Deported Russian (Spy?) Worked At Microsoft 162
subtropolis writes "KOMO News in Seattle is reporting that a recently-deported 23-yr-old Russian man 'appears to have ties to the recently-exposed Russian counterintelligence' (according to unnamed Feds). The article states that he admitted to unspecified immigration violations and was promptly shown the door on Tuesday. It also says that 'Microsoft confirms Karetnikov worked as an entry-level software tester for less than a year.' So, I'm thinking that MS had better take a really good at their logs for that time. He may have got in at 'entry-level' but his abilities may have been a fair bit beyond that. ... Interestingly, his admission to mere 'violations' and swift departure would be right in line with how this swap has gone down. The four Russians who were flown to Britain and the US had to first sign a confession before President Medvedev granted them pardons." The same news is at CBS News, too.
Oblig Yakov Smirnoff (Score:1, Funny)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
No Secret Smirnoff (Score:3, Interesting)
The only secret this tovarisch picked up was free yogurt, softdrinks and coffee at MS....
I'd worry a lot more about employees in China (Score:1, Insightful)
Aurora, anyone?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
How does a 1-word post get modded "insightful?" I guess someone thinks that's a good replacement for, "contentless?"
Most of the content was in the title. The title is part of the post, and can legitimately be considered when moderating.
why do the russians need to spy on microsoft? (Score:5, Insightful)
microsoft has freely given its source code to the kgb (rolls eyes):
http://tech.slashdot.org/story/10/07/09/0042238/Microsoft-Opens-Source-Code-To-KGBs-Successor-Agency [slashdot.org]
Re:why do the russians need to spy on microsoft? (Score:4, Interesting)
Ah... now here's someone who has been paying attention
Obviously, the Russians were after something other than the Windows source code. Microsoft does a lot more than Windows; maybe this had to do with Office, Microsoft's online service offerings, Exchange Server, SQL Server etc. You know, stuff that wouldn't be in the WIndows 7 source code (bear in mind that Windows 7 is a client OS)
Re: (Score:2)
They wanted the secret of Ballmer's monkey dance!
Re:why do the russians need to spy on microsoft? (Score:5, Insightful)
Speaking of paying attention, has he actually been formally accused of anything beyond immigration violations?
The story seems awfully speculative. Good on the feds for doing their diligence, but as far as I can tell, there's no hard evidence linking him to anything.
Re: (Score:1)
Speaking of paying attention, has he actually been formally accused of anything beyond immigration violations?
The article says no. And I'm not surprised that there's no hard evidence linking him to anything. Wouldn't you expect that a Russian counterintelligence agent would necessarily be rather good at hiding his tracks?
Re: (Score:2)
And I'm not surprised that there's no hard evidence linking him to anything. Wouldn't you expect that a Russian counterintelligence agent would necessarily be rather good at hiding his tracks?
Well, that's some terrifying logic right there. He turned me into a newt!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Or perhaps they do not trust Microsoft and suspect them on holding things back.
Then I guess that makes all of us honorary Russians.
Uncle Bob...or was it Uncle Ralph? (Score:2)
They evidently heard of the infamous "Uncle Bob" interface written by Mrs. Microsoft (Melissa French Gates), and had to have it......
Code is cheap (Score:2)
Ah... now here's someone who has been paying attention
Obviously, the Russians were after something other than the Windows source code. Microsoft does a lot more than Windows; maybe this had to do with Office, Microsoft's online service offerings, Exchange Server, SQL Server etc. You know, stuff that wouldn't be in the WIndows 7 source code (bear in mind that Windows 7 is a client OS)
Or more likely, business strategy, research & development direction, or contract bid pricing. Only a geek would assume he was in it for teh codez.
