BP Robot Seriously Hampers Oil Spill Containment 264
ChiefMonkeyGrinder writes
"A high-tech effort by BP to slow the oil gushing from its ruptured well head led to a large accident yesterday that forced the company to remove a vital containment cap for 10 hours. Robots, known as remote operated vehicles, were performing multiple operations at the disaster site when one bumped into the 'top hat' cap and damaged one of the vents that removes excess fluid, according to the US Coast Guard. The robots weigh around four tons, and are controlled from vessels on the surface using advanced IT systems with both manual and automated functions. BP removed the cap for nearly 10 hours ... in order to assess it after a discharge of liquids was noted from a key valve. The cap's removal left the oil gushing out of the wellhead, largely uninterrupted. Admiral Thad Allen, US National Incident Commander for the response, told the media that part of the problem was the number of robots conducting simultaneous operations at an immense depth. A dozen robots are circulating the wellhead."
Another factor that may hinder containment even more is the increasing potential for tropical storms in that area of the Gulf.
Bad robot... (Score:2)
No soup for you.
Re:Bad robot... (Score:5, Funny)
What would a robot's ideal soup be? Hot soup would interfere with the cooling systems, so it would have to be cold, it's a robot, so obviously petroleum would be a must, and needs a good amount of salt. Oh, hey, robot soup is oil in ocean water.
This whole mess is probably caused by robots trying to get delicious, delicious robot soup.
Re:Bad robot... (Score:5, Funny)
"The key to great robot cooking is to start with a good oil... and eat it" - Bender
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Gazpacho with a petroleum base?
Gulf Coast Style Salad Dressing . . . (Score:3, Funny)
Maybe if BP drilled for vinegar, and just let all that flow out as well . . . they could turn the whole disaster into a tasty salad dressing?
Re:Bad robot... (Score:5, Insightful)
This reminds me of all the accidents caused by SUVs. With nary a mention of the driver.
How about Bad Robot Driver!!
How many hours was that guy on shift without a rest? How long ago did he have soup? Coffee?
Re: (Score:2)
I guess there's too many cooks in this kitchen!
Re: (Score:2)
And who is controlling the robot? This is just a blame game, the robot didn't do anything.
No way man! Robots are jerks! Remember the man in my dream? The one standing on the hill? It was a freakin robot! A stupid, boring robot!
I, for one, (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Please enjoy a ocean full of oil, courtesy of BP.
Fixed it for you...
Good news is that soon your car really will be able to run on a cup of sea water!
Pacemaker robots? (Score:4, Funny)
So the well is alive now and needs to have a platoon of 4-ton robotic pacemakers?
Re: (Score:2)
*touches finger to nose*
OK (Score:5, Interesting)
This disaster is horrible, but on the other hand we have several 4 ton robots circling a well a mile beneath the water.
Humans are awesome.
Re:OK (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Obviously this is a cover-up for a Metal Gear project. Those robots are just the Gear's protection.
Re: (Score:2)
Except apparently they are bumping into things they aren't supposed to be.
So maybe: Humans are pretty damn good, would be more reasonable.
Re: (Score:2)
We should have had more and better robots, fittings should have been optimized for ROBOT manipulation, and robot teams should be ready to deploy to _each_ exploratory rig 24/7.
The undersea environment is even more hostile than outer space. Both merit building superb robot systems to work where man can't or shouldn't venture.
Re: (Score:2)
To paraphrase Homer Simpson:
"To Humans! The cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems."
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Robots use artificial intelligence to asses a situation and act accordingly.
OTOH, the machines probably have a number of robots on them. Keep in mind that a crude thermostat is a robot. It's "artificial intelligence" (as you put it) being a simple control system with a set point. A robot is any machine that autonomously does a job that involves getting input, no matter how limited, from an environment and acting (no matter how dumb or limited). Personally, I'd include teleoperated machines as robots simply because the characteristic of "autonomy" simply isn't that useful. Even huma
Re: (Score:2)
BP is lying again . . . (Score:4, Funny)
Admiral Thad Allen, US National Incident Commander for the response, told the media that part of the problem was the number of robots conducting simultaneous operations at an immense depth. A dozen robots are circulating the wellhead.
