For Businesses, the College Degree Is the New High School Diploma 728
Hugh Pickens writes "The NY Times reports that a college degree is becoming the new high school diploma: the new minimum requirement for getting even the lowest-level job. Many jobs that didn't require a diploma years ago — positions like dental hygienists, cargo agents, clerks and claims adjusters — increasingly requiring a college degree. From the point of view of business, with so many people going to college now, those who do not graduate are often assumed to be unambitious or less capable. 'When you get 800 résumés for every job ad, you need to weed them out somehow,' says Suzanne Manzagol. A study by Georgetown University's Center on Education and the Workforce found that more than 2.2 million jobs that require a minimum of a bachelor's degree have been created (PDF) since the 2007 start of the recession. At the same time, jobs that require only a high school diploma have decreased by 5.8 million in that same time. 'It is a tough job market for college graduates but far worse for those without a college education,' says Anthony P. Carnevale, co-author of the report. 'At a time when more and more people are debating the value of post-secondary education, this data shows that your chances of being unemployed increase dramatically without a college degree.' Even if they are not exactly applying the knowledge they gained in their political science, finance and fashion marketing classes, young graduates say they are grateful for even the rotest of rote office work they have been given. 'It sure beats washing cars,' says Georgia State University graduate Landon Crider, 24, an in-house courier who, for $10 an hour, ferries documents back and forth between the courthouse and his company's office."
And people wonder why the US is going broke... (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:And people wonder why the US is going broke... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:And people wonder why the US is going broke... (Score:5, Insightful)
yes apparently...unless of course you are HR and have the responsibility of weeding potential candidates
for that you just need the ability to blindly check resumes for a list of arbitrary requirements
I've found that our HR department does a much better job of screening candidates than I do as the hiring manager -- I don't really have the time to adequately screen 300 resumes, so I'll make a first pass and screen on criteria that I can filter out using the candidate management system -- desired salary range, education level, years of experience, and the 3 questions that candidates have to fill out while applying.
And a note to job seekers: when you apply for a job online and the system asks you to answer a few specific questions about the job before you submit your resume, fill out those questions carefully, because those are weedout questions, when the hiring manager scans the list of candidates, he's not even going to look at your resume if he doesn't like the answer to those questions.
And be realistic with salary ranges, entering a range that's unrealistically low is as bad as one that's unrealistically high... don't assume that a low salary will guarantee that you'll pass the screening. If someone is applying for a senior developer position and includes $20 - $30K in his acceptable salary range, I'm not even going to look at his resume because he either doesn't know what someone in his position should be earning, or he's not good enough to command a reasonable salary.
Re:And people wonder why the US is going broke... (Score:5, Insightful)
Oh bullshit.
If my business ever grows to the point of needing H.R. this will specifically left out of their jobs. We're in a situation in the U.S. right now where anyone with a unique background or who doesn't nicely fit into an H.R. cubby hole isn't getting a job and it's a travesty. It's letting very smart and capable people sit by the side of the road while the people who simply play the game right get in.
All these H.R. rules, all the bullshit with resumes is holding things back. I would rather someone with real knowledge spend some time with the "300 resumes" than someone who thinks Microsoft Office is high tech sift through and let good candidates hit the trash because they have missed on check mark on the form.
Re:And people wonder why the US is going broke... (Score:5, Insightful)
Oh bullshit.
If my business ever grows to the point of needing H.R. this will specifically left out of their jobs. We're in a situation in the U.S. right now where anyone with a unique background or who doesn't nicely fit into an H.R. cubby hole isn't getting a job and it's a travesty. It's letting very smart and capable people sit by the side of the road while the people who simply play the game right get in.
All these H.R. rules, all the bullshit with resumes is holding things back. I would rather someone with real knowledge spend some time with the "300 resumes" than someone who thinks Microsoft Office is high tech sift through and let good candidates hit the trash because they have missed on check mark on the form.
That's great that you have the time to adequately screen every candidate, but when I have 5 job reqs open, each with 200+ resumes to screen, I really don't have the time to look at each resume (and I know I'm not the only one), so answer those screening questions carefully.
If you have a unique background, then find another way to get your resume in front of the hiring manager. This is where social networking comes in handy. I've had candidates track me down on LinkedIn and email their resume that way - I always look at those resumes since I know that it's not someone who's shotgunning his resume across every open job posting they can find regardless of relevancy to his experience.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
On the other side of the table, I wouldn't be happy working for someone like you. You treat hiring an employee as some kind of minimal task diminished by shortcuts instead of looking at the Big Picture -- capable, dependable, and solid staff are not just more productive as individuals but they add to the collective foundation your company depends on to continue functioning. I'm not talking about the bullshit 'team mentality' people like you tout as a priority, I'm referring to the actual atmosphere and work
Re:And people wonder why the US is going broke... (Score:5, Insightful)
5 positions with 200+ resumes and you can't look at each resume?
