George RR Martin Finishes A Dance With Dragons 279
Lil'wombat writes "George RR Martin has completed his long awaited conclusion to the A Song of Ice and Fire series. A Dance with Dragons will be published on July 12, 2011. Let the celebrations begin! And everyone was worried that he was going to pull a Jordan."
Not the end... (Score:2)
I don't believe that this is the end... More books in the series are anticipated.
Re: (Score:2)
which probably isn't an accident.
This is not the end (Score:2, Informative)
Dance with Dragons is the 4th of 7 planned books. It is not the conclusion to the series.
Definitive proof the world will end in 2012 (Score:5, Insightful)
First Duke Nukem Forever and now this.
He really had that second half written alright.. (Score:5, Informative)
I'll echo someone I read a couple of days ago and say this is the longest wait for half of a book I've ever encountered.
Re: (Score:3)
I'll echo someone I read a couple of days ago and say this is the longest wait for half of a book I've ever encountered.
Agreed. If you can't see a big "F-U" from Martin between the lines, you aren't paying very close attention. 100% due to Martin and Robert Jordan, I will never, EVER pick up and start reading another book series that isn't completed the day I buy the first one. Screw you guys, screw you all.
Re: (Score:3)
EXACTLY why I refuse to read Stephen R. Donaldson's latest Thomas Covenant series. That jackass can release the last one before I even crack open the first one. I bugged my local SciFi bookstore for ages when I was in high school, waiting for White Gold Wielder.
I'm actually thankful to Robert Jordan for making the later books of the WoT series unreadable, thus saving me from caring about how the series would have ended had he written it.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
He's been upstaged, thank you. I'll avoid picking that one up if I find it on the rack before I'm fifty.
Re: (Score:2)
And this might be the longest half of a book ever clocking in at 1008 pages!
two corrections (Score:3, Informative)
1) The link says specifically that the book isn't done but it's close enough to done to give it a publication date
2) It's not the series conclusion. It's the 5th of 7 planned books that was originally supposed to be 3 books total :)
Aside from it not being the conclusion... (Score:3)
According to his own website, GRRM hasn't even finished it yet. I'm not believing anything about this book until I can buy it.
Re: (Score:2)
His Livejournal had a confirmation a couple of days ago, but his editor posted somewhere else saying it wasn't in the can yet and she'd sleep better if it was. Like always I'll believe it when I see it.
Re: (Score:2)
Just hope.. (Score:3)
That it's not as disappointing as the last one..
Maybe it's just me, but it seemed like a great departure from his normal style (the bad guys actually think about what they're doing, which makes them interesting), and had the "bad guys" acting like they'd never encountered politics before in their lives.. Just had a few "belief no longer suspended" moments in it..
Hope this one goes back to the old "dark and gritty".. Victories are great and all, but in the earlier volumes, they were earned..
Re: (Score:2)
and had the "bad guys" acting like they'd never encountered politics before in their lives.
That held true for Cersei sure, but then I think he's trying to describe her as paranoid and borderline insane. It's not completely clear who else is a definite bad guy in Feast.
Psychotic (Score:2)
I will still read it though ... (Score:3)
Monumentally stupid headline (Score:5, Insightful)
The first LINE of TFA says " No. Sorry. Not done yet."
How the hell do you go from that to "hey it's done!"?
I mean come on. Even for Slashdot this is retarded.
My day is officially made (Score:5, Funny)
I remember back in the day, as a young man full of optimism and energy, eagerly anticipating the second half of this marvelous novel.
Now at last I might take it in my wrinkled, trembling hands and gaze in wonder through rheumy eyes, ever so slightly before the reaper takes my withered husk from this world!
Re: (Score:3)
I read the first book in the series in the month after I graduated college. Since that time I have held eight jobs, been laid off from two; tried four separate freelance/personal businesses on the side; changed career paths three times; lived in nine houses in three significantly different geographical locations; visited 44 of the 50 US states; had two romantic relationships with two big dry spells in between; met, romanced, and married my wife, and just celebra
Delays (Score:2)
This book has had so many ridiculous setbacks and delays that it's become comical. How many times was book 4 rewritten, only to have become split (and disappointing)? And then it's another six years before book 5, which is simply the other half of book 4? According to him, he's already written some chapters from the next two books. Why? I understand the value of having notes for what's going to happen, but to take the time to write full chapters when your current work isn't finished, and fans are chomp
Re: (Score:2)
Well there's another issue with the summary. If he's got stuff for two more books, this is hardly the end of the series.