Re: (Score:2)
Obviously, the Russians were after something other than the Windows source code. ... You know, stuff that wouldn't be in the WIndows 7 source code
You mean the secret NSA backdoor keys! of course, because they're not in the Windows 7 source code, ok. right. *wink* :)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Absolutely. But SQL Server, Exchange Server, ConnectPoint, IIS, etc., would all be considered not part of the Windows 7 source code, yes?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
IIS is a part of Windows 7 (Pro and higher, IIRC).
The rest of your list aren't part of Windows Server, either.
Re:why do the russians need to spy on microsoft? (Score:5, Insightful)
It's pretty easy to look at the public details of these ops from today's vantage point and go "that's stupid," but remember when these ops were first started the world was different. Dramatically different in the case of the spies which had been here 10 or 20 years, although not so much in this case. It's only been a year. But a year ago, the FSB didn't have a contract with Microsoft for the source code, and so access to that was worth a little more.
When some of the 10 spies that were deported recently were originally placed here, we didn't live with the constant flood of information that we do today. It wasn't as easy as going to washingtonpost.com or reading someone's blog to find out what was going on in the debate on certain issues. You had to wait, for news broadcasts or to get hold of a copy of a paper. Having someone get to know an individual who was an insider and to innocently ask some questions every now and then could actually pay dividends. And once an agency has already invested time and money training operatives, creating their legends and getting them into place, they're not going to just pull them out. They might be useful for something else later. This is type of work is like a marathon, not a sprint.
Re: (Score:2)
College faculty and students have access too (Score:3, Informative)
microsoft has freely given its source code to the kgb (rolls eyes):
http://tech.slashdot.org/story/10/07/09/0042238/Microsoft-Opens-Source-Code-To-KGBs-Successor-Agency [slashdot.org]
It's not just governments. Microsoft gives some college faculty and students complete access to Windows source code. They have to be part of a research team doing something Microsoft finds interesting, sign NDAs, etc. Microsoft gets access to their work but there are no restrictions on publishing their research. A friend was on such a team when he was a grad student.
Re:why do the russians need to spy on microsoft? (Score:4, Funny)
Remember, the ads for BING are all about there being too many links. You know, links, the things offered to you based on the search criteria you entered. Somehow, fewer links are better. And let's not forget the pretty background which makes you feel happy to see so few responses to your query.
LoB
so what you are saying is (Score:2)
bing is a case of kgb industrial sabotage?
Re: (Score:2)
so most search results are junk, don't go looking at page 40 for things you are searching for.
FYI, the web is a very large place and there's lots of information out there. So, a good search engine will give you lists of possible results to your query and show you them in order of relevance.
Showing only the
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
I don't think anyone at Microsoft has seen Bill Gates for a while now...
Worked for M$? (Score:4, Funny)
Wouldn't that be something if you could rootkit a master ISO for M$'s Windows retail disk.
It would explain so much...
Re: (Score:2)
Testers don't write product code.
Re: (Score:2)
Russian spy with access to M$'s internal network and security policies, if he knew how to hack how further could he have gotten?
The ultimate (well to me) put a kit on a master iso that gets released in the 10's of thousands if not more.
Re:Worked for M$? (Score:4, Funny)
Bug #12512523512
Issue: Windows does not have Russian rootkit installed
Status: Critical
Steps to Reproduce:
1) Install Windows
2) KGB unable to access Windows remotely with secret password
3)
---
Reply: Thank you for your feedback, we believe the latest build fixes your problem!
Status: FIXED
What we all suspected is true! (Score:5, Funny)
I guess it's official -- Microsoft IS spyware!
Re:What we all suspected is true! (Score:4, Funny)
Odd, I found this in my task manager...
Image Name | Username | CPU | Memory | Description .| 3 . . . | 13,900k | For the Motherland
rpt2kgb.exe| System . .
I guess I just never noticed it before now.
The reason this is an issue (Score:3, Interesting)
Is because Microsoft's source is closed, and a spy might have a chance to find a hole in the source code that's not obvious without the source code, or possibly would have a chance to plant something in the code. On the other hand, spies are welcome to contribute to open source. They won't be able to slip much past the massive peer review.
