Three MythTV Linux Distros Compared 176
An anonymous reader writes "Linux.com has a comparison article up looking at three MythTV-focused Linux distributions. The piece looks at Mythdora, Mythbuntu, and KnoppMyth, with an eye towards ease of installation and the actual utility of the install. From the article: 'For regular system maintenance, KnoppMyth simply isn't in the same ballpark as MythBuntu and MythDora. The live CD heritage of Knoppix means you cannot update individual packages, which is fine if you like that, but for an always-on system like a MythTV back end, I'd prefer flexibility and configurability of a mainline distro. When all is said and done, if I were building my TiVo replacement today, I would do it with MythDora. MythBuntu shows a lot of promise, and I will give the final 7.10 release another look (in part because I run Ubuntu on my desktop machines), but it isn't ready yet.'" Linux.com and Slashdot are both owned by SourceForge.
MythDora? (Score:5, Funny)
Oh man...
Re: (Score:2)
These boxes connect to your local network,and stream various media files to your TV. You are limi
Re:MythDora? (XBMC on its way) (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Oh man..."
Awsome!
Too bad nerds don't usually breed so nobody here will get it.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
MythTV for PS3 (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
(Watching HDTV on mythtv trunk on fc7 right now)
Re:MythTV for PS3 (Score:5, Informative)
MythTV is modular. You do the tuning/recording/processing on the backend, which talks to the frontend (display) via the network. These functions can be on the same box, but with the PS3 as a frontend, you would want a separate backend.
http://linuxtv.org/ [linuxtv.org] has info on supported devices. My tuner of choice is the HDHomeRun, a network based dual HD tuner.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:MythTV for PS3 (Score:4, Informative)
The PS3 would make a good MythTV frontend (display) system. You're better off using a Linux box as the backend. That way you can still use the PS3 as a game system or Blue-Ray DVD player -- rather than leaving it in Linux mode all the time to record programs. As for tuners. the HDHomeRun is a good network-based HD tuner option.
> I have been using MythTV for something like 4 years now just because there isn't anything as good but I really hate it. It's so freaking slow and buggy. I mean once you have hundreds of recorded shows the thing just slows to a crawl. It takes forever just to delete a program. This all seems totally ridiculous considering the relatively tiny amount of data it is managing. Then there are the bugs like when it gets into some sort of bad state and the menus don't work (you can open the menu but can't select anything). Very poorly written piece of software if you ask me.
It's hard to say what the issue is from that description.
- Slow performance: All the standard Linux tuning applies. MythTV uses MySQL extensively, so tuning that performance is important.
- Slow Delete: File system choice is important. ext* is very slow in deleting files. I use JFS because it deletes almost instantly. In newer MythTV versions, there is an option to do deletes in smaller chunks to avoid this problem on ext* systems.
- I haven't seen bugs like those you described. I use 0.20.1, and it works well. MythTV is not ideal.. setup is difficult, as is configuration.. The menu systems could use some major improvements and configurability. It's definitely the worst DVR going, except for everything else.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
You are no champion for those that "just want to make it work".
You want to whine about something. This happens to be it. Something else would do equally well.
When it comes to "just want to make it work", a poorly tuned mysql db is just an annoyance and is no show stopper.
WARNING: Critical problem with out of date distros (Score:5, Informative)
If you download one of these distros make sure they have updated it with a
Re:WARNING: Critical problem with out of date dist (Score:3, Informative)
ABI change? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Rebuilding MythTV is trivial under Ubuntu.
My backend is running 6.10, my frontend is running 7.10 and I built 0.20.2 on both without any trouble.
Re:WARNING: Critical problem with out of date dist (Score:2)
What about Yahoo? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe, if you're doing it by yourself. It ain't gonna be pretty, nor reliable.
Re: (Score:2)
i tried this last night, and it worked great for me in feisty. and schedules direct is finally accepting sign-ups, so all is well. you get a free trial period (1 week i think) before you have to pay.