The operators got bored, and decided to play a few rounds of Robot Wars . . .
Re: (Score:2)
My God! (Score:5, Funny)
What was that robot thinking?
Re: (Score:2)
Stop stealing material from Fox News via Jon Stewart [thedailyshow.com]!
Re: (Score:2)
Funnel Time (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
These days, suddenly, everybody is a petroleum engineer [nocookie.net].
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
No, what they need to do is drill the relief wells at the same time as the main well. Since it's too late for that, they need to drill the relief wells asap. Which they're doing.
Unfortunately, threading a spaghetti noodle into a hole at the bottom of over a kilometer of water and pushing it through several km of rock turns out to be a tricky process that's very time consuming. Especially when you have to paste your noodle together a dozen or so meters at a time. Also, it would look really bad if they s
Increased potential for tropical storms? (Score:3, Funny)
Large pipe? (Score:2)
Would using a slightly larger pipe to slide down over the existing stuff, then running it all the way to the surface for collection be of any benefit? It wouldn't even have to be sealed to the existing hardware, just rammed down into the sea floor. If it leaks as much as 20% you've still contained 80% of the flow.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
BP stockholder eh?
Re: (Score:2)
Would using a slightly larger pipe to slide down over the existing stuff, then running it all the way to the surface for collection be of any benefit?
Isn't that essentially what they're doing with the "cap"? (Except that they can get SOME sealing between it and the wellhead so the pressure will speed the flow of oil up the pipe, reducing the amount escaping around the joint.)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
That's basically what they're doing with the current cap, although it's a bit more complicated than that.
The blowout preventer is still stitting on top of the wellhead, which prevents them from ramming it down onto the floor. Cutting off the BOP presents another huge series of problems, and probably shouldn't be attempted.
The primary issue with capturing the oil is the insane amount of pressure at the wellhead. The oil is gushing out of the well, despite there being a mile-high column of water on top of i
Undre Pressure (Score:5, Insightful)
The problem is pressure. There isn't a pumpjack on the sea floor using suction to draw the petroleum out of the well. It is coming out by itself, and under very high pressure.
You could weld a valve onto the top, but if you try to close it, the pressure will seek relief elsewhere. If you get really, really lucky, it just blows out the weld and rejects the valve. Much more likely, however, it would split the pipe under the sea floor where we don't have access. The only hope of capturing anything is if the breech remains above the surface.
One day in July or August BP will suddenly get shit under control and the leak will stop over night. That will be the day the two relief wells come online and provide means to reduce the well pressure. BP started drilling these relief wells in April, and they take a few months to come online. Everything else is window dressing.
Re:Undre Pressure (Score:4, Interesting)
A 40ft wide roll of black polyethylene plastic sheeting, 100ft long costs $245. for $1500, six of those rolls, heat welded together would form an 80 foot diameter hexagon shaped tube 100 feet long. Fifty of those tubes, end to end would reach the well-head area at a cost of only $75,000. Attach the tube to a giant teepee over the well head area, and one of your parent's siblings is named Robert (Bob's your uncle), the spill is contained.
Now, polyethylene may not be the best plastic for this. Costs may alter a little bit. You still need to weld the sheets together somehow, and the system needs to be lowered into the water. You may need some stiffeners here and there to maintain the shape of the tube. You'd also need to leave space for the ROVs to get under the teepee to access the well-head. Still, for a measely couple of million dollars, this spill could have been a mere PR hiccup instead of the eco disaster it's turning into.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Just, fyi, one of the best solvents you can use to remove duck tape is gasoline...
Re: (Score:2)
what if they just lowered a pipe on top of, around this one?
Re:Undre Pressure (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Undre Pressure (Score:4, Informative)
You could weld a valve onto the top, but if you try to close it, the pressure will seek relief elsewhere. If you get really, really lucky, it just blows out the weld and rejects the valve.
Actually, they are planning to put a "capping valve" at the top of the BOP soon, replacing the top hat thingy they have in place now. They are giving very serious consideration to unbolting the flange at the top of the BOP, then bolting a new riser on top.
