What Kind of Data Center Can You Build With $500M? 204
coondoggie writes "So, if the government gave your company $500 million to spend on building a new data center what would you buy and how would you build it? Well, the Social Security Administration is about to find out. As part of the stimulus bill, or the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, the SSA got the tidy little sum to replace its National Computer Center. The SSA in fact says it will need closer to $800 million to fund a new IT infrastructure, including the new data center — the physical building, power and cooling infrastructure, IT hardware, and systems applications. (This is addition to a $72 million backup facility currently under construction in Durham, North Carolina)."
The Unfortunate Reality of Maintaining Legacy (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:The Unfortunate Reality of Maintaining Legacy (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:The Unfortunate Reality of Maintaining Legacy (Score:5, Insightful)
I think more colleges as part of their Computer Science Elective they should be a class on Legacy System Maintenance. Legacy systems are not as bad as everyone makes them out to be. As well for the most part languages such as COBOL and FORTRAN are really not that hard to follow and learn. In many ways they are easier then the newer languages, as they are designed to do particular things and do them well, and not like C,C++,Java,.NET try to be the end all be all language. The old code is usually focused on the business logic while newer code seems to be working more with trying to get the formatting correct, and being well organized and modularized (which is a good thing too). But the old code you get PROCESS_CLAIM.CBL all the code that you need to process the claims are there, so when you fix the code there the problem is fixed. Having done a lot of work in FORTRAN myself I have found that there isn't that much spaghetti going on. Yes there is the GOTO statement but it is usually limited to ERROR cases where if something critical failes it GOTO ErrorNum and displays the error and quits the app.
For these legacy apps normally when something needs to be changed is because there was a change in the business process not because of a bug.
Re:The Unfortunate Reality of Maintaining Legacy (Score:5, Insightful)
As someone who maintains COBOL driven legacy systems, I disagree. Why teach that stuff in college? Those jobs are much more rare than other programming gigs, and they tend to be held by lifers (I inhereted mine when 2 people hit retirement age, and the third decided she didn't want to do it alone). If you DO get one of those jobs, the learning code for the obscure hand-coded systems is going to be vastly higher than the language.
COBOL isn't that hard to pick up. Maintaining legacy crap code is the same whether it's VB or COBOL or RPG, and the vast vast majority of your headaches will come from environmental quirks (old school databases with fixed width data, packed binary decimal numbers that no one uses anymore, etc).
The biggest problem with COBOL in the modern world is that its designed in reverse. It treats CPU cycles and RAM like they're the most precious things on earth, so a program will make live changes as it goes along (to conserve RAM and minimize disk IO), and is designed to fail in a dirty state (in the middle of everything, so you can't re-run it) on the chance that it'll preserve cycles. It's a real maintenance headache.
Re: (Score:2)
Learning curve...
Coffee's sitting right in front of me, but it's too hot to drink...
Re: (Score:2)
re: your "designed in reverse" observation. Right on. And not only that, but many organizations still use those metrics of cpu cycles and I/O to bill internal clients for running reports. Which explains why people here in my current office are afraid to request reports.
Re: (Score:2)
Heh. One of the systems I maintain is an old MPE/iX server. Real P.O.S, and it's from an era so far back that when you ran a job, what it usually output was a print queue file.
This stuff is extremely difficult to explain to people. The system wasn't written to output files...Why would it be? What would users do with them? Their terminals didn't even have disk drives! It's only real output went to a printer!
So now, people say things like, "Well can you give me this in excel?" and we say things like, "Well, I
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
NO! They already teach us enough superfluous crap to make me wish I was a business major.
What colleges need to do is stop teaching history lessons and begin teaching students how to learn on their own. Face it, your job will not mimic what you learned in college no matter how good the school was, or how good of a student you were. Real life != school life.
Don't give a man a fish. Don't teach a man to fish. Teach a man to learn how to fish.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Classic COBOL is something of a special case:
No real user types. There were things you could do to fake this but its hard to maintain.
Very limited procedure capability. There is a perform A through B capability (so the extent of the routine is defined at the call site! - but there is a way to avoid that using SECTIONs or internal labels) but there is no way to pass parameters - other than as global data. You can also write a subroutine as a separate compilation unit.
Modifiable (at run time) GOTO statements.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
The problem is not that the COBOL coders are retiring. The problem is that the government made the decision to rewrite the code 20 years too late. Everybody else knew the language was dead.
If this were a commercial company, they would go out of business for making such a stupid decision.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
There are plenty of not-out-of business companies still running COBOL for good reason. Admittedly, many of them are banks who are now going out of business, but not because of their COBOL. Look how much money IBM's mainframe division is still quietly making: many of these are COBOL engines.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If this were a commercial company, they would go out of business for making such a stupid decision.