Anyone have an alternate link? (Score:2)
Upside (Score:3, Interesting)
By the time I'm finished, of course, it'll be obsolete and I shall have to start over, just like the fourth bridge paint job. Perpetual geeking if you like.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Just the avoidance of easter eggs and little hacks to re-enable critical features is a nice improvement.
A possible source for guide data (Score:4, Interesting)
Here's an option that could be considered: buy a BeyondTV license from Snapstream, then use your username and password along with a little reverse engineering to login legally to their guide service. BeyondTV's guide data is included with your purchase -- no monthly fees. Currently it costs $70, so after a year it would have paid for itself at the proposed $5/month.
That said, I should say I'm pretty pleased with the actual BeyondTV software, even though it is Windows-based. I spent about 2 weeks trying to get Myth (MythDora) and Freevo to work at all on a pretty vanilla new Dell PC with new hardware reported to be compatible. I downloaded BTV just to see if the hardware was to blame, and after a grand total of 15 minutes, I had a working PVR with multiple tuners. The software is customizable as well, so I can do nightly batch processing like I was planning to do with the Linux box, although the included Xvid transcoding works automatically if you want to do that.
Re:A possible source for guide data (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Here's an option that could be considered: buy a BeyondTV license from Snapstream, then use your username and password along with a little reverse engineering to login legally to their guide service. BeyondTV's guide data is included with your purchase -- no monthly fees. Currently it costs $70, so after a year it would have paid for itself at the proposed $5/month.
I've got an old ReplayTV (the kind that could automagically skip commercials and came with a lifetime schedule subscription) sitting on a shelf. I would love to make use of that lifetime subscript for my myth setup.
Re: (Score:2)
While that is a technical possibility, it cannot be done legally since BeyondTV's license agreement specifically prohibits it. You can do it, b
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Most of that time was just waiting for the Ubuntu installer to do it's thing while I jumped in and out of the home office doing other things.
MythTV distros over-rated (Score:4, Interesting)
A dedicated distro may be here today, gone tomorrow, if it doesn't build a large enough community. That's not what I expect from the operating system that I'm gonna use on the MythTV server that I will build next month.
I think I'm just going to use CentOS or Ubuntu (the LTS edition - long-term support) and pull MythTV from one of the popular repositories.
Re:MythTV distros over-rated (Score:5, Insightful)
Because many of us already tried that and couldn't get it to work. MythTV is one of the worst software I had to set up. It is just wrong to expect an end user for a PVR to even know what a database is, let alone having to set it up and deal with the error messages, even if it something popular such as MySQL. MythTV just needs to be as easy as the commercial packages to setup.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, I agree that MythTV per se is a bit dorky, and it might be a chore for the non-technical user (or at least the user not too familiar with Linux) to install and configure. Yes, they do need to make the install / config process easier. And yes, I think I see now the point of using a dedicated distro.
I had no problems with the setup - but then I'm fairly familiar with the OS.
Hm, still, the average enthusiast should not find it too difficult. Sometimes the hardware might get tricky, but that's a
Re: (Score:2)
> still, the average enthusiast should not find it too difficult.
It can be a chore for anybody. A non-technical should not even touch it. I have been using Linux for at least 6 years now (both desktop and servers). Not exactly a newbie. Although most of my problems were related to poor compatibility of my tuner card at the time. But I was annoyed with other aspects of the install as well. People have varying luck with MythTV. For some, it just works and
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I've set up my share of myth boxen, and I think it can be done by a newb (after all, this is what got me into linux). Sure, problems can arise, but if you go with a popular distro like ubuntu, then odds are the wiki docs will cover the majority, if not all of them.
