Firefox 13 Released, Debuts Brand New Tab Page and Homepage 320
MrSeb writes "Mozilla has officially released Firefox 13. Unlike Firefox 12 (or 11, or 10, or indeed many of the recent Firefox versions), Firefox 13 is an important release with a handful of much-needed features that are long overdue. There's a new New Tab Page launcher, with your favorite and most-used websites, and a new default home page with one-click access to Bookmarks, Settings, Add-ons, etc. SPDY is on by default, too, which should help ameliorate the perceived speed difference between Chrome and Firefox. Finally, the developer tools (Page Inspector, Style Inspector, etc.) have been tweaked and updated!"
The new-tab page isn't a chrome invention (Score:5, Insightful)
I've seen this news all over the web since yesterday, however, the "new tab" page as it is, isn't a Chrome feature, it actually comes from Opera, which had it way before Chrome existed.
Re:The new-tab page isn't a chrome invention (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
The last time I checked, Opera was free...
Re:The new-tab page isn't a chrome invention (Score:4, Interesting)
It wasn't during the time period that they were actually innovating.
Friday, December 24, 2004
Tyler Eaves
--edited address out--
Order receipt from BMT Micro, Inc.
Order ID: 2275341
Order Number: 2004-1224-1543-51-678
Qty Product Description Price Shipping Subtotal
1 3100023 Opera 7 for Desktop 39.00 0.00 41.73
Sales tax: USD 2.73
Total bill: USD 41.73
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
So, that payment was completely voluntary, as using an ad supported Opera for free became an option in 2000. It went free with no ads in 2005. For the record, Speed Dial, the innovative feature in question, was released in 2007. Nice troll though.
Re: (Score:2)
I think a large number of Slashdotters used it in the late 90s, when it wasn't free at all. I know I used it as my main browser 1998-99, but haven't used it since then. Perhaps everyone in this thread is an old curmudgeon.
Re: (Score:2)
Yea, I was a bit miffed with that. I bought it to get rid of the ads, and like 2 weeks later they made it free.
Re:The new-tab page isn't a chrome invention (Score:5, Funny)
Seriously. Who pays for a web browser?
A couple things have changed while you were in your apparent coma: nearly 3,000 people were killed and World Trade Centers 1, 2, 3 and 7 were destroyed in a terrorist attack on the United States 10.5 years ago and desktop Opera has been free for roughly 12 years now.
Welcome back.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
What? Speed Dial is nothing like this. Chrome, Safari, and now Firefox show your most frequented websites/pages, Opera's new tab page is just a bookmark grid.
Why do Opera fanboys feel the need to convince everyone that Opera invented the web?
Re:The new-tab page isn't a chrome invention (Score:5, Informative)
Why do Opera fanboys feel the need to convince everyone that Opera invented the web?
Because they did, more or less. Tabs, mobile browsing, CSS support, built-in adblocking (which no other major browser even has, as far as I know), speed... yeah, Opera pretty much pioneered everything important about modern web browsers, and they deserve a lot of credit for that.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
They didn't invent tabs, and FF has adblock. It may not be built-in, but it still works pretty much the same, and more flexible.
Remember FF makes profit out of ads (indirectly), so a built-in ad blocker is a bit of a suicide.
Re:The new-tab page isn't a chrome invention (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
>>>In fact, a commit was made to Mozilla a few months before Opera 5 was released that added tab support.
So you're saying Opera 5 was first.
Huh, I think I finally understand why there is such contention between you and everyone else. It's because we're not all speaking the same language. The words look alike, but they apparently mean different things. So you think you're saying one thing, but everyone else perceives it as something else, and then you can't understand where all the rage comes from.
But don't fret, I'm here to help! Y'see, "before" means "first" in this context. And if "first" means something different in your language, here
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Opera was so indy, it was not caring about Opera before everyone else didn't care about Opera.
Re:The new-tab page isn't a chrome invention (Score:5, Interesting)
No, it isn't a bookmark grid. It is a list of sites you most frequently visit, albeit set manually.
