignore the pirates like Seychelles.

    Take a trip to Dubai or Seychelles. Hook up with the right crowd and you can make 6 figures easily.

    Arrrrr!
    • Re:Be Greedo (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Bob Uhl ( 30977 ) on Tuesday November 08, 2005 @12:25PM (#13979963)
      A smuggler isn't a pirate--he's a smuggler. Pirates attack opther ships, board them and steal from them (generally also killing passengers & crew). And we need to revoke the treaty which forbids commercial ships from carrying heavy weapons. A rocket into the pirate boat would do a lot better good than a little smoke-alarm noise.
      • Re:Be Greedo (Score:4, Interesting)

        by dada21 ( 163177 ) * <adam.dada@gmail.com> on Tuesday November 08, 2005 @12:35PM (#13980047) Homepage Journal
        I'm all for arming boats with heavy weapons. The ICC and other government cartels need these international laws in order to protect their Navy monopolies. I'm anti-piracy but pro-smuggling, but most smugglers are affiliated with piracy groups as well. Although in reality most of these pirates aren't organized as a large group (RIAA style?), they do generally have their own territories and shipping lanes. It amazes me that more ships aren't attacked, especially with the anti-heavy weapons laws that are more heavily enforced than the protection of the shipping lanes.

        To be honest, everyone I know with a yacht in deep waters already carries decent guns for protection. It is pretty easy to dump them if you're boarded by a coast guard or naval vessel.
        • Re:Be Greedo (Score:4, Insightful)

          by Anonymous Cowpat ( 788193 ) on Tuesday November 08, 2005 @01:17PM (#13980412) Journal
          what's the 'heavy weapons' cut off at the moment?
          A 9mm pistol?
          A P90?
          An AK47?
          A BREN gun?
          An M2 Heavy machine gun (or equivalent)?
          An M61 Vulcan Autocannon?
          BOFORS gun?
          4.5 Inch artillery?
          18 Inch artillery?

          Surely to fight off a speedboat you don't need 'heavy' weapons per se, you just need a lot of lighter weapons

          Has the UN thought about passing a security council resolution providing for military escort for aid freighters? I don't suppose pirates are likely to try anything whilst staring down a fully equipped modern destroyer or frigate - a perfect trial mission for new ships.
      • Must... beg... forgiveness... for the following:

        I think the most appropriate weapon for these ships to carry would be cruise missiles.

        Thanks, I'll try not to post again all week.

      • Re:Be Greedo (Score:5, Interesting)

        by iabervon ( 1971 ) on Tuesday November 08, 2005 @01:29PM (#13980527) Homepage Journal
        Actually, heavy weapons would just make ships more valuable targets for pirates. Cruise ship crews just aren't going to be very attentive, especially since pirate attacks are rare, and once they're in boarding range, rockets aren't going to be a good idea. And rockets would work really well against the sorts of ships that pirates target, so they'd be eager to get them. It's better to have an LRAD, which is effective at repelling the pirates, but not a weapon they'd be able to use effectively.
        • Re:Be Greedo (Score:3, Interesting)

          Actually, .50 caliber machine guns are used on boats against fast-moving rubber vehicles the bad guys use to attack/board. A gun of this caliber destroys any rubber or fiberglass hull bad guys are using. Rockets are unnecessary overkill.
    • Re:Be Greedo (Score:5, Insightful)

      by ceoyoyo ( 59147 ) on Tuesday November 08, 2005 @01:02PM (#13980298)
      Smugglers smuggling food, medicine and health equipment... there's something wrong when there's a market for smuggling such things.
  • by gg3po ( 724025 ) on Tuesday November 08, 2005 @11:59AM (#13979705)
    ...to stop using their terminology. It's not *piracy*, it's infring... hold on, wait a sec... this is about real pirates, you say?!? Can't ... I don't... how to proceed...
  • Non-lethal? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by dtjohnson ( 102237 ) on Tuesday November 08, 2005 @12:08PM (#13979795)
    Why bother with a non-lethal weapon? These folks doing the pirate stuff are not nice people. Why not mount a couple of .50 caliber machine guns on the cruise ship fore and aft and let the cruise ship crew have some target practice on the guys in the pirate zodiacs so that they will be less of a threat to the next boat or ship that comes by?
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 08, 2005 @12:14PM (#13979861)
    Hard to believe right? I am from the coastal city of Bosaso on the horn of Africa, and some of my relatives took pride in their high-seas piracy. I have always heard of illegal Japanese and Norwegian ships illegaly fishing in our shores, while Somalis, with not central government and coast guard, sat around in anger and frustration.

    This piracy started as a way to defend our coast-lines from illegal international fishing. Somalia hasn't had a government since 1990, and our fish resources became the loot of international fishing conglomerates. Others have used our coast to dump their waste, even nuclear waste.

    After the fall of the Somali government, our coast guard's ships and vessels were looted by tribes. Some of our ships and boats were sold to illegal fishing companies, which didn't go far but stayed to fish in our waters! While other boats stayed in the hands of tribal leaders and warlords who used them for piracy and people smuggling to the middle east, although more often as a vehicle for products and trade with Yemen, our neighbor to the North.

    It's funny how companies registered in Democratic developed nations, and pay their taxes there, are the ones looting our natural resources and using our sea and land to dump their waste.

    http://gurukul.ucc.american.edu/ted/somalia.htm [american.edu]

    http://www.mg.co.za/articlePage.aspx?articleid=249 733&area=/breaking_news/breaking_news__africa/ [mg.co.za]

    http://somalinet.com/news/world/Somalia/1063 [somalinet.com]

    I wish the international community would deploy high-tech sonic weapons to defend us against real theives, not just pirates, blinded and deafended by greed.

    - Mahammad Darwish
  • by hotspotbloc ( 767418 ) on Tuesday November 08, 2005 @12:21PM (#13979922) Homepage Journal
    ... as the crew of the pirate boats rolled around on the deck with the worst headache of their lives:

    CAN YOU HEAR ME NOW?

  • by afabbro ( 33948 ) on Tuesday November 08, 2005 @12:29PM (#13980006) Homepage
    ...200 decibels solves it.

    (Wikipedia notes that "Sound levels of around 200 dB can cause death to humans").

  • by softweyr ( 2380 ) on Tuesday November 08, 2005 @12:43PM (#13980109) Homepage
    I'm pretty certain the 'Type R' next to me at the stoplight this morning has one of these LRADs installed, too. Problem is, the kid that owns it is too stupid to properly employ the high frequency sound needed to really kill, so the booms and thumps coming from his car just annoy me instead.

    I can't wait for the inevitable Slashdot article on how to make your own LRAD from a Pringles can.

There is very little future in being right when your boss is wrong.

Working...