BBC and YouTube Deal in the Works? 152
Algis writes to tell us the BBC is in the process of striking a deal with YouTube to allow BBC content to be posted on YouTube. Previously the BBC has demanded quite a few video be removed from the Google-owned video sharing site. "The deal between YouTube and the BBC however, is more interesting still, since YouTube is a global service that is completely free to all users. Shows cannot be downloaded from YouTube. Instead, they're watched online on the YouTube website, or the YouTube player is embedded in other websites for no cost to the user. This is the nature of content sharing that has seen YouTube grow from a company making no money, to a company worth almost $2billion to Google, in less than two years. Quite what the BBC-YouTube deal will entail is anyone's guess. It is highly, highly unlikely to include full-length current BBC shows. What could be possible is the addition to YouTube of much older shows, such as classics like 'The Young Ones' or 'Faulty Towers', in an effort to boost the shows' exposure and increase DVD sales of these shows."
Shows cannot be downloaded from YouTube? (Score:1, Insightful)
http://www.arrakis.es/~rggi3/youtube-dl/ [arrakis.es]
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
I mean, uh, mod parent down. That troll doesn't know what he is talking about.
Re:Shows cannot be downloaded from YouTube? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Shows cannot be downloaded from YouTube? (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Ironically though I had to enable JS to actually initiate the d
Re: (Score:2)
Which is a shame, since youtube is about the only video source that consistently works for me on Linux. But we all know Hollywood will never distribute movies that way.
I completely hope this means that (Score:2)
I think I did the analogies just right on that one...
Re:I completely hope this means that (Score:5, Funny)
views=1,050
Random girl licking jello
views=1,003,420,535,232
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Can't download? (Score:4, Informative)
That, plus a set of video converters/transcoders will give you a poor-mans (well, with a computer) Tivo for BBC content with this new agreement.
Ryan Fenton
Re: (Score:2)
won't download/won't know how to play (Score:2)
Not to mention, videos from YouTube are always .flv's... I either use VLC to play them or convert them with a quick and easy drag-n-drop batch file using ffmpeg (usually to an iPod-friendl
Re: (Score:2)
I found the FLV file in my
Re: (Score:2)
Fawlty towers.... (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
"Shows cannot be downloaded from YouTube" (Score:3, Informative)
Danger Mouse? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re:Danger Mouse? (Score:5, Insightful)
Also, why don't you get a multiregion player? Importing DVDs in the UK is very common.
It's because BBC America shows many C4/ITV shows (Score:2)
Re:It's because BBC America shows many C4/ITV show (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Let's not get too nostalgic here. The early 80s was before digital, before cheap PCs, let alone those with multimedia capability. Doing stuff with film and the like would have been *expensive*, and then you were relying on getting your short film shown briefly on TV.
Re: (Score:2)
True, but it helped Jan Pinkava get a job at Pixar [bbc.co.uk].
Re: (Score:2)
True, but it helped Jan Pinkava get a job at Pixar.
Of course, I wasn't criticising the programme itself; on the contrary, in the context of its time it would have been an excellent window for talent in a society with far fewer multimedia outlets than exist today. Getting on TV was a big deal at that time. (Yes, I'm old enough- just- to consciously remember what it was like with only three TV channels and no breakfast television. Let alone the Internet...).
But even traditional stop-frame animation on a budget can be done *far* more cheaply than would have
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-367154178 4982515877&q=danger+mouse+-youtube [google.com]
As pointed out elsewhere not a BBC Show. DM was one of my favorite shows as a kid, thanks for bringing it up again so I can show my daughter.
Says who? (Score:3, Informative)
The article's keyboard-fu is weak (Score:1)
You know what I'm sick of? (Score:1, Troll)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
You will like what we tell you that you will like. You will watch videos where we tell you to watch videos. You will do so and you will like it.
Signed,
Mass-Market Media Companies
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
BBC show trailers (usually 1-2 for upcomming programs) after each program and then go right onto the next, no breaks in programs or anything. BBC IS advertisement free or as close as you can get.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
The BBC don't do ads. They've never done ads. They never will do ads. The BBC is the best media company on the face of the planet, the fact that it's almost impossible to paint them evil (if you live in the UK) really says something. You really could do with reading up on them.
The reason they pull videos from YouTube is they can't tell if you've paid for your TV license, and thats required to
Re: (Score:2)
Unless you think the MS DRM they are going to implement on their website is evil.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Never say never - there's no good reason why they can't eventually become advertiser supported, just like Channel 4.
impossible to paint them evil (if you live in the UK)
Well, having a paramiltary wing (in the form of the TV Licencing people) with a database of every house in the country and a fleet of TV Detector vans snooping around people's home looking for unlicenced TVs is fairly evil in my opinion.
