Lack of Molybdenum May Have Delayed Life on Earth 89
esocid writes "Scientists from around the world have reconstructed changes in Earth's ancient ocean chemistry during a broad sweep of geological time, from about 2.5 to 0.5 billion years ago. They have discovered that a deficiency of oxygen and the heavy metal molybdenum in the ancient deep ocean may have delayed the evolution of animal life on Earth for nearly 2 billion years. Bacteria cannot fix nitrogen efficiently when they are deprived of molybdenum. And if bacteria can't fix nitrogen fast enough, then eukaryotes — a kind of organism that includes plants, pachyderms and people — are in trouble because eukaryotes cannot fix nitrogen themselves at all. Ariel Anbar, a co-author of the research of Arizona State University, stated that "eukaryotes depend on bacteria having an easy enough time fixing nitrogen that there's enough to go around. So if bacteria were struggling to get enough molybdenum, there probably wouldn't have been enough fixed nitrogen for eukaryotes to flourish.""
Re: (Score:2)
Whats that all about?
Re:Excitement (Score:4, Informative)
You can also read the history of the combustion engine [about.com]. The first combustion engines were based on gunpowder, then coal powered steam engines, coal gas, and finally petroleum. At the same time, engineers experimented with one stroke, two stroke and four stroke engines with vertical and V slant pistons.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
model T (Score:2, Informative)
Model T, 1909-27 designed to run on corn and hemp ethanol (Henry really disliked petroleum fuels, thought they were dirty and disgusting, liked nice clean and clear corn squeezings better), prohibition basically finished off ethanol as a fuel, although it was semi popular up until then, albeit as a blend with regular gasoline, already the petroleum exploiters were pushing their way in to total control. Incidentally, later on he als
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
cheap energy won't die completely for another hundred years, but cheap oil is already coming to an end... the most likely
Re:Excitement (Score:4, Informative)
I didn't know that there was any other way besides coal/coke for the ancients to have done blacksmithing, although wikipedia says it can be done with charcoal. I have no idea how charcoal would work. The Wikipedia article isn't quite accurate: You can't blacksmith using just coal; the coal is turned to coke [wikipedia.org] by oxygenating it with a blower, and pouring water on it. At least that's what they taught in my college blacksmithing class. I can't remember the fellow's name, unfortunately, but he was 72 at the time and travelled to different universities teaching his dying art to the younger generation. This was some time in the late 1970s. He'd smithed Gerald Ford's wrought iron fence, at the time of the class Carter was president.
I really should build a forge.
I'm a blacksmith (Score:1)
Hello,
I am a blacksmith. I use straight coal for my forging. The act of burning the coal transforms the coal around it into coke. This coke is what I then move into the fire. The water he was using was to keep the fire from expanding (probably had a poor fire pot or a side draft forge). Now I do use special coal. Metallurgical grade coal burns hotter and cleaner than heating coal.
As for using other fuels. I've successfully used charcoal in my forge. In fact charcoal has been used longer than c
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
No problem. I encourage you to build that forge you spoke of. Depending on your location, coal, gas or even charcoal and coke are readily available. A simple side draft forge is easily made by placing a pipe across a metal bowl with a supply of air at the other end. Best to you!
I don't know if you're in America or even east coast, but if you are, I highly recommend the http://www.folkschool.org/ [folkschool.org]John Campbell School for solid introduction to blacksmithing.
Re: (Score:2)
terraforming and other things (Score:5, Interesting)
Also, this makes me wonder what those eukaryotes were doing for the first 2 billion years. Were they undergoing all sorts of genetic mutations that primed them for takeover once the situation changed? IOW, I wonder what would have happened if this little molybdenum problem had resolved earlier. Would the eukaryotes continued to flounder (pun!) because of a lack of genetic diversity? Or would they have just as rapidly developed putting the current day well into the cockroaches-rule-the-earth epoch?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:terraforming and other things (Score:4, Insightful)
The fact that eukareotes did not evolve it doesn't mean they couldn't have -- it just means that their environment they evolved in didn't need that ability, likely because prokaryotes evolved it already. (Or they didn't actually originally need it -- which may make more sense because if one assumes that that evolution was necessary for eukaryotes, and they evolved from prokaryotes, then how did they *lose* that ability?)
