Bill Gates Wants To Reinvent the Toilet 338
redletterdave writes "Bill Gates, the man responsible for bringing software to the masses with Microsoft and Windows, has plans to reinvent and popularize another industry: Sanitation. Gates, whose philanthropic efforts have helped bring clean water and resources to developing countries via the foundation created by he and his wife Melinda, said at the 'Reinvent The Toilet Fair' in Seattle on Wednesday that he plans to build a toilet that's better suited to developing countries in an effort to cut down on disease and death in those regions. 'Inventing new toilets is one of the most important things we can do to reduce child deaths and disease and improve people's lives,' Gates said. 'It is also something that can help wealthier countries conserve fresh water for other important purposes besides flushing.'"
Science Insider has some information on the winning designs from this year.
Reason: (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Reason: (Score:5, Insightful)
"Green" toilets sometimes have problems... (Score:5, Interesting)
Let's hope he does something better than the Stockholm "green" toilets they tried in Mongolia:
http://www.theatlanticcities.com/neighborhoods/2012/07/toilet-tuesday-death-worlds-largest-eco-toilet/2783/ [theatlanticcities.com]
http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/show/single/en/5068-Eco-toilet-scheme-ends-in-failure [chinadialogue.net]
Re: (Score:2)
[We were evicted from our hole in the ground....]
Re: (Score:2)
[We were evicted from our hole in the ground....]
That's what happens when you shit on the floor.
Re:"Green" toilets sometimes have problems... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:"Green" toilets sometimes have problems... (Score:5, Funny)
They can always have another go.
So, go number 2?
Re: (Score:2)
Oh yeah waterless toilets were an idea that was asking for it. I'm amazed at the amount of unbridled optimism it took to see the idea through to deployment though, if only it could be applied to better ideas...
The easiest gains are to be had in gray water flushing + better high-efficiency designs.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Here's a similar tale of toilet trouble
http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/matier-ross/article/Low-flow-toilets-cause-a-stink-in-SF-2457645.php [sfgate.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Or donating computers to india so now they all run windows, and places can start exporting tech support there.
Re:Reason: (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Reason: (Score:5, Interesting)
I was hoping we would quit cutting down trees and use more water to clean our behinds (water is renewable you know)
I have heard that trees might alse be renewable. Infact, I believe that cleaning water is harder than growing trees. Although I do agree that reduction in trees is definitely not a good thing.
Re:Reason: (Score:4, Interesting)
Massive deforestation is indeed a problem, but trees can be harvested in a sustainable way.
Re:Reason: (Score:5, Funny)
I think they're taking the "do epic shit" motto to new levels.
Re: (Score:3)
Well why not (Score:5, Funny)
he's spent all these years making crap.
Re:Well why not (Score:4, Funny)
Why not? BFOD.
(Brown Flush of Death).
Re: (Score:3)
(Brown Flush of Death)
Sorry, but the kebab masters already have a patent on that.
Re:Well why not (Score:5, Informative)
I could have sworn I saw this exact same story at slashdot a year ago... and someone in that thread made the exact same comment. Is this story a dupe, or a rerun?
Re:Well why not (Score:5, Informative)
Great.... (Score:2)
can't wait to see for the BSOD on that.
Re:Great.... (Score:4, Funny)
Let me clarify, not fingerprints but buttprints. But you have a point, I hope its well protected from overflow attacks.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, on the bright side, it's not Apple. I don't know if I could handle a slippery shinny device with fingerprints all over.
Let me clarify, not fingerprints but buttprints. But you have a point, I hope its well protected from overflow attacks.
The BSOD keeps me regular, and DDoS doesn't help.
Re:Great.... (Score:5, Insightful)
can't wait to see for the BSOD on that.
Let's just hope it doesn't ship with Windows 8, because Joe Average is going to shit in his pants trying to find the button that lets you lift the lid.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
can't wait to see for the BSOD on that.