I can read a 1000 page hardcover in three days without pushing it. Granted, a page in a book requires less time than a resume needs but I'm pretty sure I could at least look at each resume within a reasonable time frame.
Sure, resumes are probably a lot more boring to read but that's why it's called work.
Reading a book is much different than reading a resume and picking out important details.
If I'm just going to scan the resume and look for keywords, I may as well just let the online candidate review system take care of it.
Resumes come in a wide variety of formats, fonts, etc, and candidates rarely put the information I'm looking for on the first page... If I'm really going to read it and see if he's a good fit for the job, then I need to read the whole thing, then go back and look over it again to pick out the parts I'm really interested in.
It can take 3 or 4 minutes to adequately read and score a resume - 3 minutes times 200 resumes times 5 open job reqs is 50 hours of work, when if I'm lucky, I've got about an hour a day to take care of it.
Re:And people wonder why the US is going broke... (Score:5, Insightful)
I've never heard someone so vehemently defend mediocrity and taking lazy shortcuts in their job. It's clear the company you work for, that tolerates such nonsense, doesn't really want the best and brightest.
And with that, they'll get what they deserve.
Re:And people wonder why the US is going broke... (Score:5, Insightful)
I like how everyone criticizing this guy brings apparently no relevant experience, instead talking about what they WOULD do, or how fast they can read a book, or how things should be.
Glad to see that speculative nonsense still gets modded up on slashdot.
Re: (Score:3)
If your job as management has you "so busy" (Yeah, I've worked with management before too - what a fucking joke) t
Re: (Score:3)
So who would do my job while I'm wasting time reading 1000 resumes?
Re:And people wonder why the US is going broke... (Score:5, Insightful)
THIS is what people don't understand.
To the the clueless: Hiring you isn't my job. Hiring you is just extra work.
Re: (Score:3)
If you're doing hiring, it is your job to read those resumes. That's what people don't get. If your attitude is "hiring you is just extra work", you should have a long look in the mirror. Maybe you shouldn't be doing hiring, then.
Re:And people wonder why the US is going broke... (Score:5, Insightful)
So let me get this straight... you don't have time to read through 200+ resumes for each of the 5 open positions that you have, but you have time to read and post comments on slash dot?
Even if I work for a US company, they don't own all of my spare time. My workday is over, and I prefer to not spend it doing work.
Re:And people wonder why the US is going broke... (Score:5, Interesting)
If someone is applying for a senior developer position and includes $20 - $30K in his acceptable salary range, I'm not even going to look at his resume because he either doesn't know what someone in his position should be earning, or he's not good enough to command a reasonable salary.
So what should a junior developer with no full-time experience put down as an acceptable salary range? In general, what steps should one take to learn "what someone in his position should be earning" for each combination of job title, years of experience, and location? Is there a widely accepted set of reliable statistics?
Re:And people wonder why the US is going broke... (Score:5, Insightful)
There are numerous websites that will provide salary figures for many common job titles. However, you really should have a general idea of what you're worth based on how much you've made in previous jobs and what's acceptable to you. It works both ways - I've turned down jobs because the hiring company had no idea of the salary range they should be willing to offer (IE: I was offered $30k for a senior sysadmin/web dev/programmer position that required a Bachelor's and 5 years experience)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
I refuse to fill those out. Hell, I refuse to fill out an "application" more than writing "see resume" on it. when I am looking I usually have 4 companies or more looking to get my attention, I am not jumping through your busywork hoops just because you want to feel important.
That might be a fun thing to do to the common people that are a dime a dozen, but I dont play silly HR games. I handed you a nice resume, and more copies of it in the interview, that is all you get.
I'm guessing you would freak ou
Re:And people wonder why the US is going broke... (Score:4, Insightful)
I refuse to fill those out. Hell, I refuse to fill out an "application" more than writing "see resume" on it. when I am looking I usually have 4 companies or more looking to get my attention, I am not jumping through your busywork hoops just because you want to feel important.
That's fine, you probably wouldn't be applying for one of my company's jobs in the first place, and even if you did, you probably wouldn't want to work there if filling out a job application is jumping through too many hoops. Nor would we want you there.
That might be a fun thing to do to the common people that are a dime a dozen, but I dont play silly HR games. I handed you a nice resume, and more copies of it in the interview, that is all you get.
Well, except that your resume wouldn't have made it past HR screening if you just wrote "see resume" on it.
I'm guessing you would freak out when I take a big sharpie to your contract and strike out the stuff I dont like, inital the changes, and then sign it. I do that to ALL contracts, only a fool signs a contract as written.
Well, I wouldn't freak out... I'd probably smile and take your changes, and since i'm not authorized to approve changes, I'd take your marked up contract and pass it on to Legal. Then in the 2 weeks while waiting for their review, I'd hire someone else who's more suited for the job. I don't care how good your technical skills are if you're not able to work effectively in the organization.
