Fossett's Plane Found 356
otter42 writes "Sadly, it looks as if all those crazies claiming Steve Fossett was still alive were wrong after all. The NY Times has the confirmation that wreckage of Fossett's Bellanca Citabria was found. Now it's up to the NTSB to tell us why this happened, although, statistically, dollars to donuts it was engine/fuel-related."
He's still kicking! (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Although, if you were famous and wanted to "disappear", this seems like the way to do it. The high mountains (~10k ft) prevented his plane from being found right away, and the lack of a body (or parts thereof) is easily dismissed in a wooded, snowy part of the country.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re:He's still kicking! (Score:4, Insightful)
No body was found, and was purportedly "eaten by animals". Conspiracy theories live on!
Kudos to hiker that turned in what he found. I suspect many people would not have turned in the thousand dollars or so in cash had they made the discovery.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Maybe he found several thousand, and decided to turn in enough to be realistic.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Kudos to hiker that turned in what he found. I suspect many people would not have turned in the thousand dollars or so in cash had they made the discovery.
"If it's not yours, don't take it." Why do some people find basic ethics so hard? :(
Not to mention the questions that would come up when the wife says, "I wonder what happened to the $1000 he always kept in his pocket, just in case he needed some cash." (Maybe she would, maybe she wouldn't, but that's a big chance to take.)
I suppose you could take the cash and then not report the find at all, thus preventing anyone from even asking you that question, but gods -- the poor widow and all his friends and stuf
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
"Not to mention the questions that would come up when the wife says, "I wonder what happened to the $1000 he always kept in his pocket, just in case he needed some cash.""
Well....since they haven't found the pocket...I could think of an out ;)
Gotta be him tho, no other small plane pilot has $1000 left in his pocket after filling the tank for takeoff....
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Yes, and he'll be picking up a reward [youchoose.net] for his honesty, assuming it's still on offer.
I'm sure he'll get plenty from interview deals as well.
Re: (Score:2)
Kicking as in "cryptmaster kicking" or just "zombie kicking" ??
Re:He's still kicking! (Score:4, Funny)
I'm not saying I think (or care) one way or another but it is conceivable he used a parachute...I mean...this is Steve Fossett after all.
So, maybe Fosset and DB Cooper are not kicking back a few drinks with Elvis on some lush pacific island paradise?
not elvis (Score:2)
amelia earhart
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Why do people think that small airplane pilots need parachutes? They don't have ejection seats nor do they have any decent way to bail out in an emergency. In the cases where you could actually get out and deploy the parachute properly, you would probably have enough control of the airplane to make a decent crash landing.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Small airplane pilots can't even wear chutes; the harnesses are too big and can't be tightened up enough. Plus the canopy itself is too big and would float so slowly that they might not land for hours, if at all.
You might thank that big plane pilots have the opposite problem, but not really, because cockpit size generally limits their size to less than big enough to cause problems. Of course, open cockpit planes allow tall pilots, but even so, they can't really get too tall, or their thighs wouldn't fit i
Re:He's still kicking! (Score:4, Informative)
General aviation pilots wear chutes all the time when they do spin training. Spin training is only required for instructors, but many pilots get it anyway. Chutes are required and are most certainly used for it.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Must be a US rule. Back when I got my license (in Canada), spin training was required for all pilots and we didn't wear 'chutes. For a commercial license, the flight test includes getting into a full spin (at least two full turns) and then recovering on a given heading.
'Chutes are required for aerobatics, but simple spins aren't considered such. (Granted, there are some kinds of aircraft that should not be spun because they don't recover well. They're placarded "DO NOT SPIN". Some you really have to f
Re:He's still kicking! (Score:4, Informative)
They discontinued teaching spin recovery in primary training in about 1995 because NTSB research indicated more people were being killed in crashes resulting from spin recovery training, than being killed in spins. A gruesome but pragmatic decision.
You're free to go get training in spin recovery yourself, and most instructors recommend it. I believe that qualifies as aerobatic instruction and parachutes are required, but I'm not sure.
Re:He's still kicking! (Score:4, Funny)
I don't know myself. Well lets get back to discussing the story about a rich pilot that died in a small aeroplane crash..
