$10k Reward For Info On Anyone Who Points a Laser At Planes Goes Nationwide 264
coondoggie writes: "The FBI today said it was making national a pilot program it tried out in 12 locations earlier this year that offers up to $10,000 for information leading to the arrest of anyone who intentionally aims a laser at an aircraft. According to the FBI, the pilot locations have seen a 19% decrease in the number of reported laser-to-aircraft incidents. Those locations included: Albuquerque, Chicago, Cleveland, Houston, Los Angeles, New York City, and Philadelphia."
Profit! (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
1) Aim laser pointer at my own plane, parked in a hangar.
2) Turn myself in for "intentionally aiming a laser at an aircraft"
3) Profit!
4) Serve up to 5 years in prison and pay a fire of up to $250,000
5) Be unemployable with a prison record.
Brilliant plan there, sport. Go for it.
That is not how you go to prison. (Score:3)
What the world is coming to now a days, lasers and aircraft.
Re:That is not how you go to prison. (Score:4, Funny)
None of those net you $5K though.
Depends on the umbrella.
Re: (Score:2)
and the part of getting a doctor the covers stuff the ER does not.
Re:Profit! (Score:4, Funny)
Pay homeless people $100 to point lasers at airplanes while recording them.
Re: (Score:2)
Unless, of course, it were FBI informants committing the crime...
Re: (Score:2)
If I was a bad person, $10,000 would be enough to get me thinking, "Okay, now, how can I convincingly frame someone I don't like for this?"
Not sure how it works in the USA. In the UK, if there's one thing that both police and judges hate, is people interfering with the law. People go to jail for giving false evidence to avoid getting a speeding ticket.
And I think if you were a bad person, you'd fall into the category "bad and stupid" person. Framing someone is difficult. So your plan is to commit a crime, then create false evidence to prove someone else did it. Big mistake is that you plan to commit a crime while being known to the police.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
In Texas, sure.
huh (Score:3, Insightful)
You'd think they'd have just put polarized glass in the cockpit by now if it were that big of a deal. Oh wait... that's right, it's not that big of a deal.
Why do we continue to allow things like this to get blown so far out of proportion that we end up sending 16yr olds to prison for something that never really had a chance to do harm to anyone in the first place? A landing aircraft is moving faster than freeway traffic at it's slowest. Without computer control and actuators there is no way a person could, by hand, hold a laser on a cockpit window for more than a tenth of a second. If a pilot is unable to land a plane after a flash of light that brief, we'd better start making lightening illegal because it's a hell of a lot brighter, and more common than a laser strike.
Re:huh (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:huh (Score:5, Informative)
Polarized glass will do nothing. The issue with the laser is that, by time it reaches the plane, it's spread a fair amount. When it hits the glass of the cockpit, which has various minuscule scratches and dirt and whatnot, it gets lit up like a Christmas tree. Polarized glass will suffer the same fate. It's the dirt and imperfections that blind the pilot.
Re:huh (Score:5, Insightful)
QFT, last year I sat in the cockpit during an evening landing in Egypt (Sharm-el-sheik) and where I had previously dismissed the whole pointing lasers thing, that landing quickly brought me around. Granted, pilots generally land on the instruments anyway, but looking out the windows was certainly not an option anymore because of the effect the laser pointers had on the canopy.
One of the things I had always wondered (and asked the pilots) was 'Who would do such a thing? What do they gain from it?' until we were walking around in the (touristic) city centre at night. Tons of shops that sold massively overpowered laser pointers and more importantly: lots of small kids waving those things around.
Re:huh (Score:5, Interesting)
Because in Egypt the military was using aircraft and snipers to shoot protesters. So it's common there now to "lase" aircraft to point them out to other people so they know to take cover.
http://ichef.bbci.co.uk/wwfeat... [bbci.co.uk]
http://static2.businessinsider... [businessinsider.com]
http://s3files.core77.com/blog... [core77.com]
http://media3.s-nbcnews.com/j/... [s-nbcnews.com]
Notice there are hundreds of lasers on these things... yet there's a a surprising lack of blind pilots or aircraft crashing into crowds.
Yes, it's technically possible this could hard the pilot. But practically? Not very likely. These pilots circled the crowds for hours every night for months with hundreds of lasers trained on them the entire time without incident.
Re: (Score:2)
1. Sharm-el-sheik isn't really the center of protests (certainly not when I was there). I'm going to have to doubt your assertion "it's common there now".