I don't think I would want one that changes dynamically based on the past 3 days of my surfing. When I open Opera, I hit Ctrl+3, Ctrl+5, Ctrl+6, Crtl+2 and have the pages I want to see at the outset. I remember what spot each page is and can open it in a new tab blindfolded.
As is, Firefox's version is a bit gimmicky, trying to one-up Speed Dial in order not to make it seem like a feature copy.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Chrome, Safari, and now Firefox show your most frequented websites/pages
Yes, and I f@#$%ing hate that. I don't want Google show up on my freaking start page when the address bar is the freaking Google search field. Speed Dial all the way! Those dial tabs are a must have too.
Re: (Score:3)
Why do Opera fanboys feel the need to convince everyone that Opera invented the web?
We really only do that when someone makes a factually incorrect statement that attributes some "new" feature as being invented by a recent browser, when J.S. von Tetzchner and his friends were deciding how to actually implement it over a decade ago.
When Al Gore claimed to be responsible for the internet, were you content with letting people believe that or did you feel the need to point out that people like Vint Cerf and Tim Berners-Lee exist?
Re: (Score:3)
We really only do that when someone makes a factually incorrect statement [. . .]
When Al Gore claimed to be responsible for the internet, were you content with letting people believe that or did you feel the need to point out that people like Vint Cerf and Tim Berners-Lee exist?
Your assertion about Gore seems to be one of those pesky "factually incorrect statements". You're welcome [snopes.com]:
Re: (Score:2)
NOOOO (Score:5, Funny)
Now it looks like Safari.
Last week it looked like Chrome.
I'm going back to Internet Explorer. Or maybe Mosaic.
Either that or I'm going to wait another week for Firefox 16 which will likely imitate Facebook.
Re:NOOOO (Score:5, Informative)
Re:NOOOO (Score:5, Funny)
I use Firefox mainly during the day
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
IE mostly comes at night...
Mostly.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Just installed it, and I can't see any difference from 12. I have it set pretty minimal, just tabs at the top, no menu bar or skins. I haven't seen a reason to switch yet, either to IE or Chrome...
Re: (Score:2)
Now it looks like Safari.
Last week it looked like Chrome.
I'm going back to Internet Explorer. Or maybe Mosaic.
Either that or I'm going to wait another week for Firefox 16 which will likely imitate Facebook.
23 will imitate Lynx
Re: (Score:2)
Either that or I'm going to wait another week for Firefox 16 which will likely imitate Facebook.
Oh, you mean Firebook?
(Ray Bradbury is not amused.)
Re: (Score:2)
>>>Either that or I'm going to wait another week for Firefox 16
If you're still using the LTS version, then you are still on Firefox 10 and won't have to worry about upgrading until Firefox 17 (about one year of constancy).
Re: (Score:2)
Slashdot needs a sarcasm tab so very badly.
Re: (Score:2)
that's why I like w3m, same look and feel for years, without the cruft.
Re: (Score:2)
A week for three major versions?
Geez, what a slow development cycle - Firefox can easily do a major version per weekday - or a few, assuming there's a persistent bug that needs ironing out.
Re:And Not One Fuck Was Given.... (Score:5, Insightful)
I just fear FF 3.6 becoming the new IE 6...
Yes, but... (Score:5, Funny)
Okay, that's great, but what are the much-needed features that they added?
Re:Yes, but... (Score:5, Interesting)
There are no borders between the pictures, it's just a three by three grid of screenshots mashed together. Two of the images are of www.google.com (why two? I dunno) but it only shows the top left corner of the page. For all the other sites it shows the whole page, and then repeats the first third of the page along the right side. And then on top of the messed up images, in very small letters that still somehow manage to clash, is the name of the page/site. When you mouse over one of the images two small grey boxes appear at the upper left and upper right corners. The boxes are blank, but if you mouse over them you see that one is to "pin" the site, and the other is to remove it.
Maybe one of my plug-ins is breaking stuff (even though i told NoScript to allow "about:newtab") but there's just something messed up if what is supposedly a fundamental part of the browser itself is broken that easily. And if that's actually how it's supposed to look... they really need to fire whoever they have in charge of UI over there.