Also, they are already collecting oil through from the side of the BOP, via the lines and manifold they were using for the top kill attempt, so even if they did seal the top of the BOP, there would still be some pressure relieved via those lines. However, since BP is not talking about shutting the top of the BOP, they must not believe there is enough pressure relief through the top kill manifold to ensure that the well casing won't fail.
Here's a quote from a recent conference call by BP:
Full transcript of the call is here. [bp.com]
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
The relief wells are being drilled so they can pump concrete into the well to plug it. "Relief" doesn't refer to "reducing the well pressure" - it means to relieve the existing well from it's duties.
The two "relief" wells are targeted to terminate an existing well.
i have an idea (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
haul in lots and lots of huge car sized boulders, i mean hundreds of thousands of them,and pile huge boulders on the well site and after a layer of boulders is on it start piling smaller rock aggregate from basketball size to baseball & golf ball size. then start pouring on concrete or cement or maybe clay & sand, eventually they will seal it off, but it wont be a small task it will take a hell of a lot of boulders & rock and cement and/or clay & sand,
Unless your boulders are the size of ships, they'll just be pushed off the pipe by the effluent oil.
And they're STILL cutting corners. (Score:3, Interesting)
Kindra Arnesen [youtube.com]
BP is a band of complete villains. Putting these psychopaths in charge of the cleanup is like putting the same cast of characters who crashed the economy back in charge of the economy. Fuck these guys.
-FL
ROFLMAO (Score:2, Insightful)
We will all die!
Robot? (Score:2, Insightful)
They where useing on live tech and it laged out ma (Score:2)
They where useing on live tech and it lagged out makeing the bot mess up and the FAA wants to do the same thing airplanes.
A dozen robots? (Score:2)
the whole thing (Score:2)
Congress needs to b&tchslap this robot (Score:2, Insightful)
I'm on a boat! (Score:3, Interesting)
We were actually expecting a lot more oil from this news, but the surface is still relatively clear, with small, 20-50 meter blobs of oil to be collected and a great deal of green water otherwise. Two task forces are out here skimming, and 500 bbls a day is a good haul for one of the skimmers. We've been hampered by several fronts passing through the area, but collection continues. There's been a C-130 dropping dispersant in the area, with good results on the oil (although it makes the remains too thin to skim).
Although many here will scoff at the daily take we're seeing on the skimming vessels, it's surprising how little oil you see around the spill zone. A lot, I hope, is burning in that giant fire in the horizon. I expected a spike in how much oil we'd see, but it's all going... somewhere, just not up here.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Get BP out of the equation NOW. Is it not obvious that they cannot handle the situation at all? Unless BP pays a disinterested third party (and I hate to say this, but one picked by the government) to get this capped permanently, we will never see an end to this "cleanup" operation.
Instead you would suggest...who, exactly? Oh, that's right--no one. There is NO ONE who is set up and ready to step in for this. BP doesn't own any of the robots or much of the gear that's being used to try to contain this--it's all contract work, basically. If you "got BP out of the equation" it wouldn't change a damned thing. The same crews with the same robots would be doing the same thing, except someone else would be paying for it. Probably the US Taxpayer.
Re: (Score:2)
Instead you would suggest...who, exactly?
Benthic Petroleum!
Seriously, though... Halliburton? Boeing/McDonald-Douglas/insert-defense-contractor-with-undersea-experience-here? Demote the Coast Guard and get the full Navy in charge? Hard to say...
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Yeah, Navy has a LOT of undersea oil exploration experience. Right!
The best experts are already on the job, except for the ones BP wants to hire, with spill cleanup expertise from the mideast, being kept at bay by the US Government.
Re:Brilliant (Score:5, Insightful)
I hear a lot of people saying that. I hear very few people offering suggestions of companies who already have this sort of equipment ready. Any suggestions?
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It is about the only time Aquaman will ever be useful.
Re:Brilliant (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
No, they won't. They'll ask and receive bailouts, use those bailouts to pay bonuses to the CEO, "sell" all the assets to a "new" corporation and finally let the "old" one go bankrupt while the directors move to the "new" one.
Personal responsibility is for peasants, not for plutocrats.
