Yahoo Buys UK Teen's Smartphone News App 88
judgecorp writes "Seventeen year old Nick D'Aloisio has sold his smartphone app Summly to Yahoo for an undisclosed sum. The app — created when he was 15 — aggregates news stories by topic and condenses them for time-strapped readers. D'Aloisio and his team will go to work at Yahoo when the deal closes. From the article: 'Summly was founded by 17-year old Nick D’Aloisio when he was just 15 from his home in London. The service works by sorting news stories by topic and condensing them into bite-sized chunks for time-conscious readers.
The Summly application will be closed down and integrated with Yahoo’s existing range of mobile applications. D’Aloisio and the Summly team will be joining Yahoo as part of the transaction, which is subject to customary closing conditions and is expected to close in the second quarter of 2013.'"
Summary Fail (Score:5, Informative)
Way to restate the same thing about 5 times to make it looks like there's any real content.
Re: (Score:3)
It's just a softball for the algorithm that promises to cut it down for 'time-conscious' readers(seriously, when did having the attention span of a crack-addled monkey get redefined as a good thing?) By repeating approximately one sentence worth of actual information more or less verbatim, it sharply increases the odds that the system will actually work...
Re:Summary Fail (Score:4, Insightful)
Automated Summary? (Score:2)
There are stories that are straight forward, and making an informative summary for that type of stories are no brainers
But for stories that are a little bit complicated, it's not that easy to condense it into an informative summary of that story
I have submitted enough stories to slashdot (and end up with 99% rejection) to know that to do the job well requires much more than a word-selection algorithm
Since Yahoo is paying a hefty sum for that app, perhaps Yahoo knows something that I don't
Re: (Score:2)
The reports say that the algorithm written by the teen was based upon or is part of the family of iterative algorithms more commonly referred to as genetic algorithms [wikipedia.org]. The basic idea is to start with a set of possible solution candidates, article summaries in this case, and then pick the best ones iteratively while using so called genetic operations like crossover and mutation to modify the sets before each successive iterative evaluation. In the context of summarizing a body of text one might consider the
Re: (Score:2)
It's just a softball for the algorithm that promises to cut it down for 'time-conscious' readers(seriously, when did having the attention span of a crack-addled monkey get redefined as a good thing?) By repeating approximately one sentence worth of actual information more or less verbatim, it sharply increases the odds that the system will actually work...
By gods, you're right! Let's all stop writing abstracts for scientific papers. What a ridiculous idea, abstracts! If all the lazy academicians with the attention span of a crack-addled monkey can't be bothered with reading my twenty pages long paper, screw them! ...or not?
Re:Summary Fail (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Summary Fail (Score:4, Funny)
Sounds like you have Attention Surplus Disorder. The cure is irregular sleeping hours and meal times.
Eat more junk food (try to get at least 50% of your calories from Red Bull, Mountain Dew and Cheetos)
Spend more time on the Internet. Try to avoid slashdot stories unless they the summary is by samzenpus. Don't read the articles, just the summaries. Try to replace your time spent reading books on reddit.
If you read this far you have a serious and possibly fatal case.
Re:Summary Fail (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Summary Fail (Score:5, Funny)
It also doesn't say how much Yahoo paid. They probably offered the teenager some Funyons and an official Marissa Mayer signed poster.
Re: (Score:1)
It also doesn't say how much Yahoo paid. They probably offered the teenager some Funyons and an official Marissa Mayer signed poster.
Somewhere along the lines of $30 million. Seriously. http://allthingsd.com/20130325/yahoo-acquires-hipster-mobile-news-reader-summly-like-we-said-it-might/ [allthingsd.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Apparently it ones in the multiple tens of millions.
Seriously, Yahoo just paid at least $20million for something they could've engineered for a fraction of the price themselves?
Mayer really does have absolutely no idea what she's doing does she?
Re: (Score:2)
It also doesn't say how much Yahoo paid. They probably offered the teenager some Funyons and an official Marissa Mayer signed poster.
and they mumbled 'Mayer' so it sounded like 'Miller' [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yahoo has a pretty healthy bank account and revenue stream, as anyone who actually read their financials (as opposed to parroting how "Yahoo is dying") knows.
Re: (Score:2)
Curious, their cash flow from operations is less than zero.
Signed,
Anyone who actually read their financials
Re: (Score:1)
Welcome to the world of modern journalism. How else do you think that sleepy cities like Pittsburgh fill 3 hours of evening news without actually touching on anything that the people should really be aware of?
Re: (Score:1)
Families in Pittsburgh can't afford electricity to power the plasma TVs they went further into debt to afford before 2008, so it doesn't really matter much anyway.
Summly Fail (Score:4, Funny)
Way to restate the same thing about 5 times to make it looks like there's any real content.