In short, i don't think the page launcher in Chrome is necessary (i'll use it sometimes just because it's there, especially since there are only a couple sites i visit with Chrome anyways, but i never felt the lack in FireFox) however at least that one doesn't hurt to look at.
Re: (Score:2)
hope that can be disabled, unlike chrome, lest some sensitive person (ie. client) see a less than non-controversial web page
touchpad scrolling with PDF in background (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Okay, that's great, but what are the much-needed features that they added?
Oh, you mean that now the UI runs in its own thread? Or that it uses a forking model rather than the current cluster-futex?
nm, that was abandoned, marked 'too hard to ship in six weeks'.
Laugh (Score:4, Funny)
I'll wait until tomorrow and get FF14
Re: (Score:3)
Sorry, it's been delayed. You'll have to wait until the end of the week.
Re: (Score:2)
End of the week? but FF27 was due by then! how dare they push back those major releases!
Re:Laugh (Score:4, Funny)
It's already available [finalfantasyxiv.com].
Version 4.9 (Score:3, Insightful)
In the normal scheme, its really just 4.9.
***YAWN***
Tab launcher garbage was first thing I turned off (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
How did you turn it off? I've been digging around the options for awhile now and can't find it. Is it in the about:browser settings?
Re: (Score:3)
Nevermind, I figured it out. You just click the little grid image in the upper right hand side.
No option to turn back on "new tab opens to home page." Lame. Stuck with "about:newtab" on every new tab I open. So annoying!
Re:Tab launcher garbage was first thing I turned o (Score:5, Informative)
Aaaand i just figured out how to disable that.
In about:config, just type in "newtab" and search
You will get 3 choices.
First one is the URL for new tabs. Set it to what you want (I use about:blank)
Set the other two settings to false and the fancy schmancy crappy new tab is gone.
Smooth Scrolling (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Smooth Scrolling (Score:4, Informative)
Smooth scrolling makes it extremely hard (impossible actually) to read as you scroll. It's the sort of eye-candy which REDUCES functionality, I don't really understand why anyone would want it (honestly: how often do you scroll and don't want to read as you scroll down. AT ALL.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
"Flickering" - what are you talking about?
Re: (Score:2)
Exact same situation here. Maybe it works well on something that's not a no frills work PC, but definitely not on this one.
About time... (Score:2)
Its about time that FireFox 13 gets the features of Chrome 21. Also congrats to Microsoft for finally hitting double digits with IE 10.
Any browser not in double digit version numbers is not trying hard enough, I am talking to you Safari 5, pfft!
Re: (Score:2)
Awww. I'm using Mozilla Seamonkey 2.1..... (whimpers)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
FUCK (Score:2, Insightful)
Fuck Mozilla's fucking releases every fucking other fucking week. Want me to pay attention to a new release? then don't bombard me with requests to update, or call versions barely worth an increment to the patch level a fucking release. Buy a clue and stop ruining what was a pretty decent browser. As ColdWetDog already joked, only for real, you're actually making IE look good again. The level of fuckitude necessary to reach that level of fuckedupness is almost unfuckingbeliveable.
Re: (Score:2)
fuckin hear hear!
now they're just fucking copying fucking Chrome features. the fucks
Short version: slower version of Chrome (Score:2)
So, in other words, it's like Chrome, but slower?
When they started breaking forms on various sites web pages, we started switching.
Can't please everyone (Score:4, Insightful)
Speed dial is one of the first things I disabled when I tried Opera. Now I need to get rid of it in Firefox too.
FF is getting good again (Score:2)
Kudos to Mozilla!
I am still not using it, but I opened FF 12 up and was shocked it used so little memory compared to IE 9 and Chrome. It was smooth, fast, and less buggy than in previous versions.