This one is so bad it's comical. "The completed conlusion of the series" is actually the not-completed not-conclusion of the series.
Re: (Score:2)
Extremely ironic note:
I originally started reading GRRM specifically because he was recommended to me by fans that claimed he was the anti-Jordan because I wouldn't have to wait for him to get around to publishing the ending to his series.
Hah. The joke's on me, Sanderson is going to finish WOT (and do an absolutely brilliant job at it too, by the way) but who's going to finish this series?
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, Sanderson is doing a surprisingly good job, and I look forward to A Memory of Light. I wonder, though, if The Wheel of Time is a series that can be ended in a way that's satisfying to most fans. I guess we shall see in one year.
If you enjoy darker fantasy, I recommend the Malazan Book of the Fallen. The magic isn't subtle like it is in A Song of Ice and Fire, but it's an excellent (if somewhat unconventional) series. Looking at the release dates, the first book was published in 1999, and the 10th a
I'm still worried.. (Score:2)
And everyone was worried that he was going to pull a Jordan."
There's still two books to go, and Martin is 62 years old. Since it was SEVEN years between "a feast for crows" and "a dance with dragons", he would be 76 at this rate before he finishes. That's beyond the average american lifespan, so yes...a "jordan" is a very real possibility.
Lots of hate for Jordan? (Score:3)
So even if GRRM does kick the bucket, if he "pulls a Jordan" that means that he'll have written out enough notes for a solid conclusion to his fictional world and have selected a competent co-author who can finish out strongly. Is that such a worst-case-scenario?
Re: (Score:2)
HA! And I thought it was book 10 that everyone hated, I have found a fan!
But yes, selecting Sanderson was a good decision, he was highly motivated, and the goal was in sight. He cut the crap and ran it full steam, and so far, it has worked awesomely.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It's a matter of offsets. For example, I absolutely hated his "Ladies and Dice" rant for Mat in TGS, but seeing as the over all story flow had improved amazingly, I forgave these minor niggles.
Re: (Score:2)
While I agree there's something off about the tone of Sanderson's dialog, I'm not sure I agree that you've identified it. I'm not even sure that epic fantasy language conventions are in and of themselves a good thing.
There is something tonally off at times, but really I think he just writes poor prose and poorer dialog (although I did enjoy Lightsong and to a lesser extent Denth in Warbringer -- he seems to be able to pull of snark, although Shallan in the Way of Kings was a big step back in that regard).
Re: (Score:2)
George R.R. Martin has stated in the past that he has directed his notes and unfinished writings to be destroyed when he dies. So, if we want this series concluded, he needs to finish before he dies or depend on fanfiction (which he opposes).
It isn't done, the headline lies (Score:2)
It isn't done. It's just 'done enough' that the publishers feels like they should roll out a date. The publisher has, at various times, rolled out dates in the past only to have them be missed. I will believe it when I see it.
meanwhile (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
I have not read the it, but I have heard Malazan is a nice series. Would you recommend it?
And talking of long series, Jim Butcher is also good on doling out instalment on his Dresden series, and so is Terry Pratchett on his Discworld set (though technically, they are at least half a dozen separate series rolled into one).
Re: (Score:2)
The Malazan series is the most fascinating work of fantasy I've ever read. Highly recommended.
Butcher's Dresden Files are also highly entertaining and well written, though I strongly suggest avoiding his pure fantasy works (the name escapes me at the moment, but they're absolute crap, and I'm surprised they're written by the same man).
Re: (Score:2)
You wouldn't be talking of Codex Alera, would you? I kinda liked those, though yes, the style was markedly different, I guess he was trying to experiment with a different style with those six. But not bad, just...different.
HELL YES I WOULD RECOMMEND IT (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Your best friend will be the list on characters in the front of the books and the append
Re: (Score:2)
Eh.
Malazan reads like it's the author novelizing his D&D game. That's not really a complement, even though I'm a longtime pen and paper gamer.
(In actuality, apparently it's his GURPS game -- but I figure more people will know what D&D is.)
Ya well (Score:2)
While you were writing that comment, Stephen King just finished and published 18 books. So there!
