Facebook Bans 20,000 Kids a Day 192
autospa writes "Although Facebook requires all users to be 13 or older, the social network bans 20,000 underage users a day, a spokeswoman said. 'There are people who lie. There are people who are under 13 [accessing Facebook],' Mozelle Thompson, Facebook's chief privacy adviser, told the The Telegraph."
They end up somewhere else (Score:5, Funny)
Myspace.
Mis-read headline (Score:4, Funny)
But sending them to Myspace is almost certainly worse...
Re:Mis-read headline (Score:4, Insightful)
I thought it said "Facebook bangs 20,000 kids a day", which is probably criminal.
Unless you're an Italian PM
Re: (Score:2)
Take off the zeroes, and you'd probably be right about Berlusconi.
Re:They end up somewhere else (Score:5, Funny)
MySpace. The website for 14 year old girls. And the 40 year old men that love them.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
MySpace. The website for 14 year old girls. And the 40 year old men that love them.
I hope you mean their dads
Re:They end up somewhere else (Score:5, Funny)
Only in the context of "Who's your daddy?"
Re: (Score:3)
You mean the FBI agents and the 40 year old lonely men caught by them.
Rule 29: On the Internet, all girls are men and all kids are FBI agents
Rule 30: There are no girls on the internet.
--
BMO
Re: (Score:2)
Still facebook (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I think you mean it's "a pastime". . . .
No, I don't think he did.
Idiot.
Tch. Tch. Tch.
Re: (Score:2)
No, I think "past time" is right. As in it's time has passed. Not "pastime" as in "baseball is Americas pastime". I also don't think your last comma is right either. And it should be "on Facebook" not "at Facebook" and Facebook should be capitalized since it's a proper noun. So, to quote a wise man:
Those darned apostrophes (Score:4, Funny)
I almost hate to do this since you were so careful at catching all the other mistakes, but
As in it's time has passed.
should be
As in its time has passed.
"It's" is a contraction of "it is", as in "it's a shame people can no longer communicate effectively." "Its" is the possessive for "it", as in "its time has passed." So, to quote someone who quoted a wise man:
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
I think you mean it's "a pastime" and "because" and "facebook, too." If you're going to correct someone, at least get it right yourself. Idiot.
Maybe we need an over 13 rule on slashdot
Re: (Score:2)
Could always use a test like Liesure Suit Larry 3:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lk5l7MHGZAQ [youtube.com]
skip in to about 3:15.
In other news? (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
I don't understand (Score:5, Insightful)
When asked by the Australian parliamentary online safety committee how Facebook can detect those lying on age forms, Thompson replied, "It's not perfect." In fact, it's relatively easy. A standard online form asks a user if he or she is 13 or over, and the user can tell the truth or not. ComScore estimates about 3.6 million of kids under 12 use Facebook in the United States.
Uh, I don't understand this retarded article. How are they determining that users are under 13? The article says "In fact, it's relatively easy." but then goes on to talk about something entirely different. Of course the user can tell the truth or lie, but how is Facebook determining they lie? In their own words "It's not perfect" so what are they doing? Facial recognition to flag people that look young? Network of young friends? Use of improper grammar and slang in posts? I hate lame articles like this.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:I don't understand (Score:5, Funny)
"first grade was great today..."
In the town I live, that could be posted by half the population under 35
Re: (Score:2)
"First grade was great today" demonstrates spelling and grammatical abilities beyond that of 35 year old still in grade school, so it could only have been written by a real child.
I don't understand either (Score:2)
I hate lame articles like this.
Then why are you reading /. ?
Re:I don't understand (Score:5, Interesting)
I worked moderating dating/chat websites for a while, and we had to deal with quite a few underage users. There are a few methods for bringing the data to the moderators attention (Bayesian filtering, user reporting, even identifying likely cases by their friends within the site), but they come down to one factor:
People generally only bother to lie about their age in the age field. In their 'about me', in their username, in their pictures, in every single chat conversation or status update they'll be entirely honest under the assumption that the site only checks the Date Of Birth field. After a user/profile has been flagged as likely for whatever reason, it's generally a matter of seconds to verify whether or not that's the case.
Re: (Score:2)
They are probably cross-referencing the info provided by the user against their databases. I'm sure the personal data available to facebook is comprehensive. For example:
New user lists his/her address, gender. John Smith, Male, 13, lives at 20 Silicon Valley way, CA.