Re: (Score:3)
Who would want to work for that bureaucratic nightmare?
If it takes two weeks to get a contract fixed, everything is going to be red tape, politics and BS.
Re: (Score:3)
You must hire only low skill code monkeys and web devs, if that.
I haven't hired any entry level positions in a long time - most of our hires have been for mid-senior level developers and software architects - the kind of people that can take corporate business requirements, and architect them into complete, well tested solutions. Nearly all of my recent hires have been $100K+ positions (which is mid - senior level in the SF Bay Area).
You seem pretty smug about routinely getting hundreds of resumes for a handful of positions.
I don't know where you live, but around here, getting hundreds of resumes is not really an achievement, especially when 80% of them are "r
Re:And people wonder why the US is going broke... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:And people wonder why the US is going broke... (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:3)
HR made them do it. HR bases salaries on prior pay + % markup. So what if the person was underpaid in the prior position? What if they had built up their value so that they're worth more? HR blindly magnetizing pay to past amounts means that people end up getting paid less than their current actual value.
So if someone can only get meager increases because they're handcuffed to a low base pay, what can they do to catch up? Answer: Switch jobs more often. Since the increments are always going to be small, the
Re:And people wonder why the US is going broke... (Score:5, Interesting)
Arbitrary requirements are there for a reason: CYA. In order to avoid expensive litigation and settlements in a number of states, it's a very good idea to have enumerable reasons and missed requirements for not hiring someone.
A college degree is simply a way to pare down the number of candidates you have to evaluate. If you have a position that states a Bachelor's degree is required and there are 500 applicants, 300 of which have college degrees, you have the ability to very quickly and more importantly, in a very riskless way, eliminate 200 candidates for the position.
Do you think most hiring managers or team managers give a flip if your entry-level helpdesk or file clerk or what have you has a degree? Not even in the slightest. They care about the fact that they can safely and quickly eliminate potential candidates for said position when a large number of people apply.
Re:And people wonder why the US is going broke... (Score:5, Interesting)
The problem is that this process selects people who were foolish enough to take on student loan debt when they only have the skills for a highschool-level job. It would be smarter to throw out the people with degrees when filling low-level positions.
Re:And people wonder why the US is going broke... (Score:4, Insightful)
In order to avoid expensive litigation and settlements in a number of states, it's a very good idea to have enumerable reasons and missed requirements for not hiring someone.
You know, I think that sometimes engineers and their managers are far too worried about legal challenges to hiring decisions. I've been in this business for thirty-five years and have been associated with hiring situations all along the way and have never seen a candidate try to sue a company for not offering an interview or job. This is across about ten companies in two states (granted, neither of these were New York or California, although a few of the companies were headquartered in the latter). I just think that most of people crying about "lawsuits" are spouting crap and are simply scared without reason, based on urban legend.
Show me the statistics. And show me that a simple pass over the resumes of the few who might bring suit, should someone choose to sue, doesn't show enough issues to give a defensible case.
That being said, if you get a valid resume and you're playing the "I want to hire an H1-B" game, then you deserve to be sued - you are breaking the law, after all.
Re: (Score:3)
"It happens. Lucky it doesn't happen often, but it does."
Thank you for that good example. But the point here is, I think, not that you should water down your hiring practices out of fear of getting sued. You should simply have good, valid practices in the first place, execute them properly, and document it.
Re: (Score:3)
So in order to avoid getting sued, you're filtering candidates in a way that SCOTUS has already ruled is grounds for a discrimination suit?
Griggs v. Duke Power Co. [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:3)
Re:And people wonder why the US is going broke... (Score:4, Funny)
Re:And people wonder why the US is going broke... (Score:5, Funny)
We need a "WTF?" mod choice...
Re:And people wonder why the US is going broke... (Score:5, Insightful)
Precisely!!!
This is one of the tragic developments when every job - right down to a janitor's - requires a degree. There are plenty of jobs which do not require anything more than high school, and indeed, people who drop out and go for these are sensible in not wasting time for something they're not meant for. Just as not everybody's gonna be a PhD, similarly, not everybody is gonna be a bachelors or masters. Things like truck drivers, file clerks, postal workers, AAA workers, pizza delivery guys - all of these are important jobs that need to be filled, and none of them require college degrees.
In fact, by requiring higher educational qualifications for these lower level jobs, while the price of education is going up due to the resultant increasing demand, the value of it is going to the toilet. It's a cliché that one needs a good education to be successful - and by successful, I don't mean being one of those party goers in Madison Avenue or Beverly Hills. I mean anybody who can nail a job and lead a content family life. By requiring an education for every job, it just artificially shoots up living costs, puts greater burdens on schools & colleges, and forces overqualified people into the workplace - or more kids staying at home w/ their parents.