Won't believe it until it ships (Score:2)
I won't believe it until it actually ships from Amazon. They had a publishing date set years ago, I think they even put it up for pre-order...everything sounded like the book was done and at the printers. Now we find out it STILL isn't really finished?
What's really a shame is I'm just wrapping up re-reading the previous four books in anticipation of the new TV series. We can probably thank that for him finally (hopefully) getting this book finished. The teaser preview for the series sounds good. Hopefu
Gaiman's perspective (Score:5, Interesting)
May be a good time to post Neil Gaiman's blog entry on why George R.R. Martin is not your bitch [neilgaiman.com].
Re: (Score:2)
That post makes me glad my name is not Gareth! Thanks for sharing.
Re: (Score:2)
While I normally love Neil, in response to that particular piece he can kiss my lily white ass.
There's a vast difference between someone "out there typing what you want to read right now" (Neil's assertion) and thinking that it's a disappointment that someone is failing to meet the delivery expectations they themselves have set.
If at work I were to promise my boss that I could complete a project in six months, then turn around and have it take 24 times as long? I wouldn't have had a job after twice as long
Eff Neil Gaiman (Score:2)
I'm a paying customer and I have the right to bitch, complain and moan all I want. I spent money, not to mention time and mental energy, on Martin's books and I certainly wouldn't have done so if I didn't feel that there was at least an implicit promise that he would make a reasonable effort to finish the series and not leave me hanging out to dry with a thousand cliffhangers.
I understand about missing deadlines and writers block and all that. But if you can't write, then at least shut up about it, for G
What's the deal? (Score:2)
I know several people who are very happy about this news, and I admit I actually have no idea who he is or what series this is the next book of. I know, Google is my friend, etc., but what I'm really asking is, and this is the perfect place to ask, "Why should I read this series, especially given that it seems he seems takes an awful lot of time to complete a book". Sounds like he'd give Knuth a run for his money.
I'm honestly not trolling: I'm really interested and am just looking for more subjective inform
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
The two series are very different though and the real defining feature of GRRM's series is that it is epic in the truest sense of the word while still keeping very organized separate plot lines that interact in meaningful ways. I enjoyed the sci-fi books "The Dragon Never
lol (Score:2)
"The dragons are coming. Prepare to dance."
Jordan (Score:3)
Hi,
i consider the reference to Jordan as bad taste and offensive toward Jordans family. Do you think he intended to die? As a comment, i would have expected such a missstep, but as story this is a very, very low level.
Furthermore: the story belongs to the author and only him. If he decides to take 17 years for the next book (as Tokien did after The Hobbit), one has to wait. I would rather wait in vain, than pushing for a book the author feels not happy with.
Disappointed, Martin
Re: (Score:2)
I think he realized he had a guaranteed income stream which was larger than what he would get from residuals alone and decided to milk it. Did he intend to die before finishing? No - very few people have a stated intention to die, after all. But I do not believe he had after book six or so any intention of writing the story he initially set out to write in the way he initially expected to write it.
Re: (Score:2)
if everyone who read the series knew he was going to take 5 years to write half a book, no one would buy until the series was finished.
Contrary to my experience. No one usually cares how many books a series contains before he/she buys it. Once they started with the first and liked it, they buy the next ones wether the series is finished or not.
The author does in fact owe his or her readers to a certain extent.
100% disagreement on this. Being a fan does not give you one ounce of rights towards the author (or any other artist). You pay and get the book; this is the complete transaction. Everything beyond this is voluntary service from the author. CU, Martin
Re: (Score:2)
100% disagreement on this. Being a fan does not give you one ounce of rights towards the author (or any other artist). You pay and get the book; this is the complete transaction. Everything beyond this is voluntary service from the author. CU, Martin
I disagree with you. When an author creates a book, it's already done. Any sales of that book are a down payment on the author writing more. If I didn't care if the author wrote anymore, I'd not buy the book but get an electronic copy somewhere and read that.
Now, in some cases, this is a general "You do good stuff, please keep it up.", with no specific expectation. But sometimes there is an expectation associated with it, particularly in the case of a series.
But, I would rather wait for the book the author
tv series (Score:2)
If the HBO series is successful he will be forced to finish the series. He can't very well let the series get ahead of the books. Assuming 1 season = 1 book, I'd say that gives him ~6 years to finish the last two books.