Facebook accesses data bases that tell it that the inhabitants of 20 Silicon Valley way are Peter, Mary, Linda & John, ages 35, 32, 13 & 10, respectively.
Facebook figures out that the new user is actually only 10.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
All I know is that my stupid cousin encouraged both of her kids (8 and 10) to get Facebook accounts and brow beat several members of the family into friending them. Their accounts haven't been closed after nearly a year. I'm half-tempted to finally take the friend requests then immediately do the "Which Sexual Position are You?" quiz and post my results.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It's not per se that they have Facebook accounts that bothers me. Technically it's against the terms of service, but that's hardly a serious issue. What annoys me is that my cousin had her kids make these account and send friend requests to essentially everyone in my immediate family without warning us ahead of time. My mother is one of five sisters, many of whom have two or three adult children of their own now, it's quite a substantial number of people we're talking about here. When people ignored and
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Facebook isn't supposed to be appropriate for 10-year-olds.
think the kids don't know about those? (Score:2)
I don't think you were 18 or even 13 when you learned about the concept. I was 6 to 9 years old when I was discussing them with my classmates and looking at porn.
The law that makes Facebook restrict age and ultimately makes kids lie is idiotic. It is one of the many crappy laws passed back when normal non-nerd people were terrified of the internet.
Re: (Score:3)
You're an American aren't you?
Re: (Score:2)
Of course the user can tell the truth or lie, but how is Facebook determining they lie?
Facebook is not. Their second grade teacher is determining it, and flagging the account as "impersonation". This works pretty well if you live in a small town. When I used to have a FB account it would pop random people up from my hometown and current city and ask me to friend them... Or was that the dating site ads? Well anyway. If you put your town as "LA" or "NYC" this doesn't work, but proportionally very few people live there, or they technically live and attend school in a very small suburb, whic
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
A couple of options jump out at me.
Any point where they could enter a birthdate, you can use that.
If they post what school they're at, and you know they're under about grade 6, you can use that (especially handy if a school only goes to grade 6), or anything else about what grade they are in.
Probably user reports.
I wouldn't want to go blabbing the technique used, just because it's probably possible to troll people with it who are close to the age. And one thing you want to do is get em hooked young so they
Re: (Score:2)
Uh, I don't understand this retarded article. How are they determining that users are under 13? The article says "In fact, it's relatively easy." but then goes on to talk about something entirely different. Of course the user can tell the truth or lie, but how is Facebook determining they lie?
I always liked how Leisure Suit Larry did it - Asking questions an adult at the time would know, but a 13 y/o kid hoping to see 8 bit boobies would not know.
Re: (Score:2)
I think it's like the no-fly lists. I once had a yahoo account that I could not get to some business networking sections and they recommended that I go to the underage site. There was no way to get them to change whatever flag had been set, through emails or phone calls. Watch out you may be under aged .
Re: (Score:3)
They estimate 3.6 million users under 12, but Facebook claims to ban more than 5 million a year?
From TFS: "There are people who lie."
Re: (Score:2)
I wonder if they ban more bots, or Chinese "Like" farmers, than they do 12 year olds...
/MEME-tasm!
Re: (Score:2)
A) Facebook is only starting to seriously ban people,
B) A large part of the "Banned" kids do not wait till they are 13 to recreate an Account...
C) The quantity of under 13 users is probably growing...
So they claim to ban around 7 million kids a year, and are probably increasing the rate, and it's probably not enough.. (for some values of enough)
As for bots and farmers they are probably in the millions a day...
Re: (Score:2)
From what I understand, they just ban any account that has any content with the word "Bieber" in it.
Says 20,000 a day, not 20 million.
Re: (Score:2)
However I believe this policy could only serve to drastically improve the overall facebook experience.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
-1, Bieber.
Re: (Score:2)
She said she was 18! (Score:2)
I wish they would let us customize our default posting options, by age or individual. I would love nothing better than if my postings by default couldn't be seen by anyone under 18 (i.e., my nephews) and anyone over 60 (i.e., my parents).
Re: (Score:1)
Yeah, but more interesting would be if they could fix me a pair of goggles one could use that only showed "beautiful women"* and blurred everyone else.
* for a given value of beautiful.