Re:He's still kicking! (Score:4, Insightful)
Pilots of small planes don't need parachutes -- unless they're flying aerobatics (in which case they're required). The Citabria is a plane designed for aerobatics, although if Fossett wasn't planning on doing any he wouldn't have needed to take a 'chute.
(One of the things that makes a plane designed for aerobatics is that there are ways to make it easy to get out. I don't know about the Cit but for example on the Cessna Aerobat, you just pull the hinge pins (designed to be easy to pull) and the door comes off.)
And in a mountainous or heavily treed area, there's no such thing as "a decent crash landing", the plane is going to break up.
Re:He's still kicking! (Score:4, Interesting)
Most airplane accidents are single-aircraft incidents, and most of the problems occur on take-off or landing, well below altitudes where a parachute can be effectively used. The number of lives saved would be negligible. Even if pilots were mandated to know how to use a parachute, most of them would probably stay in the plane to save the passengers, who would be even less likely to know how to use a parachute.
Re:He's still kicking! (Score:5, Informative)
I've flown a Citabria. It's designed for aerobatics (the name is "airbatic" spelled backwards, even) and, at least in the plane I flew, the "seat" is actually a sling that holds your parachute. There was no way to sit in the thing unless you were wearing one.
Of course, it may be possible to buy a version of the airplane with normal seats--epecially if you're a billionaire, as Fossett was--but I never saw one myself.
Re:He's still kicking! (Score:5, Funny)
I think it's pretty obvious what happened here: Fossett was teleported out of his plane by the crew of a Starship from the future that used the "slingshot around the Sun" technique to travel back through time in order to retrieve him. They then took him back to their time in order to speak with an alien race that was accidentally destroying the Earth in its attempt to communicate with any daredevil billionaires that might be on the planet. Unfortunately for them, the Earth no longer used money, so there were no billionaires available, hence the need to fetch Fossett.
The evidence points so clearly to this scenario that there must be some sort of vast conspiracy covering it up, perhaps to avoid the embarrassment that would result from revealing that two of the Starship's crew members were able to infiltrate a nuclear wessel undetected.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
That is sooo totally too complicated.
Occam's razor says that they brought him back to deal with the Grand Nagus after Kirk lost Earth in a Dabo game.
(not his fault, hard to tear your shirt in a Dabo game)
Re:He's still kicking! (Score:4, Informative)
Fuel / Engine Related? (Score:2, Funny)
I think it happened because the wings were at an attitude that they could no longer provide lift.
There. I think the cause has now been sufficiently genericized.
Re:Fuel / Engine Related? (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
That reminds me of the Far Side cartoon where the pilot (looking out the wind shield) says to the copilot:
"Say, what's a mountain goat doing way up here in a cloud bank?"
Simpler still: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
No, it was Earth's gravitational field that was the problem. Suction is very different and is only occasionally a serious concern regarding air travel.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Thank you Captain Obvious! You have saved the day again!
Or weather, or health related (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Or weather, or health related (Score:4, Informative)
Other sources are providing more information. According to CBC [www.cbc.ca], the plane slammed into a mountain.
Anderson said no remains were found in or near the aircraft, but said the crash was so severe that "I doubt someone would have walked away from it."
The plane appears to have crashed head-on with the mountainside before disintegrating, he said. The aircraft's engine was found about 90 metres from where the fuselage and wings were found.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
If you are worth his kind of money, I think carrying $1,000 is a non-issue. He was, after all, staying at one of the Hilton's places, and depending on where he was going perhaps he preferred to pay for fuel in cash? I dunno, I used to carry $200 with me all the time and that was when I was earning $22K a year. If I was loaded I sure would carry $1k just on the occasion I needed it (10 x $100 bills is nothing, same in my pocket as $5 and 5 $1s)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
GTA: Inyo (Score:4, Funny)
Re:GTA: Inyo (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Images of Grand Theft Airplane: Inyo National Forest. Poor dude getting jacked at 10,000 ft.
Or The X-Files "Max", "I think he caught the connecting flight."
