Sony Blu-spec CD Format Detailed, Hits Stores 290
CNETNate writes "More details about Sony's new Blu-spec CD format — standard CDs authored using Blu-ray's blue diode technology — are beginning to emerge, with commercial releases beginning to hit Amazon. Blu-spec CDs are compatible with existing CD players but have been mastered with higher levels of accuracy by using the same technology used to author Blu-ray discs, with the intention of eliminating reading errors that occur as a result of being authored with traditional red laser technology. Sony has also launched an official (Japanese) site for Blu-spec CDs."
I'm unimpressed. (Score:5, Insightful)
This reminds me of the gold plated cables "to ensure the digital signal has the highest fidelity".
This looks like snake oil marketed to the "I'm a pretend audiophile who loves buying more expensive things with questionable benefits" crowd.
Re:I'm unimpressed. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:I'm unimpressed. (Score:5, Informative)
Re:I'm unimpressed. (Score:5, Informative)
CDs aren't created directly with lasers. The pit-land pattern is etched into a glass master, from which the stamps are produced which are used to press the polycarbonate discs that end up in our CD-players. The step which involves a laser is the activation of the photochemical surface of the glas master. Where the photochemical surface is washed away, the etching process creates the pits. I think it's a stretch to think that switching to a blue laser can provide a noticeable benefit in that process.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
It can if Sony says it can... or at least the good old Sony fanboys will say.
I'm leaning heavily toward the snake oil side of this one. I've never had a pressed CD have ANY issues, the "benefit" I see is that these CDs will cost more, which is a benefit to Sony - more royalties.
Yet another example of Sony not really innovating, but sucking the lifeblood out of technology markets. If there's a way to kill CDs, causing the price to rise with no benefit will do it.
Re: (Score:2)
I never thought that I had problems with my CDs (some of which are 25 years old) until I ripped them all using "grip" with cdparanoia turned on. A small number of the CDs ripped at very slow speeds (sometimes less than 1X), which I assume was the result of cdparanoia doing multiple read passes to try to compensate for errors.
However, since standard CD players have logic to hide small errors, I never heard any problems with them anyway. Maybe audiophiles disagree. IMO, probably the main benefit from this tec
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
After reading the article, it seems that this in theory would reduce the amount of 'innate' errors in the master. This would imply that, with fewer errors, your CD could get slightly more scratched before it starts to skip/distort/bug out noticeably.
However, as many others have said, this is solving a problem no one seems to have. You aren't getting better quality audio, you are just reducing the already low error rate of the master.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:I'm unimpressed. (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
And make sure you follow your $500 Ethernet cable's directional markings to allow for optimal signal transfer!
Bah, its not even snagless.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
It's an extra $300 for the snagless version, the clip cover is platinum, the density of the platinum gives it improved snaglessness, the clip cover is also imbued with magical snag fighting powers via Denon's proprietary shamanizing processes which will banish snags to the land of wind and ghosts!
Re: (Score:2)
Re:I'm unimpressed. (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
This reminds me of the gold plated cables "to ensure the digital signal has the highest fidelity".
Outside pure mathematics, nothing is digital. It is all modulated in and out of analog in the PHY [wikipedia.org]. Because it's analog, it has a signal-to-noise ratio, and signals can't be correctly demodulated unless the SNR is high enough.
In typical environments, it's easy to ensure enough SNR in the cable to pass correct SPDIF audio. But cables with excess capacitance and RF interference can still distort the clocking pulses inherent in a modulated signal. For cheap DACs that use cheap methods to recover the DAC cloc [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
You make the mistake of equating something that's technically correct but completely irrelevant. The fact is that ANY well made coaxial cable has sufficiently low capacitance and good enough shielding to send SPDIF 6 feet from your CD player to your receiver's DAC.
Of course, you could say "screw it" to the whole coaxial cable thing and use TOSLINK. That has the added benefit of elimina
Re: (Score:2)
Actually audiophiles are the ones buying expensive CD players thanks to (assumed) better reading of the CDs and less use of error correction or failed error correction / reads. So .. Makes sense that way but then I personally would assume I actually get the correct bits out in the end no matter what CD player I use so I wouldn't expect to get any improvements either.
Atleast with DVD-audio or SACD you get higher resolution.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Gold plated cables are outright fraud.
Real dynamic improvement comes from Brilliant Pebbles [machinadynamica.com].
