DePaul University To Offer Degree In Predictive Analysis 71
itwbennett writes "The Chicago-based DePaul University will offer what it says is the nation's first master's degree in predictive analysis, the school announced on Wednesday in conjunction with IBM, which will provide resources for the program. 'We realized there was a need to create a program that prepared students in careers in data analytics and business intelligence,' said Raffaella Settimi, an associate professor at DePaul's College of Computing and Digital Media, who helped craft the program. 'A lot of the professionals who work in these fields have a variety of backgrounds, but there really isn't a program dedicated to data analytics,' Settimi said."
First prediction! (Score:5, Funny)
Did they predict their own success?
Re: (Score:2)
I hear the market for these jobs is great in Italy.
Re: (Score:3)
No, because there is not yet a tool to do that. What I'm afraid, again - see this : "It will focus on hands-on use of applications"!
Instead of teaching how to think, maybe how and why to create these applications, they will teach how to use tools and toys? IMHO that's a real problem today, especially in IT - all these courses how to use tools and toys, operators, certified to push a button! What has happened to teaching how to think, how to create? At least a long time ago, business analysis needed a good b
Re: (Score:2)
Year 1 schedule announced. (Score:4, Funny)
Chiromancy ...
Astrology
i-ching
tarot cards
numerology
dream interpretation
Re: (Score:1)
You forgot Feng Shui, you insensitive clod!
Re: (Score:2)
Religion...
DePaul is Catholic (Score:2)
Afaik, DePaul University is a Catholic pseudo-degree mill. So they'll use just use papal infallibility.
As others have observed, they have basically just added some calculous courses onto a standard low-level liberal arts degree. You'll fair far better hiring any math major with half was decent grades from any upper level state school.
In Other Word: (Score:1, Insightful)
statistics.
Yours In Chicago,
Kilgore Trout
Re:In Other Word: (Score:5, Insightful)
statistics.
As Feynman might have said, Statistics is to Predictive Analytics as Mathematics is to Physics.
Re: (Score:2)
Unfortunately the idiotic moderators are uninformed.
K. Trout
And so it goes.
Went to DePaul for Statistics (Score:5, Informative)
I went to DePaul and got an MS in Applied Statistics. I also work for a marketing company doing "predictive analytics". (I really don't like that term. It degrades the importance of understanding the relationship between independent and dependent variables, and places more emphasis on dependent variable fit. You can have a highly accurate model, but if marketers don't understand how their efforts affect sales the model is worthless.)
At DePaul one series of classes was mostly math theory, the remaining classes were 100% about "predictive analytics", i.e. using a computer to build statistical models. It used a more traditional approach to applied statistics with "topical" classes: sampling, forecasting, design & analysis of experiments, nonparametric statistics, Monte Carlo simulation, multivariate statistics, etc.
The statistics program is part of the College of Liberal Arts & Sciences in the math department. This new program is in the computer science department (which has its own college). The program (http://www.cdm.depaul.edu/academics/Pages/MSinPredictiveAnalytics.aspx) looks like a hybrid of CS, Stats & Marketing. It includes a class in neural networks which most stats programs lack, but again, this focuses on "prediction" instead of "inference", which is less useful to marketers. (Neural networks is a highly valuable topic. Just not as much in this field.) Also, the program lacks pure programming classes, which there is A LOT of in this field (data never comes in formats ready to model). Most is done in SAS or R, but any programming language teaching basic concepts (variables, logic, arrays, loops, functions) is useful.
I graduated from the program... (Score:4, Funny)
and I predict this will be FIRST POST!!!!
(yes, I did get a D- average... how did you know?)
Re:I graduated from the program... (Score:5, Funny)
Congratulations, your performance is within the acceptable range of tolerance.
You'll receive your masters in 8-10 business days.
Re: (Score:2)
I tried to sign up but... (Score:5, Funny)
I got a notice saying the courses had been canceled due to unforeseen circumstances...
Re: (Score:2)
statistics (Score:5, Interesting)
There are, however, many quality degree programs in Statistics. As someone who went through one of them, you can largely choose your own mix of theory and practice. I wonder if this isn't just statistics rebranded? I hope it doesn't concentrate too much on certain proprietary software packages. Statistics is like anything else. You can easily produce a bunch of numbers and compile massive books of tables and graphics. But if you don't know the assumptions of each of your methods, and consequently their shortcomings in each situation, you can draw some fairly bad conclusions rather quickly. I just hope this program gives a solid background in theoretical statistical inference, experimental design, and regression analysis, so students understand the 'why'.