Again, not a biologist but the critical reader in me gets a "I have a hammer, so everything is a nail" vibe from this theory.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, I'm no biologist but right off the cuff I think there are some problems with this "theory"... it makes an assumption that in an environment without fixed nitrogen that complex life would not have evolved to either not need it or to do it itself. It also assumes that the availability of molybdenum is required to fix nitrogen.
I'm no biologist either... all the more reason for us to get really nasty and get a right proper flamefest going!! ;-P
So, there are certain rules to the chemistry that underly biology and (really really speculating here... in fact this whole thing is just speculation on my part, sort of a beer-guzzling approach to science discussion) maybe it's possible that one really *does* need molybdenum to fix nitrogen with any efficiency. That gives evolving life two choices (it seems I'm repeating you here)--
1. stru
Re:terraforming and other things (Score:5, Informative)
It is important to realize that life on earth didn't all come to existence at once. Animals cannot breath CO2 not because it can't evolve for it but because our metabolism depends on oxygen. Without plants fixing CO2 and putting out O2, *for millions of years*, animals couldn't exist. Plants couldn't evolve to fix nitrogen in the similar way. Read up on the nitrogen cycle.
BTW, IMAB (I am a biologist).
Re: (Score:2)
IANAEM (I Am Not An English Major), but wouldn't that be "IAAB"?
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
I did. and molybdenum was not mentioned anywhere.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
(Mo is used as a cofactor, meaning that it can be used over and over again without being depleted. You just need a single atom of Mo per enzyme.)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
to a artificial process discovered in 2003, NOT to natural fixation.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
BTW yes I am just kidding.
Thanks for your post. I loved science but never really got into biology. Probably because the required biology classes in high school and college where mainly what I called "gross plumbing" classes.
I did like Chemistry so I have to admit that I get a chuckle out of it when people make a statment like. "Maybe life could just use someth
Re: (Score:2)
Mostly "not existing". Eukaryotes didn't appear until around 1.5 to 2 billion years ago -- about 2 billion years after prokaryotes arose.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Without an oxygen rich environment to free the molybdenum, there's no significant nitrogen fixation and thus those plants are going to be hurting pretty quickly.
There is significant nitrogen fixation from lightning, currently thought to be over 5% of the natural total. This is well known, and I'm sure the authors of the paper are aware of it. The article states that a low level of nitrogen fixation favors prokaryotes, but it's unclear if this is just generally true in a low nitrogen environment, or if only nitrogen fixing bacteria are thought to have thrived when the level of molybdenum was low.
Re: (Score:2)
But what is the advantage to learning how to fix nitrogen if there is already sufficient amounts around? Clearly, the amount that is fix(ated?) by lightning (and other non-biological processes??) is not sufficient to to support the kinds of nitrogen level needed for serious eukaryotic developement. At least that's how I read it... reiterating that I'm not a biologist, just curious.
And it's not clear to me at all that only nitrogen fixing bacteria thrived when the molybd
Re:terraforming and other things (Score:5, Interesting)
It's all about evolution. Sure, you* have enough NH3 to survive, even to grow, but there's millions of tons of N2 gas in the atmosphere, and if you could somehow use that as a fuel source, you'd be set for life.
So then, along comes a random mutation in an enzyme that pulls converts nitrites to nitrates (I'm making this up - but it was probably some enzyme to do with N). Rather than killing you, it allows you to pull N2 out of the air and turn it into ammonia, allowing you to reproduce more quickly. Now another mutation comes along, and it allows you to use Mo to push forward the reaction (mind you it worked before you had Mo: reactions can generally go forward without their cofactors, just more slowly.)
With this cofactor, you're able to reproduce much more quickly than your neighbors which don't have the mutation, and you become the bacteria we know today.
*you here refers to a now-extinct progenitor of nitrogen fixing bacteria. Individuals reproduce, populations evolve.
Like I said, cofactors generally speed up a process. They are not generally required for the reaction to happen, they just speed it up (by several orders of magnitude) when they are present.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Also, this makes me wonder what those eukaryotes were doing for the first 2 billion years.