Re:I'm unimpressed. (Score:5, Informative)
Read the summary again. This isn't blu-ray, it's just using a blue laser to regular burn CDs instead of a red one.
It's solving a problem nobody has.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:I'm unimpressed. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Read the article again.
or better yet:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blu-spec_CD [wikipedia.org]
Less distortion more accurate. I like more accurate. It's not some end all game changing technology, but it is better.
I won't be surprised if this allows for more pits on the CD.
In any case, this is just a manufacturing improvement.
Re: (Score:2)
It allows for a blueray sized number of pits on the CD. But that isn't going to happen with this particular product.
Re: (Score:2)
"I won't be surprised if this allows for more pits on the CD."
I definitely would. The CD spec is pretty resilient. Unfortunately CD's aren't. And if the have scratches, bubbles or other problems, they won't be on single bit size where this improvement takes place. Simple solution: use a DVD player and DVD's instead. At least the top of the DVD is well protected. Or use blue ray with their protective shielding. But the favorite solution: don't use them at all.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I think it's trying to solve the problem of Sony losing CD sales to download sales.
Re:I'm unimpressed. (Score:5, Funny)
You can use high intensity laser diodes in engines instead of spark plugs. Sure, it's more expensive and doesn't have any benefit, but it's NEWER!
Re:I'm unimpressed. (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Ah, but furry dice are much less energy-intensive and have nearly 50% of the effect, so I feel they'll remain the thinking man's automobile modification choice for many years to come.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
The stated reason is more accurate CDs, but I think you've got it.
I mean, I don't know about you, but I've never had a problem with CDs being unreadable from the store(though some hack-job magazine CDs didn't last very long). I've been using CDs for at least 15 years. What problem is this technology solving?
I hadn't think about the price fixing scandals, but maybe. Perhaps we'll see regular CDs drop to 8 bucks, and these new (identical) cds priced at 20-30 bucks.
Re:I'm unimpressed. (Score:4, Insightful)
Perhaps we'll see regular CDs drop to 8 bucks, and these new (identical) cds priced at 20-30 bucks.
No, you'll see these new cds priced at $20-30 and they won't make the older ones anymore.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
If i'm not wrong, Audio CD are error tolerant, they was designed to play without being interrupted by ignoring minor errors while reading. Because everyone will be more angry if their CD is skipping like crazy than having little distortion in the sound. That is why programs like EAC exist, they can check if the reader are bypassing errors or not so a (near) perfect copy of the audio data on the CD can be created.
I keep my CDs carefully and I don't have a great ear so I can't say that my CDs give different s
Re: (Score:2)
Reminds me of the pseusoscience marketing bullshit they use for things like gold cds.
However, it wouldn't surprise me if these new CDs sound better, but the blue laser won't have anything to do with it. It'll have to do with higher quality mastering (such as not compressing and clipping the music within inches of its life).
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Gold would actually make sense for a CD you wanted to last indefinitely, because gold is extremely non-reactive, and wouldn't oxidize.
That said, it's only one half of the equation. the plastic part of the CD would have to be replaced with something with a long life, because it doesn't matter if your data is there if you can't see it anymore.
Re: (Score:2)
"lossless copy of the CD"
the irony is rich today~
It's an improvement in the manufacturing process.
That is all. There product will now be more accurate. Does that matter to the user of Music CD's at this time? no.
Not everybody has that luxury (Score:2)
I keep my CDs carefully
Not everybody has that luxury. Some people would benefit from a scratch coating like that of Blu-ray Disc or the sharper pits that the blue laser creates in the pressing master, as they'd make the disc last for more years in perfectly readable condition before the player has to use signal processing to fill in an unreadable frame.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I need a source on this. As far as I've ever been told, digital data is digital data.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
An 80min CDR can store just over 700MB, but 80min of audio. 80min at 44.1KHz 16bit Stereo works out around 820MB. Some of your data-CD space is eaten up file file system data, but not 120MB.
That extra space that audio uses for audio is used to store that error detection/correction and seek data I was referring to.
Re: (Score:2)
Actually the data format CDs have much better error protection than audio CDs [findarticles.com].
This means that audio quality could be influenced by an error rate which would still allow you to read a complete data CD.
CD-DA vs. CD-ROM (Score:3, Informative)
There's no difference between the audio CD and the one with data.