For the lower level jobs that don't require much education in & of itself, a better metric would be to pick employees based on character, as opposed to education. Is s/he someone who's dedicated to the job, punctual, honest and capable of sticking to a job for a reasonable amount of time? Too many people in the work force - particularly younger workers - change jobs every few months, which is a telltale sign of a lack of commitment and eager to try making a fast buck. Why not weed out those, instead of checking whether the girl you are gonna hire as a secretary or someone who'll work in the office cafeteria has a Masters degree? This is the result of too much of an emphasis being given on education - even when it's not needed!
Re:And people wonder why the US is going broke... (Score:5, Interesting)
The problem is that no one really wants to have a shit job. And most of these kids are perfectly competent enough to go be a biologist, a lab tech, a philosophy consultant (as if that was a job), but there are plenty of people that are better then they are and they can't get a job in their field. So they drop down a peg and go be a pizza boy. And it turns out there enough that drop down that all pizza boys are now expected to have a college degree.
If you have an average US highschool grad who can afford to go to college, wouldn't you tell him to go get a degree? It's a real downer to accept that, even though you were smart enough and had enough money, that you probably shouldn't even try to get a good life. That you should lie down and accept a blue-collar job of hard work and a shitty retirement when you're too old to break your back every morning. There's a big push to be successful. That's normal. And success is pretty much defined as getting a good job, by having a good degree.
You're looking at it from the perspective of people hiring. That they really shouldn't put so much weight on a degree. But from the hiree's perspective, OH DEAR GOD YOU NEED A DEGREE. The split used to be those with a college degree and those without. Right now there is another split is between people with worthwhile degrees; science, technology, engineering, and math, and those with degrees like philosophy, history, or English. Too many people for too long felt that ANY sort of degree would guarantee a good life. That's no longer true. It puts you above the have-nots, but not by far.
I think we need more tracking in highschool. To set people up for their path. Either meaningful college, tech schools, or straight to the workforce.
Re: (Score:3)
No, let's look at it from the hiree's POV. You want to design the next CPU or ARM that goes into a cellphone, you get a BS or an MS in Computer Engineering, w/ a heavy focus on architecture, and then when you apply, you apply for those jobs. If you were going to work for AAA fixing flat tires, it's not a bad career choice - it's certainly work that needs to be done by millions of those who can't change their own tires. Or if one wants to be a janitor - again, not a bad job, b'cos while in the future, rob
Re:And people wonder why the US is going broke... (Score:5, Interesting)
Precisely!!!
This is one of the tragic developments when every job - right down to a janitor's - requires a degree. There are plenty of jobs which do not require anything more than high school, and indeed, people who drop out and go for these are sensible in not wasting time for something they're not meant for. Just as not everybody's gonna be a PhD, similarly, not everybody is gonna be a bachelors or masters. Things like truck drivers, file clerks, postal workers, AAA workers, pizza delivery guys - all of these are important jobs that need to be filled, and none of them require college degrees.
In fact, by requiring higher educational qualifications for these lower level jobs, while the price of education is going up due to the resultant increasing demand, the value of it is going to the toilet. It's a cliché that one needs a good education to be successful - and by successful, I don't mean being one of those party goers in Madison Avenue or Beverly Hills. I mean anybody who can nail a job and lead a content family life. By requiring an education for every job, it just artificially shoots up living costs, puts greater burdens on schools & colleges, and forces overqualified people into the workplace - or more kids staying at home w/ their parents.
For the lower level jobs that don't require much education in & of itself, a better metric would be to pick employees based on character, as opposed to education. Is s/he someone who's dedicated to the job, punctual, honest and capable of sticking to a job for a reasonable amount of time? Too many people in the work force - particularly younger workers - change jobs every few months, which is a telltale sign of a lack of commitment and eager to try making a fast buck. Why not weed out those, instead of checking whether the girl you are gonna hire as a secretary or someone who'll work in the office cafeteria has a Masters degree? This is the result of too much of an emphasis being given on education - even when it's not needed!
What does going to college tell you about a persons character? It tells me they're submissive to authority and lack initiative, which is great for many roles. A person who rejects the idea that he should sit at the feet of the wise old professor and learn and instead go out into the world and get to work making waves might not suck up what you give them and ask you if they're doing ok.
Mediocrity and reliability go to school. The worst and best reject it.
Limited world view (Score:5, Insightful)
What does going to college tell you about a persons character? It tells me they're submissive to authority and lack initiative, which is great for many roles. A person who rejects the idea that he should sit at the feet of the wise old professor and learn and instead go out into the world and get to work making waves might not suck up what you give them and ask you if they're doing ok.
Mediocrity and reliability go to school. The worst and best reject it.
You can go about making your waves. Make big ones - I genuinely hope you do and you have a great time.
I analyze and evaluate the structural performance of supersonic fighter jets, which make waves, but of a different type entirely. My values and goals simply don't match yours.
Those of us who wish to be movers and shakers in STEM must first know the basic building blocks, and those are easily learned from the wise old professors who built these things before us. I strive for reliability in specific ways and pick an choose which authorities it is in my best interest to submit to. If you think my peers and I lack initiative and must be "mediocre," I think you need to open your eyes to different ways of viewing the world.