Re:Or weather, or health related (Score:5, Insightful)
Yes being a sail plane pilot is good experience if your engine quits. But have you ever flown a Citaboria? I have. Here is how you land one: The plane has no "flaps" so don't worry about those. While at pattern altitude (about 1,000 feet above ground) when you are on down wind abeam of the numbers. Put the engine to down to idle. Make two left turns and the plane will land right on the number. basically you loose that 1,000 feet "way fast" the Citaboria glides like a rock. You really have to keep the nose down or you run out of airspeed. By comparison any two seat trainer flys like a sailplane
If the engine quits that plane is going to land within only a couple miles at best. That said there was a road within walking distance of the crash site. Any reasonable pilot still in control of the aircraft would have at least attempted to aim for a clear area. I don't think he was in control when it hit the ground.
My gues is the caue was either a mechanical, non engine failure of the structure or control system or a medical problem.
Check your own logic before calling others crazy (Score:2, Interesting)
Last I heard, they were saying he appeared to have hiked at least a half kilometer from the crash site, to where his cash and ID were found.
This isn't to say that he isn't dead now, or that someone else found the crash site and (for reasons unexplained) took his ID and a grand in cash from it, then hid them where the hiker later found them, but the simplest explanation is that he survived the crash.
So the fact that they found the plane does not automatically make anyone claiming he is alive "crazy".
--Mar
Re:Check your own logic before calling others craz (Score:5, Insightful)
that someone else found the crash site and (for reasons unexplained) took his ID and a grand in cash from it, then hid them where the hiker later found them
My guess would be that "someone" would have been something like a raccoon or a buzzard.
Re:Check your own logic before calling others craz (Score:5, Funny)
My guess would be that "someone" would have been something like a raccoon or a buzzard.
That certainly explains why when I'm killing rats and spiders they keep dropping gold and broadswords.
Re:Check your own logic before calling others craz (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Last I heard, they were saying he appeared to have hiked at least a half kilometer from the crash site, to where his cash and ID were found.
I saw several accounts, authorities say it was a "hard crash" as in "smashed into the side of a mountain at full speed" and that there is no chance whatever that he survived the carsh.
I think the cliff he hit was the problem (Score:5, Informative)
At that high an altitude, if you get clouds/ fog, you can run into a mountain at 10,000 feet, even if you're a good pilot ( who forgot to check his map).
NTSB said that the wreckage looked like high velocity impact, with little chance of survival.
Re: (Score:2)
Exactly... An engine failure in something as slow as a Citabria would be easy to to "pancake" as they call it. Chances are he never saw the mountain which is very easy to happen..
Re:I think the cliff he hit was the problem (Score:4, Insightful)
Exactly... An engine failure in something as slow as a Citabria would be easy to to "pancake" as they call it. Chances are he never saw the mountain which is very easy to happen..
Fossett was an experienced pilot. He wouldn't have been flying in IMC (instrument meteorological conditions) in the vicinity of a mountain below the minimum sector altitude, at least not intentionally.
Given that he was in a different area than he was expected, I suspect Steve had some sort of medical problem that incapacitated him. If the airplane was trimmed properly, it could have flown for a while before impacting the mountain at cruise speed.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Too early for amature guesses. (Score:3, Interesting)
I don't know what it is but the end result looks like controlled flight into the ground.
Fossett was a very good pilot. An engine failure at altitude would have given him enough time to send out a distress call unless he was very close the ground when it happened. So maybe but it could have been any number of things. From the report of the crash it sounds like it hit hard and fast.
For the family this is probably a relief since now they can have some closure hopefully.
Re:Too early for amature guesses. (Score:5, Informative)
I don't know what it is but the end result looks like controlled flight into the ground.
Yeah, I don't get the "statistically, dollars to donuts it was engine/fuel-related", because statistically, CFIT is a much more common cause of air accidents than engine or fuel problems. Fuel problems are actually one of the *least* likely causes, be it contamination, starvation or exhaustion.
There were reportedly clouds at around the altitude he'd have been flying at that day obscuring mountain peaks like this one. I think the most likely cause at this point is he was flying in a cloud and ran into the mountain. It happens, even to airliner pilots with sophisticated ground proximity warning systems. General aviation pilots usually have either no such equipment, or rudimentary ground avoidance equipment. I'm not sure what, if anything, his plane would have been equipped with, but even if it had such equipment, it wouldn't necessarily have been enough to prevent a CFIT accident.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
You have never flown have you? Actually this kind of accident is very common with a good pilot. This wasn't a tricky flight. He planned VFR and probably did minimal planning. Why? Because this was a milk run flight. A drive around the block. If you make the mistake of flying VFR into IFR condition in an aircraft that can not support IFR then you are in a world of hurt.
