Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
News Science

North Pole Heads South 393

blamanj writes "Things are not looking good for Santa. First, news that it's getting warmer at the North Pole, and now, scientists report that the (magnetic) pole itself is on the move. 'Earth's north magnetic pole is drifting from North America at such a clip that it could end up in Siberia in the next 50 years.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

North Pole Heads South

Comments Filter:
  • Pole Reversal? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by MichaelSmith ( 789609 ) on Friday December 09, 2005 @08:51AM (#14218310) Homepage Journal

    Is it true that we are overdue for a reversal in the polarity of the Earths magnetic field? Would this be a Bad Thing for us humans if it happened soon?

    • Re:Pole Reversal? (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Max von H. ( 19283 ) on Friday December 09, 2005 @08:57AM (#14218347)
      Is it true that we are overdue for a reversal in the polarity of the Earths magnetic field? Would this be a Bad Thing for us humans if it happened soon?

      Yes, it would be a Very Bad Thing (tm) because when a reversal happens, we're left without the Earth's magnetic field, which protects us from lethal cosmic rays which are high enery/DNA disruptive stuff, such as gamma rays among other niceties.

      Magnetic field reversals coincide with mass surface life extinctions, I'll bet it won't do us any good if it happens in our lifetime.
      • we're left without the Earth's magnetic field, which protects us from lethal cosmic rays
        Simple solution [zapatopi.net]
      • Re:Pole Reversal? (Score:2, Interesting)

        by drgonzo59 ( 747139 )
        We just have to make sure we destroy ourselves so our lifetime is not long enough for the cosmic death rays to get us. Drugs, wars and bird-flu should do the job very nicely, and are a lot more fun than gamma rays if you ask me...
      • Re:Pole Reversal? (Score:5, Insightful)

        by Yahweh Doesn't Exist ( 906833 ) on Friday December 09, 2005 @09:21AM (#14218479)
        not true. even when flipping there is enough of a field to protect us. plus the magnetic field does nothing to protect us from gamma rays anyway. if a gamma ray burst happens anywhere in our neighbourhood and is aimed at us, then we're fucked field or no field. there are cosmic rays passing through us every second anyway.
      • Rubbish (Score:5, Insightful)

        by mrRay720 ( 874710 ) on Friday December 09, 2005 @09:24AM (#14218494)
        Gamma rays are photons - i.e. light. They are not affected by the weak magnetif field surrounding the earth. Loss of the magnetic field would be devestating long term because it would make it easier for solar winds to slowly strip away the upper atmosphere.

        But... a weakened field for a few decades will not send us all to early graves. The biggest impact of a changing magnetic field would be to:
        - Navigation. I guess we all have to adjust to GPS and similar.
        - Animal navigation. Sadly birds, fish, etc. haven't yet implemented and learned how to use GPS. They'll have loads of trouble.

        In terms of dangers it poses to us in the next hundred or so years, should this be a continuation of the existing decrease/beginning of reversal in field strength, it's importance is way below things like climate change, oil reserves running out, etc.

        Nuisance for us, a bitch for animals that rely on it to migrate, but as a race, the danger from it is effectively zero.
        • Re:Rubbish (Score:3, Insightful)

          by Alioth ( 221270 )
          It's unlikely birds etc. will have a real problem at all. Or even people who use compases to navigate their small boats.

          The poles have been moving around since before life began - and has certainly shifted around significantly whilst birds that can use it have existed. In any case, a compass can only really provide you with rough navigation - a bird won't be using the magnetic pole as its sole navigational system (if it did, then normal day to day weather changes would screw them up much more than a pole th
          • Re:Rubbish (Score:5, Interesting)

            by ShamusYoung ( 528944 ) on Friday December 09, 2005 @10:07AM (#14218840) Homepage
            I'm sure you're right. Obviously birds have survived this before.

            Consider: Birds don't live for decades. If the pole were to shift within a year or two, it might very well hose the bird population. However, if a flip happens over the next 50 years, then there will be many bird generations between now and then. Each generation will get "used to" the new orientation as it happens.