In addition... (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
I don't know, but judging by job listings hiring for IT positions, they care more about what you can actually do. Every single time you see a degree mentioned it's, "or equivalent work experience".
Maybe there's a practicality in IT that we don't always appreciate.
The Catch-22 of work experience (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:The Catch-22 of work experience (Score:4, Informative)
So where should one obtain related work experience without already having related work experience?
Based on my 20 years of experience as an ethics consultant and 10 years as the CEO of a Fortune 500 company, you should just lie about it.
Re:And people wonder why the US is going broke... (Score:5, Interesting)
This story can't be true in all markets.
In my area, many employers look at a degree as something to be avoided if it isn't outright needed.
They don't really want a know-it-all with all these great job options out there (their perception, not necessarily reality).
They want you to know how to do the job already, but still need the employer.
I got more calls back when I used my still-in-school resume.
Re:And people wonder why the US is going broke... (Score:5, Insightful)
I went to get a masters degree in an area outside of my original studies because I wanted to move into technical jobs. I didn't have experience yet but I thought that all education was good and I would make it clear that I went to school to *learn* and I was willing, even with an advanced education, to start at the bottom and work up.
It darn near killed my career. *Every* HR drone has been taught that the only reason to go to school is to get more money. EVERY one.
It didn't matter what I put into the cover letter. It didn't matter what I said. Master's Degree = roundfile. It didn't matter that the company could get a well educated worker at a bargain price.
The fact that H.R. can not see beyond simple rules and labels is hurting corporations. The fact they're too stupid to understand this simply backs up my point.
Re:And people wonder why the US is going broke... (Score:5, Interesting)
The best piece of advice I received as a young man was "A degree shows people you can be taught. Work experience shows people you can be employed."
I began my 28 year career in software development shortly after that conversation. I make good money on long term contracts. I am a senior developer. I do not have a degree.
Unfortunately, I'm fairly sure this is no longer a plausible scenario and why I'm encouraging my son to either develop instant world-peace solving brilliance, or resign himself to another 4 years of post secondary education.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
Really, does it take 4 (or is it 5 now!) years to train people to be file clerks?
That's not the point. High school diplomas have become so watered down now (IAAT) that they really serve no purpose: Teachers are coming under increased pressure to pass students, administrators side with parents of failing students, and even state legislators lower the bar of standardized testing to the point where the tests themselves are meaningless as a measuring stick of success.
Businesses are starting to recognize that
Re:And people wonder why the US is going broke... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:And people wonder why the US is going broke... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:And people wonder why the US is going broke... (Score:5, Insightful)
Perhaps if you can justify why someone needs a bachelors to ferry documents, pizzas, flip burgers, clean bathrooms, stock shelves, or run cash registers, your logic might have basis in reality. Your fallacy equating non-college degreed status with 9th grade dropout is priceless as well.
All this 'overeducation' does is water down the significance. It does not necessarily make for a more productive/happy/content workforce. Why would someone with a bachelors be happy with any of the above jobs? You speak of commitment and follow through, but where would that motivation come from if they're just there because of a bad economy? ..vs someone who truly needs the job because they're simply not capable of collegiate level work? If the minimum required education to work $10/hr jobs these days creates a debt of 50k or more, it's no wonder so many are out of work with no way back in. These barriers are way outside the line of reason and are a typical symptom of an overly bureaucratic, top-heavy society that values irrelevant paperwork over actual, tested ability, attitude, and willingness.
People like you are the opposite of those who cry victimhood and are as much a part of the problem. This 'cry of the successful' is basically 'I did X so anyone who doesn't is a lazy fuck'. I'd like to see you give up your decent job and clean toilets for the rest of your life. You wouldn't, so quit demanding everyone else hit your standards just so they can have the 'privilege' of cleaning your shit for scrap wages...or is it you'd rather keep these people jobless so you can complain about their 'laziness' just to feel better about yourself?
myopic is a perfect nick for you.. It fits your position perfectly.
Re: (Score:3)
Signalling (Score:5, Insightful)
'When you get 800 résumés for every job ad, you need to weed them out somehow,'
As one professor pointed out in an econ class - the real value of a degree is the signal it sends - you are someone who at least can stick to something long enough to finish it. Simply put, it takes some of the workload off of the person looking to hire.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe, but I doubt it. If so, someone would have done it. A four-year bachelor's degree can be had for six months of middle-class wages so it's not expensive at the low end. People who refuse to go get one "because of the cost" are lying to themselves, or to you. My guess is they just couldn't make it.
I did know one guy, once, who was just as smart as me but only had a high school degree. He had managed to worm his way into a middle-class government job, but he'd hit the ceiling of where he could go without
Re: (Score:3)
He had managed to worm his way into a middle-class government job, but he'd hit the ceiling of where he could go without a BA.