He was going to announce Dance with Dragons over Christmas, but he was in the hospital for a week or two. Since he seems to have a lot else on his plate[ie tv series premieres in a month] this delayed him more than 2 weeks as he needed to find a new free time in his schedule instead of jus
"...and pull a Jordan." (Score:2)
and what? Die? That's a tad insensitive even for Slashdot. I know we are all emotionless robots here but come on...
Pull a What??? (Score:2)
And the Tolkien estate sues him (Score:5, Funny)
dont care... (Score:3)
I started reading his incredibly good books 11 (that's ELEVEN) years ago. They were great books! But waiting 5 years for a Feast for crows? I waited till it came out on paperback, got about half way through it and realized there was no point. I didn't remember any of the characters or the plot, and didn't feel like re-reading 4000+ pages just to catch myself up. Now, 17 years after the series started he finally writes the last book. Good for you George. Maybe my kid can read it when he gets old enough. But as for me and a lot of your audience? You lost us a decade ago. You got too involved in other projects, even politics for gods sake.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Was anyone actually worried he would "pull a Jordan?"
Yes. He's going to be well into his 70's before he's done, and he weighs like 400lbs.
Comment removed (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Well, this is a happy coincidence. I was going to throw out an "is this series any good?" question to the /. hordes, but, let's be honest, that would probably tell me nothing. But from other of your posts, I think you can give me a good opinion on that.
I'm not generally a fan of fantasy (notable exceptions: Nevèrÿon, selected Michael Moorcock, Chronicles of Thomas Covenant (although that was a _long_ time ago)), but I've liked Martin's SF short stories. Is this series worth the time investment?
Re: (Score:3)
This is one of the best fantasy series I've ever read.
Actually, it's more what I'd call "realistic" fantasy. Now, before you start telling me that fantasy is by definition not realistic, let me explain.
Martin's characters are some of the most relentlessly human I've seen in a fantasy series. None of the characters, save a few who live on the edges (so far) have been pure good or pure evil. Everybody is a shade of gray.
Add to that the fact that Martin isn't afraid to kill off major characters, and it's a del
Re: (Score:2)
Well put, those are exactly the characteristics that I find most enjoyable about Martin's writing.
Re: (Score:2)
Also, it seems very much to be more a story of political, interpersonal, and family relations that happens to be set in medieval fantasy than it is about fantasy with some personal drama on the side. I've only read 80% of one of the books, but it was very good. (:
Re: (Score:3)
Yeah, as my wife would say, his books are character driven, not plot driven. The plot exists as a setting in which to explore the characters' motivations and choices, rather than the characters existing merely to move the plot forward.
Re: (Score:2)
I also haven't noticed any pure good characters, (Ned being the closest) and the only pure evil characters have been of that 'stuff' coming from the north.
Not even Gregor Clegane or the Bloody Mummers?
Re: (Score:3)
I'd suggest the Malazan Book of the Fallen too then, by Stephen Erikson.
Get through Gardens of the Moon (the first book) and give the second one a go too, even if you don't like the first. It starts in (innovative) generic fantasy mode but swiftly turns up the ratchet, goes heavily multi-threaded, ties together story threads across millenia and has some of the harshest treatment for 'main' characters I've seen in mainstream books.
I mostly love it for the constant ratcheting up of the bar for "don't fuck wit
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
I think it's important to note that the series isn't really a fantasy series. It has fantasy elements, but that is not the focus. Thematically, I would have to say it's tragedy. I wish I'd known that when I went into the series. It's good, but if you expect the good guys to win the day...
Re: (Score:3)
Too much fluff. Have you seen the way Isaac Asimov writes? Now that's the way to get a book go
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? (Score:4, Informative)
Was anyone actually worried he would "pull a Jordan?"
Yeah, their is concern... check out this timeline:
* A Game of Thrones (1996)
* A Clash of Kings (1998) 2 years
* A Storm of Swords (2000) 2 years
* A Feast for Crows (2005) 5 years and next book half done
* A Dance with Dragons (not in 2011) 6 years
* The Winds of Winter (forthcoming) so 6 years (GRRM age now 68+)
* A Dream of Spring (forthcoming) so 6 years (GRRM 75+)
Unless something really changes in the speed of his writing we are likely never going to read the ending.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Actually, part of what made this book so long in coming was the fact that GRRM initially wanted the 4th book to skip ahead years, with some of the intervening detail revealed in flashbacks. He got partway into writing it, and realized that wouldn't work.