Yes there is. At some conceptual point in the Compact Disc system, Compact Disc Digital Audio can be thought of as having 44100 stereo samples per second, each 4 bytes long, for 176,400 bytes per second. Once this becomes momentarily unreadable, CD-DA players have to use signal-processing methods to hide the dropouts. Compact Disc Read Only Memory, on the other hand, has 75 blocks of 2,048 bytes per second, and some of the missing 22,800 bytes are filled with an extra block of error correction codes. The d
Re:I'm unimpressed. (Score:5, Informative)
That's the point of an audio CD.
No.
Why post shit like that when you have no idea?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Book_(audio_CD_standard) [wikipedia.org] Audio-CD
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellow_Book_(CD_standard) [wikipedia.org] CD-ROM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CD-R#History [wikipedia.org] Orange book (CD-R)
The whole bunch:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rainbow_Books [wikipedia.org]
Red:
"On the disc, the data is stored in sectors of 2352 bytes each, read at 75 sectors per second. Onto this the overhead of EFM, CIRC, L2 ECC, and so on, is added, but these are not typically exposed to the application reading the disc."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CD-ROM#CD-ROM_format [wikipedia.org]
"In order to achieve improved error correction and detection, a CD-ROM has a third layer of Reed-Solomon error correction.[2] A Mode-1 CD-ROM, which has the full three layers of error correction data, contains a net 2048 bytes of the available 2352 per sector. In a Mode-2 CD-ROM, which is mostly used for video files, there are 2336 user-available bytes per sector."
So less bytes / sector for data = more for error correction.
Re: (Score:2)
This tech, like those multi-thousand dollar cat5 cables you can find on the internet, makes your ones 'oneier' and your zeros 'zeroier'. Duh.
they use 3.5% of the capacity, to avoid noticing. (Score:2)
never had a problem with CDs being unreadable
never had a problem != not always occurring to you. Since you have also only used 3.5% of the capacity of the CD disk, because everything is wrote 6* with crc on everything to test... basically if they prove this tech out, you can get 6-20* the amount of data on a CD.
from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compact_Disc#Data_structure [wikipedia.org] music payload of 2048 bytes per sector for the Mode-1 CD-ROM format. (2336 for mode 2)
(bits in a frame totals 588) * (98 frames per sector) = 57624 bits / sector basically de
Re: (Score:2)
oops bytes vs bits, so its 32%, not 3.2%
Re:I'm unimpressed. (Score:5, Funny)
CDs bought in the store are made with lasers: The glass master is made with a laser. And if improvements to accuracy are to be made by changing the wavelength, I'd say it would say that it would be at the glass master stage where there would be the most effect.
Further, TFA (which you neglected to read) talks about releasing some 60 titles using this newish process. It's obviously not all about home recording.
And mastering houses aren't concerned with speed. They're deep into the funky voodoo of slow, methodical, and reliable. The better ones are almost certainly still burning with carefully-maintained 8x Yamaha and Plextor SCSI drives, and probably even then at rates no greater than 2x or 4x, on carefully-chosen media.
And even if it were: Faster burns, lower error rate? Jesus, man. We'd be burning them faster for years now, with either red or infrared lasers, if the fucking discs didn't distort from centripetal force to the point of being unusable at somewhere around 52x. And it should be obvious, but: Changing the color of the laser doesn't make the disc spin any faster.
Do you apply this much guesswork in other aspects of your daily life?
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
distort from centripetal force to the point of being unusable
That's one hell of a euphemism for "shatter".
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
There's a world of difference between "shatter" and "so unstable it doesn't work anymore."
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
At this point I'm just grateful that people read my own replies as opposed to how I misread everything, and so I've gotten plenty of "you misread" posts but not to a malicious extreme. People can be pretty damn vicious if you make a statement, are totally in the wrong, and don't notice that you're talking out your ass in 10secs. I mean I posted a reply in what, 4 minutes?
There are like 5 direct and 17 or so total replies already.
Re: (Score:2)
It would only be cost effective if the price of these new CDs was the same as regular CDs, because the cost of replacing a CD player is tiny compared to the cost of replacing your audio collection with more expensive disks. If that were the case, there'd be no business case for Sony to bring this technology.
Re: (Score:2)
Green lasers are a bit better than red lasers but not as good as blue ones, as the wavelength is in between the two.
Re: (Score:2, Redundant)
Ugggh...
Blu-spec CDs are compatible with existing CD players
It's in the summary. FFS.