Accidents happen. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Brilliant (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re:BP engineers are morons... (Score:5, Insightful)
Hm. 1+ mile underwater welding. That sounds ... um, rather difficult.
They had a hard enough time dropping a giant cap and not having it pop off due to the pressure...
Re:BP engineers are morons... (Score:5, Insightful)
You have two problems at work here: you have to do this under a shitton of water, and you are trying to cap a pipe with a shitton of pressure behind it. If it were as simple as "simply clamping/bolting a cap on it", then I suspect it would be done by now.
Or hey, maybe I'm wrong and you should be busy sending your resume to BP right away instead of posting on slashdot. ;)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
How many LoC's is a shitton and how many Shittonnes does that equal?
Re:BP engineers are morons... (Score:4, Funny)
Depends whether you're talking about long shittons, or short shittons.
A long shitton is 1.12 short shittons, and a long shitton is also close enough to a Shittonne that it makes no appreciable difference.
The real question is, how many Shittonnes in a MetricFuckload?
One Shittonne equals 10 MetricFuckloads, or a decaMetricFuckload. Or, more readable, a deciShittonne equals a metric fuckload.
Re:BP engineers are morons... (Score:5, Insightful)
Very few things are easy when you're 5000 feet below sea level and dealing with pressures of 2k psi.
Re: (Score:2)
well shoot, we could at least be scraping up 20,000 barrels a day with the Dutch rigs built for just this thing....but since they're not 100% efficient at removing the oil, someone high up in this administration (guess) said no.
Re: (Score:2)
Oh, wow, 20k. That's like what the hole puts out in a few hours.
The reason it's a no-go is because it's roughly akin to mowing Central Park with a hand-push mower. "But I'm cutting grass!", I might say. Well, yes, but so insignificantly that it's basically a waste of effort.
And that decision is BP's decision, but you seem awful eager to nail Obama to the wall over this. What, exactly, should Obama be doing differently? That's an honest question - I've spent the last month trying to figure it out.
Re: (Score:2)
If they were successful in cleaning up the mess, then there wouldn't be a crisis to take advantage of anymore...
Re:BP engineers are morons... (Score:5, Informative)
And then the pressure builds up behind the top of the wellhead, forcing oil through the porous sandstone compromising the integrity of the sea bed possibly causing a complete rupture of the ocean floor leading to the entire contents of the oil deposit rushing into the gulf. There's a reason they quit trying to top kill it. There's a reason they removed the broken pipe at the wellhead allowing more oil to flow into the gulf. This is bad, but the alternative is far worse.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Now, it couldn't.
The hubris you must have...
Re:BP engineers are morons... (Score:5, Insightful)
Every time one of their fixes fails, and I'm tempted to say things like "those guys are idiots!", people like you come along to demonstrate what true idiocy looks like.
Thanks for puttin' it in perspective.
Re:Black hurricanes (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Give the guy some slack...maybe it's the only way he could do the GP's momma without throwing up in his mouth.
Re:Oil, Tropical Storms, and Hurricanes (Score:5, Informative)
The chief concern I've heard is that the hurricanes might drive the oil deeper into the wetlands, doing harm to one of the critical ecosystems in the area.
Re: (Score:2)
hurricanes might drive the oil deeper into the wetlands, doing harm to one of the critical ecosystems in the area.
It's worse than you think. [xkcd.com]
USA should ask Nigeria for advice (Score:3, Interesting)
The Niger Delta wetlands have been suffering oil damage for the last 50 years from BP and other US oil companies, perhaps the US government could ask the Nigerian government on how to deal with it.
Re: (Score:2)
Check out Dr. Jeff Masters Blog at wunderground.com [wunderground.com], especially the "Resources for the BP oil disaster" section at the end of each new blog entry. His My post on what oil might do to a hurricane" [wunderground.com] entry concludes:
Unfortunately, there is a decent chance that we'll get a real-world opportunity to see what will happen. June tropical storms tend to form in the Gulf of Mexico, and we've been averaging one June storm every two years since 1995. This year, the odds of a June Gulf of Mexico storm are probably a lit
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Let me know how that works out.