Re: (Score:2)
Remove adblock plus and try again.
Re: (Score:2)
That used to be known as 'beer'.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
She may have said she was 18, but the grey hair should have tipped you off she wasn't!
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, we're all well aware of your position, Mr. Polanski.
Question (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Surely if they're teenagers, they're 13 or over and allowed to use Facebook? :o)
Oooops...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I looked that that, but the options are very limited (pretending to be someone else
1) The kid is pretending to be someone else; someone whom is 13 or over.
2) Tell FB that you personally know that kid, that kid is 8, and someone else is impersonating the kid online (school bully, stereotypical middle aged creepy male lunatic right out of a TV special, who knows, even though its almost certainly the parents or a relative).
At the real world age of 3 months its pretty obvious the parents are doing it for the laughs, it MIGHT even be funny (but lets face it, probably not). At the age of 7 yea
Re: (Score:2)
Duh (Score:2)
My youngest niece and all her friends are on facebook and she's under 13 -- she uses her ipod touch to access the site. She can type with her thumbs faster than I can on a keyboard with all 10 fingers! Her spelling is terrible, but, she gets her messages across. I'd never heard of this rule until now, I just assumed it was normal for her to be on facebook.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I probably have a dozen or so family members under the age of 13 on FB, and know quite a few friends whose kids are. How else are they going to play Farmville? I can't think of any of them who have posted a single picture or status update.
What does Facebook expect? (Score:2)
Sadly, Facebook is the Crack cocaine of the internet. Facebook has put oodles of web games on their site that kids dig. Children are very social creatures, and this is basically the cookie jar that's within reach and a tiny bit of innovation (lying) from kids to get that cookie. The problem is that kids don't think through things, when they lie.
They may say they are 14, and then have open discussions about all the 3rd grade class stuff the kid does and posts from other friends to post dates and times and
My son.... (Score:4, Funny)
Shocking (Score:2)
This is simply shocking. 13 year old kids lie to get on Facebook? Why - back in my day, they hadn't invented LYING yet! The younger generations are going to hell, I tell you. Lying. My generation would never have though of telling a lie to anyone. Well, maybe to get out of a horse-whipping or something like that. Even then, we'd have crossed our fingers behind our backs!
Fake accounts? (Score:2)
How many with fake accounts?
TFA completely wrong on age requirement (Score:2)
Those are the obvious reasons. But none of those are correct.
What about banning parents in Facebook? (Score:2)
-"Mom, stop treating me like a kid."
-"You will always be my kid"
-"Mooom, I am 30 years old..."
-"Hush, are you eating well? You look skinny".
Parental participation should be illegal.
It was hard enough to move out from the basement, Facebook is the nightmare for overprotected kids: it is the digital basement. Forever... and ever... and ever... (curled up in fetal position)
Re: (Score:2)
Well put your mom on list and make the list to not see anything. Problem solved.
Or just don't add them in Facebook.
Re: (Score:2)
I always thought it would be funny for parents to create Facebook accounts for their kids when they're born, upload all their pics to it etc.. didn't realise you weren't even allowed an account if you're under 13. The chances that Facebook will still be no 1 when the kid hits 13 aren't astronomical of course..
Re: (Score:3)
I always thought it would be funny for parents to create Facebook accounts for their kids when they're born, upload all their pics to it etc.
I have two under-13 "friends" on Facebook -- both children of people I know. One is only 1.5 years old, and got a Facebook account within a week of being born. When he's older I doubt he'll see that profile as "his", it's really his mum's second profile.
Re: (Score:2)
The "you must be 13" thing is because of COPPA. The companies don't care in the slightest, they just don't want to deal with the regulatory junk.
Also, why the hell does a kid that young need a cell phone? Tell him to go outside and play in the dirt.
Re: (Score:2)
You “pay” attention (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attention_economy) by clicking over to a site. And if you like what you see on a site, you might mention it to friends, or link to it on your blog or from your website, enhancing its reputation. And since many businesses and netizens have found ways to convert “wealth” in the attention and reputation economies into the kind of wealth that they can deposit in banks, maybe we need to come to a new understanding of free.