The reason they pull videos from YouTube is they can't tell if you've paid for your
Re: (Score:2)
Just to compare this to the Australian experience. Here, the government regulates commercial broadcasters fairly loosely - much of the detail is left to "codes of practice" devised by a commercial entity comprised of a coalition of the commercial broadcasters.
With regards to commercial time, Government regulation limits advertising to a maximum of 16 minutes per hour. However, under the codes of practice, program sponsor
Re: (Score:2)
They advertise themselves all the time. They spend around ten minutes an hour showing vomit-enducing ads telling us how great and brilliant they are, and threatening to lock us up if we don't pay their tax.
If you like derivative soaps, disastrously bad sitcoms, mind-numbing 'reality' TV, and all the crap sport that none of the commercial channels wanted. Horse-jumping anyone?
Re: (Score:2)
We don't have a special "book tax" to pay for public libraries, why do we need a separate TV tax to pay for public broadcasting? Channel 4 is public broadcaster, but that survives by commercial advertising, why can't the BBC? Why do we even need public broadcasting? And if we really do
Re: (Score:2)
Other than the M6Toll, how many private motorways are there?
That's the biggest problem with the fee - commercial broadcasters do as good a job as the BBC - they've even been known to do a better job and they don't require a special tax. If the BBC were the only broadcasters then maybe you could justify it (though I think even then, the regressiveness of everyone paying the same amount, no matter how much th
Re: (Score:2)
That's right - all Australian commercial networks do all the things listed above every single day on every single prime-time program. I wond
Says who? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
download from youtube? (Score:2)
But the BBC shouldn't worry. What gets posted to youtube is in a crappy
highly compressed format that looks like garbage compared to a DVD. After
seeing something I like on youtube, I'd rather buy the DVD than keep the
piss-poor a/v file from youtube.
Re: (Score:2)
You know there is a python intepreter for Windows too. Hense, this script also works in Windows if you have python installed.
Full shows are already there (Score:5, Insightful)
I like the BBC. They seem to be one of the few big media organisations who actually 'get' the internet. Their whole online service is second to none, and their new iPlayer looks set to to revolutionise the way TV is watched. See what happens when you don't have advertisers and shareholders to answer to?
Adam Buxton (Score:3, Informative)
The BBC do have 'shareholders' kind of, the BBC Trust http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbctrust/ [bbc.co.uk] and to a certain extent the government, who are in charge of the charter renewal (and how much money the beeb gets). Also don't forget that the Daily Mail
Re: (Score:2)
Except for Top Gear, which gets yanked quite often due to copyright issues.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
And if you like Charlie Brooker, make sure to check out what he has to say about Macs [guardian.co.uk]!
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
They'd still have to proove that it's mostly UK Licence fee payers who are getting the benefit. That was one of the major points of the podcast/iPlayer consultation documents, and all the work coming out of BBC Backstage - the Licence Fee payer has to come first.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Although it's moot in this instance; Brooker's show (Screenwipe...excellent show btw) has so many clips of things that just getting the rights for any putative DVD of the show would be completely impossible. UKNova is your friend
WRONG! (Score:2)
Hahahaha... Something is streamed to your computer (an flv file, which vlc supports these days), you can easily grab the location of the flv, and therefor you can easily download low quality crappy youtube uploads if you really want to. Google "download youtube" before making such bold and incorrect statements.
I mean... wow... That's the first thing I did when I discovered youtube: find out how to download the content.
TV Licencing (Score:4, Insightful)
Inspector: I'm here to discuss your TV licence.
Me: I don't have one.
I: I know.
M: Come in and look, there's my TV, there's the aerial point with nothing plugged in to it. I can't get a signal at all in here.
I: What do you use the TV for?
M: Computer and DVDs.
I: Plan to watch any television in the future?
M: Like I said the signal is poor, so the answer is no.
He then put a mark on his clipboard and I haven't heard from the TV licencing dogs since. Goes to show how much they want that £140 a year though, if he did believe I was watching TV then I could go to court and face prison.
Re: (Score:2)
We used to have those here. The tax was abolished because of all the people scamming their way through a loophole. Now the tax has been replaced by two related taxes that don't require an inspector.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It's PBS with a police force, who have a database of every home in the country and everybody who has a TV has to "donate" and everybody has to donate the same amount. They use the database of every home in the country to make sure that pretty much every home has a TV license - if you don't have a licence (and even if you do have one but something went wrong in the bureaucracy) they send
Re: (Score:2)
Re:TV Licencing (Score:4, Interesting)
Except they do it commercial free, and produce much of their own material without commercial pressure.
Re: (Score:2)
They don't produce as much as they used to (and a lot of what they commission, they don't own, unlike years past), and a lot of it is still made with ratings pressure (as that's the main way they can show "value for the fee payer") Look at all the main BBC programmes - they all have equivalents on commercial TV. Even the arts and documentary programmes have commercial equivalents. There is very, very little that the BBC does that isn't being done
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
All of this to maintain a monopoly that's retarted the UK satellite market by 10 years or more (Sky boxes are *really* shitty compared to anything available in Europe and don't even try to compare to the US).