Re: (Score:2)
Is because Microsoft's source is closed, and a spy might have a chance to find a hole in the source code that's not obvious without the source code
Why go thru that amount of work when they already have the source code [slashdot.org].
Re: (Score:1)
Except for the little detail here:
http://tech.slashdot.org/story/10/07/09/0042238/Microsoft-Opens-Source-Code-To-KGBs-Successor-Agency [slashdot.org]
Not really that necessary to have a spy poking around in source code that was handed to you on a silver platter, huh?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1, Insightful)
They won't be able to slip much past the massive peer review.
You mean the same "massive peer review" that stopped the OpenSSL bug that was committed by a Debian developer or the same review process that spotted the trojan in UnrealIRCD? Oh wait, it missed both of those things.
Re: (Score:2)
They got discovered and fixed, which is good.
They got into production releases, which is not. They shouldn't have been in the stable release, only nightlies.
Re: (Score:2)
"The reason this is an issue Is because Microsoft's source is closed"
Or not.
One of the biggest "spy issues" post Perestroika was about bussiness negotiations for airliners (Boeing vs Airbus). Being Microsoft the big company it is you can bet foreing countries intelligences want to know what's happening inside and that has nothing to do with source code.
Re: (Score:2)
Oh no, it's starting! (Score:3, Funny)
"So, I'm thinking that MS had better take a really good at their logs for that time."
He stole that word (I assume it was "look") from right under your nose! We are in some serious trouble!
My boyfriend is Russian of Nigerian origin (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Where else... (Score:2)
Reminds me of Civ4 (Score:2)
You've stumbled across a Russian Spy near Redmond!
Modern Spying (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
"CIA ... trying to figure out what other countries are stealing from our corporations or what we can steal from somebody else's"? That's quite a lot of assumptions about the process already... (and actually it seems [europa.eu] like it was, also & in singular case, sort of the other way around)
Anyway, why it would be such a big practical problem? Think insider trading type of stuff; and leverage in international treaties.
Re: (Score:2)
i've seen news specials about this 20 years ago after the wall first fell. as soon as the warsaw pact fell apart the french and some of our allies started spying on us
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
i've seen news specials about this 20 years ago after the wall first fell. as soon as the warsaw pact fell apart the french and some of our allies started spying on us
Did they ever stop?
I've always assumed that every country spies on every other country, at least to some minimal extent.
Obviously, if you're the US, you don't commit a *lot* of resources to spying on, say, Canada. But there'd be at least a small team responsible. And in that Canadian Bacon movie, all the dirt they dug up on Canada came in hand
Re: (Score:2)
Senator: Thanks! (to aide)Get me the lobbyist for XYZ corp!
Lobbyist: Thanks Senator, here's a check for your re-election campaign.
Senator: Thanks a million! (giggle) Oh by the way here's a little something you boys might find interesting. (hands over folder...)
See that wasn't so hard, now was it?
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
French intelligence, DGSE, is the only one that I know to admit that about 25% of their budget is for corporate espionage.
I don't (Score:2)
Who doesn't think that the CIA is out there trying to figure out what other countries are stealing from our corporations or what we can steal from somebody else's?
Perhaps they are doing the first thing. But the second?
Who would the CIA tell? Would they just go to some random company and say "have some cool tech we just discovered"?
Government spying agencies being more along the lines of industrial espionage make more sense when you have industries that are more governmental entities than private companie
Worked as an Entry Level Tester at Microsoft...? (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Depends, are you good at taking out heavies and sapping turrets?
Re: (Score:2)
No, you're a sleeper. Get back to work.
Useless Speculation (Score:1)
Privacy (Score:2)
Facebook (Score:2)
He should have been more careful with putting "Spying @ Microsoft" as his occupation on Facebook
He's not alone (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Fortunately, the Apple spy doesn't hold his phone correctly, so he can't tell Moscow what he's learned. Whew.
Re: (Score:2)
So THAT's what happened to the antenna!