The wost thing any pilot can say is, "I can make it". When I was younger I flew sailplanes. I was never even what I would consider to be a
Dollars to Donuts I say... (Score:5, Funny)
Now it's up to the NTSB to tell us why this happened, although, statistically, dollars to donuts it was engine/fuel-related.
Dollars to donuts the CRASH was gravity related...the engine/fuel is just a side problem!
Re: (Score:2)
Oh, there you go pushing your little pet "theories" again....
Re:Dollars to Donuts I say... (Score:5, Funny)
Exactly. Gravity is just an unproven theory. Intelligent Falling [theonion.com] is clearly to blame.
Re: (Score:2)
Wrong about Fossett, wrong about Reiser... (Score:5, Funny)
What are the random internet nutcases right about anymore?
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
The world ain't what it used to be.
Wacky conspiracy theory (Score:3, Funny)
It took them this long to find the plane because they had to fake up a wreck!
I wonder where he was. (Score:2)
In relation to the search we had on Slashdot some time ago, I wonder where he was. I remember looking all over trying to report whatever I could.
Also, unless it's changed, I don't think the nay-sayers are wrong yet. They found his plane but IIRC they have not found a body.
Re: (Score:2)
This is what I want to know. I know I spent a good few hours scanning those fresh satellite photos... I want to know how close I got. =P
Head on collision (Score:5, Informative)
They're saying that the damage looks like he flew straight into the side of the mountain and that it was extremely unlikely that it was a survivable impact.
http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/10/02/steve.fossett.search/index.html [cnn.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Don't they usually have the option of ejection and parachuting in modern planes?
Re: (Score:2)
Eject,no, not unless you're in a jet fighter.
Parachuting possibly, depending on the plane style, etc, but you'd have to realize you were in trouble and proceed to jump out. Perhaps he had a heart attack, stroke or otherwise wasn't in control of the plane when it collided. Perhaps he didn't have time to get out once he realized his situation, or he stayed at the helm trying to correct it the whole way it. That there was a lack of communications from him leads me to believe that it is likely that he had a a
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Don't they usually have the option of ejection and parachuting in modern planes?
No. This wasn't an F-16. And it looks like the kind of accident where the pilot's first sign that he was in trouble was approximately 0.2 seconds before impact.
If nothing was wrong with the plane, he probably flew it right into the side of the mountain under power, not realizing the mountain was right there until it was, well, right there. If something was wrong with the plane, he probably could have successfully glided it to a survivable impact. There's rarely any use for a parachute in a small, single
My experience that day (Score:5, Interesting)
The day Steve Fossett was lost I was driving from San Francisco
to Las Vegas by way of Barstow. Just after Barstow we entered one of those huge desert storm systems, a line of thunderheads
stretching North and South, and all of a sudden it rained so hard
and the wind blew so hard that it was hard controlling the car,
even when we slowed to 20 MPH. Soon after we left the storm, I
heard about the disappearance of Steve Fossett on the radio.
I have been convinced ever since that moment that that storm
killed him. I cannot see how a light aircraft could have flown
through it, and yet it came up pretty suddenly. Looking at the
map, I might still be right.
Re:My experience that day (Score:5, Informative)
Barstow is 256 miles [google.com] from Mammoth Lakes. Granted, that's by car, but it's a fairly straight-shot route.
That's like saying a thunderstorm in New York City killed someone in Washington DC
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Have you ever seen a MCC squall line? [wikipedia.org] Coherent bands of severe weather and linked thunderstorms can easily span distances of 300 miles.
That's like saying a thunderstorm in New York City killed someone in Washington DC
Your example, set on the Atlantic seaboard, tells me you have no familiarity with continental severe weather. Yes, the same storm system someone experiences in place "X" can kill someone at about the same time in place "Y" 200-300 miles away. Predominately, in a north or south direction. (Tha
Weather History (Score:5, Informative)
Mammoth Lakes, CA
Week of Sept 2, 2007
No precipitation.
http://www.wunderground.com/history/airport/KMMH/2007/9/3/WeeklyHistory.html [wunderground.com]
See the radar loop from that date by using the link in the Radar Archive box near the bottom-right of this page:
http://www.wunderground.com/radar/radblast.asp?ID=HNX®ion=c1&lat=37.65124893&lon=-118.98217010&label=Mammoth%20Lakes%2C%20CA [wunderground.com]
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Looking at the Nexrad there, and also from Edwards AFB, "My" storm clearly did not extend that far, and there doesn't seem to be much bad weather around Mammoth Lakes that day (although 1 hour time steps is pretty coarse for thunderstorms).