Would that be the Brown Screen of Death?
Re:Great.... (Score:4, Funny)
can't wait to see for the BSOD on that.
Would that be the Brown Screen of Death?
Brown Spray of Death.
Great... (Score:5, Funny)
plans to build a toilet that's better suited to developing countries
toilet starter edition...
Re:Great... (Score:5, Funny)
You can only drop 3 logs at a time.
iPoop (Score:5, Funny)
I'm just going to wait for Apple's competing product. The toilet is a perfect example of an Apple product. It has one button, one function, and it needs to be clean and durable.
Re:iPoop (Score:5, Funny)
I'm just going to wait for Apple's competing product. The toilet is a perfect example of an Apple product. It has one button, one function, and it needs to be clean and durable.
And incredibly it will be the first toilet ever to have a seat with smooth, rounded edges. Not like all those barbed wire versions the rest of us have been using for 20 years.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Once they enter the market, despite decades of existing players in that market, nobody else should be able to participate in the smart toilet market. The entire market is God's gift to Apple.
MCCCXXXVII intellectualis proprietas pupillam est magnum sacculum canis stercus
Re:iPoop (Score:4, Funny)
And then, there'll be the inevitable design flaw that crops up once the iCrapper becomes the market darling. And the cover-up of the design flaw. And the extensive silencing of forum discussion of the design flaw. And the "You're sitting on it wrong" email. Then the threatened lawsuits, and the announcement of free toilet seat covers to help remedy the problem.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm just going to wait for Apple's competing product. The toilet is a perfect example of an Apple product. It has one button, one function, and it needs to be clean and durable.
The iCan.
Re: (Score:2)
It's an oldie.
Pass (Score:5, Funny)
Way to state the bleeding obvious. (Score:5, Insightful)
"Bill Gates, the man responsible for bringing software to the masses with Microsoft and Windows..."
Fucking hell, this is Slashdot, not Readers Digest.
Re: (Score:2)
I like how some nobody blogger who no one has ever heard of can get a post on the front page of /. (submitted by some "A/C" most likely the blogger him or herself) with just a name and no introduction.
But Bill Gates, oh better explain that one! No one's ever heard of him.
Re: (Score:2)
Plan B for the Gates Fund? (Score:2, Insightful)
Apparently genital mutilation wasn't preventing disease.
Why reinvent the wheel? (Score:2)
So lets spend millions to reinvent the wheel while we're at it!
Re:Why reinvent the wheel? (Score:5, Insightful)
Well, in this case, taking into account the water and sanitary needs of developing countries, this makes perfect sense.
Not everybody has the luxury of municipal water which takes such things away to be handled by Someone Else.
Doing it in a way that is portable, cheap to operate, doesn't require a massive infrastructure, and doesn't spread disease ... well, for a lot of people in the world, that would be a huge improvement.
From TFA:
So, really, what wheel are you insinuating is being reinvented here?
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Oh yes. Why would you need to reinvent the toilet when all rural areas in third world countries obviously have the same access to municipal water and sewer systems just like we have here in the first world?
Goodyear makes tires, not wheels (Score:2)
get it right. :)
Why? (Score:4, Interesting)
There are already a multitude of solutions available, eg. bio-friendly bags that turn poop into fertilizer and just need you dig a hole. Seems to me that if he really want to reduce disease and improve lives he should aim to develop soap which doesn't require water. or something.
Re: (Score:2)
There are already a multitude of solutions available
Then why are people in Monrovia Liberia shitting on the beach right now? Might it be that the problem requires a solution yet to be devised?
Re: (Score:2)
The problem is that you have to be careful how you use fecal matter in a lot of rural areas, or it can end up in the water supply. It's not as simple as collecting shit in a bag and using it as fertilizer. If you're not careful where and how you use it (and how it's composted), it can wash into rivers and seep into the water table.
