David X. Cohen of Futurama Talks About the Movie 141
Joel Keller writes "I conducted a brief interview with David X. Cohen, EP and show-runner for Futurama, about the release of the new DVD, "Futurama: Bender's Big Score," as well as the return of his show to TV. The interview was posted to TV Squad this morning. In it, Cohen talks about how the movies will be split up into episodes, some of the inside references that they inserted for the die-hards, and a quick preview of what the second Futurama movie is going to be about."
To Mix Memes (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Say, isn't David Cohen's middle initial not really X?
Re: (Score:2)
(It's not redundant - I believe that's the correct quote. Unless there were multiple ones.)
Re:To Mix Memes (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I, for one, bow to our new amphibian overlords.
Comedy Central? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Comedy Central? (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
In all seriousness, I agree. With the exception of South Park, Comedy Central really doesn't have a whole lot going for it. With Sci-fi, well they had Dead Like Me for a while but they g
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If only for their decade of supporting South Park, even during times when there was great pressure to take it off the air, and for giving Parker and Stone sufficient freedom and control of the show to really make it something special, Comedy Central will always have a place in the Satellite TV of my Mind. I don't happen to subscribe to cable orsatellite, and I won't watch network television, but I've watched ever
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Comedy Central? (Score:4, Informative)
The show's been on Cartoon Network for the last 7 years not Comedy Central
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Comedy Central != Cartoon Network.
The show's been on Cartoon Network for the last 7 years not Comedy Central
He was talking about MST3K.
MST3K was on Comedy Central/Comedy Channel for seven years. It's the only show to survive from the network's launch that survived that long. So it's hard to understand how someone could use MST3K as an example of Comedy Central killing off good shows quickly...
Granted, as the show went its timeslot got shifted around, it got split up into "MST Hour" format, etc. - and then the seventh season was remarkably short... But still, it ran seven seasons. It even survived major cast
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Oh yeah, five years is real quick. BTW, that's longer than they had under Fox's reign.
MST3K (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Comedy Central? (Score:4, Informative)
Zwuh?
The Comedy Channel/Comedy Central picked up a quirky little program from a Minneapolis UHF station, and turned it into a national sensation (turning itself one of the top-tier cable networks at the same time). MST3K ran on CC for seven seasons.
Honestly, Futurama would be more at risk returning to Fox -- the network that already short-sightedly cancelled the program once -- than to a cable network like Comedy Central, which has typically taken very good care of its cash cows.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
AdultSwim (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
just like Family Guy right? It was all [AS] and had nothing to do with DVD sales?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Sure its filler material but its damn good filler.
Its still insanely popular. I dont think DVD sales would completely demonstrate that.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I think it worked both ways, meaning Futurama (and Family Guy) also saved Adult Swim.
It was the mass appeal of Futurama that allowed AS to experiment with alternative shows. I believe Futurama and Family Guy would be considered lead-in shows, which all the remaining shows benefited from anyone who decided not to change th
Re: (Score:2)
Re:AdultSwim (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Besides where else would we get Dr. Rockzo the Rock and Roll clown?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
As a fellow venture fan, I'd recommend Stroker and Hoop to you.
Re: (Score:2)
honestly they might have done more harm than good given some of the crap thats hitting AS these days. I dont think AS was ever in any real danger honestly. Its not like cartoon network was going to make big money running any of their regular fare in the late night time slot. Using that space for anime and off the wall cartoons was probably a pretty easy choice. Admittedly the success of Futurama and Family Guy helped them bring in more shows but to some degree I wish they would get back to their roots a
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Oblig. (Score:2)
Or...
Calculon: I've seen better acting from extras in Godzilla movies.
His show? (Score:5, Interesting)
Didn't some guy named Matt Groening [wikipedia.org] have something to do with it?
Re:His show? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:His show? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:His show? (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
I've seen it (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
i thought it was great. though. can't wait to buy the real version. i hope it has commentary!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I thought it was obvious as soon as i noticed their voices were the same.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I didn't like it (Score:2)
Here I am sitting at the computer while it's still playing in the other room. I found it dead boring, not funny and with no coherent plot. This is coming from a huge Futurama fan who has bought the DVD box sets of all 4 seasons.
I guess this is going to be yet another series that I will have to forget was ever continued after it was "over". Careful what you wish for, huh?
My favorite part (Score:4, Interesting)
My favorite part was during the opening graphics - the "old" cartoon showing before the Planet Express ship crashes into the billboard. I had to stop the movie and jerk back a few tears, it was the most intense feeling of nostalgia I've felt in a very long time.
Re:My favorite part (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
Oblig. (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Oblig. (Score:5, Funny)
Well, bless. . . (Score:2)
Mars University Challenge (Score:5, Interesting)
Speaking of Futurama, a week or two back, the BBC's intellectual quiz show "University Challenge [wikipedia.org]" had a whole round (3 questions) on "Science References in Futurama"!
If I remember the questions were along the lines of:
(I.e. the contestants could conceivably have got the answers without knowing the show - more detail was given for q1 than I can remember - although they didn't do too well and Paxo looked a bit bemused).
I think that this confirms the sad truth that "Futurama" must be the most intellectual TV show of recent years (excluding University Challenge).
Answers: Re:Mars University Challenge (Score:3, Informative)
2. (Hermes) Look it up, ya lazy bum!: http://www.peelified.com/cgi-bin/Futurama/3-000058-1/ [peelified.com] (read down a bit; further info at http://www.mathsci.appstate.edu/~sjg/futurama/cubes.html [appstate.edu] )
3. Aleph naught
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Something should not have to be boring to be intellectual.