And there's the rub. If you are sufficiently intelligent you can get by without a degree for some time. I know two excellent software developers that didn't complete University. One graduated highschool at 16 (from a prestigious private school) then dropped out of University due to huge money offers during the .Com bubble. Another decided he'd had enough with tech support and learned to code. Smart guy, would have done fine in University but he started working right after highschool then got himself a decen
Re:Signalling (Score:5, Informative)
First of all, $70,000 income for two people is well above poverty. The national median income for a family of four is fifty-some thousand and the poverty line is below twenty thousand. $70k might not be rich but don't cry too much in your milk because you are doing okay.
Second of all, an entry-level accountant [salary.com] makes about $45,000 per year. That means you make about $25,000 a year so I assume you are a doing unskilled labor. The $20,000 difference in your salaries is the value of her education, so she'll earn enough to pay for her degree in 3.5 years. For the 48 years after that, her higher salary is gravy.
If she can scratch up from entry-level accountant to slightly higher rank accountant [salary.com] then she'll get there even faster than three and a half years.
If you are complaining about this, try to imagine what it would be like if you were both doing unskilled labor. That's real poverty. You're living okay on that education of your wife's. Treat her well, she's your meal ticket with that education of hers.
Re: (Score:2)
It's always been tough for new grads, they tend to set unrealistic expectations, just cause you're good at what you do in your class in college, doesn't mean your going to land the next available senior position at a company. In fact, it's a bad fit, 100% of the time, nobody is ready for that w our current schooling systems. There's more mid-level jobs, than starter jobs, but there's work to be had for the person who isn't looking to land into a fortune 500 on their first try. What I've found is like hig
I'm getting a different message (Score:2, Interesting)
the real value of a degree is the signal it sends
Very true!
you are someone who at least can stick to something long enough to finish it.
That is not the message a modern degree sends.
The modern degree sends a message that you are a herd animal, to the point that you will stay with the herd even to the point of your own financial ruin.
There's no question that to some companies a docile herd animal with no instincts for self-preservation is a valuable resource. I'm just not sure I'd want to work for them giv
Re:I'm getting a different message (Score:5, Interesting)
"The modern degree sends a message that you are a herd animal..."
blah blah blah whatever.
You know what? It does. And in this case, the employer is ALSO a herd animal, and if you want to get hired, you need to convince them that YOU can be a good herd animal too.
Don't want to "kowtow to that corporate herd bullshit"? Fine, found your own company, I hope you're hugely successful. But you need to understand that sink or swim, you're on your own.
I'm sick and tired of purported iconoclasts saying they disregard social norms, but then beg for the protections/benefits that COME from being part of the herd. It's easy to be a brave individualist when you're living in mom's basement.
Re: (Score:3)
I expect it applies to BAs, too.
That's the stupidest thing I've ever heard. (Score:5, Insightful)
It is inefficient to make everyone spend 4 extra years in school just so lazy recruiters can save themselves a couple hours, to say the least.
Re:That's the stupidest thing I've ever heard. (Score:5, Insightful)
If the job doesn't require a degree, you shouldn't even be looking at candidates with degrees. Unless you want to be stuck with someone who's just going to be there until they can find a real job. You have it exactly backwards, as does the whole insane job market.
Re: (Score:2)
Of course, for the more astute, it sends the signal that you have some big loans to pay off and you're going to need a bigger paycheck to do it.
Re:Signalling (Score:5, Interesting)
It also signals you are likely loaded with student loan debt and are desperately in need of a job. This will gives you a disadvantage as the company will you see a hard-working, low payable employee. In other words, your ass will get ridden by management and subliminally reminded that they can easily let you go, which will effectively limit your career growth.
I see this in all types of careers.
Another source for the devaluation of the 4-year college degree are these Baccalaureate degrees from these for-profit universities.
Having a masters degree, even more debt, helps you grow in your career and in a few years from now, a masters will be considered a "diploma" in the math/science industry. These for-profit schools are beginning to push these degrees to unsuspecting victims.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Their only advantage to an employer was that you could pay them less. Someone with a degree is a perfect substitute for someone without a degree except they cost more (and ostensibly they have learned something, but that doesn't matter for jobs like these). As a group, HS grads only hurt themselves by trying to raise their wage
What happens when more and more people have degrees is that it gets har
Indeed (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Indeed (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Indeed (Score:5, Insightful)
i'd rather be washing cars... (Score:4, Insightful)
...than have a massive pile of debt that I don't expect to pay off until I'm 50 and still making car washing wages.
Re:i'd rather be washing cars... (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3)
Me too.
But I'd rather have this nice cushy job having paid off my student loans in 6 years and now making two-times the national median income, than wash cars. And I could have paid them off in 2 years but the loans were so incredibly cheap that it was uneconomic to pay them off faster. Wow, damn, education is so cheap compared to its value! What a great country we live in!