2. Helicopters have this unique feature of being able to hover in the air and move in all directions at very low speeds. Landing airplanes don't have that luxury.
3. I'm pretty sure the instruments in a military chopper are a lot more capable to deal with loss of visual capabilities than civilian aircraft. Infra-red vision may well have been available to th
Re: (Score:2)
Did you even notice that most of these laser were pointed at the biggest part of the aircraft and not the cockpit? The pilots are also probably using very expensive visors and cameras to see where they are going and not actually looking out the window. You are comparing military aircraft to civilian aircraft. Not a valid comparison.
But practically? Not very likely
It has happened [dailymail.co.uk]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Go to Cairo, breath the leaded-gas fume encrusted air, fight off the wandering dogs, dodge traffic, learn that their more important industry is tourism of all things and that it's on shaky grounds with the country undergoing political turmoil, that their whole economy is tanking, that the nation's credit rating is falling, and then reflect on the need to keep laser pointers out of the hands of children.
I mean, I get the sentiment. That some of these kids are going to look into the things and have their visi
The TSA will fix this! (Score:2)
Just remove the windows from all planes, and install body scanners everywhere within a hundred miles of any route.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
When it hits the glass of the cockpit, which has various minuscule scratches and dirt and whatnot, it gets lit up like a Christmas tree
no it doesn't and i say that being someone that's shined lasers through glass many times. and i can guarantee a plane's cockpit window is much cleaner than the windows i'm talking about.
if the glass is clean you'd see basically nothing. if it was dirty, you might see a bit of color. that's it.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
no it doesn't and i say that being someone that's shined lasers through glass many times.
Many cockpit windows are not glass, they are plexiglass. Glass is very heavy. Plexiglass tends to pick up lots of micro-scratches from improper, and even proper, cleaning, and it crazes over time from stress and sunlight. Even properly cleaned plexiglass cockpit windows suffer from glare and light splatter, and after a short bit of time during a flight they can have a lot of insect dirt on them, too.
and i can guarantee a plane's cockpit window is much cleaner than the windows i'm talking about.
I don't know how you can guarantee any such thing unless you are personally cleaning every one of them prior
Re: (Score:2)
Do you know how diffused the beam is by the time it gets to the cockpit's dirty plexiglas window?
Plenty of first-hand observations in this thread tell you that you're flat out wrong.
Re: (Score:3)
Non zero incidents of pilots injured by lasers says you are wrong.
http://newyork.cbslocal.com/20... [cbslocal.com]
Re:huh (Score:4, Informative)
10,000 is a good number becasue it will raise awareness; which is what causes the real decline. People, many posting on slashdot, are really clueless about the impact a laser can have on a flight deck, and on pilots. So you need to get there attention some how.
and here.
http://www.pangolin.com/faa/la... [pangolin.com]
You should look into this great tool called 'Google'
Re: (Score:2)
A typical flash from a hand-held laser at 1000 feet lasts about 1/50 of a second. In the FAA simulator studies, the flash used was one second long. The animation above "splits the difference" by using 1/2 second flashes. We feel this is a realistic portrayal of how long a typical exposure might last.
I don't even need to refute that link. It refutes itself.
Re:huh (Score:5, Informative)
Ok, wheres your studies to prove this?
You need a study to know that laser pointers are non-polarized and that shining a bright, non-polarized light through a polarizing filter doesn't stop the light from passing through? And even if the filter is 100% efficient, which none of them are, you only cut 1/2 the light that passes, and none of the light that lights up the crazing or other imperfections in the windows.
Remember, we're talking about sending stupid per-pubesent teenagers to prison.
No, we're talking about a $10,000 reward for information about people committing a crime.
I'm not saying they shouldn't get in trouble. I'm saying $10,000 rewards are insanely excessive.
Do you not know the difference between a fine, which is punishment for the criminal, and a reward, which isn't?
Trying to pass laws that make being young and stupid illegal haven't worked very well in the past.
Too late. It is already against the law to point a laser pointer at an aircraft. The law says nothing about "young and stupid people who point laser pointers", it covers old and smart people too. And if you think that pointing a laser pointer at an airplane will make it "fall out of the sky", you're wrong.
Re: (Score:2)
And if you think that pointing a laser pointer at an airplane will make it "fall out of the sky", you're wrong.
Naw, man, that requires a grandma reading her Kindle in-flight.