Thanks for that. I had always wondered about this, and now it seems clear that the storm I was in was not involved in the Fossett crash.
Re:My experience that day (Score:4, Funny)
Haikus are easy
but sometimes they don't make sense
Refrigerator
Re: (Score:2)
Any glider pilot with half a clue who values his life at all will stay the hell away from anything that looks like a thunderstorm.
The area (Score:5, Informative)
As mentioned in another post, as best as I can tell from the news articles, this [gass.ca] is a Google Earth view of the area he went down. The Minaret Lake area is where the hiker found his ID and money, and the Minaret Peak is near where his plane hit.
Re: (Score:2)
The crash site its near Minaret Lake in Amsel Adams Wilderness (as mentioned in SF Chronicle and Wired). The hiker who found the site went far, far north-west from his home in Mammoth Lakes - way up in High Sierras. Its is a gorgeous place, and very remote.
I suppose the investigators are not too keen on having clueless media dudes descending on the area so they have been coy about the actual location, describing it as "near Mammoth lakes"
Occam's razor... (Score:2, Funny)
I think it is becoming clearer that Fossett survived the crash, and was shortly adopted by a bear, and is currently living in a cave, having forgotten his human status due to traumatic brain injury.
Maybe you need to stop being so dismissive of people who think he is still alive.
Re:Occam's razor... (Score:5, Funny)
I think it is becoming clearer that Fossett survived the crash, and was shortly adopted by a bear, and is currently living in a cave, having forgotten his human status due to traumatic brain injury.
*sigh* More of this? You he's-alive-and-adopted-by-bears people are crazy nutjobs. It's the he's-alive-and-adopted-by-wolves people who have their fingers on the pulse of truth. Wake up!
It's called "Controlled flight into terrain" (Score:3, Informative)
It's an all-too-common occurrence in aviation. It even occurs to big, commercial flights. For example, Eastern Airlines flight 401 [wikipedia.org] (in 1972).
By all accounts his plane was equipped with an ELT and a radio. Presumably he would have used one or both if an engine failure or other mechanical problem occurred and he had some time while gliding.
Noone says why he's famous (Score:2)
Summary:
So, how close were we? (Score:5, Interesting)
I, like many of us, participated in that mechanical turk thing a few days after the crash to try to find his airplane in satellite photos. Did we cover that area? I kind of hope not.
Re:So, how close were we? (Score:4, Interesting)
A summary of various comments above: it was outside the turk's search area, and google earth still doesn't have recent photos of the crash site even now.
The google earth blog [gearthblog.com] however has a kml file of the crash location [gearthblog.com] based on the no-fly zone coordinates and some additional guesswork,
I looked at it and couldn't see any wreckage, certainly nothing we could have seen during the search.
-M
Location? (Score:3, Informative)
Right, based on the NOTAM [faa.gov] the center of the no-fly zone is at 37.658889N,119.125556W [google.com].
Still some hope left. (Score:2)
Facts for the Conspiracy Theorists (Score:2, Insightful)
As someone that's hiked that area long ago, when they mentioned the search would begin on the John Muir Trail between Dorothy and Shadow Lakes. That is a *heck* of a lot of VERY rugged forest area above 8000ft. It's not like there's a long snow-free time up there, or a whole lot of people at any given time either.
That they were able to find the wreckage is awesome. That's one great reason why we pay taxes people.
Prior searches focused on land east of the Glass Mountains. Another *huge* area.
As an FYI, the
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
>> That's one great reason why we pay taxes people.
Not quite.
http://news.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/05/01/2057200 [slashdot.org]
Though I can't say I'm pleased at the thought of paying taxes that will go to searching for swashbuckling billionaires who crash their private planes into national parks. Seems like people in that category can handle a few invoices for the extra services they require.