            From a strictly Darwinian standpoint, this would explain why birds don't live very long. A bird that lives longer will experience more of the shift during its lifetime. During a shift, more of them will become lost and confused. Therefore, having a shorter lifespan is an advantage. Birds that live longer would tend to have more trouble during a shift, and would get weeded out of the gene pool from time to time.

            Stupid birds.

            • Birds that live longer would tend to have more trouble during a shift, and would get weeded out of the gene pool from time to time.

              Every old bird was a young bird once, and thus had plenty of opportunities to pass its genes on. The net effect is zero.

              Birds don't live for decades.

              Cockatoos can live for more than sixty years.
            • Re:Rubbish (Score:4, Insightful)

              by SnapShot ( 171582 ) on Friday December 09, 2005 @10:43AM (#14219238)
              Birds don't live for decades.

              The Red-Tailed Black Cockatoo [birdhealth.com.au] can live for up to 100 years. And, according to this article [oreillynet.com], "The [Albatross] is a survivor. It flies 1,900 kilometers (1,100 miles) per day, with pinpoint navigation, and returns to its nest repeatedly over its 50-year lifespan."
              • Re:Rubbish (Score:3, Insightful)

                by aclarke ( 307017 )
                Oh no. Now you've gone and disproved evolution. I'd say the "migratory bird lifespan observation" was its strongest proof yet.
            • Interesting theory, but I think you're wrong.

              The rarity of MAJOR changes in the magnetic field wouldn't, I imagine, have any real effect. Moreso, if using the poles for navigation was so unreliable over the course of a single lifetime, such an ability wouldn't have been positively selected for in the first place.

              There are many much more significant changes that happen far more frequently (day/night, summer/winter) that have been easily adapted to that I doubt your suggestion is valid.
          • It's true, there's not going to be some mass bird extinction. Their navigation can't help but be affected - they do rely on it in part - but for the majority of species I don't think we'll be taking catastrophe. After all, I don't think many species if any navigate by that method alone, and the fact that it happens (in geological time) so reguarly implicitly implies that it's not an end of the world scenario at all.

            I'm sure that if this does go on further to be a full on change over a hundred years or so, t
        • Re:Rubbish (Score:2, Interesting)

          by beauzo ( 566782 )
          If you are worried about climate change, then you should also be worried about polar shift. I'm sure the two are more related then you think. -B
        • But... a weakened field for a few decades will not send us all to early graves. The biggest impact of a changing magnetic field would be to:

          I wish I could find the source this, but it was an episode on Nova I saw a while ago about the magnetic fields and pole reversal, but it has been known that when the poles flip it tends to last longer than just a few decades. One is known to last over 3,000 years.

          But in general, it won't be too bad because obviously life survived through that. Increased cancer rates wil
      • Re:Pole Reversal? (Score:3, Informative)

        by fredrik70 ( 161208 )
        um, no, it's not that bad, you seen too much movies!
        http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/movies/thecore_rev iew.html [badastronomy.com]

        having said that, question is what would happen to birds and other animals that navigate by the magnetic field. anyone know?
      • Re:Pole Reversal? (Score:4, Informative)

        by cervo ( 626632 ) on Friday December 09, 2005 @09:55AM (#14218752) Journal
        Well hmm according to http://image.gsfc.nasa.gov/poetry/venus/RevScience .html [nasa.gov] the earth's magnetic field does not cause mass surface life extinctions. If you would like to make an assertion like that, you really do have to back it up with something. In fact it will cause little change in the way things function, maybe a few thousand extra cases of cancer each year. Now if the field never came back and our atomosphere ionized, then we would be screwed.
      • Re:Pole Reversal? (Score:4, Informative)

        by ortholattice ( 175065 ) on Friday December 09, 2005 @10:04AM (#14218823)
        Yes, it would be a Very Bad Thing (tm) because when a reversal happens, we're left without the Earth's magnetic field

        Supercomputer simulations [nasa.gov] do not show that. According to the site: "Reversals take a few thousand years to complete, and during that time--contrary to popular belief--the magnetic field does not vanish. 'It just gets more complicated,' says Glatzmaier. Magnetic lines of force near Earth's surface become twisted and tangled, and magnetic poles pop up in unaccustomed places. A south magnetic pole might emerge over Africa, for instance, or a north pole over Tahiti. Weird. But it's still a planetary magnetic field, and it still protects us from space radiation and solar storms."