More likely they'd get a bailout.
Re:The Unfortunate Reality of Maintaining Legacy (Score:5, Insightful)
Everybody* else knew the language was dead.**
*everybody: the disturbingly large subset of programmers who are unaware that COBOL and FORTRAN still power the vast majority of the financial and healthcare infrastructures of the world.
**dead: working quietly in the background without need of constant updates and maintenance
Re: (Score:2)
The original poster was talking how they had COBOL code to maintain, and no one to work on it.
As someone who maintains (part of) that 36 million lines of COBOL code...
Re:The Unfortunate Reality of Maintaining Legacy (Score:5, Insightful)
There is nothing wrong with a functional 20 year out of date COBOL application. It is a bigger waste of company/governmental resources to rewrite it just because you want to use the language flavor of the month.
So they should have rewritten it in 'C' 20 years ago, then of course you have to go OO and rewrite it to C++ 15 years ago, then Java was really cool so 10 years ago rewrite again, and now M$ has taken over the world so we better port it to .NET today, but you've just wasted 4 projects to simply get the existing functionality and your company is out of business (or added 0.0001% more to the national debt if you are the government).
There are very good reasons to port old projects but just doing it because it's 20 years out of date is not one of them.
Re: (Score:2)
To some extent you are right. WHen you rewrite it there is a 50% chance you will stuff it up worse, and it costs a whole hell of a lot of money.
On the other hand there could be competitive advantages and/or productivity advantages to moving from a batch COBOL world to an online, always-on, web enabled modern infrastructure. How many times have we rung some company or ggovernment department, and they couldn't do something half rational because their computer system was way out of date?
Re: (Score:2)
There is nothing wrong with a functional 20 year out of date COBOL application.
Tell that to the manager who can't hire anyone because they refuse to work on COBOL code. Which, was the issue the original poster brought up.
That is like saying "There's nothing wrong with leaving data on these 8-inch floppy disks! There are perfectly fine!" Until you find out one day that there's no hardware that can read them.
There is something very wrong with leaving something in a language so old that no one is willing to maintain it. If they rewrote it in C 20 years ago, then they would have a poo
Re: (Score:2)
Tell that to the manager who can't hire anyone because they refuse to work on COBOL code. Which, was the issue the original poster brought up.
I doubt that very much. I'd work on COBOL for the right price.
That is like saying "There's nothing wrong with leaving data on these 8-inch floppy disks! There are perfectly fine!" Until you find out one day that there's no hardware that can read them.
Easy enough to virtualize hardware.
Re:The Unfortunate Reality of Maintaining Legacy (Score:4, Insightful)
The US gov't IS out of business... We're bankrupt. No one has the balls to say it on camera, but every person with common sense knows what it means when (money in) - (money out) is consistently 0.
Every person indeed does: if we had a government that had "(money in) - (money out) = 0", "efficient" and "well run" would be the words you're looking for.
Here in the real world "(money in) - (money out) = -11,000,000,000,000" and counting.
Yeah, it's not like they can just print more money (Score:2)
I mean what do you think our government is, a government?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
1.) Word
BIG IRON
A really strong neural net... (Score:2, Funny)
At $8.95/45 specimens (http://sciencekit.com/harvester-ants%2C-live/p/IG0034483/), the newly constructed Hex would have the most powerful neural net we've ever seen!
But that wouldn't leave any money for the clacks...
Mimicking Private Industry? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
This is the govt. You're not gonna see mysql (really not gonna see this one for such a large datastore) nor postgres. It'll either be Orac
Re: (Score:2)
This probably isn't the best solution for relational databases...
Actually... that's exactly the architectures many enterprise scale relational databases take (not the transactional type ones, but data warehousing ones); which conceptually are mostly SQL interfaces to map-reduce...
Die Hard 4 (Score:3, Funny)
WOODLAWN!!!11! (Score:2)
They could hire Justin Long (and John Hodgman?) to conduct guided tours...
Re: (Score:2)
Why build one... (Score:5, Interesting)
...when you could have two for twice as much?
OK, actually two 250 million dollar datacenters, but I love that quote from Contact.
Why tie up that much money in one site when you could build two world class structures and have full redundancy?
Re:Why build one... (Score:5, Interesting)
I concur. There are 3 empty data centers along the I-81 corridor (within 2-3 hours of DC) that stand empty, reminders of the dot com bust. Why build new when you can retrofit an existing center.
Re:Why build one... (Score:5, Insightful)
Because they're not in my Congressional district?
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
I could think of three reasons:
* Because those data centers are probably 10 years old already?
* Because government data centers may have different requirements than internet startups?
* Because 2-3 hours is too far away for social security administrators to drop by for a quick visit?