From TFA... (Score:4, Funny)
I hope this guy doesn't own a gun... get it?
Citabria, huh? (Score:3, Interesting)
I remember that about 25 years ago in Alaska we had a number of cases where the Citabria would crash because a wing came off. (And the Citabria was supposed to be aerobatic-certified aircraft. It just wasn't rugged enough for bush flying.) As I understand it, an AD was issued that should have corrected all the defects, but just knowing the problem existed is enough to dismiss early conclusions as to the reason behind the crash.
Why those links? (Score:2)
I saw this in the Chicago Tribune (and submitted it to slashdot, still pending) =/
There are links from the AP, UPI, the Salt Lake City paper; the news is all over. Why does the summary link to an international paper and a snarky British IT rag (the Register)?
I mean, if it's a story about something they found in Antarctica then IHT is a good link. If it's something about a British hacker then El Reg is a good link. If it's about Australia then an Australian paper os a good link.
Google News has this on its fr [google.com]
1 foot = 3.04 metres? (Score:5, Funny)
Mammoth Lakes is about 10,000 feet, or 30,400 meters, above sea level, and snow makes already difficult terrain largely impassable and could bury plane wreckage.
Don't take the bet.. (Score:2)
Engine/Fuel related? I kind of doubt it. I know the area. If the plane's engine quite at that altitude he could had still landed at Manmoth airport. He had more then a mile of elevation above the valley floor and the distance was not great. Even if not at the airport there was a road within WALKING distance of the crash site.
I've flown a Citobria they are very strong plans and can be put down on a very short space and crash landed on a few hundred feet of road way.
I strongly suspect that something else
Re: (Score:2)
Is it just me or does the wife seem really really indifferent. Here is the possbility her husband's remains have been found, and she's "monitoring the situation"? The hell? Its not a weather system! Then again, I can't begin to imagine what she went through, so maybe this is an attempt on her part to keep her hopes from getting too high. I dunno, but really, does anyone else get this vibe?
Someone saying that they're "monitoring the situation" is a polite way of saying "thanks, I know. Now leave me alone."
Re:What's with the wife? (Score:4, Insightful)
.
They had been married forty years.
She surely knew how his life was likely to end:
In college at Stanford University, Fossett was already known as an adventurer; his Sigma Alpha Epsilon fraternity brothers convinced him to swim to Alcatraz and raise a banner that read "Beat Cal" on the wall of the prison, closed two years previously. He made the swim, but was thwarted by a security guard when he arrived. Steve Fossett [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Is it just me or does the wife seem really really indifferent. Here is the possbility her husband's remains have been found, and she's "monitoring the situation"?
Sounds to me like she told a newsie vulture to go away and leave her alone.
(I'm reminded of the school shooting in Oregon, where the news media descended like a cloud of buzzards and the students told 'em to go to hell - going so far as to moon them from a school bus.)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re:That's really a shame. (Score:4, Informative)
Chevy Chase and the estate of Generalissimo Francisco Franco hold joint rights to that meme [wikipedia.org].
Re:That's really a shame. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:That's really a shame. (Score:5, Informative)
He pushed the envelope in sailing and flying, setting more than 100 records. He was also active with the Boy Scouts at the national level, even heading up the National Eagle Scout Association. He set the bar very high, and inspired thousands, maybe millions. His money was incidental, though it helped him to set those records. It's just the kind of person he was. That's why so many people care about it.
Remains were found in the wreckage. (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Because the lessons learned from his crash can save the lives of others. If it was a mechanical defect, the details of that defect need to be made known. If it was a mistake on his part, then knowing what that mistake was can help others to avoid it.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, for one thing the plane didn't crash on Fossett's own property. That at least makes it someone's business other than his; and quite possibly everyone's business if the plane crashed on public lands.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
If the rule is the same as it was when I was flying, you can go above 10,000 feet to a maximum of 12,000 feet without oxygen for a maximum of 1/2 hour. Otherwise stay below 10,000. I was a passenger in a 172 on VFR when the pilot, an experienced Viet Nam helicopter vet with several thousand hours, went to near 12,000 to get above some clouds for a few minutes. The effect was noticeable almost immediately. We zipped back down through a hole in the clouds pretty quickly (fortunately). He mentioned that had hi