Re: (Score:2)
Proof positive (Score:1, Troll)
I always suspected that Windows amounted to sabotage!
Derp (Score:2)
The four Russians who were flown to Britain and the US had to first sign a confession before President Medvedev granted them pardons.
It's hard to pardon somebody when they've admitted no wrongdoing.
Re: (Score:2)
That didn't stop Gerald Ford. [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Ford's reasoning was that accepting the pardon was the same as admitting guilt.
Now that they have it (Score:2)
That explains Vista... (Score:2)
...it was a Russian plot.
He was also deported quite quickly (Score:4, Interesting)
You read the WashTimes? (Score:2)
Please note that they seem to have gotten that news 2 weeks after the Washington Post [washingtonpost.com] reported it:
If he was there to change code, he probably did it (Score:2)
Maybe Microsoft has tightened security in the last few years, but I doubt it. The network is pretty wide open and it isn't run like some sort of movie company with real security. A smart enough guy would be able to get in and do what ever they wanted. People routinely work at all hours and leave their computers running in offices with open doors. Screen savers aren't always password protected.
So, if he was trying to put something into windows, then it s probably there
What more do they want ? (Score:2, Funny)
I am not worried (Score:2)
It should only affect the Russian version of Windows.
Thinking (Score:2)
[...] worked as an entry-level software tester [...] I'm thinking that MS had better take a really good [look] at their logs for that time.
Wow, thinking is hard, huh.
Re: (Score:2)
In Microsoft, testers aren't the guys who click buttons with a mouse. They write code - a lot of it - for automated tests and their infrastructure. It is reflected in position names, too - devs are "Software Design Engineers", testers are "Software Design Engineers in Test". Compensations between the two are on par, as well.
(Indeed, it's often possible to find a SDET who is more technically apt than many SDEs on the same team.)
Naturally, a "tester" like that would have access to more internal resources than
he was really a counter-spy for USA (Score:2)
Our Friend (Score:2)
A Russian spy getting access to Microsoft's secrets might be a real boon to America. Perhaps we will learn what goes on there as well as if our government plays games with the OSs offered for sale. What better tool to spy upon people than their own operating system?
Product Manager for the Kin Phone?? (Score:2)
So THAT explains it!
Confused (Score:2)
What does it matter if he was or wasn't a spy and was working at Microsoft? Do people actually believe that Microsoft software is in any way secure? It's rather easy to install a key logger remotely on a Windows machine, so easy in fact there is no reason to actually consider Microsoft is in any way secure.
Am I wrong or does the EULA basically say that nothing that Microsoft holds no responsibility for any actions that the operating system does. Furthermore, don't they basically advertise the fact that
going home (Score:2)
These stories are going to influence many Russians working abroad and who has nothing to do with an espionage.
Reputation of being from Eastern Europe is not a joke in itself. It is no surprise and in a way deserved since indeed there are a lot of criminals and vagabonds, who moved to the West and are noticeable. By the way, we also do not like the same criminals at the East ourselves.
But now after these spy stories people are just scared and confused when they hear a Russian name in a business context. Seei
Re: (Score:1, Offtopic)
At one point in time, Iraq DID have WMDs. We know this for a fact, because they were bought from the US. They were used against Iran, and this is well documented. Saddam also had a vested interest in projecting the illusion he had WMDs currently, to ensure his status as a regional player. Iran may very well have decided to seek some revenge, if they knew Iraq was basically defenseless. That explains his brazen attitude and actions leading up to the invasion (Saddam's, not Bush's... I'm still trying to
Re: (Score:2)
When two separate UN WMD teams went in and found nothing, that should have been a tip off that something wasn't right.
When we gave these UN teams specific locations to search, because we "knew" Saddam had those weapons, and found nothing, that should have been a tip off that something wasn't right.