      • by Griim ( 8798 )
        From the link [nasa.gov] mentioned above:

        "They've also learned what happens during a magnetic flip. Reversals take a few thousand years to complete, and during that time--contrary to popular belief--the magnetic field does not vanish. "It just gets more complicated," says Glatzmaier. Magnetic lines of force near Earth's surface become twisted and tangled, and magnetic poles pop up in unaccustomed places. A south magnetic pole might emerge over Africa, for instance, or a north pole over Tahiti. Weird. But it's still a
      • Re:Pole Reversal? (Score:3, Informative)

        by mysticgoat ( 582871 )

        ...when a reversal happens, we're left without the Earth's magnetic field, which protects us from lethal cosmic rays...

        A quick google shows that this incorrect. The atmosphere continues to block most incoming radiation even during those times when the magnetic field has completely collapsed. 'Cosmic ray' is not the right choice of wording here, either-- very little of the incoming radiation meets the definition of cosmic ray, which is good because neither the magnetosphere nor the atmosphere provides mu

    • Re:Pole Reversal? (Score:3, Informative)

      by nwbvt ( 768631 )
      There is no timetable on which the poles reverse, and it doesn't happen at regular intervals. Yes, I believe the time since the last reversal is longer than the mean time between pole reversals, but the term 'overdue' does not apply here.
    • Re:Pole Reversal? (Score:5, Interesting)

      by luvirini ( 753157 ) on Friday December 09, 2005 @08:59AM (#14218358)
      Well the shift around the globe to Siberia is something that has apparently happened before.. the magnetic pole has never been stationary, but what is news in the article is the fact that the mevement speed seems to be accelerating.
      • Meantime, the news that NORTH POLE is moving SOUTH is completely no news. As if it could move in ANY other direction.
        • Isn't anywhere it goes North, because North can be defined as "towards the North Pole?"
          So, the North Pole can only go North.

          (Posts like this happen when things are slow at work.)
    • Re:Pole Reversal? (Score:4, Informative)

      by stupid_is ( 716292 ) on Friday December 09, 2005 @09:02AM (#14218374) Homepage
      Yes it is (both). This article [pureenergysystems.com] goes into some speculative detail. Upshot is, possibly damaging a shed load of electrical devices, disruption to electrical grids, etc....

      Could be interesting times (mental note: buy manual tin opener)

    • Re:Pole Reversal? (Score:2, Informative)

      by KwKSilver ( 857599 )
      There's a long period around the reversal when the earth's magnetic field is dowm. No protection from cosmic rays & other miscellaneous high energy particals. Hundreds of years. One resource on the Brunhes-Matuyama reversal about 780K years ago is: here [agu.org]. Here's another more general one on reversals from NASA [nasa.gov].
    • Is it true that we are overdue for a reversal in the polarity of the Earths magnetic field? Would this be a Bad Thing for us humans if it happened soon?

      It's all a russian plot to take over the world

      Actually, if it recall correctly, predictions are that, if a pole shift were to happened, it would created a period of turbulent/chaotic magnetic field configurations. You would get lots of transient and shifting polarities across the entire planet. Scientists believe that the process would take hundreds of y

  • Cyclic? (Score:2, Informative)

    by Mortiss ( 812218 )
    Is this a part of the cycle of the reversal of Earth's magnetic field? I always though that this cycle took much much longer ( but 1/3 of the way down in under 50 years?).
  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 09, 2005 @08:52AM (#14218317)
    Quick, call G.W. Bush that the russians are stealing the pole to hide weapons of mass destruction in siberia !
    We haven't found them in Iraq, so they MUST be some else.
  • news (Score:3, Interesting)

    by akhomerun ( 893103 ) on Friday December 09, 2005 @08:52AM (#14218318)
    i don't think it's news that the north pole is getting warmer, but the actual magnetic pole moving?

    well now that i read about it the poles moving seems pretty normal.