Re:huh (Score:5, Insightful)
http://www.usnews.com/news/art... [usnews.com]
14yrs in prison. Most people in prison for HOMICIDE serve half that.
This is the definition of unfair sentencing .
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
14yrs in prison.
Good. You picked a perfect example of your "young and stupid" "pre-pubescent" teenager here. A 26 year old deliberately trying to down a police helicopter, and his twenty-something girlfriend, who were probably the same source of the laser used to attack a hospital transport helicopter that the police were looking for.
Most people in prison for HOMICIDE serve half that.
Citation required, and so what? He was trying to kill a cop. Deliberately. After trying to kill people who fly in a hospital helicopter.
This is the definition of unfair sentencing .
I think it is quite fair. It will send a message that
Re: (Score:2)
With time of for good behavior and mandatory parole he will be out in 8 years.
Most people in prison for HOMICIDE serve half that.
Citation needed.
Re: (Score:2)
Ok, wheres your studies to prove this?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iI7Qq1mYQlI [youtube.com]
Re:huh (Score:5, Informative)
You'd think they'd have just put polarized glass in the cockpit by now if it were that big of a deal. Oh wait... that's right, it's not that big of a deal.
If it were as simple as polarized glass they might actually go that route. Unfortunately for everyone, it is much more complicated than that. [wikipedia.org] You need specific lenses to protect from specific wavelengths (of which there are many).
[...] hold a laser on a cockpit window for more than a tenth of a second. If a pilot is unable to land a plane after a flash of light that brief, we'd better start making lightening illegal because it's a hell of a lot brighter [...]
With high powered lasers (that are surprisingly easy to come by) [wickedlasers.com] a fraction of a second is all it takes to cause serious and often permanent eye injury. [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Ahem. Beam divergence.
At the distance an aircraft would be from the laser-pointer, the spot will have spread sufficiently that this is not the case.
If you solve this problem (you're not), the Navy and Air Force will make you rich.
Re: (Score:2)
Polarized for which orientation?
Re: (Score:2)
Polarized for which orientation?
All. I propose NON-transparent aluminum.
Re: (Score:2)
How about you learn how electromagnetic waves propagate before spreading bullshit?
How will a polarizer magically prevent pilots from being blinded by a high-power laser?
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
and what about the rotary winged aircraft (helicopters) where normally it would be incredibly hard to polarize such complex glass surfaces. Those aircraft also fly closer to the ground meaning that the flash of light is much more intense. they also are not normally moving at speed and hovering making it easier to aim said light at the cockpit and longer flashes of laser light can blind or ruin a pilots career.
Way to jump to conclusions. every think why New York City was a pilot location? if you read the fbi
Re: (Score:2)
You have no clue. While a 5mW legal laser pointer is not that much of a deal, you can get far larger ones online. And they can blind pilots longer, or permanently. The analogy to lightening also cannot hold water, because that does not come without warning (remember that planes always have good weather reports...). And then there is an indirect kill possibility. In some places cretins shining lasers at air ambulances are a problem. If the pilot has to do an emergency landing while transporting a patient in
Re:huh (Score:4)
So we have to wait until the average slashdotter knows people who have been blinded by lasers in order to do anything about it? I don't know anybody who was seriously injured because somebody threw a tennis ball at them out of a fast-moving vehicle without realising that their throw speed plus the speed of the car made for a fairly high velocity. This is still illegal and dangerous and reportable. I don't think there's a 10000 dollar reward for it, and I don't know how common it is compared to aircraft lasering, but I do support taking measures against it because I know it happens a nontrivial amount of time (the extent of the measures can be debated). These things aren't just potentially harmful, they're aggressively and unnecessarily harmful. We're not talking about making it illegal to blow bubblegum bubbles because it might pop and then a little bit might splash into the mouth of somebody else with a deadly bubblegum allergy. We're talking about pointing lasers at aircraft generally for reasons of dickishness.
Re: (Score:3)
it happens all the time.
here is a pilot that ahd eye damage?
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/he... [go.com]
http://www.wfaa.com/news/local... [wfaa.com]
Permanently blinded? I don't know. Temp blinded, often.
There are hundreds of cases.
Learn to fucking use Google.
Re:huh (Score:5, Interesting)
ok, and how many people do you know that have been permanently blinded by a laser? Any?
Yes. And your implication that it is ok to temporarily blind someone who relies on "see and avoid" to keep from running into other traffic is just pathetic.
How about this? [go.com] It took all of five seconds to find using Google.