That assumes a newb with quite a large amount of dedication. Many people who are not regular Linux users seem to install software like this:
I would like to have faith. I would like to believe that newbs read forums and ask useful que
Re: (Score:2)
Ubuntu, Xubuntu and Kubuntu are all really the same distro with different meta-packages installed (ubuntu-desktop, xubuntu-desktop and kubuntu-desktop respectively). From a quick perusal of Mythbuntu's website it would appear that they operate on much the same principle, aside from being in a separate repository.
It sure would be nice to be able to do
on a vanilla Ubuntu Server install (Ubuntu Server is really just Ubuntu without any of the aforementioned desktop packag
Re: (Score:2)
that being said setup could certainly be made easier
Re: (Score:2)
No offense, but that's fucking idiotic. If you're building a DIY PVR, and you decide to build it on top of Linux, it behooves you to understand the basics of system administration. This includes how to run a mysql database, among other things. Or were you just expecting the system to magically auto-maintain itself?
Re: (Score:2)
> No offense, but that's fucking idiotic. If you're building a DIY PVR, and you decide to build it on top of Linux, it behooves you to understand the basics of system administration.
That bigotic "Those dumb users" mindset especially when basic usability testing is lacking is actually offensive. Don't know about you or what a majority of MythTV users do, but I DON'T build dedicated PVRs. I installed a PVR software on
Re: (Score:2)
Hey, did I say that? No! I said the users should be expected to *learn* something. God forbid...
Don't know about you or what a majority of MythTV users do, but I DON'T build dedicated PVRs
Then you're most certainly in the minority, and your needs may not be well served by Myth.
I just don't think it should come down to that for an entertainment app.
If that's all your Myth install is to you, then you're definitely in the minority. Myth isn't an "app". It's a softwar
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, and it picks a default. So if you don't care, why didn't you just ignore it? Honestly, if that's the extent of your complaints, you obviously gave up too easily.
Incidentally, if what you say of your experience is t
Re: (Score:2)
My biggest problem is that the MythTV distribution for Ubuntu is not built with XvMC support. My computer (Athlon 64 3000+, 1 GB, GeForce FX 5200) is perfectly suited to run as a dual back/front-end box if XvMC is enabled (accor
Re: (Score:2)
I'm following the "Install MythTV" section of this page:
www.pchdtv.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1938
Note that I'm using Ubuntu Feisty Fawn instead of SuSe. I have also already installed some development tools to compile the utilities that came with my pchdtv 5500.
Problems:
1. Path to frontend.h is wrong. Quick file search is easy to fix.
2. Configure complains about lack of LAME MP3 library. Ins
Re: (Score:2)
The sections on Shared-Library Requirements for MythTV and Environment Variables for MythTV seem to be what I was looking for, except that the instructions don't match what I see in Ubuntu, and it doesn't say at all how to permanently change these variables. At least I know from previous research that "export" will set them temporarily during a console sessio
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If there is an automated build for lirc, that can be assimilated into a normal distro just as well.
apt-get install mythtv works pretty much the same way either way.
Automagic setup of mysql with mythtv is going to work the same exact way even with some crusty edition of Debian.
Reinvent what wheel? (Score:3, Insightful)
Once I can actually read the article, I'll comment in full. But to state that one cannot upgrade software in KnoppMyth is dead wrong.
Regards,
Cecil
Re: (Score:2)
I just did a fresh install of knoppmyth yesterday (in preparation of your impending release of the next version), followed by an 'apt-get update; apt-get upgrade'.
I had to hold the lirc stuff due to two packages wanting to replace the same file... but other than that, no problems at all.
Re: (Score:2)
18 months is not too bad. The Ubuntu OS upgrade is not too bad either, from what I've heard.
Maybe I'll give it a try.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't see what's the point of building a dedicated distro for MythTV. Why reinvent the wheel? Why not use a well-known, established distribution, and just create a software repository with MythTV?
Because MythTV isntallation is a pain in the ass. Even with all the packages in a repository. After messing around with your proposed method for a weekend, I downloaded MythDora on a whim, popped in the disk, and was off and running in an hour. Not that I particularly like Fedora, but automated installation of the trickier bits is what did it for me.
