Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Ubuntu

Ubuntu's Mir Gets Delayed Again 241

jones_supa writes "Delays keep piling up for the Mir display server on the Ubuntu desktop. After already being postponed multiple times, Mir might not be enabled by default on the Ubuntu Linux desktop until the 16.04 LTS release — in two years time! This was the estimate by Mark Shuttleworth in a virtual Ubuntu Developer Summit. Using Mir, Mark says, will lead to supporting more hardware, obtaining better performance, and 'do some great things' with the technology. He expects some users will start using Mir on the desktop over the next year. Mir is already packaged as an experimental option, along with an experimental Unity 8 desktop session."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Ubuntu's Mir Gets Delayed Again

Comments Filter:
  • tablet and phone (Score:2, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 14, 2014 @01:33AM (#46480185)

    It's already default on the tablet and phone, which is what Shuttleworth is excited about these days. So in that sense, it is already here.

    So wayland is going to have to do a lot more than make decent ground if Ubuntu is to drop Mir. Wayland will need to do everything that Mir and X11 can do, and exceed them, and also be on a mature and well tested code base. Merely being an adequate competitor won't cut it.

  • by jones_supa ( 887896 ) on Friday March 14, 2014 @04:13AM (#46480637)
    Much better performance, no tearing problems, smooth compositing and desktop effects, old legacy X11 crap thrown away.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 14, 2014 @05:20AM (#46480845)

    network transparency

    Which is of course why X gets used where it is used in the first place. Wrap your head around X being used on MS Windows guys - once you work out why it is used there you'll stop laughing at network transparency and see why people are using it.

    X is only network transparent if all your apps are from 1995 and are written against Motif. Everything newer than that is not network transparent, it's just shoving uncompressed bitmaps across the network in a highly inefficient wrapper protocol that makes large numbers of inefficient, lag inducing round-trips.

    A rootless VNC-esque protocol (Xpra) is a superior solution in every way.

  • by thegarbz ( 1787294 ) on Friday March 14, 2014 @07:37AM (#46481277)

    If you think that he's wrong maybe you should look at how any modern X system works. Both X developers and Wayland developers have discussed in detail that there is nothing network transparent about any modern release of X which does any kind of direct rendering or hardware acceleration, something that was introduced around the mid 90s, so the parent's comment is actually right on the mark.

  • by Bengie ( 1121981 ) on Friday March 14, 2014 @08:13AM (#46481403)
    Wayland is a simple abstract layer. You can make your own remote protocol and have receive your draw commands and render it locally. One can fully implement X in Wayland, but one cannot implement Wayland in X. Therefore, Wayland is better. If you need X like functionality, someone could easily create a wrapper, which they already have for X.
  • Comment removed (Score:3, Informative)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Friday March 14, 2014 @08:40AM (#46481569)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 14, 2014 @10:12AM (#46482305)

    Have you tried using Xpra [xpra.org]?. It does exactly that with X. It works great over the internet, and lets you attach and detach X applications across X servers. Basically, it's screen for X.

For large values of one, one equals two, for small values of two.

Working...