Video A Conversation with Rob Malda - Part One of Three (Video) 72
Video no longer available.
Slashdot's Glorious 15th Anniversary (link to bad fireworks video) is coming up in October, so Jeff 'Soulskill' Boehm and Rob 'samzenpus' Rozeboom decided to have a chat with Rob Malda. Back in 1997 Rob founded a website named Chips & Dips that later morphed into something called Slashdot, which has been (as the saying goes) "often imitated but never duplicated." Since leaving Slashdot, Rob has been doing this, that, and the other, but we'll let him tell you what he's doing in his own words. Note: This is an audio interview with some semi-interesting photos laid over it as a slide show, so you might want to listen to it rather than watch it. Parts Two and Three of the interview will be along in the next few days.
Questions to Rob Malda (anyone can answer) (Score:1)
Read all about how governments use brain pattern matching abusively [blogspot.com].
Re: (Score:2)
Why you proposed your wife via Slashdot?
Read all about how governments use brain pattern matching abusively [blogspot.com].
Just ask the government.
Re:Questions to Rob Malda (anyone can answer) (Score:4, Informative)
Because it was Valentine's Day, he wanted to do something both geeky and romantic, he knew Kathleen would see it, and she said "yes".
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Sorry, Did Not Listen (Score:5, Insightful)
Why post an audio interview without a transcript? Way to know your audience.
Re: (Score:2)
RTFA == WTFV
Re: (Score:2)
Get out much?
Re: (Score:2)
Wet?
Re: (Score:2)
No, the use of == is correct here. He's certainly not assigning the value of WTFV to RTFA. He's stating the equivalence of RTFA and WTFV. Since the article is in video form, the only way to read the article is to watch the video. If you've watched the video, you've read the article. If you haven't watched, you haven't read. They can both be true, or they can both be false. Either way, (RTFA == WTFV) evaluates to true.
It would be better to write RTFA â WTFV, of course, but slashdot doesn't believe
Re: (Score:1)
The GP already made it CLEAR that the == operator is not a statement of equivalence.
The particular choice of operator for equality in a predicate cannot influence whether the predicate is being logically asserted, i.e. holds for all valuations, or is just a free-standing formula. To make it clear that it was an assertion, it should have been written with a turnstile in front:
|- RTFA == WTFV
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Plus, I'm pretty sure a transcript would result in a TL;DR, so I'm concurring.
can't watch vid (Linux Mint) (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Compressed SWF format not supported (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
"That's why Slytherins all sing, Malda is our king"
Who? (Score:4, Insightful)
Oh, it's all so 2011.
Re: (Score:3)
I would assume the people who wanted to follow CmdrTaco more carefully could, like, follow his personal website or something. At leas
Transcript, please. (Score:3, Interesting)
Enough with the video.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Yeah, like you were going to RTFA anyway ;-)
Will there be meetups like we did for 10? (Score:2)
Just checking.
Had a blast at the last one.
Re: (Score:3)
Thanks for that one /sarcasm ...from now until the end of time, Google is going to be aware I searched the android market place for 'grindr' and think I'm a queermo.
So, which of the following are the reasons that this worries you?
Re: (Score:2)
And should it be limited to people with slashdot ID's of 4 digits or fewer?
Re: (Score:2)
Yes.
Re:Will there be meetups like we did for 10? (Score:5, Funny)
And should it be limited to people with slashdot ID's of 4 digits or fewer?
Yes it should. Just be sure to schedule it in time for the early bird specials and wrap it up before 8pm so everyone can get to bed on time.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
Way to discriminate against people with 5 digits. sheesh! :P
Re: (Score:2)
Well SOMEONE needs to call you people out on your conspicuous consumption of extra digits!
I know we should not RTFA..... (Score:2)
But I guess we slashdotted google+ anyways
Chips and dips AKA https://plus.google.com/photos/105030465637303791249/albums/5645165571128591969 [google.com] brings up a blank page
What does it mean 'what would it become'? (Score:2)
I mean what do you think /. is? Maybe it's something that I don't understand at all, it's a forum, it's an advertising platform, it has themes that are supposedly geared towards technology (but also plenty of flaming... well, that's an advertising technique).
But I don't get it probably, what does Malda mean by 'what it will become'? What could it become, except diluted over time? It's like a newsgroup, maybe it's IRC with memory, but what is he talking about?
Re: (Score:2)
He got a class on "Business Speak" somewhere. When you leave a major undertaking, presuming it's not a sinking ship, you speak of it in multi-tenses.
Slashdot's decline and irrelivancy (Score:1)
They should ask him what he thinks of Slashdot's decline due to an increasing moronic userbase. This site used to be about open source advocacy, yet now half the people on here are using closed source Apple products. Will Slashdot even be around in a year or two?
Low comment count explained (Score:1)
Three hours after this is posted and there's still less than 40 comments, half of them are trolls or off topic. Kinda makes you think that no one really cares about Taco... and that Slashdot is falling apart due to techno-political ramblings that only get comments from fanatics so they can pound their chests.
But, hey, it's all about page hits anyway anymore. I guess Slashdot found it's bread and butter.
Ah, 1997. (Score:1)
I think I joined in late 1997 or early 1998.
Four digit user ID club. :)
Re: (Score:2)
Whoa, quite the early adopter of that particular oath! :)
Dumb and dumber (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The tyrant will (Score:1)