Re:I'm unimpressed. RTFS (Score:2)
Not to mention why should people care to replace the standard CD players that have functioned for years?
TFS: "Blu-spec CDs are compatible with existing CD players but have been mastered with higher levels of accuracy by using the same technology used to author Blu-ray discs, with the intention of eliminating reading errors that occur as a result of being authored with traditional red laser technology"
This is a way to make sure your data writes work better. I've had more than one drive that writes CDs at only 85% success rate.
Re: (Score:2)
I'd wager it's to make it harder to get a quality rip of the cd.
Think of it as trying to use a floppy that was formatted in a very new drive in a very old drive. The new drive has smaller, more precise and sensitive heads. It can read the disks it formats without problems. The older drive has larger, less precise heads and has trouble reading the disk made by the newer drive. The disk may be within spec but not what was the practical standard of the time of the old drive.
J_Random cd player probably won't ha
Data recovery of old CD-R (Score:3, Interesting)
Of course, most drives manufactured these days are designed to handle the oddities of CD-Rs ...
Oddly enough, I found that my old CD-Rs (from 2001) can't be read on a modern tri-format DVD writer, but can be read accurately on a Sony-branded CDROM drive. I've verified it by copying out a 300MB ZIP file and testing it.
Of course, I found I can read my old pressed CDROMs (from 1993).
Anyway, to keep on topic ... link to Blue-spec CD [wikipedia.org]. Oh my goodness, the article's changing right before my very eyes (21:12, 26 February 2009)!
Is it DRM free? (Score:3, Insightful)
Just wondering if anyone knows?
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Maybe I'm an idiot, but how could you apply DRM to it if it works with standard CD players?
DRM can only be applied (in this case) via software, naturally the data stored on it could be encrypted, but that has nothing to do with the technology here, you'd have to find a way to apply DRM to lightwaves or something, therefore DRM would be up to the content distributor, just like everything else.
If they had developed a new hardware (ie: new player + new cd format) then DRM could be embedded into the hardware. T
Re:Is it DRM free? (Score:5, Informative)
There are two basic schools of design for Audio CD DRM: The one is to include, in a location that won't interfere with the audio tracks, a data track, and put some sort of nastiness in it, set to autoplay on insertion. This is
The other main method is to exploit differences between the Red Book standard(audio CDs) and the Yellow Book standard(CDROM drives) and introduce deliberate errors into your CD that will be negligible under redbook but problematic under yellow book. Because this is a hack, there are no really good ways to do it(and, it causes real issues with some newer stereos that use CDROM drives); but that is how it is tried.
Re: (Score:2)
Fair enough, so theoretically (I haven't RTFA), they could opt for your second option, and conform better to Red Book, and thus make their claim of better reading ability on standard CD drives, while (possibly) increasing the errors on CD-Roms, or probably more likely vice-versa, as then more people would be playing them on CD-Roms where DRM implementations are easier (see option 1)...
Huh? (Score:4, Insightful)
h the intention of eliminating reading errors that occur as a result of being authored with traditional red laser technology.
I thought commercial CDs were pressed, not burnt.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
10 ETCH MASTER WITH LASER
20 PRESS CD WITH MASTER
30 PROFIT AND COMPLAIN
40 GOTO 20
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
50 ALSO, FUCK YOU. :-)
Sheesh, meme's been alive a couple of days and it's already evolving.
Re:Huh? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Huh? (Score:5, Informative)
TFA could be referring to the fact that red lasers are used to check the master for consistency.
Re: (Score:2)
Or not:
http://www.sme.co.jp/pressrelease/images/20081105.pdf [sme.co.jp]
and yes, red lasers are used during the manufacturing process, not used to create the master, but used when creating the CD from the master.
read up:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CD_manufacturing [wikipedia.org]
memory (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Heh (Score:5, Informative)
If you RTFA, you'll notice the bottom half of it is titled:
Why this is all marketing nonsense
Funny how the summary left out that part.
Re:Heh (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Too bad the article is wrong.
Impressions... (Score:5, Insightful)
I would have been more impressed if they'd somehow managed to keep it compatible while 'hiding' a second layer such that while you'd get the traditional old two channel audio with a traditional player, a blue laser player would be able to access the second layer, enabling high fidelity, high bitrate 6 or even 8 channel sound.