Lessons to be learned [Re:Why?] (Score:5, Informative)
There are already a multitude of solutions available, eg. bio-friendly bags that turn poop into fertilizer and just need you dig a hole.
And the "multitude of solutions available" don't always work.
Here's a "lessons learned" article on the Daxing Ecological Community [chinadialogue.net] toilet experience; hope the Gates foundation is willling to learn from other peoples' failures: http://www.chinadialogue.net/article/show/single/en/5068-Eco-toilet-scheme-ends-in-failure [chinadialogue.net]
Deja Vu (Score:2, Insightful)
Why do I feel like we've talked about this before [slashdot.org]?
Oh, yeah. Because we have [slashdot.org].
Re: (Score:3)
If they let us mod the articles most of them would be -1 Off-topic or -1 Flamebait. So they're not going to let us mod the articles.
Better design for Europe (Score:5, Funny)
Can you please design one that doesn't leave shit streaked all the way down the back when you take a dump? I thought a toilet was a toilet, until I saw all the kinds they have in Europe. You have to scrub every one of them down after a dump. The worst was one that had a flat shelf to dump on and the water would wash it off. Yeah, good luck getting that loaf to wash away. What the hell? Sorry for the shitty post, but this is the topic we were presented with.
Re:Better design for Europe (Score:5, Funny)
I think the toilet superiority scale goes something like this:
Japan > U.S. (pre low-flow) > U.S. (post low-flow) > Europe > Third world
Re:Better design for Europe (Score:4, Funny)
Japanese toilets send it straight to a vending machine :)
Re:Better design for Europe (Score:5, Insightful)
Maybe so, but if I was confronted with this [wikipedia.org], I would be quite baffled. I mean, 38 buttons on a toilet control panel?
I'm betting a lot of Western visitors find themselves with a big "what the heck do I do now" moment. :-P
Re:Better design for Europe (Score:5, Funny)
Maybe so, but if I was confronted with this [wikipedia.org], I would be quite baffled. I mean, 38 buttons on a toilet control panel?
I'm betting a lot of Western visitors find themselves with a big "what the heck do I do now" moment. :-P
Whatever you do, don't press the button marked "ATR". It's the Automatic Tampon Remover.
Re:Better design for Europe (Score:5, Funny)
Hahaha, He doesn't know how to use the three seashells!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I like the ones in Autobahn gas stations. You drop a one-euro coin in a slot to get in. When you get up, the toilet senses the loss of your weight and flushes itself; then a nozzle and a brush swing down onto the seat. The nozzle spritzes, the brush spins, the seat rotates 360 degrees, and then a dispenser gives you a receipt you can use to get your money back if you buy anything.
But quite a few small restaurants in Paris still have "Turkish Bombsights"...
low flow superior (Score:2)
Most of the pre-low-flow toilets just waste all the water rather than putting it to good use actually flushing stuff. I have a 4.8 liter (1.26 gallon) toilet that is designed well and it does a great job--big tank for water pressure, big valve between tank and bowl, it just doesn't drain the whole tank on every flush.
Re: (Score:2)
When I remodeled my bathroom I thought the replacement low-flow toilet would be a nightmare, but I ended up going with a Kohler "Highline High Efficiency Watersense" toilet. I am truly amazed at how much shit it can take. I've never had to use a plunger on it.
A properly designed low-flow toilet *can* get "that loaf to wash away".
Re:Better design for Europe (Score:5, Informative)
The worst was one that had a flat shelf to dump on and the water would wash it off. Yeah, good luck getting that loaf to wash away. What the hell? Sorry for the shitty post, but this is the topic we were presented with.
That's a German thing. It's intended to let you inspect it for health reasons. [wikipedia.org] ... I'm shocked that I know this. What the hell!?