Before I switch I need to know if the following are fixed
1. Sandbox support
2. Mozilla update breaks permanently after Windows Restore
I fear webmasters will be dealing with Firefox 12, 13, and other obsolete versions many many years from now as anyone who has done a Windows Restore Point will have Mozilla update dis
Keywords! (Score:2)
Questioning (Score:2)
Happily using 10 ESR (Score:2)
And in the meantime I'm quite happily using the ESR version of Firefox with no plans to ever use the fly-by-night version. That said, version 10ESR is quite a bit slower than 3.6, the last ESR. Progress for you.
Re: (Score:2)
How about when you have 316 tabs open? I's using 3.9 GB plus another 0.6 for plugin-container for me.
Nice, but they broke live bookmarks. :( (Score:2)
Live bookmarks no longer show favicons for bookmarked sites, and "Open All in Tabs" no longer seems to work.
How to disable the newtab page (Score:5, Informative)
First thing I did was to look for an option to disable the "Newtab page" (the feature that Firefox shows you your most used websites including little pictures of them whenever you open a new tab). Seems the Firefox devs decided that this is such an important function that there is no option to disable it in the settings dialogue, or at least I could not find one. But you can disable it via about:config and then setting "browser.newtabpage.enabled" to "false". Guess that is handy if you do NOT want your boss/colleagues to find out about your "hotponysex" fetish whenever you want to open a harmless Intranet page while somebody standing next to you.
Re:How to disable the newtab page (Score:5, Informative)
There's a button you can hit on the top-right of new tab pages that toggles the setting you found.
Re: (Score:2)
Open a new tab, and in the upper right corner click on the checkerboard looking icon to hide or show the tab page. Not real intuitive, but you don't need to mess with about:config.
Ah, good to know that there's a button for it. But... it's a setting, so why isn't there an option in, like, the "settings" dialogue? That's where I supposed most people would look, not on the tab itself, when all other global settings are in the dialogue window.
Conentrate on the browser part (Score:5, Insightful)
I love Firefox and use it every day, but I'm getting a little tired and confused with some of the features they keep putting into the core. I've always thought one of the great things about Firefox is the extensions; and while other browsers offer similar 'add-on' concepts, Firefox just seems to do it better. Why aren't they concentrating on just making a seriously good browser engine and then leaving the extra stuff to the extension developers. Or, if it's something important, get with the extension developers and help them out, offer a 'Firefox suggested extension package' that downloads and enables extensions by default. That way, all the 'normal' users get the cool goodies, and the rest of us can turn them off or uninstall them all together if it's not something we need.
For instance, the new development centric stuff they have in FF13 is nice. But it doesn't hold a candle to the development tools that have been in IE9 and Chrome for some time. I use Firebug for all my web debugging needs in FF and it works wonderfully. Get with those guys and improve their already awesome extension. Don't try to re-invent every cool extension and add it to the core. Not everyone needs it, not everyone wants it. Just build the fastest, most standards compliant browser out there that offers an amazing extension engine and you'll have a winning browser.
Re:Conentrate on the browser part (Score:4, Informative)
Believe it or not, 90% or more of our engineering effort goes into "the browser part" (that is, Gecko, our rendering engine, and SpiderMonkey, our JS engine). Have a look through the list of bugs fixed in FF13 [mozilla.org] to see what I mean.
It's just that these back-end improvements are not things most people can understand -- I work on Gecko and I don't understand most of the changes that go into it -- so PR and the press instead focus on highly visible UI stuff.
Why no speed-dial on new windows? (Score:2)
B.F.D. (Score:2)
if firefox (default layout) wasn't dumbed down to chrome's level, some of these would still be 'one click' away.. so i'm sorry.. but i'm simply not impressed with those 'new' features that simply copy chrome.
most visited,
Yeah, well... (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
You could use Chromium, the FLOSS browser on which Chrome is based (and Chromium doesn't include flash or other crap most /. users won't want).
Re: (Score:3)
Finding the download page for the latest binary can be tricky, although it's much easier now than it used to be. Here's a link for the lazy [appspot.com].
For the extremely lazy, here's how to install, assuming that you're using linux, and it went into your Downloads folder:
Re:Go Firefox! (Score:5, Interesting)
I tried Chromium. There is a problem: I've become addicted to tree-style tabs [mozilla.org], courtesy of the Firefox extension.