So, he started over. Then he realized that this new approach required him to fill out all sorts of stuff that he hadn't counted on, which made the book length explode. Then he seperated them into two, and "A Feast for Crows" was born.
He has stated many times
Re: (Score:3)
To be fair, Martin was struck by a very bad case of writers block because of the way he wrote A Feast for Crows. He was trying to cut down on the number of characters in the book so he left a bunch of important characters out, but was left with the problem of writing the second book with events that characters in the first one had already experienced. Hopefully he won't have the same issue with the final two books. So there's hope that they'll both get published this decade.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
i foresee a new career path for sanderson. help may be needed for janny wurts [wikipedia.org] if she doesn't hurry up, and didn't eddings leave something half done at the end? feist's stuff can probably be kept going forever.
has sanderson done any sci-fi? he should talk to david gerrold, or gordy dickson's heirs....
Re: (Score:3)
I'm not understanding the summary for this story in the context of what you've written. Why does it say that he has "completed his long awaited conclusion" to the series when there are still two more novels after it to be written and released. Poking around, I read that he may have written a few chapters in later books... but is that it?
Re: (Score:2)
I kind of think this "pulling a jordan" comment is pretty rude, and I'd expect it from a troll thread. Jordan died, most likely against his better judgement. I expect Martin shares our concerns about his potential expiry in the next decade, and also hopes that he doesn't die.
I understand the impatience, I love the series too, but I think this "pulling a jordan" mentality is hurting everyone. All 4 books have been great, I'd be more afraid that the next book will be a let-down than that the next book won't a
Re: (Score:3)
All of you over sensitive clods whining about the phrase 'pulling a Jordan' need to just step back and look at it. Jordan had a good arc supposedly planned out. 3-4 books.
He started making good cash on his books.....and suddenly started writing by the pound. Spending an entire page describing a few blades of grass or a barmaids perfect breasts. He stretched the series either intentionally or because of a horribly inflated ego and the lack of a decent editor who would slap him around and cut his bullshit
Re: (Score:3)
It's not Jordan's fault he got amyloidosis, and he certainly never had any intention of creating an "interminable, never ending cash cow". It is true he got a bit lost around 7-8, but he pulled out of it quite nicely before he died - before he was even diagnosed, I believe. It was a mistake, or a series of them, that lead to problems in those books, not intent.
Re: (Score:2)
Agreed. Wizard's First Rule was excellent. The second, meh. Third and on, save the trees man, I'd rather have them than this potboilery shit.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, I do get suckered into reading some really terrible authors, but thankfully I have managed to avoid Goodkind. As for Jordan, just answer me this, how many times can a woman smooth the front of her dress?
Re: (Score:2)
Faith of the Fallen? Ugh.
I'm half shocked Goodkind didn't get sued for essentially taking a copy of Ayn Rand's The Fountainhead, crossing out its title and author and writing his own.
Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? (Score:4, Insightful)
... you don't think it's clear that, at that point in writing the series, Goodkind read him some Ayn Rand and thought it was the most genius shit ever?
I mean, Jagang is instantly transformed from being a badass conquerer who wants to break your spirit and take everything from you just because he's such a badass and can to... a guy who wants to bring communism to the world. That completely pisses on the characterization of the major antagonist of the series. Faith of the Fallen isn't just a bad, unoriginal book, it's in that "Highlander 2" special echelon of being a sequel so bad, it actually ruins the good entries in the series before it.
Re: (Score:2)
Do you mean not drawing the story to completion in a small number of books, or leaving a series unfinished by PASSING AWAY? I don't know in what sense you meant that phrase but that's kind of offensive, isn't it?
The latter. And it's supposed to be offensive. Jordan drug out the Wheel of Time series for over 20 years...it wasn't just possible he was going to die before finishing it, it was a statistical certainty. And he didn't give a rats ass. He worked on other projects, games, tv series...let WOT languish with 3-4 years between books, etc. So yes it's offensive, and he deserved it.
Re: (Score:2)
Let it language 3-4 (or 6) years between books while working on other projects... gee that doesn't sound at all familiar, now does it?
Re: (Score:3)
Nah, with all due respect to the author of my favourite series, he was slow. Though it had more to do with his fascination to delving way too deep into often unnecessary details rather than him unable to write a plot in a first place. (For instance, did he really need to spend all that all that screen time on Galina?). That meant that he ended up wasting too much time summing it up.