Re: (Score:2)
One of the references attached to that article is hilarious: http://www.asecular.com/~scott/misc/toilet.htm [asecular.com]
Good for him (Score:5, Insightful)
I know the typical /. response is to either make a "Windows Sucks!" crack or to launch into some conspiracy theory about how this is part of some secret agenda to foist MS-brand proprietary toilets on the world. But I'm going to applaud his efforts instead.
But if you have to have a crack, here's one: This beats the crap out of anything Steve Jobs ever did for the third world.
Re: (Score:2)
Fertilizer (Score:2)
The best use for human excrement is fertilizer really - high phosphorous and nitrogen content, ideal for the fields. It's certainly more environmentally friendly than fossil-fuel based fertilizers (and not just in the third world either).
Re: (Score:3)
Great way to spread disease too!
Without proper composting or another method of heating it to kill all the nasties using excrement as fertilizer just continues to current problem of spreading disease.
Re:Fertilizer (Score:5, Informative)
Night soil [wikipedia.org], un-composed, is a health risk because pathogens are returned un-treated to the food production cycle. Composting it into "humanure" [wikipedia.org] is a good way to regain the nutrient value in a local closed system while reducing artificial fertilization inputs.
Composting toilets exist, so I'm not really sure what role Gates would have, except maybe simplifying design and streamlining manufacturing and distribution so that they can become cheap and common in the areas of interest. Or else using some other technique besides composting for sanitization.... but that would require some kind of energy source to Pasteurize the waste. Hard to beat just letting composting microorganisms crank up the heat using just the nutrients in the waste.
Re: (Score:2)
How about burning? I know dried animal dung is used for cooking, maybe the same could apply with dried human waste? The resulting ash would still be high in N and P and of course pathogen-free.
Good for Bill. And: read "The Big Necessity." (Score:5, Interesting)
This is great and I applaud and respect him for doing this. After you get done cracking jokes, go read The Big Necessity by Rose George. I never fully understood just how privileged we are.
"2.6 billion people don't have sanitation. I don't mean that they have no toilet in their house and must use a public one with queues and fees. Or that they have an outhouse, or a rickety shack that empties into a filthy drain or pigsty. All that counts as sanitation, though not a safe variety. The people who have those are the fortunate ones. Four in ten people have no access to any latrine, toilet, bucket, or box. Instead, they defecate by train tracks and in forests. They do it in plastic bags and fling them through the air in narrow slum alleyways.... Four in ten people live in situations where they are surrounded by human excrement because it is in the bushes outside the village or in the city yards, left by children outside the backdoor...
In 2007, readers of the British Medical Journal were asked to vote for the biggest medical milestone of the last two hundred years. Their choice was wide: antibiotics, penicillin, anesthesia, The Pill. They chose sanitation."
Re: (Score:2)
there is a cheap ac system it's called an ammonia absorption unit. the downside? it's extremely toxic in usable concentrations. the plus side? it can cool a room to -20 F(or below) in 100 F weather. if you eat meat it is ammonia cooled.
Re: (Score:2)
Toilets are great. Poor sanitation has arguably killed more people than wars.
...and through most of history, wars have done most of their killing by means of poor sanitation.
Videos here (Score:2)
Kudos to Bill... (Score:4, Interesting)
2.5 billion people live without the "minimum necessary" sanitation services. Access to safe, clean and effective human urine and feces disposal facilities is the most basic definition of sanitation. Improvements sanitation and hygiene has demonstrated positive effects on health. Unfortunately, many people are denied access to sanitation technology and/or infrastructure and thus lack the means of disposing of their waste. The challenge scales with population and can reach critical mass of non-functionality in areas of high population density in developing countries.
There is no single solution. The answer to the challenge requires management of fresh water and access to sanitation technology that mitigates today's risks while scaling with a determined uplift of infrastructure. This kind of massive-scale civil and social architecture requires great resources (fiscal, intellectual, and moral) directed in a continual and strategic ways. I believe Bill, Warren, and others are well positioned to drive success in this area...