It sounds to me like you are making excuses for failure but it is possible you are just trolling.
The only thing I can think of... (Score:4, Insightful)
Over qualification, if somebody is actually requiring a college degree to scan groceries (clerk), they can go shove it. Then again according to this article the people at the NY Times only have HS diplomas, so should anybody really listen to them?
Also, based on the example given, Landon Cider sounds like he went for a law degree and rather than becoming the billionth lawyer, he got stuck as the water boy.
This is spam (Score:5, Informative)
I wouldn't use the NY Times to line a birdcage.
By CATHERINE RAMPELL
"joining The Times, Catherine wrote for the Washington Post editorial pages and financial section and for The Chronicle of Higher Education"
* The Chronicle of Higher Education
* 1255 Twenty-Third St, N.W.
* Washington, D.C. 20037
So this is basically a lobbyist for higher ed encouraging everyone to take out education loans.
No thanks.
-1, Obvious? (Score:4, Insightful)
Can we mod an entire article down? How is this news for anyone?
No Degree for Me (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Well...yes, you are lucky. I know people similar to your situation that managed to get the right positions and connections early on such that the empty college line on their resume was inconsequential. I also know college graduates like the one mentioned in the summary who seem stuck in an endless loop of shit jobs that they're constantly laid off from (not fired).
The way I see it it's all about how you get your foot in the door. Some people find their connections out of high school and others require that
Re: (Score:3)
Intern pay (Score:4, Informative)
I have no degree and get $20 an hour.
Wow, $20 an hour. Impressive. [/sarcasm] That's about what, $40,000 per year if you work full time? The average starting salary for an engineering graduate in 2011 was around $61,000 [knovel.com]
I'll skip the indoctrination and keep earning double what these college kids get.
You make barely more [psu.edu] than an engineering intern gets while still in school. You're really showing them how it's done.
Today on Slashdot We Directly Contradict Yesterday (Score:5, Insightful)
*head explodes*
So
Re:Today on Slashdot We Directly Contradict Yester (Score:5, Insightful)
My experience with GSU (Score:2)
having a degree from GSU barely qualifies some of their graduates for shuttling documents. I think there are people that graduate that do nothing other than stare at a wall.
Says Something About High-Schools in the US (Score:3, Insightful)
No love for the military folks? (Score:2, Informative)
The military has many programs and partnerships to help you get your degree while you are serving but most are from little unknown colleges. The oppurtunity is there though.
I could have got a Nuclear Technolgies degree using my military training, experience, and background and nothing but a few cleps. I slacked off and never did it. That was 15 years ago and I never thought i would need it. I got out of that field and I am now the network manager at a large international company. Even though I made it
No Child Left Behind (Score:5, Insightful)
Well with initiatives like "No child Left behind", where you really have to work at failing for the school system to let you, a college diploma is the only standardised ubiquitous way that a HR person can tell if someone is likely not a complete waste of space.
Non-college graduate here.
Screw HR... (Score:5, Informative)
It isn't what you know, it is WHO you know.
Stop answering job ads by filling out forms and sending them to HR drones. Find a way to make direct contact with people who make hiring decisions. Network. Schmooze. Volunteer at charitable events -- especially charity golf events.
When I was out of work I volunteered to update the web presence of an exclusive downtown executive club in a big city. It was a horrid mess of Cold Fusion and Visual Basic -- the old kind, before dot Net. Fixing it wasn't point. Getting free invites to attend functions at the exclusive downtown business club got me to rub elbows with people who made hiring decisions -- and needed competent IT employees.
Getting ahead without a degree can be done. Yes, it is harder, but alternate paths do exist if you try. And then there is the "I have no student loan debt" benefit.
You'll also be surprised how many of the people who own their own successful businesses at those exclusive clubs never finished college.
How about a Monster.com for the non-degreed? (Score:2, Interesting)
I own businesses in the Midwest and South Florida. When I post a job listing (usually through Craigslist), I specifically request people with no degree apply.
In the past 9 years, 100% of people I've hired were undegreed. These were the people I wanted, because they specifically weren't indoctrinated into the college mentality. I want self-starters, people I can later on invite to become a business partner. I also don't want political correctness, feminism or any of the other progressive mindsets in any
Re:How about a Monster.com for the non-degreed? (Score:5, Insightful)
I also don't want political correctness, feminism or any of the other progressive mindsets in any of my businesses. Those people can hit the road -- I don't even want them as customers.
Maybe with luck society will separate into two groups: the politically correct nauseated degreed folks and the self-driven and determined entrepreneurial type.
You sound like a real douche.
Re:How about a Monster.com for the non-degreed? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3)
Sheesh. I almost reported your post for being spam before I noticed that this page is his homepage link.
Re:How about a Monster.com for the non-degreed? (Score:5, Insightful)
And what's wrong with that?
The part where you sound like a fucking sociopath, which impression is reinforced a lot by looking at your website.