That's obviously because you're not reading it with Summly, which would shorten in into just three lines.
Re: (Score:2)
Way to restate the same thing about 5 times to make it looks like there's any real content.
It's a bug in his algorithm, he obviously condensed the article incorrectly. Oh wait, you mean he doesn't work for slashdot? Does that mean the editors are real people?
Money Laundering (Score:2)
This got me thinking that Apps and internet companies are a great way to launder money. You buy illegal goods under the cover of publically paying someone for their "app" which turns out to have no value later. Politicians that want illegal direct donations can skip to whole speaking fee nonsense which has reasonable caps and instead author dubious apps and sell these to the Koch brothers for ten million a pop.
Entropy conservation. (Score:2)
His algorithm is actually like a heat pump. It reduces the article's entropy by pumping random redundant text into slashdot.
Cue a dozen patent trolls (Score:4, Informative)
Starting law suits over this.
Cue half a dozen news publishers sueing over aggregating their stories.
Sigh.
Another step in Yahoo's demise (Score:1)
First they cancel telecommuting, and now they blow millions on some kid's news aggregator.
Re: (Score:2)
I'll just spell that out: THIRTY SIX AND A HALF MILLION DOLLARS.
Words fail me.
Re: (Score:2)
If they gave me 36.5 million dollars I wouldn't be running off to work for Yahoo. I'd try to invest the money sensibly and retire.
Unless you decide to take up "literally burning piles of money" as a hobby, you don't have to do anything sensible with 36.5 million dollars to be able to retire on it.
You might not be able to buy 250 million dollar yachts and play with the real big boys, but who cares?
Re: (Score:2)
What do you count as not being sensible but you could still live forever on it?
Presumably he only gets around 2/3 of that after taxes, right? So $20 mil (later stories have said $30mil was the purchase price). TONS AND TONS of money. But I'd still invest it in something reasonable, even some in ridiculously low 1% CDs, and some in dividend paying stocks, to just live off of the ~$200+K/year without getting out of bed.
Re: (Score:2)
That's standard terms of acquiring small startups. They just paid 30 mil not for the code (the app will be closed), but to have this Fresh Hipster Talent on board. I think they are mad, but so does lots of others.
Yahoo! is AOL these days. There is no way back.
Re: (Score:3)
I'll just spell that out: THIRTY SIX AND A HALF MILLION DOLLARS.
Actually, spelling it out would be "Tee aitch eye are tee why space ess eye..."
But yeah, that is a ridiculous sum of money.
Re: (Score:1)
Makes you wonder if they shouldn't have aggregated the minds of the excess telecommuting employees using the algorithm and turned their bodies into cup cakes.
So you'd be able to read a five line summary of Bud's thoughts- which was probably more than you got out of him when he was telecommuting - *and* you'd have tasty cupcakes to keep you in the office with his IM handle written in icing on top in the CEO's charmingly girly handwriting with little smilies and hearts instead of dots on the letters.
Plus some
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
"So SRI wrote the AI piece which does the heavy lifting, and the kid's company made pretty UI to display the summarized articles. $30 million well spent..."
It doesn't stop there, apparently they had a 3rd party making the Android version for them who are now ticked off that the app they've built wont see the light of day. In other words his company couldn't even do the Android side of things in house.
What exactly has Yahoo paid for here? a 17 year old who can write an iOS interface for a bit of software he
How is this app any different from the news apps.. (Score:1)
..already available in the App Store, or any of these: http://lifehacker.com/5845798/five-best-news-aggregators
Re: (Score:1)
It summarises the stories for you, apparently quite competently (I haven't used it myself - it won't run on a 2nd gen Touch). As far as I could tell, none of those aggregators in the linked article do that.
Re: (Score:2)
It summarises the stories for you, apparently quite competently (I haven't used it myself - it won't run on a 2nd gen Touch). As far as I could tell, none of those aggregators in the linked article do that.
That feature sounds nice. But, how long would it take someone to reverse engineer how it works. Why would Yahoo spend more than 1 engineer's annual salary buying this? It sounds like the kind of thing that could be replaced by a pretty small Perl Script.
Re: (Score:2)
the money transfer is probably some type of money laundering or tax scam, rather than payment for rights to a technology.
That is a serious accusation based on no evidence or logic whatsoever. It is at times like this that I wish you couldn't post anonymously on the internet, so that this kid and/or yahoo! could sue you for criminal libel and reducing the overall intelligence level of the internet.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Even if that's so, this is Yahoo, so no one will ever listen to him and they will continue to do all the batshit crazy stuff they do that no one likes or even cares about
Bye Bye Freedom! (Score:2)
Well there goes working from home, kid!