Chromium/Chrome had this feature natively for a long time, until the developers disabled it in a sneaky-Pete maneuver that pissed off a bunch of people [google.com].
The obvious response, to write a Chromium extension for Tree-Style Tabs, is not an option. The Chromium plugin API does not expose the functionality necessary to do so.
Webkit (Chromium/Chrome's layout engine) seems to be a little faster than Gecko (Firefox's equivalent), but I would prefer to use a browser that gives the user (ME!) control over it, even at the cost of some rendering speed.
The time I would gain in rendering efficiency would probably be lost trying to scan this [googlecode.com], as opposed to this [mozilla.net].
Re:One Man's Feature is Another Man's Bloat (Score:5, Informative)
Re:One Man's Feature is Another Man's Bloat (Score:5, Informative)
"So, if I go to slashdot.org, I want my browser to only fetch things from slashdot.org. Not scorecardresearch, not doubleclick, not gstatic, not google, not facebook, etc"
you want noscript then.
Re:One Man's Feature is Another Man's Bloat (Score:5, Informative)
Or Ghostery [ghostery.com]
Re:One Man's Feature is Another Man's Bloat (Score:5, Informative)
That'd be RequestPolicy actually. NoScript doesn't stop images from external domains being loaded (the 'traditional' way of tracking across the web).
Re: (Score:2)
Re:One Man's Feature is Another Man's Bloat (Score:4, Informative)
The only feature that I want that is long overdue is a setting wherein the browser will make HTTP GETs only to the original domain. So, if I go to slashdot.org, I want my browser to only fetch things from slashdot.org. Not scorecardresearch, not doubleclick, not gstatic, not google, not facebook, etc etc etc.
You want RequestPolicy [requestpolicy.com] - it does exactly what you want and lets you whitelist on a per-site basis. So, for example, you could let google pages also pull in stuff from gstatic.com but no other websites could pull in stuff from gstatic.com.
RequestPolicy is more powerful than adblock/noscript/ghostery because of the per-site control - all of those others don't care about what site the request is coming from, only the one it is going to. At best they let you whitelist the requests from an entire site, RequestPolicy is much more fine-grained. Those other add-ons are important too, they just have different strengths.
Re: (Score:2)
I liked the way that Firefox 12 would open a new page at precisely the point you don't want it to open at (typically, it seems, displaying the first button on the page) rather than the top. I was about to give up on it until I managed to find the about:config option to turn off retardo-mode.
Have they fixed that, or is adding a new home page more important than actually being useful for web browsing?
Re: (Score:2)
FF12 never did anything like that here so, yes, I guess they fixed that proactively ;) What option?
Re: (Score:3)
Switched to Chrome about 2 weeks ago because FF was just too bloody slow. Now I have no desire to switch back.
There's a speed difference? I switched about the same time and didn't notice any difference at all. It must be pretty small or only weird corner cases.
I will say that "chrome to phone" sounded like the most exciting development in computing for the year 2012, installed it, tested it, and haven't used it once since. Oh well.
Addon installation is much smoother, I never realized how annoying restarting the browser was until I didn't have to anymore. Like moving from windows to linux.
The start page web apps
Re: (Score:2)
I switched to Chrome a few months ago. There are a few annoyances that I've got used to. I don't regret the switch at all... now I can tell which page is using excessive CPU and draining my laptop battery. Now I can tell which page is using excessive memory. Now I can close the offending page without having to quit the whole bloody browser. You failed long ago Mozilla.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Chrome is faster because to pre-loads and pre-renders web pages as you type into the address bar or view a Google search results page. It also seems to lag less with a lot of tabs open because they each get their own process where as Firefox uses a single thread for them all. Firefox tries to "schedule" tabs internally but it doesn't work as well.
Re: (Score:2)
Funny, I tried chrome and gave up because of speed issues... went back to firefox.
Now to be fair, with just on or two tabs open they both seem pretty equal and I can't tell which is faster. But once you start opening a lot of tabs (and I often open a lot of tabs) the sandboxing that chrome does per tab seems to really eat in to the resources available on the computer.