I can't resist... (Score:3)
Licensing fee (Score:3)
But most of "flushed" water is recovered (Score:2)
There's a difference between "consumed" water and "flushed" water.
Water that you use in your house and return to the sewers can be cleaned and re-used.
Water that you put on your plants or waste on golf courses evaporates and is consumed.
A new toilet attacks the small part of the problem: the flushed water that is reused. Instead, Bill should focus on reducing water consumption.
--PM
Re: (Score:2)
Cleaning water to drinking standard, then cleaning sewage to dumping-in-the-river standard require time, land, energy and chemicals, even if the water does go back where it came from (mostly) eventually. I many places in the world they simply don't have the water or infrastructure to distribute it, so there isn't any flushing anyway.
Not Microsoft's first forray into toilets (Score:4, Interesting)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ILoo [wikipedia.org]
Perfect guy for the job (Score:2)
They censored my comment (Score:2, Interesting)
I thought my comment was perfectly reasonable. Here it is
Gates said :- "The flush toilets we use in the wealthy world are irrelevant, impractical and impossible for 40 percent of the global population, because they often don't have access to water, and sewers, electricity, and sewage treatment systems."
Why does a flush toilet need electricity? Mine doesn't; moreover, although I live in a wealthy rural part of the UK I have no main sewer connection. The toilet flushes to my own septic tank where the stuff decomposes - it is little more than a masonery tank set below the ground and looks after itself apart from my getting the solids pumped out once a year. It isn't rocket science.
It uses water, but doesn't most of the World's population live near water? Far more than 60% I'd wager. It does not need to be drinkable. Yes, there are regions that do not, but we have plenty of it in the UK, so no thanks Gates, this "wealthier country" does not need to your stinking toilets to conserve water. Take your concerns elsewhere.
Re: (Score:3)
Your comment was not censored, it's on the article, and I'm glad to see you showing yourself here so that I can mock you.
He isn't pushing for a better design of toilet for the UK. He's pushing for a better design of toilet in the developing world.
And yes, your sanitation system does need electricity because your crap (including the stuff you're talking) goes to a waste treatment plant that depends on electrically driven machinery to operate. It doesn't just sit in your septic tank and decompose, by your ow
you're first-world biased (Score:2)
I lived in a place in Congo where for most of the year water was carried (by human power) several hundred vertical feet up from the river. People did not have enough money for masonry on their houses, much less for underground septic tanks, and there is nobody around to pump out solids later.
Incidentally, the electricity would likely be for an electric incinerating toilet--a reasonable option if you have no running water but do have power.
Africa (Score:4, Insightful)
Also, this story is a dupe. [slashdot.org]
Here's some ancient toilet tech (Score:2)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pig_toilet [wikipedia.org]
Wait, what?!? (Score:2)
I thought he already did that [wikipedia.org]! It sure functioned like one, at any rate...
More astroturfing, ... (Score:2)
The reason? (Score:4, Funny)
Because he's not happy with the way shit's going.
Jokes aside.... (Score:4, Interesting)
American attitude (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Before I looked at the date of the post you linked to, I thought you were joking about the "minor differences", and were instead going to have linked to something like this: http://slashdot.org/story/03/05/02/188215/microsoft-rolls-out-iloo [slashdot.org]
Cause that's what -I- thought of, when I saw the thread title: "maybe he decided it was a good idea after all?"
Re: (Score:2)
never had a toilet break (Score:2)
What are you doing to yours? I replace some 30-year-old toilets because they used far too much water, not because they stopped working.
Re: (Score:2)
Why would I want to deal with this instead of using the normal toilet? Assuming I still have access to the normal unit.
use your left hand for wiping (Score:2)
The typical behaviour where I lived was to use your left hand for wiping, your right hand for touching food, shaking hands, etc.
Re: (Score:3)
And I thought that's what the Windows 8 team was already doing!
Not the toilet, just it's intended contents.