As is, it sounds like they're eliminating 'errors' by doing the equivalent of printing old 200 dpi images with a modern 1200 dpi printer. Sure, it's a bit cleaner, but there's no additional information.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
"but there's no additional information"
It is more about less additional and extraneous information than anything else.
But right... this if anything in history is a money grab.
Now if they have stiffer plastic and if the plastic has better longevity then it may be more "wise" to buy new stuff on it.
Buying old CD on CD again doesn't make any sense even if they are "remastered."
And yes I am all for better sound quality... the industry is trying its best to double dip and triple dip the consumer.
Re: (Score:2)
It is more about less additional and extraneous information than anything else.
I'd say that it's more about eliminating noise than any information. Noise isn't normally considered information, and information isn't normally considered extraneous. At least not when it's easily ignored.
These CDs will have the exact same capabilities of the old style.
And yes I am all for better sound quality... the industry is trying its best to double dip and triple dip the consumer.
Oh yes. Sony's a big one at this, I think that if they're lucky about 1 in 10 of their formats actually catch on. Of course, the biggest killer of their media formats is their insistance on riddling them with DRM - increasing the cost of
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
SACD can do that with one type of the SACD discs. So if you put the disc in a SACD reading PS3 you see two disc icons pop up in the XMB.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, one of the first two generations of PS3, at least.
But yes, that was pretty much what I was proposing.
not as good as HSM cd's (Score:3, Funny)
I much prefer my half speed master cd's.
(its easy, really. burn at 24x or even 8x 'for great justice').
sheesh.....
Mahoney! (Score:4, Funny)
Finally a complement for my 200$ gold tipped cable (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Finally a complement for my 200$ gold tipped ca (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Except bits are not 1's and zeros. there are a pit with a length that gets interpreted as 1 and zero's.
So now that make a more accurate CD.
Lass master copy failure do to too much distortion.
Not that I would expect anyone here to understand that the world is bigger then what they do or know.
Ok (Score:3, Insightful)
So, since a CD is digital, with error correction codes, the ONLY thing this solves is that it might make it easier for a cheap, portable CD player to read the disk. When you rip that CD to a lossless audio file, current technology will do that just fine.
Uh...hello? What exactly is the point, then? Last I heard, portable CD players have been made completely and utterly obsolete due to the advent of portable MP3 players, which are now cheaper, smaller, and can hold a whole CD binder worth of music in a device smaller than a cellphone.
Re:Ok (Score:5, Interesting)
> Uh...hello? What exactly is the point, then? Last I heard, portable CD players have been made completely and utterly obsolete
> due to the advent of portable MP3 players, which are now cheaper, smaller, and can hold a whole CD binder worth of music in a
> device smaller than a cellphone.
Not... quite...
The main reason why more and more people think mp3 audio sounds as good as CD audio is because the audio fidelity of CDs has gone down the toilet over the past decade. It's as if the recording engineers of the world have completely forgotten EVERYTHING they learned during the previous 25 years. Modern CDs have CLIPPING, for god's sake. That's inexcusable. Combine sloppy mastering with media of diminishing quality and players whose quality basically ceased to exist 5 years ago, and you have the reason why most current CDs sound like crap. Modern CD players never skip, because they have big ram buffers so they can recover from skips before the listener realizes it happened at all, but pretty much every other spec meaningful to CD players has gone downhill since the mid-90s.
Find a DDD Telarc disc from the early 90s that was intended to show off the capabilities of CD players back then -- wide dynamic range, basically 0% cross-channel interference, the works. Now rip it, and try to make the best-quality mp3/ogg encoding possible. Now do a blind comparison of the two. I guarantee you'll be able to tell the difference. You might have a hard time telling which is which if you hear it in isolation, but side by side you'll have no problem figuring out which one is compressed.
Put another way, the quality of compressed audio hasn't increased... the quality of CD audio has fallen compared to the quality it had during its golden era. 15 years ago, record companies spent lots of money trying to master perfect CDs, because they knew every disc they released was going to be scrutinized for the tiniest audio imperfection. Now, they don't even bother trying... and wonder why their customers don't bother *buying*.
If every new Britney Spears & Madonna disc had the production standards and "reach out and touch the music" clarity that the best Telarc discs had 20 years ago, people would STILL be buying them at stores, even if they intended to rip them to mp3 for convenience. Why? The added value of a flawless, premium-quality master from which to rip at will. We'd probably even start seeing "mp3" players that can play raw PCM, and people taking advantage of SDHC media's capacity to "rip them raw". Even a 2 gigabyte microSD card can hold ~3 CDs worth of uncompressed data.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm eagerly awaiting your ABX results.