If you really want an idea, try reading "Oxygen" by Nick Lane, basically it's a popular science book which looks at recent research into the evolution of the Earth. It's very interesting and overturns a few established ideas, such as the "mass extinction" of anaerobic microbes as oxygen entered the atmosphere. I got it as a bonus when I bought his other book "power, sex, suicide" which looks at mitochondria and cellular evolutiuon too, and actually found it more interesting.
42 (Score:5, Funny)
According to wikipedia.
Coincidence? I think not!
Re:42 (Score:5, Funny)
According to wikipedia.
Molybdenum is the 42nd-most-abundant element in the universe
ZOMG! Is it April Fools' yet?
--
Toro
Re:42 (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:1, Funny)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
You dope. That is what the atomic number means.
MOD PARENT UP!!! (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Not only that, but when you multiply six by nine (in base ten), you get 54 -- which is the average number of neutrons in a molybdenum nucleus. (Is there anyone here that does not know that 6x9=42 in base 13?)
Hmm...
Interesting thought for a sci-fi novel (Score:1, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Of course it's entirely possible that Pak evolved from foodyeast too, in which case the GP is correct.
Re: (Score:2)
Ahhh. World of Ptavvs. Earth was a food world of the Slavers [wikipedia.org]. Creatures which could telepathically dominate any species. The Tnuctip [wikipedia.org], clever little buggers, fomented a revolution with the Bandersnatchi (who were immune to the Slavers telepathy, by design) against the Slavers. Who promptly, with great spite, wiped out all life in the galaxy. The Bandersnatchi on Earth presumably died out. Leaving the algae to evolve.
Protectors don't even come into it. Though Slavers are mentioned in Protector, Roy Truesdal
Re:Interesting thought for a sci-fi novel (Score:5, Interesting)
"Centuries ago, sailors on long voyages used to leave a pair of pigs on every deserted island. Or they'd leave a pair of goats. Either way, on any future visit, the island would be a source of meat. These islands, they were pristine. These were home to breeds of birds with no natural predators. Breeds of birds that lived nowhere else on earth. The plants there, without enemies they evolved without thorns or poisons. Without predators and enemies, these islands, they were paradise. The sailors, the next time they visited these islands, the only things still there would be herds of goats or pigs.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Does this remind you of anything? Maybe the ol' Adam and Eve story? .... You ever wonder when God's coming back with a lot of barbecue sauce?"
Do you wonder what the Lake of Fire is? Did you know that the original title of the Bible is "Preparing Humans?" Can you picture the classical image of "Satan" dressed up like Col. Sanders?
I mean, did you ever wonder why it seems so easy to go to hell? To prepare us to accept our fate. It's all there to condition us to behave like Douglas Adams' Arcturan Megacow!
Thanks for the hilarious post.
--
Toro
Re: (Score:2)
One of my favorite Twilight Zone episodes.
It was all being saved (Score:2)
the deity screws up again (Score:5, Funny)
A fixation (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
--
Damn you Bill Gates!(TM)
Molybdenum?! (Score:5, Funny)
*ducks*
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I will be very sad if anyone catches the reference.
I wouldn't worry about it.
Obligatory Simpson's Quote (Score:2)
Brett
implausible (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Just like life as we know it doesn't technically need oxygen, but oxygen dependent metabolism is SO much more efficient that when it comes along it not only blows everything else away but also opens up a lot of new possibilities for life.
"Lack", "Delayed"? (Score:2)
This discovery could be useful for accelerating the terraforming of planets, eventually.
Eukaryotes (Score:2)
Is there any reason we're being lumped along with things like elephants and trees or was that list just a very small sample of the creatures included such that the term covers pretty much all living creatures? Presumably creatures like primates are also in this group?
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Author needs to study some biochemistry (Score:4, Interesting)
Nitrogenase, the enzyme that performs nitrogen fixation today, commonly uses, but doesn't require, molybdenum for its function. There are forms of the enzyme that use vanadium or iron as a cofactor to the ubiquitous iron-sulfur cluster that actually performs the chemistry.
I don't know if this event happened before or after the iron catastrophe, but the fact that the enzyme uses iron anyway makes me believe that there must have been enough iron around the oceans back then. Methinks the author's running off the old idea that the nitrogen reduction occurs on the molybdenum atom instead of one of the iron atoms in the iron-sulfur cluster.
An excuse for always being 10 minutes late (Score:1)
Wait a minute (Score:2)