I can't even find anything on a lab experiment gone wrong or military laser accident. Nothing.
Why yes, of course, every lab accident makes the 11 o'clock news so you can find out about it.
The only thing I can find are articles from pilots complaining, and they have an understandable axe to grind.
Yeah, I supposed it's a surprise that people who are the targets of attempts to blind them, even temporarily, might have "an axe to grind" with those people.
But what's the practical chance of that happening?
It's documented fact. The chance of a documented fact happening is not "damn near 0".
You're worried about people going to prison for trying to blind a pilot of an aircraft carrying upwards of 200 passengers? Here's the simple way to avoid it: DON'T SHINE A LASER POINTER AT AN AIRPLANE. Problem solved.
OT: what the hell is wrong with /. today? It keeps telling me I'm not logged in and it ignores the "ads disabled" flag completely? Five different views of the same discussion in five tries at reading it.
Re: (Score:3)
Completely blind the flight crew during lift off or landing isn't a 'big deal'? heicopterpilots that have there eyes damaged is no big deal?
Please, please try to understand why polarized glass would not solve this problem.
"cockpit window for more than a tenth of a second. "
which is all you need to lose focus and be distracted as is, can see the instruments. sure, it's may only be for 4 or 5 seconds, but by then you have hit the ground.
Re: (Score:2)
So essentially blinding someone who is supposed to be in control of a vehicle which weighs several thousand pounds, carrying potentially hundreds of people and gallon upon gallon of highly explosive fuel does no harm? What a strange, twisted world you must live in where you think it's acceptabl
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
I like the part where you assume you know what his argument is.
As a passenger coming into Seatac, I got hit in the face with a green laser pointer, we were probably well below 3000 feet. It was bright enough to completely mess up the vision in my left eye for about 30 seconds. Such a lovely neighborhood.
So, you can argue on the internet all you want about what the divergence of the laser should be, having personally witnessed a green laser in my face during final approach, I can assure you it is capable of
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Prove it. Can you name one instance where an aircraft was brought down by someone shining a laser pointer at it? I wanna read an actual NTSB report that says pilot blindness caused by an ordinary retail store bought laser pointer located on the ground resulted in a subsequent crash. There's no such thing.
Re: (Score:2)
Planes can land on instruments only. It's a much more complex and difficult operation, but it's becoming more and more common during the evenings because of the green lasers pointing at cockpits.
So while you have massively increased risk, it hasn't materialized into a crash yet as far as we know because safety precautions in aviation are massive. But poking those precautions "because they haven't crashed yet!" is about as good of an idea as jumping in front of cars because "it hasn't hit me yet". Eventually
Re: (Score:2)
Pilots are complaining of near accidents. Some had to set down helicopters (air ambulances carrying patients in critical condition, no less), others had to do blind instrument landings without manual safety intervention possibilities and go-arounds with little notice. As nobody wants to spook the public, unless something crashes and people die and it is absolutely certain that a laser was the cause, things are being hushed up.
Re: (Score:2)
Can you prove that feeding elephant dung to your toddler is unsafe? Name once instance of where a toddler ate elephant dung and was harmed as a result. You can't, and therefore feeding toddlers elephant dung must be safe.
Re: huh (Score:3, Informative)
Do we always have to wait for people to get killed before doing something?
Does not seem very smart to me.
Some Accidents/Incidents: (Accidents because pilots were hurt, even if minor)
Kelowna B722 at Regina on May 13th 2013, laser beam incapacitates first officer
http://avherald.com/h?article=46251419&opt=0
American B752 at San Juan on Nov 16th 2012, laser beam injures pilot
http://avherald.com/h?article=4594849f&opt=0
Germanwings A319 near Stuttgart on May 12th 2012, first officer partially incapacitated
Profit! (Score:5, Funny)
2) Offer to pay him $8K for pointing a laser pointer at a plane and going to jail.
3) Profit!
You could probably find a more erratic person willing to take less than $8K of the 10K, but I would imagine you'd want to deal with a fairly rational person who doesn't feel resentment towards you (i.e. for getting ripped off). The goal of this plan is to rip off the government and the tax payer, not the fall guy.
What the government should do, is offer $20K for turning in the orchestrator of a laser pointer arrest reward scheme.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
A crucial part of the plan was not getting caught.
A crucial part of the plan is identifying yourself to the police as someone who knows about a crime and turning someone else in. That pretty much rules out "not getting caught" as any significant concern, since if nobody gets caught you don't get the reward.