Re: (Score:2)
The demo video on their site is impressive.
Re: (Score:2)
pppppffffft. Bull puckey.
They're actually harder to use. That's not even counting if you want something other than what in the can.
Any dedicated MythTV distro I've ever tried has made me want to throw the install CD across the room.
Configure? Yeah. Update? Not so much. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
MythTV Box (Score:3, Interesting)
If someone does this right I'd think they could have quite a hit on their hands.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
If you're in the UK there's always these guys http://efficientpc.co.uk/desktops/isis/ [efficientpc.co.uk] Not sure about the zero effort upgrades, if they take the packages from a repository it can't be that hard.
I often look at their website with the temptation to splurge some cash, not sure about their laptop packages though. I don't like the idea of buying a laptop and then not being able to use all the hardware that comes with it. Even if the hardware is spurious.
Re:MythTV Box (Score:4, Informative)
Installing it the painful way... (Score:4, Insightful)
I'm currently trying to do what the distro should be doing for me; installing layer and application at a time.
Of course, I'm also trying to do this on a system put together from more recent hardware, the m-atx Gigabyte platform GA-MA69GM-S2H Socket which uses AM2 and the AMD 690G Northbridge. And a USB connected ATSC HDTV card.
I'm finding it's a snap to install Ubuntu, LAMP, and MythTV but almost impossible to get any further than configuration. And that is the problem. I can install WinXP and SageTV and have all these components work right now. So it still is the main problem for Linux and any distro - hardware support.
Yes, the larger question still is open versus restricted driver support. But at the end of the day, especially the present day like tonight, I'd rather have my hardware recognize a restricted driver and install it seamlessly than having the "freedom" of an open source driver. If move to open from a restricted, then shouldn't that be the incentive for hardware manufactures to provide these drivers?
Books on MythTV (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Why Mythtv when XBMC exists (Score:2, Insightful)
I pulled the drive and stuck it in the computer in the other room, and decided to try XBox Media Center an my old xbox I had sitting around.
Re:Why Mythtv when XBMC exists (Score:4, Insightful)
Weird, I had no idea you could plug a video capture card into an XBox, let alone set up XBMC to use it to record TV. Got any links?
Re: (Score:2)
Fuck, I hate it when people say this. Yeah, sure, if all you watch is mainstream, popular television, particularly if you track new series, downloading might just work for you. But for anyone who watches even slightly off-the-beaten-track stuff (say, re-runs of America's Test Kitchen), good luck finding a well seeded torrent, or be prepared to wait for weeks while your downloads trickle in.
Re: (Score:2)
That's why.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
- It doesnt allow you to decode hi def video.
- Contrary to what you claim, it only outputs at 480i.
- It's hard to update since it's illegal to distribute in binary form, so you're stuck to deal with l33t forums and such to get one, or find the MS compiler and compile the sources (on windows).
- There is alot of formats it doesnt support, like ogg, matroska video, vob subtitles, quicktime, mp4..etc
- For some re
Re: (Score:2)
720p works okay with XVID/DIVX, but you are right that H.264 and 1080 are out of the question sadly.
- Contrary to what you claim, it only outputs at 480i.
No, the XBOX can do 1080i/p, and can upscale video to those resolutions better than many expensive TVs or DVD players. There are even a few games that support it, Dragons Lair HD being the only one that springs instantly to mind.
- It's hard to update since it's illegal to distribute in binary form, so you're stu
Re: (Score:2)
Everything else just sucks by comparison. I tried various things for Windows, including Media Portal. All were rubbish. Media Portal, for example, has a really slow menu system. On XBMC, you move a highlight and it's instant. On MP, every time you move there is a scrolling
Some comparision.... (Score:5, Informative)
The comparison seemed rather dull and uninformed. The installation, default theme and the "running" systems are compared. In the end, it comes to "convenience". This is where the author's lack of information really shines.