Sounds like whuffie to me
Re:Lying about age? (Score:5, Insightful)
You start at -1 because you're a fucking moron and a troll, and because you've recently taken to using dozens of sockpuppets in an attempt to make sure every single person here knows how fucking stupid you are. Something you apparently don't even try to hide anymore considering you posted this as cpu6502 and knew the intentions of a post by commodore64_love.
Re: (Score:3)
He's never attempted to hide it. I don't think he uses "Sock Puppets" in the tradition sense, I think he just likes having his name show up 15 different ways. It's very odd. We've gotten into a few arguments over the last few months and it's really odd to get continuous replies from 5 or 6 different accounts all of whom are obviously the same person.
Re: (Score:2)
He's never attempted to hide it. I don't think he uses "Sock Puppets" in the tradition sense, I think he just likes having his name show up 15 different ways. It's very odd.
Or maybe he just likes to boost his own ratings from the moderator points he gets in the other accounts. Doesn't seem to be working out so well though
Re: (Score:2)
commodore64_love has been on my foes list for AGES, I guess I just need to add a few of his other aliases.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Why are they banning under-13's from using the site? Is 13 the age of consent in the United States? what an arb number...
Any number is going to be an arbitrary threshold; perhaps you didn't give the idea the few more seconds of thought it deserved before typing?
Re:Age of Consent? (Score:5, Informative)
Federal law prohibits websites from collecting personal information from anyone under the age of 13.
Re: (Score:2)
Federal law prohibits websites from collecting personal information from anyone under the age of 13.
'Federal' suggests you are talking about a U.S. law. Many users of Facebook are not based in the U.S. What implications does this have here, specifically to non-U.S. users of Facebook, if any?
Re: (Score:2)
The question mentioned the US specifically, so it was a US-specific answer.
Re: (Score:2)
Why are they banning under-13's from using the site? Is 13 the age of consent in the United States?
No, but it is the age of consent [wikimedia.org] in Spain and Iran. It's 12 or less in Angola, the Philippines, Yemen, and parts of Mexico. A few countries don't have an age of consent, requiring only that sex be within marriage (at any age). In most of the world, it varies from 14 to 16, and in the USA it varies from 16 to 18.
Re: (Score:2)
I would presume that 13 is the age because FB is the kind of site that media outlets would love to rake over the coals. 13 was established long before the internet was popularized, and it has held are
Re: (Score:2)
A virgin.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Lol if I had a nickel for everytime I posed as an OVERage person when I was underage..
Unfortunately there was no world wide web when I was underage, and the only chance I have of pretending I'm old enough now is trying to sneak in to the pensioners' matinée film club
Re: (Score:2)
Was this before beer was invented? You have a 6 digit /. UID, I have a 5 digit /. UID and even we had friends with fake IDs.
Re: (Score:2)
Just because Facebook tries to work within California's rules, does that mean that UK use by young children is a problem - not counting the whole appropriateness/stalker issue?
If one server is located on United States soil, transactions on that server are subject to United States law. Feel free to start your own UK-only Facebook clone, and good luck signing people up.
Re: (Score:2)
Whether it's law or not, the rule is a certain age, which users click "I agree" to when they sign up. If they lied on that, it doesn't matter what the law says about data protection, their accounts are forfeitable.
And they don't want to have to keep track of a million different laws so a blanket-ban on under-13's is just common sense and saving on administration - like every forum software I've seen in the last ten years says by default or recommends.
Who cares about the law - if you say it's not for kids,
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I run a large UK children's club..
You know, they say pedophiles seek out positions where they know they'll come into contact with a lot of children... that's why I don't volunteer.
Re: (Score:2)
I work in schools. No school that I know of has a forum unless every word is moderated by staff first. And my brother runs a large Scouting website which has a forum. His disclaimer reads:
All users under the age of 13 must have prior parental consent, as required by the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act of 2000, before registering on this forum. This can be done through the following methods: ... @ ...) via
Digitally Signed E-Mail from the parent or legal guardian
Contacting the site administrator (
Re: (Score:2)
No one ever actually agrees to any EULA or TOS. I used to read those things just so I would know what I'm not allowed to do - then start doing those things immediately. Just because some bunch of fools puts a disclaimer and some rules at the bottom of a sign up page doesn't mean anyone has read them, or that anyone agrees to them. And, I'll wager that a half decent lawyer can bet any and all terms thrown out if it ever goes to court.
It's the internet, FFS. People are supposed to have free access to data