Lasers Unearth Lost 'Agropolis' of New England 105
sciencehabit writes "Hidden ruins are customary in the wild jungles of South America or on the white shores of the Mediterranean Sea. Now, researchers have uncovered a long-lost culture closer to Western civilization — in New England. Using aerial surveys created by LiDAR, a laser-guided mapping technique, the team detected the barely perceptible remnants of a former 'agropolis' around three rural New England towns (abstract). Near Ashford, Connecticut, a vast network of roads offset by stone walls came to light underneath a canopy of oak and spruce trees. More than half of the town has become reforested since 1870, according to historical documents, exemplifying the extent of the rural flight that marked the late 1800s. Some structures were less than 2 feet high and buried in inaccessible portions of the forest, making them essentially invisible to on-the-ground cartography."
Summary (and article's first paragraph) misleading (Score:5, Insightful)
This makes it sound like a long-lost native civilization was discovered. Not the case. Early European settlers in New England devastated the native landscape and, basically, turned it into English sheep farms. As expansion pushed westward and agriculture shifted with it, that economy changed and native (and some invasive) species have reclaimed the landscape.
Still very cool and interesting, but a different story from what you might expect from reading the lede.
Re: (Score:1)
Re:Summary (and article's first paragraph) mislead (Score:5, Funny)
Attention Rest Of World, we in the US consider stuff from the 1800s not only old, but akin to ancient ruins.
Vizitez u our museums with art from the Olde Masters like Norman Rockwell and Robert Crumb.
Re:Summary (and article's first paragraph) mislead (Score:5, Funny)
"To an American a hundred years is a long time, and to a Briton a hundred miles is a long distance."
-- attribution unknown
Re: (Score:2)
And to a Frenchman, a hundred minutes is a lunch hour.
Re:Summary (and article's first paragraph) mislead (Score:4, Funny)
Re: Summary (and article's first paragraph) mislea (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Was taken to a historical town in the US - couldn't help but snicker half the time...
Re: (Score:1)
Re: Summary (and article's first paragraph) mislea (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
.. Or Mr Angelo (Michael to his close friends).
That's on a museum in Chicago, IIRC.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
farms ... that were abandoned by their owners after lucrative mill towns sprung up across New England
Actually the main reason that so many New England farms were abandoned is that farmers were moving to the Midwest, where the farmland was much better. I love New England, but the poor rocky soil makes it a lousy place to farm.
Re: (Score:2)
It is semi-odd that later waves of immigrants didn't take it over, at least until they could save up enough to move on, or it dawned on them that the land was crap and they sold it to the next bunch of suckers that got off the boat.
Because if one thing built the USA, it was suckers getting off boats and being looked down on by those who had (just) got their socks dry.
Re: (Score:2)
Apple's lawyers are rubbing their hands and doing that looking from side to side thing like if you're watching tennis while wearing a neck-brace.
Re: (Score:3)
You're nearly 2 centuries behind, dude. Joseph Smith discovered ancient golden plates back in 1823, in nearby new york state.
Re: (Score:3)
Early European settlers in New England devastated the native landscape
Eek!
and, basically, turned it into English sheep farms.
Oh, you mean they wanted homes and livelihoods just like us. That doesn't sound quite so sinister.
Re: (Score:1)
But, but they devastated the native landscape.
That makes them evil.
And since we're their descendents (at least the New England readers of /.), we owe retribution to Mother Gaia forever and ever and ever.
OTOH, Mother Gaia has covered the remnants of their "devastation" so thoroughly that they need LiDAR to detect them.
So maybe it wasn't so "
lost in time (Score:5, Funny)
Re:lost in time (Score:5, Insightful)
Good point. But it may not take even that long. For example, I think the Studebaker plant still stands. And Armco Steel, which once was a primary employer in the Kansas City area, has been a gigantic rusting (but intact) hulk for a couple of decades. Since these things cost so much to tear down and there's no economic incentive to do so, they seemingly will last until nature takes over, in decades or centuries.
Re: (Score:3)
A whole lot more than just the Studebaker plant.
http://www.marchandmeffre.com/detroit/ [marchandmeffre.com]
Re: (Score:1)
South Bend is busy tearing down the last bits of the Studebaker production plant. Only the most ornate and preserved buildings remain. The area is being populated with industrial park structures which are more adaptable for current business uses including two server farms.
Re: (Score:2)
Yep, soon we'll just 3d print everything in the garage, at least until the replicators hit the market.
Re: (Score:1)
When people talk about the decline in manufacturing, they're generally worried about the decline in the number of people employed in manufacturing and not at all interested in the amount of goods produced.
And why do they care about the number of people? Seems to me that most of the are overmuch concerned with voters, not economics. So that one input to the process is more important than the results of that process.