When the documents from Niger were shown to be an out-and-out fabrication which came from
Re: (Score:2, Offtopic)
Nuclear weapons "evidence" was clearly B.S., however he is known to have chemical and biological weapons. He stated not to have nuclear weapons, but beat around the bush on the chem and bio weapons, and played a pseudo-shell game with inspectors, largely to keep up appearances with his neighbors. I am by no means a supporter of the Iraq war. I've lost enough friends to it not to have any romantic notions that we went in for the "right reasons" when the war was sold to us. However, it's not as if Saddam
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Only it turned out that Saddam, against all expectations, actually did fear repercussions and had all his WMD destroyed. Who'd have thought it! Certain no-one who wanted to trouble themselves with proof, when they *knew* the answer they wanted already.
Re: (Score:2)
Oh, yes, it was quite obvious.
When Saddam decided he was going to publicly sympathize with the Taliban post-9/11, that should have been a tip off that something wasn't right.
When Saddam decided to up the payout to suicide bomber's families that attacked Israel post 9/11, that should have been a tip off that something wasn't right.
When Saddam decided to play shell games with the UNSC resolutions, that should have been a tip off that something wasn't right.
When European and Russian contractors were found sell
Re: (Score:2)
Nobody's arguing that. We are, however arguing that a) that didn't amount to a hill of beans, and b) boy, was that ever the mother of overreactions.
There's also the corollary argument that if the US (and other western countries) weren't so enamored with fucking around with these dipshit little countries in the first place, many of these problems si
Re: (Score:2)
Nobody's arguing that. We are, however arguing that a) that didn't amount to a hill of beans, and b) boy, was that ever the mother of overreactions.
So you are arguing it...
a) Embassies, WTC, Cole, WTC again, Pentagon b) I guess relying on smart weapons was the proper continued reaction in your mind. You're of course welcome to your opinion...however, conversely, I wouldn't trust you to walk my dog down the street.
There's also the corollary argument that if the US (and other western countries) weren't so enamored with fucking around with these dipshit little countries in the first place, many of these problems simply wouldn't exist in the first place.
Perhaps.
Congrats on being technically correct and absolutely useless.
If I knew what this meant, I would respond.
Re: (Score:2)
Silly me, I thought we were talking about Iraq!
I know, I know, don't feed the trolls...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
These two points are inconclusive. You are a dictator who lost a war to a foreign country. That same country is actively pursuing its interests in your area. People from your area attack that country. You do not sympathize with them? You HAVE TO, in front of the domestic audience, while being careful not to appear officially responsible in front of the rest of the world.
Well, I guess by that logic, if you are in the business of sending messages to a domestic audience YOU HAVE to do what YOU HAVE to do.
I'll await your implication that we should be smarter than that...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
post anon as I moderated
Not anymore you didn't, unless you moved to a new IP.
Slashdot just doesn't tell you that you're undoing your mods when you check the anonymous coward box.
Re: (Score:2)
.
Your ideas intrigue me, how do I subscribe to your news letter?
Re: (Score:2)
It's not an out-and-out conspiracy like the tinfoilers of HAARP, Bilderberg, aliens, UFOs, etc would have you believe
Everything else you said is more or less correct, except that mind control and "aliens" are indeed also part of the mix. Anybody who bothers to research the issue will figure that one out quickly enough -if their minds are strong enough to conduct that much current without their breaker circuits popping.
Crop Circles made with planks and ropes wouldn't display any of the true oddities observed in the fields. You know; things like like magnetic seeds. It's astonishing that when such evidence is dumped righ
Re: (Score:2)
Weird. Modded down to -1? Wow. What did I say to inspire that kind of response? Curious. Usually I can predict when people are going to get upset by the things I write, so I have to say, this kind of surprises me. Are people truly THAT offended by the idea of somebody laughing at a poorly executed bit of made-up spy drama? I don't get it.
Ah well. Here's a repost...
~~~~~~~~~~~~
This is a circus event.
You can tell because the idea of the "Russian Spy" and the "Cold War 2.0" has been seeded into our po