Re: (Score:3)
So your superior drive and ambition means you ... routinely turn away customers? (Scare away, more likely.) You do not sound as smart as you think you are.
Re: (Score:3)
Ooooh ooohhh! And then the self-driven determined entrepreneurial types shove off and go make their own society. Possibly under the sea [wikipedia.org].
Yeah... That'll work out.
Come on dude, you are a living stereotype that has been the butt of many running jokes. Lemme guess... You're a fan of Ayn Rand. Your father owned a business. You grew up in upper-middle America. With a front lawn. Possibly in a cul-de-sac. You actually suckle as much government handouts as you can, while lambasting anyone that does likewise, but te
The educational system in this country is BS now (Score:3)
The educational system in this country is BS at this point. I dropped out of college 3 times - the first time, to pursue an internship which my university didn't officially endorse, then again after returning to that same university, and then again from an online college. I began to realize that what I was learning was in no way going to help me in my chosen field, and I have a perfectly fine job which could not possibly benefit from a degree anyhow.
The problem is not that people should need a 4-year degree for basic jobs, but that the K-12 system is no longer sufficiently educating many graduates - and that HR departments are either lazy or overloaded to the point where they just slap a 4-year degree down as a minimum requirement (whether the position really needs it or not). Because I graduated from a very good private high school, and actually tried during those years, not just sliding by, I have plenty of knowledge, skill, and experience to hold myself just fine in the sorts of jobs that interest me.
I've held my current job for over seven years now, which is a good indication of interest in a career, rather than just a paycheck - and ought to be plenty of proof to any future companies I might want to work for that I can 'stick with something'... when it is worthwhile. Frankly, any company not willing to look over my full resume and consider my value without regard to my college education is one I wouldn't want to work for anyways.
Car washing (Score:3)
" 'It sure beats washing cars,' says Georgia State University graduate Landon Crider, 24, an in-house courier who, for $10 an hour, ferries documents back and forth between the courthouse and his company's office."
I work for a full service car wash as a supervisor. I wash cars. I don't have a college degree. I both make more than $10 an hour and would rather be washing cars than sitting at a desk. So this quote in the summary really made me laugh.
Call it neo-feudalism. (Score:3)
Pay to Play Society (Score:4, Interesting)
Education these days is nothing more than another form of corporate profit and requiring college degrees for even menial jobs is nothing more than a method to force people into a form of indentured servitude.
How's that you say? Well debt == enslavement and where is most people's largest amount of debt outside of their home? Debt which can not be discharged by declaring bankruptcy? Student loans.
Now be a good slave and get in line to get your expensive degree so you can work at McCrapphole corporation.
the fundamental fallacy (Score:3)
"'When you get 800 résumés for every job ad, you need to weed them out somehow,' "
The goal is not to filter resumes. The goal is to find the best applicant for a given amount of search effort.
The problem is, companies are decidedly unserious about putting in the effort to find someone. For all the talk about how hard it is to find qualified applicants (let alone the best), companies are busy filtering resumes for typos, the currently unemployed, and past periods of unemployment.
Re: (Score:2)
The breakdown in parenting and education has resulted in your typical 20 year old American being a complete idiot. If you guys could stop being such idiots, we could stop using the college filter on you. Honestly, the college graduates are not a whole lot better.
Try being less dumb.
Care to point out exactly when your typical 20 year old American WASN'T a complete idiot? The 1700's? 1945? 1960?
Just curious.
Re: (Score:2)
Because there's no way to prove you've actually read and understood the library books you took home or the internet sites you visited.
Re: (Score:3)
A college education is the single greatest value in the modern world. Nothing else even comes close. Dollar-for-dollar, nothing else delivers more quality of life to the individual -- nothing. People who complain about its cost have no idea what they are talking about.
That's just not true any more in the US. It's true for the top 10 colleges, and maybe the top 50, but as you go further down, the return on investment of a college degree goes negative now. In 2011, 85% of college students moved back in with their parents. [time.com]
Hiring manager perspective (Score:4, Interesting)
Actually, I graduated without a dime in student loan debt. I worked full time and went to school full time (with a very understanding employer). Now, I am a hiring manager in the world of IT. I value experience, but a degree shows that you have some soft skills to go with your knowledge. A degree with business courses also shows me that you will understand other functions of the company, and not just your own job. An engineering degree shows me you are able to solve complex problems and have learned to research well. Even a liberal arts degree at least shows me you are able to meet deadlines and focus. Certifications will get your foot in the door, whereas a degree will move your career path along.
Re: (Score:3)
We should cut the work week to a few hours. Advances in automation means that it takes less work to produce the same level of goods. Since there's a limit on how many goods we actually want to have, and a limit to our planet's ability to deal with rampant resource consumption and waste, the answer is not constant growth. We should not be harnessing every advance in automation into building more shit and filling our landfills with more trash. Constant growth is an impossibility because we are limited by the