Lost in New England, you say? (Score:3, Interesting)
West of Arkham the hills rise wild, and there are valleys with deep woods that no axe has ever cut. There are dark narrow glens where the trees slope fantastically, and where thin brooklets trickle without ever having caught the glint of sunlight. On the gentle slopes there are farms, ancient and rocky, with squat, moss-coated cottages brooding eternally over old New England secrets in the lee of great ledges; but these are all vacant now, the wide chimneys crumbling and the shingled sides bulging perilously beneath low gambrel roofs.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Apparently it really is Lovecraft[1]. I was surprised, because it didn't contain the word "gibbous".
[1] I mean his words, not really him. Though you never know.
Re: (Score:2)
I wasn't certain at first the quote was his, because it didn't contain the word, "tenebrous".
Someday these lasers will find pre-beta Slashdot. (Score:1, Funny)
Many years from now, digital archaeologists will use similar technology to find the remnants of pre-beta Slashdot.
They'll be stunned at what they find. They'll find a site that's actually readable, unlike the Slashdot Beta site. They'll find a site where discussion can easily take place, unlike the Slashdot Beta site. They'll find a site that loads quickly, unlike the Slashdot Beta site. They'll find a site that isn't riddled with large, useless images, unlike the Slashdot Beta site. They'll find a site tha
Re: (Score:2)
I doubt it. Most people on the computer are not on the computer or tablet or whatever to get work done. They are on it for entertainment and occasional menial tasks. For many, writing their resume on the computer is the most work they will actually do.
Exciting times for archaeology (Score:5, Informative)
The use of LIDAR and other sensing techniques is having a powerful impact on archaeology around the world. New finds keep turning up, and there is still a lot of the earth to explore with those sensing technologies. Couple that with the ongoing efforts to digitize old records and the growing use of geospatial information systems and there are some interesting times ahead.
Great article: The technology uncovering humanity's past, and perhaps its future [stltoday.com]
Unitedstateans looking at their belly button (Score:4, Insightful)
How is New England closer to Western civilization than the 'white shores of the Mediterranean Sea'? Western civilization was born in the shores of the mediterranean sea.
Re: (Score:2)
That does't make that statement, the summary, or the article's first paragraph any better. By the way, the Aztec Empire was in North America, not South America.
Re: (Score:1)
Either way neither the Aztecs nor Incas were part of Western civilization. The settlers from Europe were.
Re: (Score:2)
Either way neither the Aztecs nor Incas were part of Western civilization. The settlers from Europe were.
That's correct. The Aztecs and Incas were *wiped out* by some of those "settlers".
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
No, only their civilizations, and most of those were on their last legs anyway due to smallpox and local wars, something that the Spanish simply took advantage of. By the time the Spanish actually settled in large numbers, the civilizations had ceased to exist, although many of the indigenous people still survived and continued to live under the new rulers.
None of this is in any way different what civilizations around the worl
Re: (Score:2)
We'll stick with your assertion that the Spaniards "only" wiped out the Incan civilization. As I have seen from your posts, you consider civilization to be the most precious attribute of any people.
Why do you consistently push your
Re: (Score:2)
Who do you think the European conquerors were? Well-off middle class folks who just got up one day to destroy some peaceful South American civilizations in order to boost their retirement plans? In reality, for the most part, they came from totalitarian, theocratic regimes that had just barely survived attacks from powerful
Re: (Score:2)
You're just trolling, and attempt to change the discussion by attacking when your points are invalidated.
I'm not an idealist, but this look into your soul you provide with your terrible assertions makes me glad I'm not you.
The j
Re: (Score:2)
Central to your character is the idea that you are smarter, more perceptive, and more rational than most (all?) people. It's just not the case. I am at least as well educated as you in history and logic. The difference between us is that it's *your* attitudes that are twisted. You're just trolling, and attempt to change the discussion by attacking when your points are invalidated.
Did you find a mirror and start arguing with it?!?
Re: (Score:2)
Central to your character is the idea that you are smarter, more perceptive, and more rational than most (all?) people. It's just not the case. I am at least as well educated as you in history and logic. The difference between us is that it's *your* attitudes that are twisted. You're just trolling, and attempt to change the discussion by attacking when your points are invalidated.
Did you find a mirror and start arguing with it?!?
Did you lose your meds?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
part of Western civilization.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
They're West, but they're also quite a long way down. So the actual distance is more. Or something like that.
Re: (Score:1)
>> How is New England closer to Western civilization than the
'white shores of the Mediterranean Sea'?
Dunkin' Donuts?
Misinterpretation. (Score:2)
Closer here means culturally and structurally more like the Western civilizations than the pre-Columbus cultures, not physically closer.
The Mediterranean and jungles of South America refer to the expected locations of lost civilization ruins rather than in New England area.
Re: (Score:1)
A virtuous cycle is possible: you use lasers to cook the bacon, you eat the bacon to fuel the brain to build better lasers.
