Neuros OSD Review 55
An anonymous reader writes "The Neuros OSD promises a lot — it claims to be the first open source Linux-based embedded media center and it "records video and links your PC, portables and entertainment center". Bold claims, but can it live up to them? Linuxlookup.com has a two page review of the Neuros OSD."
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
At $230, it doesn't look like it's breaking the bank for a DVR...until you realize that it doesn't include a hard disk! It also doesn't record HD video. At that price, it seems like it should do one or the other.
I'd get one if.... (Score:4, Interesting)
-nB
No 16:9? (Score:4, Informative)
Re:No 16:9? (Score:4, Informative)
Doesn't take much to support 16:9. Also is effortless to support most sets with HDMI and distinct audio ports with a DVI-HDMI cable.
I have a diskless mythfrontend on my TVs HDMI port, running 1280x720, and the backend has an HD Tuner. Absolutely beautiful.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
First off, it was a moderate/somewhat hard effort for me. Keep this in context, though, as my day-to-day job involves putting together similarly complex net booting stuff, so diskless systems are old hat for me. Running X, booting it so it can sleep and be diskless, and doing it all in such a small amount of memory were challenges beyond the everyday (systems I work with rarely run X, never sleep, and always have gigs of ram). Myth itself is documented pretty well, but
Re: (Score:2)
All my systems are home built.. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Not All Three (Score:5, Insightful)
I have quite a large TV - a 37" widescreen - and the playback on that screen was quite poor. Whether this was related to the widescreen issues mentioned below or the general quality of my input source I'm not sure, but I certainly won't be using the OSD to record TV for playback on my TV.
I'm not sure I can justify spending money on something that'll record stuff that only looks good on the PC or a portable player... if I wanted that I'd just use my PC's inbuilt functionality. Still, a good start.
Re: (Score:2)
I put together a PVR about a year or so ago, and it takes so much time to go through and calibrate it so that the colors and contrast look okay across all recordings.
I'd say a device like this would be good (like you said) just for smaller devices or SDTVs.
I read it, but I'm confused. (Score:2)
Nevermind, read it again! (Score:2)
Review (Score:4, Funny)
Goatse? (Score:3, Funny)
Oh my!
I'm trying SO hard not to post a link to a certain hole.
Re: (Score:1, Funny)
Buff it up to 1080p and add cable card support. (Score:3, Insightful)
First? (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
There are others. I remember seeing another company with one about 6 to 8 months ago.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Let's see... (Score:5, Interesting)
Widescreen? Nope. HDTV? Nope. Dual tuners? Doesn't look like it. Display on front to show what it's recording? Nope. Support for digital cable (cable card)? Nope. Downloadable programs over the 'net? Nope. Suggestions based on other users TV viewing? Nope. "Season Pass" like recording? Doesn't seem like it. Fits nicely in a rack of home theater equipment (doesn't look like a PC)? Nope. Ability to hack? Yes. Monthly fee? No.
Let's compare that to a TiVo series 3.
Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, soon, yes, yes, yes, no, yes.
It only won in the last two categories.
Yeah, I'll drop my Series 3 for this thing. Heck, I wouldn't drop a Series 2. You can hack a Series 2 to add other stuff, and still have the great TiVo UI and service.
I've yet to see what I consider to be even a mildly compelling alternative to a TiVo. Unless you have all the parts sitting around and want to build a MythTV box for free, they just aren't there. I mean, why should I choose this over a cable company DVR which would give me things like On Demand and HD?
TiVo: Still #1, no serious competitors since the death of ReplayTV.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
That's because you picked the categories, based on things the Tivo has, rather than features the Tivo lacks.
Because you don't have to hack it to allow you to copy *your* videos off it, re-encode them, edit out commercials, record to DVD, etc.
A spare computer is a better option, IMHO, but this little thing has it's benefits as well.
If I offered you a glass of milk... (Score:2)
-It does not taste like lemonade.
-It does not look like lemonade.
-It is not made from lemons.
-It is not opaque like lemonade.
for bunnies fucking sakes, this device has a completely different use, which I'll let you guess in order to allow you to improve your reading comprehension skillz (you read TFA I am sure, so try again).
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It's so obsolete it's fascinating (Score:2)
Comment removed (Score:3, Informative)
Outdated (Score:1)
Is it legal? (Score:2)
TFA mentions that the little box requires some non-free kernel modules. Doesn't shipping this violate the GPL?
Quick Summary (Score:2)
Ask someone who knows... (Score:4, Informative)
Neuros bought most of the video codecs and Linux BSP from a third party. How do I know? - I was an engineer for said third party, and wrote/developed a few of the modules for this platform. In fact, I'm intimately familiar with the video and audio playback code.
That said, I have a few comments:
The sound and video often get very out of sync and sometimes the video judders, or slows to get back to where it should be...[emphasis added]
First of all, I had not observed this at all when using a pristine source. We did recognize that our coping mechanisms would produce a similar result if the incoming source had missing frames or audio, etc...
In fact A/V sync was one of the enduring problems on which I worked during my tenure. Suffice to say, we chose to gradually pull audio and video back in sync when sync was lost because our clients complained that the alternative appeared too jittery. Unlike other vendors, we could present acceptable quality playback with as much as 1/4 of the frames missing from the input stream. Most other encoders/decoders would produce a noticeable, annoying frame-jitter whenever there was a loss of either audio or video.
But, aside from that, here are some more things the article failed to mention:
Hope this helps.
I do feel some connection to this project because I did a lot of work on this platform. Truth be told, I'm thinking of buying one just for sentimental reasons; unfortunately, my company didn't hand out samples. I do know quite a bit about the BSP, and would be happy to answer any questions regarding the platform that I can.
Re: (Score:1)
Just out of curiosity... (Score:2)
Does it boot from the SD/MMC card yet?
One of the last things I did was to make the board check for an SD card at startup, and boot from that. Failing to find a card, it would then default to the flash. (More or less like the original PC's would boot floppy by default, then HD). I don't think these scripts made it into the releases, but it wouldn't be too hard to do.
Re: (Score:1)
Only composite out? (Score:2)
>On the other hand it played back quite nicely on my PC
This unit only has composite tv-out. 15 years ago that may have been what most users expected but composite signal will not look "good" nowadays when approximately 99.99% of video playing devices and TVs have some option of S-VHS, component or HDMI signals.
Maybe this was intended as a psp/ipod/pc video recorder with a "preview on TV" option?