Re: (Score:2)
Identifying yourself to the police as someone who committed a crime is different than identifying yourself to the police as someone who witnessed a crime and wants to collect a reward.
The fall guy is supposed to get caught for point a laser at a plane. The person collecting the reward not supposed to get caught for fraud.
Re: (Score:2)
Identifying yourself to the police as someone who committed a crime is different than identifying yourself to the police as someone who witnessed a crime and wants to collect a reward.
I know that, so that's maybe why I said that part of the plan was "identifying yourself to the police as someone who knows about a crime and turning someone else in" and not "identifying oneself as the criminal". Someone has to get caught, and YOU are the one who is making sure they do. "Not getting caught" is not part of the plan, since nobody gets paid if nobody gets caught.
The point is that you are making sure that someone gets caught, AND the person who is getting caught is the one you conspired with
Re: (Score:2)
The fall guy is supposed to get caught for point a laser at a plane. The person collecting the reward not supposed to get caught for fraud.
It wouldn't be fraud. It would be conspiracy to point a laser etc. etc. so you would get convicted just as the person who actually did it.
Does a laser pointer have any noticeable effect? (Score:3)
I can't imagine it would have any real affect or we'd read about planes falling out of the sky left and right all over the world.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Yep. Precisely how many planes has any laser brought down so far? Have lasers become a standard military weapon yet? If so I'd expect to see Al Caida and the Taliban routinely using laser pointers to crash US aircraft. But oddly enough, we don't...
Let's get real. Is a laser pointer a mile away going to disable both of a pilots eyes? AND both of a copilot's eyes? And how long were you blinded when a supermarket checkout scanner laser last caught your eye? Did you crash your shopping cart? Did you cal
Re: (Score:2)
Al cicada?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cicada
Pointing lasers at UFOs is still cool... (Score:3)
right? Right?
This is getting so old. (Score:2)
Re:This is getting so old. (Score:5, Interesting)
Its a knee jerk overreaction to people being so freagin retarded in this country. If you don't have laws, enforced laws, with teeth, people do whatever to the full extent of what is allowed, with no common sense whatsoever.
Now, everywhere in the world has that issue, but just not to the full extent the US has it (as far as the "first world" goes). I've lived in multiple countries for a number of years, and now I'm in the US, and its just shocking. People smoking while leaning on a no-smoking sign. People screaming on top of their lungs in the street at 3 in the morning. People letting their dog bark for hours while cheering it on. Lines while waiting at a busy bus stop? Hell no! If there's no risk of jail time, not only someone will do it, but a LOT of people will do it.
And people pointing laser pointers at anything and everything.
Its such a ridiculous society that doesn't give a flying duck about their neighbor. EVER. So you end up in a world where everything has to be fucking spelled out with someone in uniform wacking them behind the head all the time like little babies, or they won't apply the slightest bit of common sense.
Re: (Score:2)
You need to read a better source. 40,000 laws is pure grade balognium
And blinding a flight crew is not frivolous.
Re:This is getting so old. (Score:4, Informative)
This one isn't frivolous. It has put pilots and crew in the hospital with eye burns.
http://www.wfaa.com/news/local... [wfaa.com]
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/he... [go.com]
While it hasn't led to air crashes YET it is still a serious form of assault on someone in a critical position.
Some states still have the death penalty for attacking a first responder. Something to think about.
Re: (Score:2)
http://www.laserpointersafety.... [laserpointersafety.com]
You think these penalties are too extreme? Messing with pilots while they are controlling aircraft is a very serious activity.
Shouldn't they have announced the pilot locations? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You didn't hear it ,therefore it didn't happen?
I guess no trees make noise when you aren't around.
Re: Shouldn't they have announced the pilot locati (Score:2)
A first-hand perspective for the doubters (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I Never Liked Him (Score:2)
Damn, everyone and his brother should accuse their worse enemy. $10,000 is $10,000. Oh wait, no one is actually going to prosecuted and this is all just a mind fuck? Say it isn't so.
Used for enemy revenge (Score:2)
Get a family dollar pointer, point a plane, toss pointer by enemy neighbor porch/car door.
Call report strange laser
Profit...
Government is going after "snitches" Supreme Court just stood behind forcing Time's reporter to turn over his anonymous source over a CIA operation he wrote about. They want to arrest Assange/Snowden, they got Manning, making government employees scared to snitch on illegal government activity. Yet the government wants citizens to snitch on each other!?