Re: (Score:2)
cd has error *detection* but not so much correction.
proof: audio cd (redbook) vs 'data cd' (iso format). iso format has real checksums. redbook audio does not. that's why 'ripping' is not accurate and can't be, by definition.
dvd, otoh, has always been a filesystem with checksums and since you never really 'stream' dvd, there's time to re-read on error (up to a read-ahead limit).
they screwed up the original cd format. its not robust and its not reliable. but there is nothing you can do now other than pl
Re: (Score:2)
Sigh.
This is all about manufacturing the CD from the master.
Less distortion, tighter manufacturing error control, few manufacturing failures due to pit distortion.
Why can't the writers and the technical people on slashdot realize there is more about the world then the end users see.
Just to clarify:
this is NOT about YOUR reader. Probably not even about your world, so to speak)
But they introduce the errors anyway! (Score:2, Insightful)
The only problem I've ever had with audible "errors" on CD are when the publishers have introduced them as part of some sort of brain dead DRM attempt!
Make them harder. (Score:5, Interesting)
Stick a better anti-scratch coating on the data side of CDs
(and DVDs), and they'll be much better than just cutting the pits and lands more accurately.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Stick a better anti-scratch coating on the data side of CDs
(and DVDs), and they'll be much better than just cutting the pits and lands more accurately.
You realize that the data side of the CD is really the top, right? That the actual data layer is right THERE at the top, with almost nothing to protect it, right?
And that the DVD spec put the optical data layer in the MIDDLE of the disc, with polycarbonate layers on either side to protect it, right?
And that you can polish scratches in the polycarbonate just fine with various compounds, so that even a pretty serious scratch can be eliminated? Even massive all-over scratching from sand can be fixed with suf
Are We There Yet? (Score:2)
The Copyright Industry WANTS Read Errors... (Score:2)
with the intention of eliminating reading errors that occur as a result of being authored with traditional red laser technology
That would be ironic considering that abuse of published CD and DVD standards to create reading errors (i.e. "bad" sectors) on purpose is common practice in the content industry as a misguided form of copy protection; Disney being amongst the worst offenders.
Stop the loudness war instead? (Score:5, Informative)
Instead of that bullcr**, they could just stop reducing the dynamic range of our music and give us back the sound our CDs were supposed to produce...
See : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loudness_war [wikipedia.org]
DVD-Audio (Score:3, Interesting)
Pointless; DVD-audio lost opportunity (Score:3, Interesting)
This pointless technology serves no more audio-fidelity improving purpose than the hundreds of ridiculous inert gimmicks gullible "audiophiles" have been buying for years, such as Stop Light Pen [elusivedisc.com] or the fabulous $485 wooden knob [archive.org]. Disappointing to see cash-hemorrhaging Sony in desperation stoop to the level of these other scamsters.
SACD and DVD-audio both offer actual audio fidelity improvement, but were always commercial non-starters given the expensive and mostly obscure hardware needed for playback. Imagine if the DVD consortium back in the day had included the DVD-audio specification in the basic DVD player profile so that all the millions of DVD players out there today could play them. We would have had ubiquitous high-quality audio playback hardware today, and a greater market would have accordingly existed for high quality disc-based audio formats. It might have kept the recording industry scam going for longer.
How this works... (Score:4, Insightful)
This technology works by increasing the resolution of the bits coded onto the CD, so that the zeros are rounder, and the ones have the little tip at the top, and a flat line along the bottom.
But seriously... How about we improve CDs by setting a standard that eliminates harsh audio compression, and sets limits on the audio leveling..?
The benefits are obvious... (Score:5, Funny)
Of course blue lasers are better to author CD's. Want proof of the superiority of blue?
GI Joe v. Cobra: Good guys have blue lasers
Jedi v. Sith: Good guys have blue light sabers and blue lasers, the bad guys have red
Smurfs v. Gargmel: Good guys are blue, bad guy has a reddish cat.
I rest my case.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, if you're a recording artist, surely having a more reliable method of creating CDs means that the "breakage" rate will go down and your profits will go up.
right?
Re: (Score:2)
You'll download 'better quality' mp3s? /sarcasm
Re: (Score:2)