    "They found that the north magnetic field shifted significantly in the last thousand years. It generally migrated between northern Canada and Siberia, but it sometimes moved in other directions, too."
  • by confused one ( 671304 ) on Friday December 09, 2005 @08:52AM (#14218319)
    Santa doesn't live at the magnetic North Pole, silly.
  • this is news? (Score:4, Insightful)

    by v1 ( 525388 ) on Friday December 09, 2005 @08:55AM (#14218332) Homepage Journal
    The magnetic poles have been moving for what, millions of years, and science has known about this for many years now. Magnetic history found in rock has shown the poles have actually completely switched places several times in the past.
  • When I went to school I was taught that the magnetic poles swap places once every 23,000 years, so I guess the NP (or should it be SP - who knows?) is just getting ready to leave.
  • Good gravy! (Score:5, Funny)

    by tbone1 ( 309237 ) on Friday December 09, 2005 @08:56AM (#14218342) Homepage
    Even the North Magnetic Pole is getting outsourced! It's a sorry world.

  • Interesting fact (Score:2, Informative)

    by SamSim ( 630795 )
    The so-called "North Pole" is actually a south magnetic pole. Think about it: the north pole of any bar magnet you use as a compass points "North", but with magnets, opposite poles attract, so the north magnetic pole of a magnet points towards the strongest nearby south magnetic pole, so if it's pointing North, there must be a south magnetic pole up North somewhere! Likewise, the South Pole is a north pole.
    • Re:Interesting fact (Score:3, Informative)

      by peragrin ( 659227 )
      Unless of course they mislabeled your compass. What if it's the compass that is backwards. Damn that means a conspiracy going back thousands of years.

      It's well known that compasses are actually labeled backwards.
      • Well, there's two ways of looking at it: either the Earth's magnetic poles are labelled wrongly, or EVERY OTHER MAGNET IN ALL HISTORY is labelled wrongly. Take your pick.
        • Re:Interesting fact (Score:4, Informative)

          by Mendokusei ( 916318 ) on Friday December 09, 2005 @09:32AM (#14218543)
          Well, there's two ways of looking at it: either the Earth's magnetic poles are labelled wrongly, or EVERY OTHER MAGNET IN ALL HISTORY is labelled wrongly. Take your pick.

          Compasses aren't labelled incorrectly. The North side of a bar magnet in a compass is labelled North because that is the way it points, not for its magnetic pole. They aren't saying, "Hey, this is the North pole of this magnet," they are saying "Hey, this side of the magnet always points North." Those are two completely different meanings.

        • Aside from the fact that opposites attract, the decision of north and south is quite arbitrary. Just like with rotational motion someone decided clockwise is negative and counterclockwise is positive, they could have just as easily have decided the other way. But the fact is that whatever your compass is labeled is the opposite of the way it is pointing (okay a confusing statement). But if you take two magnets and try to hold the two north poles together, they repel each other and it is quite difficult.
  • by digitaldc ( 879047 ) * on Friday December 09, 2005 @08:58AM (#14218354)
    Does this mean the South Pole will shift to Chile or Argentina as well?
  • by Lostie ( 772712 ) on Friday December 09, 2005 @08:59AM (#14218360)
    ... is it called pole-vaulting?
  • No piccies (Score:5, Informative)

    by DavidHOzAu ( 925585 ) on Friday December 09, 2005 @09:02AM (#14218372)
    But this site sure has them [nasa.gov] and this site has some too [nrcan.gc.ca].
    Read them. They are worth it.

    It looks like there are two magnetic norths on the planet. Our current one looks like it is just the additive of the major and minor magnetic fields of the earth with their collective strengths oscillating over time... hence the apparent movement.
    • From one of the links:

      Keeping track of the north magnetic pole is Newitt's job. "We usually go out and check its location once every few years," he says. "We'll have to make more trips now that it is moving so quickly."

      North pole track-keeper - what an easy job!