Fuck off, I ain't reporting shit,
Badly written offer. (Score:2)
One can report someone for shining a laser pointer, they are arrested but not convicted -as they didn't shine it at a plane, in fact at the time no planes were in the air.
Profit (just a bit of your time)
Easier to get rid of the windows? (Score:2)
It's just a source of structural weakness in the airframe anyway. Just get rid of the windows and replace with cameras.
great idea! until the camera or monitor fails. (Score:2)
then they're fucked.
seriously, what a terrible idea.
Re:What if you point a friken shark? (Score:5, Funny)
One Hundred BILLION dollars!
Wow! (Score:3)
"One Hundred BILLION dollars!"
It just occurred to me that when the movie came out a hundred billion was a lot of dollars.
How quaint.
Re: (Score:2)
How about one hundred BILLION satoshis!
Re:Off the Flight Path... (Score:5, Insightful)
[...]offers up to $10,000 for information leading to the arrest of anyone who intentionally aims a laser at an aircraft.
Re:Off the Flight Path... (Score:5, Interesting)
Planes get lost, re-routed etc ALL the time.
Think a nightclub with laser advertising, plane flies overhead, or helicopter.
Can they be punished?
Major astronomical telescopes often use lasers for their adaptive optics systems. They coordinate with relevant authorities to insure they don't zap sensitive optics on satellites and post "plane spotters" outside so they can shut down the laser if a plane comes too close to the beam.
Of course, those lasers tend to be considerably more powerful (>5W) than handheld laser pointers (~5mW), so it might not be directly comparable, but I'd hope that any organization that is shooting lasers into the sky would have someone keeping an eye out for aircraft.
Re: (Score:2)
Major astronomical telescopes often use lasers for their adaptive optics systems.
Why don't they just use non-visible lasers?
Re:Off the Flight Path... (Score:4, Informative)
Just because the light isn't visible doesn't mean it's not harmful. After all, it's the invisible to you ultraviolet light from the Sun that gives you a sunburn.
Re:Off the Flight Path... (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Second point. Since the telescopes themselves are working in the visible light range the lasers for the adaptive optics systems need to be there also because distortions of the light is what they're adapting to telescopes optics to.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
They coordinate with relevant authorities to insure they don't zap sensitive optics on satellites and post "plane spotters" outside so they can shut down the laser if a plane comes too close to the beam.
Also the most thankless jobs on The Death Star...
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
5mW at an area of 1mm^2 corresponds to 50W at an area of 100cm^2.
This means that looking into a 5mW laser, and assuming it is concentrated in 1mm^2, corresponds to looking at a 50W lightbulb at a distance of 2.82cm.
Ouch.
Re:Off the Flight Path... (Score:4, Insightful)
Laser advertising needs special permissions and is either focused at a billboard, wall, etc, or if aimed at the sky under permanent direct control of an expert and only permissible with similar restrictions as fireworks. Your question is stupid.
Re: (Score:2)
2 years without Chrisq's racist rants, sounds like heaven.
Its lucky that you weren't around during WWII. You would have been insisting that complaining about Hitler and the Nazis was racist and "anti German"
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Driving uses about the same amount of fuel, creates about the same amount of pollution, and is far more dangerous than flying.
Re: (Score:2)
My airspace, MINE!
I read a book of that nature. I can't remember it's name, but the jets were flying over his house due to a new airport, so he floated Barrage balloon above his place.
It was a fairly decent book but he'd most likely be shoot in this age. - They downed the balloon with the after burners of a jet.
-A barrage balloon, sometimes called a "blimp," is a large balloon tethered with metal cables, used to defend against aircraft attack by damaging the aircraft on collision with the cables, or at least making the attac
Re: (Score:2)
My airspace, MINE!
-A barrage balloon, sometimes called a "blimp," is a large balloon tethered with metal cables, used to defend against aircraft attack by damaging the aircraft on collision with the cables, or at least making the attacker's approach more difficult.
Found this gem reading further: " They proved to be mildly effective against the V-1 flying bomb, which usually flew at 2,000 feet (600 m) or lower but had wire-cutters on its wings to counter balloons. 231 V-1s are officially claimed to have been destroyed by balloons." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B... [wikipedia.org]
Something I didn't realize is how many freaking V-1's were set off.
Re: (Score:2)
Arresting the nitwits who shine lasers in people's faces is a mitigation measure.