Re: (Score:2)
Never mind shaking the foundation of capitalism at the same time, validating administration critics that they will use opportunism to favor socialization of some sectors. I'm not sure I can ever agree with seizing a company because it's basically reneging on an agreement between the government and the company. These circumstances should be accounted for by raising the liability and that will help slow the amount of errors they make because put simply their insurance, whatever it may be, will go through the
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
If BP is seized it will quit laying golden eggs. BP isn't human, so damaging the shareholder value does _nothing_ against the employees who screwed up.
Paper entities don't feel pain, people do. Find and punish the malefactors to deter future screwups and to SAVE BP, whose stock is held by many US and other pension funds.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Find and punish the malefactors to deter future screwups
That's never going to happen [chron.com] even if anyone were serious about it. Making BP's investors pay is a whole lot easier than getting those responsible to pay.
Re: (Score:2)
Making the company pay is completely different from bankrupting the company.
Dead cows don't give milk.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Dead cows don't give milk.
But they do give delicious steak.
Re:Kindra Arnesen's speech (Score:5, Insightful)
If BP is seized it will quit laying golden eggs.
I don't think people are too happy with the "golden eggs" that BP is laying.
so damaging the shareholder value does _nothing_ against the employees who screwed up.
The first problem is identifying who actually screwed up. Was it some worker who made a mistake and hit the wrong button or something? Or was it his manager who asked him to bypass some safety measure? Or perhaps the manager's manager who asked for unrealistic metrics while looking the other way on ethical violations? Or was it the manager's manager's manager who knew all this was going on and just didn't do anything?
How do you assign blame, and how do you prove it? Once you've figured that out, how do you punish them? Do you throw them in jail? I'm not opposed to it, but it doesn't help clean up the oil spill. You could fine them billions of dollars, but I don't think the individual employees have that money.
And here's the thing: when you get down to it, the shareholders invested in a company that was behaving unethically. It's the shareholder's investment that allows BP to function this way. When CEOs act unethically, they do it in the name of serving the shareholders. Don't the shareholders bear some responsibility? Isn't part of the problem that the "owners" of the company failed to ensure that their company was "doing the right thing?" I'm not sure that we should be seeking to punish shareholders, but I also don't see why they should take a pass.
As I see it, we have a systemic responsibility/blame problem. We love to blame people, but our system is explicitly set up to limit liability of anyone with wealth or power so that entrepreneurs won't be too risk-averse to build new business ventures. However, I think we've gone too far. The problems of the last decade have not been because people are not risk-averse enough.
People aren't investing their money, they're gambling it. Corporations cut corners and endanger lives to save a few bucks, creating situations where serious accidents become likely. When accidents occur, we let them off the hook. We say, "we shouldn't punish these corporations, because that will just hurt share holders!" and so not only do we not punish them, but we bail them out. I bet if we do go looking for an individual to blame, we'll get fed some low-level middle-management-type who was just passing along orders. Nothing will happen. Nothing will change.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Was it some worker who made a mistake and hit the wrong button or something?
No, it's not possible that criminal blame lies in that direction. Gross negligence, in the case where the worker put himself in a position where he was bound to make such a mistake, maybe, but if it's a genuine worker mistake, then any criminal blame, if such exists, lies with those who created a situation where a single worker mistake can undermine the whole operation with such severe consequences.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
so damaging the shareholder value does _nothing_ against the employees who screwed up.
No, but if we penalize the shareholders, the next batch of shareholders will be more careful about investing in companies without morals. We really need to realize that investing money in a company means that you're actually financially supporting them, it's not just a casino where you put your money into a magic number machine and it spits out some random percentage, hopefully above 100, of what you put in after a week.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Is that the best you can come up with? "Engineers" ? As if BP go out of their way to employ dumbshits because they are cheap? Before you go crapping about "engineers" in a derogatory fashion I invite you to google just what some of the "engineers" have come up with in the past, like the Thunderhorse platform. You know that one that's the largest of it's kind in the world. The one which cost $5 billion to make.
But clearly there's no engineers at BP, clearly you're smarter than all of them.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
The problem is the when government regulation does prevent a disaster from happening it becomes a non-event and no one pays any attention to it. It's easy for government to get the blame when things don't go well but they seldom get much credit when thing do go well.