With better lasers you may be able to use them to excite the pollution molecules until they break into less harmful products. For cost effective transport I recommend sharks.
Re: (Score:1)
Did you notice that shark image on the story?
Re: Usefullness of LASERs. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I had a Rauchbier last night. Smelled like bacon. If only a laser was involved...
long lost civilization (Score:5, Informative)
Now, researchers have uncovered a long-lost culture closer to Western civilization — in New England.
"Long lost civilization" here means 1700s New England farms, it's not a discovery that Native Americans were building saw mills or anything.
Re:long lost civilization (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
It's still there ? Hm, some might say that.
But thats only if you count the current USA as a civilization. ;)
Re: (Score:2)
tour guides in Paris dismiss anything younger than 500 years as "contemporary"
Are we citizens of the New Republic supposed to be impressed by European claims of greater antiquity? There are places in the Mideast, India and China where anything younger than 2,000 years is dismissed as contemporary.
Re: (Score:2)
"Long lost civilization" here means 1700s New England farms, it's not a discovery that Native Americans were building saw mills or anything.
I misread the headline as "lasers unearthed in Lost 'Agropolis' of New England and had done even better than mills.
Re: (Score:2)
it's not a discovery that Native Americans were building saw mills or anything.
While true, there are also those. But, somewhere else.
Re: (Score:2)
While true, there are also those.
Really??
Re: (Score:2)
In the Pacific Northwest there was heavy use of wood in home construction, including a well developed skill for board+wooden nail construction. Most families had square wooden boxes. You can get semantic on the fact that the logs were split into planks rather than milled, but after splitting the boards would be sawn to length. (with a stone hand tool) And there is a strong argument to be made that shaping wood with stone tools, such as in a dugout canoe, is "milling." Certainly if I was building one using m
Lovecraft country (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
As does The Kamasutra...
Re: (Score:1)
True for Most of CT (Score:3, Interesting)
I'm from CT (Score:2, Interesting)
And as a boy, I'd constantly stumbled on structures like this. What this study does show is how extensive it was and how it connected - I never appreciated that because all I ever saw was a lone stone wall or something in the middle of the woods and didn't know it was part of this huge network.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
No, the impressive thing is that the technology is already revealing abandoned structures closer to home. The find itself as a find is not interesting.
There are two main areas where this is interesting:
1) Thinking about the future looking back at us, and what will we look like? What does our past already look like now that it is showing up?
2) The power of these tools to find things not immediately visible to human observation is impressive. These aren't giant pyramids, these are small structures mostly obsc
Re: (Score:2)
Who do you suppose owns these tracts of land, now? I guess I'm just assuming that the 250 acres of woods wasn't literally your back yard, but maybe it was.
Anyway, there should be property records for all of the fields "discovered" in the LIDAR map. When the farmers abandoned their farms, were they purchased by the state as watershed or open space, or by developers who never did anything with them, or what?
Re: (Score:2)
-polis is Persian for "city," for example the famous Persepolis, City of the Persians.
You need a whole farm town to make an agropolis.
They must have found an old grange.
Not a "long lost" civ. (Score:2)
The summary makes it sound like they found 3000 year old ruins, not 300 year old ruins. This is not a lost civilization. It's just early Americans, colonial and USA. It's still interesting. There was no need to sensationalize. It reminds me of the innocent looking ditches I used to pass by in Fairfax County, VA local parks. It wasn't until after moving away that I saw an article online explaining that the ditches were colonial stream diversions leading to mills that no longer exist. A preserved examp
Re: (Score:2)
If the places are no longer on any existing maps, they are "lost." If they are actually cataloged somewhere, they're not lost. Notice the lost-ness being claimed is in reference to the 'agropolis' (farm town or grange with associated farmland) not to Colonial New England.
-1, Obvious (Score:3)
Southern New England is overrun with old stone walls and relics of old farms, take a walk in the woods some time. Also, water is wet.
Historical/Archeological value (Score:5, Insightful)
Property owners can use these maps to determine whether any such structures exist on their property. They will then bulldoze them flat so as to prevent some preservationist societies from declaring their property off limits to development.
Re: (Score:2)
>> I grew up in a city in the netherlands where city hall was built in 1250 and most of the houses are from the early middleages.
Good for you! ...but was it overgrown with forest & forgotten?
If so, what a relevant comment, and I'd love to hear about your being raised by European squirrels while foraging for berries..
If not, kind of pointless, as this was about a area where civilization was overgrown, not an old town with people still living in it, with operational roads.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Really? But Jersey is in England, so it should be!
Re: (Score:2)
For some reason I thought it was closer to Cornwall than France. So, it's a monarchy?
Re: (Score:2)
According to their coins It's a bailiwick, whatever one of those is.
It probably involves somebody who wears a silly hat.