To stated that one cannot install additional software on KnoppMyth is wrong. You can install a
In addition to MythTV and it's official plugins KnoppMyth includes mplayer, xine, webmin (how is that for conveniences?), rrd (hit Apache and see how your system as been performing, seems pretty convenient to me), MythWebFlash, irblaster support and so much more.
In addition to the official themes, we also include most if not all of "Juski's" http://juski.co.uk/ [juski.co.uk]themes are included as well. So while the author didn't like Titivillus, there is nothing stopping him or any user from using any theme. Got an ipod? What to take that show with you? Myth2ipod http://www.myth2ipod.com/ [myth2ipod.com]is include in KnoppMyth. Or stream it with MythStreamTV.
Both NFS and Samba are included and configured. All one has to do is start the daemons. Got an nvidia based video adapter? Guess what is automatically installed on first boot? Navigate with a keyboard? KnoppMyth includes out the box support for multiple remotes. Guess which distro was the first to officially support the popular Hauppauge PVR line of hardware MPEG tuners?
The ideal behind KnoppMyth is to make it easy to get a Linux/MythTV powered PVR is a quick and easy manner. Some of you already get this... Think appliance. KnoppMyth is into it's fifth year and we'll continue to improve and develop it. Much thanks to member of the community for the improvements, ideals and support. I do wish MythDora and MythBuntu well, however as I see it... They are threading on ground already paved.
Regards,
Cecil
Re: (Score:2)
Regards,
Slightly OT... Lightweight MythTV Front-end (Score:2)
Lately, I've started looking at a device called the Neuros OSD... I don't know much about the state of development of the OSS add-ons but if someone gets either the MythTV front-end running on it, or writes a front-end that is
Re: (Score:2)
Wussy (Score:2)
Happy with MythDora 4.0 (Score:2)
I think it took me about as much time to angle the new SATA drive into the machine as it did to do the install and an equal amount of time (because I
How does LinuxMCE compare? (Score:2)
Re:And People Complain About The Many Version Of V (Score:5, Informative)
if you're going to watch HD it's best to compile it yourself so it can do the most cpu optimizations (make sure to enable them via the appropriate configure flag)
Re: (Score:2)
Just curious.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
The big ones, but also enabled in many pre-compiled packages:
* cmov, about 10% (supported by Pentium Pro and later, but not some VIA processors)
* enabling MMX & SSE, about 10-15%
Total you can add about 30-35% with full optimization on a P4, vs. compiling for a Pentium Pro, which is the default. These numbers are somewhat old, but there is no reason to think they have changed app
Distro? You Want Distro? You Can't Handle the... (Score:3, Funny)
New Slogans
Yes, I realize, a distro != fork, but now-a-days with the vast differences, it may almost amount to one.
Re:Distro? You Want Distro? You Can't Handle the.. (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
If t-shirts were like distros or operating systems, I'd have to wear blue every time I wanted to play a game.
So I ask you, is that you, BadAnalogyGuy?
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
It's not so bad. We're geeks... we only have to choose once every month or three.
-
It IS slashdotted. (Score:2)
Slashdot takes out other subsidiary's servers.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, by all means lets use Enormoware (C,R,TM) where you have $50/hr call center 'help' and mass incompatibilities. And lets also spend the next 50 hours downloading 'obscure.dll' only to get the machine to 'lock up' every 10 minutes.
Re: (Score:2)
apt-get
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
My issue, though is your statement, "...but as I had no idea if changing the default password would break functionally, I had to ditch it."
- So, what you're saying is you did zero research, and
Re: (Score:2)
The article didn't really address anything substantive. The really tricky parts like ivtv and lirc weren't even addressed. It's really impossible to judge competing distributions if you don't mention that sort of stuff. This article was too superficial to be useful.