Re: (Score:2)
I'll happily pay 10 times the cost of the BBC (it's actually around 3.5 times), considering that Sky has infinity times more content. All the best things are on Sky, the films are all on there first, all the top American programmes, Premiership football, Super league, Ru
Re: (Score:2)
For $7.50 I could get basic cable. That would be ABC, CBS, NBC, FOX, UPN, PBS, a couple of independents, c-span, local cable news and some other crap. Most of this I could get off the air, but i'm lazy. Radio, well... I lost track of how many stations there are. There are 25 stations in the basic lineup. Many people who subscribe to basic via other servic
Re: (Score:2)
But most of Freeview is commercial channels, who don't get any of the licence fee money (and it seems like a large percentage of Freeview is shopping channels and "phone in and win" channels). The only reason why the BBC and the other Freevie
Re: (Score:2)
Actually, I think Freeview is essentially part-owned by Sky - not sure how much control they have, though, especially since Ofcom probably wouldn't be too happy if they tried anything.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
There is also Freeview which is getting increaingly good 40 odd free channels with about 5-10 digital only commercial channels with anything worth watching (Freeview would have died without Aunty comming in an giving the kiss of life, she's rather keen on going digital)
I'm not saying th
Re: (Score:2)
12 episodes could easily be 2 years worth of episodes. I'm not sure why a series has so few episodes compared to American ones, but that's the way it is.
i'm not offended by paying for programing
I'm not offended by paying for programming (I happily pay for Homechoice/Tiscali TV) - I'm offended by having to pay for channels that I don't want and I'm even more offended that I face the risk of a 1000 pound fine or jail if I want to watch a competitors free to vie
Re: (Score:2)
One reason I got BBC america in the first place was for classic doctor who. I rather thought that they would be running the whole thing like the local PBS station did, in order, from begining to end. Instead they showed the first year or two of Tom Baker... over and over again. This trend also seemed to be consistent with other classic programs. I can't
Re: (Score:2)
But for me, one programme doesn't justify $22 a month, nor does any of it justify the heavy fines/jail time. Would you really want every one in America to have to pay $22 a month to PBS, whether they want to or not, no matter if they can afford it or not, or face a $2000 fine, jail time and a criminal record for the crime of watching a non PBS channel without paying for PBS? Does that
Re: (Score:2)
Together with ITV they're reaching crisis point (ITV is ripe for takeover now) - you can't fund a channel on advertising alone, when you're competing with Sky who have a huge subscription charge (~$1200 a year) *and* wall to wall advertising. Not to mention an effective monopoly that means you have to pay that if you want more than the basic channels.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not happy about it, and no, those 5 TV channels and 11 radio stations aren't worth it. More importantly I'm not happy that I have to pay it, even though I don't watch or listen those stations and that if I don't pay it (but still want to watch channels that I do want to watch) I get a 1000 pound fine or go to jail. I'm not happy about
Re: (Score:2)
Would it make you feel better if they just added £140 onto your taxes? Because then you wouldn't notice it so much?
Re: (Score:2)
IANAL, but: looks like you got lucky, but, as often clarified here on
(I guess the original reason was to make prosecution easier: they do not have to catch/prove you actaully watching the TV)
Re: (Score:2)
I bought a TV from Currys, having been over this before. It went like this
Shop: you will need to fill in this tv license form.
Me: OK, postcode is SW1A2AA
Shop (reading from screen): Prime Minister and first lor....
Me: Yup
I do have a license, but I'm blowed if I'm going to be bullied into giving away personal details and marketing information.
Could this be.... (Score:1)
Additional content... (Score:2)
Awesome BBC (Score:4, Interesting)
Rock on BBC!
Re: (Score:2)
Spelling.... (Score:3, Informative)
Yeah, I know...it's a quote from the story....
What's journalism coming to?
Re: (Score:2)
God, I loved that show.
What a disaster (Score:2)
YouTube videos are a nightmare - the BBC should be embracing bit torrent and as little compression as possible.
They are (Score:2)
This coming on the heels of this piece of news: (Score:2)
Big content producers are going to want to retain control over their own content, obviously. And it's so easy to do so with the internet. You don't need youtube if you can develop your own video site with flash player and all in six months.
What youtube should do is offer to license its software or host the content, and charge for licensing and/or hosting. It can slap ads on those videos that aren't paying for either service, but not for their paying customer
iPlayer alternative (Score:2)
*yeah, I know, proxy servers make such things pointless, but I would still expect them to try.
Finally, some real BBC content for Democracy (Score:2)
On another note, Democracy says that you can view Google/YouTube and Yahoo! videos, but while the searches work great, clicking the download link results in "Not Found" 100% of the time. Has anyone else experienced this and found a fix? I'd really like to ha
Re: (Score:1, Interesting)