Jobs Favors DRM-Free Music Distribution 755
Another anonymous reader tips an essay by Steve Jobs on the Apple site about DRM, iTunes, and the iPod. Perhaps it was prompted by the uncomfortable pressure the EU has been putting on Apple to open up the iPod. Jobs places the blame for the existence and continuing reliance on DRM squarely on the music companies. Quoting: "Much of the concern over DRM systems has arisen in European countries. Perhaps those unhappy with the current situation should redirect their energies towards persuading the music companies to sell their music DRM-free. For Europeans, two and a half of the big four music companies are located right in their backyard. The largest, Universal, is 100% owned by Vivendi, a French company. EMI is a British company, and Sony BMG is 50% owned by Bertelsmann, a German company. Convincing them to license their music to Apple and others DRM-free will create a truly interoperable music marketplace. Apple will embrace this wholeheartedly."
FTA (Score:5, Informative)
Here's the parts I found most interesting:
Well, Jobs gets it (Score:5, Informative)
At least he understands what the rest of us understand, which is that DRM can never prevent copying. The most it can do is slow it down.
He does get one thing wrong in the article though: "No DRM system was ever developed for the CD". Not true. There are several DRM systems developed for Audio CDs. However, they all depend on the disc being placed into a computer that will pay attention to something other than CDDA tracks, which means they are ineffective on purpose-built CD copiers or computers on which the user has either disabled autorun or holds the shift key while the disc is inserted.
DRM doesn't have to be effective to be DRM...
Re:Apple comes out against DRM? (Score:3, Informative)
Aside from that, I wonder if more people would buy from iTunes if there were no DRM. I know I would, but I might not be representative of the population.
(Unless the population lives in their parents basements and cries themselves to sleep at night for all the loneliness they feel every day.)
Re:Or... read the essay. (Score:5, Informative)
Re:iTunes and DRM (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Yeah right... I don't believe it for a second. (Score:5, Informative)
Re:iTunes and DRM (Score:2, Informative)
I'll probably do this with my two protected files sooner or later, when I actually get around to it.
Re:Yeah right... I don't believe it for a second. (Score:3, Informative)
Re:mod jobs up (Score:5, Informative)
Re:iTunes and DRM (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Okay, what about OS X DRM? (Score:5, Informative)
Is it also the record companies that force Steve to sell OS X with DRM? Do not forget that OS X is tied to Mac hardware by a "Trusted Computing Module".
Have you considered checking your facts? The most recent Macs don't even have a TPM module and no version of OS X ever used it, although some third party utilities did, in order to do more secure encryption. Macintosh computers do check the motherboard to insure it is an Apple one, but no "DRM" is in use and if you look at the code that does that it contains a "please don't violate our license by installing on other hardware" message.
Re:Why DRM on all iTunes songs? (Score:4, Informative)
Re:At least Apple is consistent, I guess... (Score:3, Informative)
Nevertheless, it is incorrect to state that you can natively run OS 9 applications on any new Mac. As Apple has wanted to phase out OS 9 for years now, I do not forsee this changing any time in the future.
Re:At least Apple is consistent, I guess... (Score:5, Informative)
Re:At least Apple is consistent, I guess... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:At least Apple is consistent, I guess... (Score:5, Informative)
Bob
Re:Why DRM on all iTunes songs? (Score:4, Informative)
You're 100% wrong (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Yeah right... I don't believe it for a second. (Score:3, Informative)
You can either choose to believe Steve's reasoning that it is the same reason that he states for not licensing Fair Play, or you can believe that Microsoft is INCREDIBLE STUPID as the fact that Zune doesn't use Plays for Sure was a huge black eye for them. It added to customer confusion and isn't helping Zune succeed.
Apple was already on record as opposing DRM. (Score:4, Informative)
This quote's at least a couple years old: Second, he gives an argument against licensing FairPlay to other vendors that I hadn't heard or thought of before
Yes, that was interesting: if their contract with the labels requires that kind of control, then they can't legally open up Fairplay and keep most of the music in iTMS available.
Re:mod jobs up (Score:4, Informative)
I don't think it's a case of Jobs suddenly realizing DRM is bad and becoming a generous benefactor by disregarding his greedy interests. First, he's been against DRM from the beginning. It's come up again and again, and I don't know whether any public statements have been made before, but by all accounts Steve Jobs did not want DRM on iTMS. The record companies just required it.
Second, by most accounts, Apple doesn't make much money off of the iTMS anyhow. They roughly break even. It's a marketing issue, to promote the iPod, and that's pretty much it. Third, even if Apple did make money from the sales, they don't need to make much. While record companies are spending money to actually produce the music, Apple only needs to make enough to cover their costs of running the store. Therefore, Apple doesn't need to worry very much about piracy.
So even if Apple took a small loss on the iTMS, it might be worth it for marketing purposes. However, keeping the DRM hurts their PR, and it's probably a nightmare to manage, keep up-to-date, etc. Plus, they've lost the business of people who might have purchased from iTMS, but who won't because of the DRM. DRM is a net loss for them, I'm sure.
Re:At least Apple is consistent, I guess... (Score:4, Informative)
Of course, if you don't see any other advantages to iPods, then there's no point. A lot of people like their price/form factor/clickwheel/battery life/reliability/style/customer service.
Re:At least Apple is consistent, I guess... (Score:4, Informative)
# AAC compressed audio at 96 Kbps generally exceeded the quality of MP3 compressed audio at 128 Kbps. AAC at 128 Kbps provides significantly superior performance than does MP3 at 128 Kbps [apple.com].
Re:Bullshit (Score:5, Informative)
Re:At least Apple is consistent, I guess... (Score:4, Informative)
Re:At least Apple is consistent, I guess... (Score:4, Informative)