Re: (Score:2)
There's nothing wrong inherently with a 10 year old datacenter. Guys, 2000 was 10 years ago. It isn't like we're talking about datacenters from the paleolithic era.
If you already have a building with 5 or 10 megawatts of power run to it from the utility company, and already having some generators hanging around, why not use it? It's not like there have been quantum leaps in cooling or fire suppression or generator technology or how raised floor is put together.
So what, you have to go and buy 30 million
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
We don't need no stinkin' data center. (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
I wonder if the emphasis was intended...
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
the typo was really close to immolate...probably psychological
Re: (Score:2)
I think it's really time to get religious again, but I tend to think more along the lines of the Maya and such. Let's immolate a manager a day until the gods of economy look favorable on us again.
I'm damn sure that would work really, really quickly...
Re: (Score:2)
How about a location first (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:How about a location first (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
As of 2007, based on median income 10 out of the 20 wealthiest counties in the nation [wikipedia.org] were located in the DC metro area. As recently as 2000, it was only five. So now that the economy has tanked, where should we spend stimulus money? Why, in the wealthiest part of the country, where all our 'public servants' live. All hail Versailles on the Potomac!
Re: (Score:2)
Or an old abandoned salt mine. Perhaps they could do that at Yucca Mountain. There is already sunk cost there.
We have some brand new abandoned data centers here too.
I think up the road from DC into WV and not Northern VA would be the way to go. Cheap and located close to the decision makers.
Mantraps (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I would definitely include mantraps in any new datacenter design, but I know of other datacenters that have them already. Some of them even have sensors to ensure that only one person at a time is in the trap. Crazy stuff.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Something modest (Score:5, Funny)
Then spend the rest on hookers and blow.
Hey, the gov't does that all the time, why are you staring at me like that??
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, I've heard that Congressional party leaders are traditionally selected by a meeting of the senior critters over lines of coke on a stripper's tits.
Ummm.... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Yeah, he could have asked the government or investment bankers...
..near an industry that can use hot water. (Score:5, Interesting)
Find an industry that would otherwise need a gas fired boiler and on-sell the heat.
Other options:
- Heated public swimming pool
- Source of community/public heating
Ask Google (Score:3, Informative)
http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/02/googles-data-center-secrets-revealed/ [engadget.com]
Ask Google - appropriate! (Score:2)
Yes, don't you hate it when people don't ask google first?
What Kind of Data Center Can You Build With $500M? (Score:5, Funny)
Data Center: $10M*
Hookers and Beer: $490M
*I reckon I could get that down to $6M by cutting corners though, so that's another $4M for the beer :)
Re: (Score:2)
I don't have any mod points at the moment, but if I did, I'm not sure if I should mod this "Funny" or "Insightful"...
Re: (Score:2)
Simple (Score:5, Funny)
200m for me, 200m for you, 100m for the guy in India who builds a data center.
Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)
I do know (Score:2)
Here. [ssa.gov]
So, we
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Or they could do something really novel like let *me* handle *my* own money bypassing SS entirely.
Careful, you try not paying your taxes and Obama will tap you as a cabinet member so fast your head will spin.
Re: (Score:2)
OR,,,, (Score:3, Insightful)
or they could contract it out to google.
someone who knows how to manage large data centers correctly.
Re: (Score:2)
It would be nice, but I think there's policy in place to put out for bidders, and I doubt google would bid or be the lowest, if they did.
Re: (Score:2)
How government would do it (Score:3, Insightful)
Dislaimer: I have worked for a contractor to the Air Force, and I have some insight as to government bidding, contracting, and results.
Well, if I were responsible for results, I would get requirements from staff, send out RFPs, hire the best people, manage the project, and deliver on time and on budget a state-of-the-art data center.
If I worked for the government, I would do the following:
- Find a company I would like to work for as a six-figure lobbyist, and hire them without regard to experience or practicality. I will have personal contacts with the CEO, and if I don't, I soon will.
- Get my "requirements" from that company, and have them provide the solution they specialize in without looking at my environment.
- I would not supervise them. I am too important for that.
- I would ask for more money as the project spirals out of control. The government would give it to me.
- The project would drag on for a decade, would never finish, and would ultimately get scrapped. I wouldn't care, because I now work for the vendor, lobbying the government for more projects. I get my own private limo and driver, and I don't have to declare it on my taxes, unless I want a very visible government job again.
Someone might raise a fuss in the public about this, but all that proves is that the government need more money to fix it.
P.S. The contractor I worked for beat out a lower-bidding, "women-owned", "development-zoned", and much more local company. By any government calculus, the local company should have won the bid hands-down. But there were, shall we say, non-written reasons the local company lost and the gigantic out-of-state, double-the-bid, next door to DC company won.