- RG>
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
No, its not Futurama that's sad. Futurama deserves to be very happy. Its all those other shows (and that includes the CSI genre as well as SF) with less intelligent references to science (and more glaring scientific errors) in an entire season than Fut
Re: (Score:2)
There was also "Old Fortran" and Kleiner (in a very odd-shaped bottle) :-)
Re: (Score:2)
Wha? I thought my Futurama knowledge was boundless but I can't for the life of me recall a Schrodinger's Cat parody. The closest I can think of is a reference to Heisenberg in "Luck of the Fryrish." Racetrack PA announcer: And the winner is number three, in a quantum finish. Professor Farnsworth: No fair! You changed the outcome by measuring it!
And quoting the WP article on Schroedinger's cat:
It is accepted that a subatomic particle can exist in a superposition of states, a combination of possible states. According to the Copenhagen Interpretation, the superposition only settles into a definite state upon observation. This is known as collapse or measurement.
Schrödinger proposed his "cat", after a suggestion of Albert Einstein's. Schrödinger states that if a scenario existed where a cat's state of life or death could be made dependent on the state of a subatomic particle, and also isolated from any possible observation, the state of the cat itself would be a quantum superposition according to the Copenhagen interpretation, at least.
Basicly the winner was and was not number three, in a superposition of states. By measuring it, they collapsed the state to be the winner just like Schroedinger's cat which would collapse into a state of dead or alive.
How you figured it was related to Heisenberg I don't know - his most famous part is the uncertainty principle about measuring several quantities at once, but it says nothing of changing anything. So full score on the Futurama trivia, no marks
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Still, I don't remember a reference to a quantum physicist in that scene, so its probably something else.
Seen it. (Score:3, Interesting)
The only parts I didn't like were the song and dance routines. They were really poor when compared to the opera piece they did.
They really went nuts with the time travel. Which I liked. Sure it got confusing, but it was cheap and easy TIME TRAVEL. Chaos just comes with it.
I plan on buying the DVD when it comes out to show my support.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Is it an american thing? Turn every half decent programme into a musical?
There's no *way* I'd watch it in a cinema now. Wait for the DVD when you can fast forward the singing bits.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Wait 'till you hear Mark Hamil as the Chanukah Zombie.
As for the film, on the downside, no full frontal Amy Wong or Leela nudity.
On the plus side No Zapp Brannigan nudity of any kind whatsoever! (Oh, thank you, sweet Jeebus!)
Re: (Score:2)
1) I was a "little" intoxicated
2) I'm used to watching it in 20 min episodes (i hate commercials)
So what TIME will it be on??? (Score:2)
Or is it Nov 27th, 2008? If it is, then those people could have said so. I mean, today being Nov 26th, when you here it will be on Nov 27th, you think tomorrow.
Re: (Score:2)
OB Reference (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
WAAAAARGH (Score:2, Flamebait)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm region 1 and I'm still thinking of downloading for now. Don't get me wrong... I bought and own the TV DVDs but I'll wait for the box set of the movies. I've been screwed too many times by buying things as they became available only to be pissed off when a box set comes out later with "never before seen extras."
Fool me 50 or so times... shame on me!
My only concern is how bad it looks for the future of the series if everyone thinks like me. So... erm... forget I mentioned it.
Re: (Score:2)
Bender's Big BORE (Score:3)
Am I the only one that found the movie to be completely bland and devoid of any of the uniqueness that made the show what it was?
Don't get me wrong, though! I am a HUGE Futurama fan. I watched the show from the beginning and thought it was going to best new thing since sliced bread. And to be canceled ... Part of me believes that this was the most ignorant decision ever made in television history. But I also understand that Futurama is NOT geared towards the bottom of the IQ barrel like the rest of today's television, and it wasn't going to last knowing that intelligent audiences don't make "good little consumers."
I honestly got the impression that they just bought the movie's script from an unrelated writer and stamped the good ol' Futurama cast on the project. This wasn't the Futurama I knew and loved.
One of the things I loved about the show was its witty references to technology and how the 1,000 years of advancement had only resulted in backwards-thinking and useless gadgets. Indeed, this concept is enshrined in the name of the show, Futurama, which is a reference to the now-cheesy, B-ish displays at World Fairs that attempted to predict technology of the next era (e.g. today). Those goofy gizmos never materialized in our own time, but they seem to thrive in the year 3000.
So I didn't find any connection to the series besides the unsettling number of previous characters they decided to throw in for nostalgia. Most of them were out of place, but some of them were just down right degrading to the movie and .. believe it or not .. even the show. For instance, just why exactly did they feel the need to utterly ruin the emotions we all felt in Jurassic Bark's story of Seymour?!?! I won't apologize for the punctuation. It's a mystery to me what was going through their heads when they decided to event put Seymour in the movie, let alone killing him in the most lame, unexpected, and unimaginative manner. Wasn't the idea that Seymour lived out his years missing Fry? So all of a sudden we have him getting to see Fry right before he gets burnt to death? SERIOUSLY! WHAT THE FUCK!?
I could have lived with a mediocre movie, but they had to go and screw up part of my love of the series too!
Try harder! Try again!
Anybody else smell that? (Score:2)
I certainly hope your not one of the writers because I just know you could have done better than that.
Re: (Score:2)
But the movie sucked. It really did.
The jokes were boring, and the pace was just too slow. If this was written during the strike that explains a lot.
douchebag (Score:3, Insightful)