    • Two magnetic norths? Are you referring to the two center points in this image [nrcan.gc.ca]? One is magnetic north, the other is geographical or geometrical north -- the center of the 37.5* arc that the Earth rotates around.
  • "This may be part of a normal oscillation and it will eventually migrate back toward Canada," Joseph Stoner, a paleomagnetist at Oregon State University, said Thursday at an American Geophysical Union meeting. Previous studies have shown that the strength of the Earth's magnetic shield has decreased 10 percent over the past 150 years. During the same period, the north magnetic pole wandered about 685 miles out into the Arctic, according to a new analysis by Stoner.

    Those crazy stoners. They're always an

  • Magnetic North Pole (Score:5, Informative)

    by metlin ( 258108 ) on Friday December 09, 2005 @09:07AM (#14218403) Journal
    The magnetic North Pole has never been a single point.

    It has always been a general area, and at any given point of time, the *actual* North Pole would be somewhere in that area.

    So, given that, this is not really surprising.
    • by metlin ( 258108 )
      Actually, I should rephrase that - it has been a single point, just not a single steady point. It's a point that varies in its position.

      The general area where the point might be is known, but the point itself keeps changing its position.
      • by Ethelred Unraed ( 32954 ) * on Friday December 09, 2005 @09:34AM (#14218559) Journal

        Personally I think we should send a commando squad to nail it into place.

        Especially if it's going to Siberia. Clearly it was a double agent from the Cold War. Because it is leaving the geographic North Pole, the North Pole will clearly get warmer, adding a whole new meaning to "Cold War". Thus we will have new war with Soviet Russia, which will be called the Warm War, so we'll dig up Reagan, who will tell the Russians to stop dancing around our pole (while the Poles will go on strike against martial law and double entendre).

        Some call me Nostradamus. Others call me "raving lunatic". You be the judge.

        Cheers,

        Ethelred

  • Great. First control of Internet, now this!
  • shite! (Score:2, Funny)

    now i'm going to have to relabel all my magnets.
  • by vagabond_gr ( 762469 ) on Friday December 09, 2005 @09:30AM (#14218526)
    North Pole Heads South

    Well, it didn't have much choice, did it? The north pole is the only place on earth where no matter where you're going, you're going south. So what's all the fuss about?

    (of course the fact that it is actually moving is quite a story)
  • All those boyscouts with compasses laughing at me when my GPS fails once in a while! All your compasses will fail you completely. JUSTICE!
  • That comment seemed odd to me. That would seem to suggest that Siberia does not get auroras now. I also seem to remember parts of Europe getting auroras as well.
    Alaska getting LESS auroras would make more sense to me.
  • The field reversals of the earth are in many ways similar to the solar sunspot cycle. Sunspots are places where the sun's magnetic field is "tangled up", and happen as the sun's field reverses.

    The same sort of "tangles" will happen as the earth's field reverses - the only difference is that since the earth is not undergoing nuclear fusion, we won't see "earthspots".

    However, I wonder what will happen to the earth's magnetosphere and ionosphere as the flux lines break and reconnect - on the sun that is what c
  • The difference between Magnetic North and True North historically (magnetic declination) is constantly changing. Clued people who use magnetic compasses are well aware of the dynamic nature of magnetic declination and take it into consideration when determining compass directions. For more information see http://erg.usgs.gov/isb/pubs/factsheets/fs03501.h t ml [usgs.gov] and/or http://www.geography.wisc.edu/sco/maps/magneticdec lination.php [wisc.edu]
  • We havn't seen this happening in the last 200 years! It _must_ be happening because of human factors! We need to stop poluting the world with little magnets!
  • but I embrace it.

    I came across the web archive of an experiment done by the guy who used to run fanaticus.com, before he was shut down by the DEA.

    He had read about how UV lights had modified aquarium plants, which ended up causing an ecological disaster when they escaped into the sea, via the aquaducts...

    So he put blacklights on a timer in his mushroom growing cabinet, and produced an albino strain, AFTER the mycelium had colonized the substrate, but before it started pinning.

    And the spores from that first

Understanding is always the understanding of a smaller problem in relation to a bigger problem. -- P.D. Ouspensky

Working...