Honestly I'm not picky, I'll use whatever browser works, I'm happy to try chrome again if they've improved the handling of large numbers of ta
Re: (Score:2)
Consider upgrading that pentium 3 machine.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
The OS already has a perfectly fine task-switching mechanism.
Let me guess, a GIMP developer?
Re: (Score:2)
Let me guess, a GIMP developer?
Hell no. GIMP is one application, so it should have one taskbar entry per instance - not three or four. A web browser is also one application, so it too should have one taskbar entry per instance - not one entry for 30+ separate instances. My position on this is consistent.
Re: (Score:2)
Not exactly consistent. what qualifies as an "instance"? Gimp believes that each image you load, and each toolbox should each be their own instance. Firefox believes that web browsing in general is an "instance". they are opposite ends of a spectrum to be sure, but it's hard to say where along that continuum the right balance is. Personally I love tabs. They keep my browser under control.
For example if I'm building a web page I may have 15-20 browser tabs open with various different references/image sources
Re: (Score:2)
Firefox 12 still has a memory leak in it. Nothing like getting back from the weekend to see Firefox has a 1.5 GB RAM footprint and making my system crawl to a halt. Always amusing to turn on the task manager and just watch the memory getting sucked up in real time.
Re: (Score:3)
For reference, I use Safari on OSX for little more than watching youtube videos and light web browsing (this site, XKCD, Anandtech, etc) and the memory usage blows up over time. I've found through Activity Monitor that's it's really the flash plugin. It appears that it never gives back the RAM it takes until I close Safari (or force quit the plugin, but then I have no Flash until I reboot Safari).
That, combined with the fact that I have occasional stutters playing back an HD Flash video with a 2.8GHz C2D
Re:Okay... (Score:4, Insightful)
They were fixed in Firefox 7: http://www.gadgetvenue.com/firefox-7-to-use-up-to-50-percent-less-memory-08114900/ [gadgetvenue.com]
If by fixed you mean browser usability was sacrificed in order to make the apparent memory usage drop, then yes. My biggest complaint with these memory "improvements" is in regard to image handling:
- Images are now decode-on-draw meaning they display slower and background tab images are not decoded. Browsing an image gallery or some other image-heavy site is now obscenely painful in Firefox.
- Decoded images on background tabs only live for 10-20 seconds and then are discarded at which point they must be re-decoded when the tab is activated. Long-lived tabs like Gmail now flicker every time you switch back to them as images are re-decoded.
These are just the two that come to mind right away. Luckily they can be fixed by tweaking some about:config settings (image.mem.decodeondraw and image.mem.min_discard_timeout_ms). Unfortunately many cannot be fixed so easily.
I'm really tired of the Firefox devs choosing (usually wrong) user complaints over good design and usability practices.
Re: (Score:3)
I agree we haven't done a good job tweaking image discarding parameters. We have a plan to fix it, but it's been stuck on some stupid stuff for a long time. I hope we'll get resolved for FF16.
In the meantime, you can make Firefox much less eager to throw away images. Open about:config and set
image.mem.min_discard_timeout_ms to some large value (e.g. 120 000, for 120s), and also bump up image.mem.max_decoded_image_kb (to
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
If you are fine with 40+ security vulnerabilities with it!
Remember Firefox is the only modern browser with no sanboxing still either. Seriously even IE 9 is better than 3.6 as it is old. There is ESR extended support for corporations which is based off of FF 10 and is much slimmer and gets regular security updates. I left Firefox after 4 and use Chrome and IE 9, but I have to say FF 12 is very slim, and very light even compred to FF 3.6.
Re: (Score:2)
who modded this troll? Firefox does NOT have sandboxing (chrome and ie do). Adobe had to write their own sandbox for their plugin for firefox. 3.6 DOES have unfixed vulnerabilities. 3.6 IS no longer supported. and IE9 is better because it is still supported.
TROLL != I DISAGREE
Re: (Score:2)
you can disable it. just set a different home page.