So.... they plan on killing the app then? (Score:2, Funny)
The Summly application will be closed down and integrated with Yahoo’s existing range of mobile applications.
Sounds like they're going to take what was probably a nice, small app with streamlined code, and bloat the everloving piss out of it by integrating it into the godawful nightmare that is anything that Yahoo touches. Seriously, who even USES yahoo any more? I honestly have not heard a single person I know utter their name in at least 5 years.
Well, whoever has this app now, you probably want to look for a replacement, because I'd bet money on the 'integrated' version being a horrendously slow, ad-filled beh
Re: (Score:2)
Seriously, who even USES yahoo any more? I honestly have not heard a single person I know utter their name in at least 5 years.
Why do people keep posting shite like this on slashdot? We know yahoo! aren't all cool and trendy like the beloved Google or Apple, but they're still a company with turnover of $1 billion a quarter (quick Google) so they're doing something all right.
Re: (Score:2)
AOL has a fairly large turnover as well...
Re: (Score:2)
They are going to get rid of the app and fold the core algorithm into yahoo websites.
This will be an interesting thread (Score:1)
/me just gets the popcorn and watches.
Ooo, young blood. (Score:1)
They wanted the name? (Score:5, Insightful)
The Summly application will be closed down
So they just wanted the name and the programmer, but not the app?
Um, so... (Score:4, Insightful)
He reinvented Slashdot? I don't know because I didn't RTFA which is apparently what this app is all about.
Re:Um, so... (Score:5, Funny)
No, he reinvented Slashdot editors. There seems to be room for improvement...
Oh come on! (Score:2)
This pisses me off more than a nerd who gets a girl! >:-(
When does he report? (Score:2)
It's going to be a heck of a commute, from the UK to Sunnyvale.
Re: (Score:2)
It's going to be a heck of a commute, from the UK to Sunnyvale.
It's okay, it's 2013 so he can telecommut... oh wait, yeah you're right!
Re: (Score:2)
It's going to be a heck of a commute, from the UK to Sunnyvale.
Yahoo have an office in central London.
Pretty sure TLDR beat them.. (Score:2)
http://tldrstuff.com/ [tldrstuff.com]
I've tried it on my tablet and prefer to read the original articles, but meh.
What is the advantage of this (Score:2)
As opposed to a news corporation dutifully maintaining a good RSS feed?
Umm (Score:2)
Yahoo has mobile applications? o.O
Dotcom bubble money (Score:3)
$30 million for a newsreader app. Really. $30 million.
Apple recently spent, according to estimates, $20 million on a company which allows phones to map indoor spaces. That tech will directly help improve their Maps product. So $20 million for very innovative stuff. Apple will surely get their money's worth out of that purchase.
In contrast, $30 million for Summly, which probably just packaged some open source libraries for summarizing documents. I don't see any secret sauce or innovation in this product. This purchase smells of desperation by Mayer & Co, but I guess if I was Yahoo and had no products anyone cared about, I'd be desperate too.
Hey, I remember this kid. (Score:2, Insightful)
He was the subject of some news stories a while ago.
As I recall, said stories were very, very careful to dance around the fact that his father had essentially set him up through his connections with some pretty powerful people. The app itself isn't crap, but it isn't good either- it's just a net zero and went absolutely nowhere after he got his initial "investments" through his family. Frankly, given the breadth of the knowledge on the internet and how easy it is to type code into a graphical IDE and click
Re: (Score:1)
And that's really what bothers me about the whole thing. Apart from some idiot in the NY Times calling him a "genius programmer", what bugs me is that there's is no way he has the CS skills to do this by himself (which would have been impressive). And what do we find: he was able to get a bunch of seed money from wealthy investors and hire some developers and "partner" with an AI company to do the actual backed. I'm sure the fact that his dad is a banker and his mom is a lawyer had nothing to do with any of
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not even sure why this is news.
$30 million dollars is why this is news. I've got two friends publishing Apps for their livelihoods, and combined they make half what I do as a typical developer.
There may be a lot of comments saying "this app is crap," but still no one has explained how he got $30million for it. You've theorized connections, others have theorized: anything that uses yahoo's typical interests.
Someone got rich and famous over a simple app, while all the app developers I know are scrounging by while producing much fancier app
Will they be allowed to telecommute? (Score:1)
Zombie Yahoo (Score:2)
They were murdered by an ex Hollywood hack they hired as the CEO - Terry Semel - who probably knew how to massage egos of Hollywood actors but had no idea on science, internet, technology and so on. Remember Yahoo buying broadcast.com - I still don't know what was broadcast.com - other than the fact it was a nice URL. Mark Cuban and a lot of people who brokered the deal got rich by sales commission from Cuban - that's all.
Jerry Yang and David Filo are no Sergey Brin and Larry P
Re: (Score:1)