Looks like calculus to me (Score:2)
I looked at the site and it's basically a math degree which requires calculus and some statistics. I don't think this degree in specific would be worth the money unless you really have a passion for math.
Re: (Score:2)
Sounds like mostly statistics, with a side of marketing and IT (and selling itself as something like operations research).
A.K.A. Actuarial Science (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
oh nice oxymoron! (Score:1)
'We realized there was a need to create a program that prepared students in careers in data analytics and business intelligence,' said Raffaella Settimi, an associate professor at DePaul's College of Computing and Digital Media, who helped craft the program.
It has got to be right up there with military intelligence and giant ants.
Fortune telling 101 (Score:1)
wha? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:wha? (Score:5, Funny)
I'm a bit dismayed that you didn't see this coming.
Which School (Score:2)
What school are you attending? I googled the terms and didn't come up with much?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re:wha? (Score:4, Insightful)
I have an M.S. in predictive analytics, and I'm only months away from my Ph.D.
Knowing some Ph.D.'s, that's a pretty bold prediction :D
Re: (Score:1)
Not included in the program (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
I'm afraid you will have to wait about 20000 more years for that...
Re: (Score:1)
I thought it was one word. You didn't mention that Lawrence Robertson would ALSO be proud.
This could be very popular with Italian Geologists (Score:2)
No surprise here, this is DePaul (Score:1)
The quality of their product is well known in Chicago.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
and the quality of their product, Chicago (the band), is quite well known. Those guys went to school there.
So did my father-in-law.
Blue Devils.
Re: (Score:2)
Oops, my bad. Blue Demons.
Either way, a funny mascot for a Catholic university.
Psychohistory (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
If you have not already been contacted to take part, it is because it had been mathematically determined that you would provide no useful input.
Stasiland diploma (Score:2)
http://wikileaks.org/wiki/EU_social_network_spy_system_brief,_INDECT_Work_Package_4,_2009 [wikileaks.org] and
http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Mind_Your_Tweets:_The_CIA_Social_Networking_Surveillance_System
The only question is why do they need to make such bold public push for future workers? Hard to tap the shoulder of an entire graduating class for a private chat?
Fusion centres a growth sector in the USA?
NSA shifts to e-mail, Web, data-mining dragnet
http://ne [cnet.com]
Wisdom From Homer Simpson (Score:3, Funny)
I think that this is best guide to how the market analysts actually predicted anything on Wall Street
The code of the schoolyard, Marge! The rules that teach a boy to be a man. Let's see. Don't tattle. Always make fun of those different from you. Never say anything, unless you're sure everyone feels exactly the same way you do.
Tune in the Marketwatch a few times and see if I am wrong...
Italian Scientists (Score:1)
statistics without rigor: terrifying (Score:2)
Programs like this essentially boil down to training to interpret (using this word generously here) statistical results, without a solid understanding of statistics.
Anyone smart enough to be entrustable with this kind of stuff, should be smart and willing enough to learn real statistics. Unfortunately this would require more commitment than our "fluid" and deskilled labor market can tolerate. We all pay for this.
Queueing Systems (Score:4, Interesting)
It's important to be predictive in anything that involves a queuing system, such as a sales website or where a lot of the theory got its start in telephone calls [wikipedia.org]. Really it applies to anything where people try to do the same thing at once that requires resources for the company to allocate. It can be the difference between success (Blizzcon ticket queue never crashed out) and failure (iPhone 4G). Especially with more people trying to access the same thing at once on the internet, this sort of analysis of how many resources to allocate efficiently is going to be more important. You don't want to allocate too much due to costs, but you can't do too little otherwise your customers suffer.
Yeah, it’s a lot like statistics, but it's going from 'What Happened?' to 'How and why did it happen?' and from 'What is happening now?' to 'What's the next best action?'.
Applied Reckoning (Score:2)
I already have qualifications in the field of dead reckoning.
I reckon that if I took this course, I would get an A.
Azimov would be proud. (Score:1)
Perhaps this will lead to Hari Seldon's psychohistory.
Three years too late (Score:2)
They're several years too late. The market for Wall Street "quants" has collapsed.
DePaul Programs (Score:1)
Predictive statistics is a Fraud (Score:1, Insightful)
I wonder what Nassim Taleb would say about this degree?
He would probably point out that it amounts to an advanced degree in practical fraud perpetuation.
Standard Gaussian statistics cannot accurately predict anything that matters.
Because if their track record (Score:3, Interesting)