Brandon Sanderson really did cut out the "no-doubt-interesting-but-ultimately-irrelevant" plot trivia. That's why he was able t
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Nah, with all due respect to the author of my favourite series, he was slow. Though it had more to do with his fascination to delving way too deep into often unnecessary details rather than him unable to write a plot in a first place. (For instance, did he really need to spend all that all that screen time on Galina?). That meant that he ended up wasting too much time summing it up.
Brandon Sanderson really did cut out the "no-doubt-interesting-but-ultimately-irrelevant" plot trivia. That's why he was able to bang out two books in about as many years. Him and Jim Butcher are some of my favorite modern day authors. I highly recommend their works.
Though if you like, you an replace "Pulling a Jordan" with Author Existence Failure [tvtropes.org], but that will entail you loosing all track of time :P
Disclaimer: I am a fan of the Jordan books, although I don't think I could explain the plot to you.
Which is my Preferred Theory on what happened to Jordan: I don't believe he had the whole thing plotted out, and ended up in Twin Peaks land - so many plot points to clear up that it just couldn't be done, and he couldn't decide which ones to abandon. (I think Sanderson has done a great job just focusing on the important ones, while keeping the general style.) But if I had to compare Wheel of Time to another s
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Heh, well, I'd guess the first step in avoiding "pulling a Jordan" is trying not to. :)
Re:Pulling a Jordan (Score:4)
Personally, I like the Jordan style much, much better for WoT. There's an essential life to the story, and characters, that's missing. A lot of the things that seem unnecessary, even in retrospect, are there to justify the otherwise insane decisions the characters make; for me, it was clearest at the beginning of the Galad/Perrin confrontation--the characters just seem to move on strings, acting for no real reason other than that's what's necessary to move the plot along. I don't mean that to discourage anyone from reading the Sanderson WoT books though--especially since there is a lot in there where, either Jordan wrote it himself, or Sanderson's ability to imitate his style waxes and wanes, because the magic is there, just in spurts. The example I spoke of was probably the worst, and it wasn't that bad.
Anyway, even (or maybe especially) if you don't lie WoT at all, you should check out Sanderson's other works. Mistborn was pretty good--that's a high compliment for fantasy, which is usually absolute shit--and The Way of Kings, the only published book from the Stormlight Archives, is fucking amazing. I honestly haven't loved a book this much since The Fires of Heaven (I liked WoT before that, but that's the book that made me love it).
As for what the article is actually about, for those who have read it, is there an actual story arc going on? I read I think around halfway through the first book, and it just seemed like a bunch of disconnected subplots, and keeping track of all the characters even in that little bit was extremely difficult--now that I know he takes his PoV characters seriously it'd probably be easier, but I remember it being a real challenge to even remember what I already read about them. And maybe it's trite of me as a reader, but if I'm going to read about swords and magic and all that, I'm looking for a story about something more than the machinations of a bunch of people squabbling over power. From what I read, it seemed that that's all there would be.
But, I loved the writing. I loved the characters, and how well the author got into their heads. I guess I'd like to be on the bandwagon for this one, so (please) without spoiling anything, is there an actual story here?
Re:Pulling a Jordan (Score:4, Interesting)
Just to provide a bit more insight on what Martin is attempting to accomplish in this saga; he's actually a historian by education who specialized in the war of the roses. All the squabbling that occurs is a remythologization of that power struggle, because people generally don't want to read stale history books (and by people, I mean the fiction consuming public). So it's pretty integral to his goals a writer and continues throughout the whole series, but the POV chapters lend very well to get in to the minds of various people and villains often end up having shades of gray which adds a great dynamic IMO. Don't know that any of this changes your opinion on his work though :)
Re: (Score:2)
Sorry to double reply, but the story is slow moving in many respects ... by the fourth book the overarching phenomenon is still developing and you have an idea of what it will be but still no clear picture.
Re:Pulling a Jordan (Score:4, Interesting)
Why wouldn't you want him to pull a Jordan?
Re: (Score:3)
Robert, not Michael.
I think it refers to dying with your epic fantasy series unfinished.
Re: (Score:2)
It's more than the second half of Feast of Crows. The first 1/2-2/3[of a 1000 page book] will be concurrent to Feast of Crows, but the rest of the book will be after Feast of Crows[ie stuff always planned to be in book 5]