Re: (Score:2)
Politics, politics, politics.
We'll I would like to start a company that you are trying to find. Six figures seems like a bargain so when do we have a deal?
Or everyone could have their hands in the till, make money, even if it gets scraped like that Ultimate Warfighter scheme. They couldn't cancel one thing because everything was supposed to be able to work together. Is that what your talking about?
It really seems like there is a lot of sunk cost without much to show for it, like the F-22. We could make quit
Build a cloud facility (Score:3, Interesting)
Commodity hardware
Full virtualization at the OS level
And a second, mirrored data center on the other side of the country
Me, personally? (Score:2)
All told, $499.5M could go toward the real-estate and construction costs, staff, transportation, etc. $500K would cover my compute hardware needs quite nicely.
When you analyze what the SSA ends up doing with $500M, y
Re: (Score:2)
Why do they need a data center that large? (Score:4, Funny)
an underground bunker full of supercomputers (Score:2)
and yes, they'll play doom.
seriously though, I'd buy google data crates. one to match each US representative and then I'd place them across the US in those areas, which is the best indicator of population coverage.
Then I'd spend the leftovers on an underground lair.
I'd do the right thing... (Score:3, Funny)
I'd then proceed to give the rest to support the bailout of the severely ailing and deserving auto and financial institutions.
sb
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Once you're done bailing out the deservingauto and financial institutions, you should still have about 499m left (let's assume you bought a LOT of boxes, tin cans and a few miles of string...).
Servers in the sky (Score:2)
http://www.server-sky.com/ [server-sky.com]
The idea is to launch a lot (zillions) of tiny (grams) solar-powered servers to orbit. This means you have no power of cooling issues. It sounds pretty crazy on the face of it, but if it costs ~$1G to build a data center, it may actually be economical. There are a ton of practical issues, of course - the site goes into them in some detail.
Besides hookers and blow... (Score:2)
Seriously I would give my business to the vendors and hardware manufacturers who are committed to America. Force the equipment to be made here, with U.S. labor start to finish and supported by U.S. labor until the contract expires.
You want to get the country back on track, rather than just giving handouts force the change to happen with the money already being spent.
That said, I would ensure it is heavy on virtualization and solid blade servers/chassis. A nod needs to be given to "green-ness" and every effo
Did some work there in '99 (Score:2)
Or around '99. Anyway, one of our jobs was replacing token ring with ethernet! I'm talking replacing the fat cables. Ugh, that was fun. Their closets were horrendous. We had to rewire the phones, too, for some reason I forget now. The server room was completely under-AC'd. (At least they had a raised floor). All kinds of conduit issues, electrical issues (underpowered circuits, non-grounded circuit boxes). The building itself was ok, but would have to be gutted, and I'm not sure if the infrastructu
What's It Storing? Your Benefits Data (Score:2)
The Government, Improving. (Score:2)
That depends ... (Score:2)
... on management's competence. I used to work for a company that burned through about $300 million one one IT project. Effectively, it was all lost (I say 'effectively' because the project exists in the form of a couple of servers, just so they don't have to write down 0.3 billion on an annual report and have the BOD see it). Hire these people and $500 million will get the footings poured.
"What? You want the walls and roof? That's gonna cost you more. By the way, that's a nice little Social Security Admi
Old Tech Costs? (Score:2)
Was it cheaper when they did it all with paper files?
Re: (Score:2)
Was it cheaper when they did it all with paper files?
Yes, but mostly because there were a lot fewer people back then. (Remember, that even sorting is O(N log N) -- and you have to do that to get the right papers in the right files. I would guess that there needs to be lots of O(N^2) operations to catch fraud. 300,000 Americans is a big N.
Re: (Score:2)
300,000 Americans is a big N.
Erm, 300,000,000.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Exactly.
Just copy the general ideas of this datacenter [pingdom.com] in Sweden.
Sharks and laser beams would fit right in.
Re: (Score:2)
To build a new data center for the Social Security Administration all you need is $200M for immigration lawyers to draft legislation to lift the H-1b cap, $200M to buy Congressmen to pass it
I really don't get your point (or the joke, if there is one), but it's worth pointing out that influencing elected officials doesn't cost millions (short of large scale lobbying campaigns). If you glance at the political contributions received by influential politicians, you'll see amounts that are generally small.
To ta
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Voters don't need TV commercials, the candidate does because his opponent has them.
Also, if you don't think politicians are a step ahead of a law they passed to 'open' campaign contribution information you are fooling yourself.
Re: (Score:2)
Just a mote?! Must be microscopic sharks...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I like the *IDEA* of social security, a way of paying into the Treasury and earning a nice 3-5% on money, just as a hedge against inflation. I *LIKE* that idea. I don't like funding it with my children's paychecks, however.