Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?
United States Privacy Security

NSA Says Snowden Emails Exempt From Public Disclosure 231

AHuxley (892839) writes "The Desk reports on a FOIA request covering "... all e-mails sent by Edward Snowden" and the NSA's refusal to release all documents. "The National Security Agency has acknowledged it retains a record of e-mail communications from former contractor turned whistleblower Edward Snowden, but says those records are exempt from public disclosure under the federal Freedom of Information Act. In a letter responding to a June 27 FOIA request from The Desk, the NSA’s chief FOIA officer Pamela Phillips wrote that while the agency has retained records related to Snowden’s employment as a contractor, they are being withheld from public examination because, among other things, releasing the records 'could interfere with law enforcement proceedings, could cause an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, could reveal the identities of confidential sources or would reveal law enforcement techniques and procedures.' Other records are being withheld because those documents were 'also found to be currently and properly classifiedand remains classified TOP SECRET, SECRET and CONFIDENTIAL.' The letter marks the first time the NSA has publicly acknowledged retaining communication and employment records related to Snowden’s time as a contractor."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

NSA Says Snowden Emails Exempt From Public Disclosure

Comments Filter:
  • by Bob9113 ( 14996 ) on Sunday July 13, 2014 @02:12PM (#47443637) Homepage

    Snowden / Binney 2016! [traxel.com]

    That image is my original artwork (with friendly tips from Slashdot user Indigo), copyright 2014 Robert Bushman, licensed under CC by-nc-sa. It is properly sized for a 2.75" by 5" sticker with .125" bleed at 300 dpi. I'm getting them printed at psprint.com (I recommend doing a search for "vinyl bumper stickers", since they often have a coupon running on Duck Duck Go). I haven't seen my physical proofs yet, but the on-screen color conversion looked good to me. Please feel free to print a stack and spread them far and wide.

  • by Jeremiah Cornelius ( 137 ) on Sunday July 13, 2014 @02:18PM (#47443673) Homepage Journal

    No longer inhabits the constitutional legal framework of its purpose or foundation.

    It is an illegal institution, with no basis for either loyalty or obedience.

  • Ask Snowden! (Score:5, Interesting)

    by jargonburn ( 1950578 ) on Sunday July 13, 2014 @02:39PM (#47443765)
    Perhaps they should try and contact Edward Snowden and see if he has copies of those email messages that'd he'd care to release.
  • by DoofusOfDeath ( 636671 ) on Sunday July 13, 2014 @02:42PM (#47443781)

    "Any excuse will serve a tyrant." -Aesop.

  • by DoofusOfDeath ( 636671 ) on Sunday July 13, 2014 @02:44PM (#47443789)

    America no longer has distributed agriculture or fuel production. A revolution, however warranted, would lead to an unimaginable amount of freezing and starvation within the first two winters, I'd wager.

  • Re:Misuse of FOIA (Score:5, Interesting)

    by James McGuigan ( 852772 ) on Sunday July 13, 2014 @03:10PM (#47443961) Homepage

    Edward Snowdon understood what would happen if he where to seriously try and push the issue internally.

    The global surveillance network was a core NSA policy authorized at the highest levels. This was not simply some rouge agent or rouge department. Previous individuals have attempted to raise concerns internally and failed to achieve any change underlying policy. The NSA has even deliberately lied to congress on the matter.

    As a contractor, he has no employment rights. Making noise would likely get his security clearance revoked and his employer finding someone else who doesn't have a moral problem with surveillance. It would also likely get himself added to the NSA watchlist.

    As a pragmatist, his decision to publicly release records has successfully created enough political pressure for congress to at least review the NSA's policies. A cowardly little shit who was willing to risk everything on a high risk venture, with a very strong possibility of getting caught, that takes some major balls from someone who knows exactly what the NSA is capable of.

  • Re:Snowden's copies? (Score:2, Interesting)

    by cold fjord ( 826450 ) on Sunday July 13, 2014 @03:23PM (#47444071)

    Isn't it ... "odd" ... that Snowden could manage to steal 1.7 million documents, but apparently didn't manage to get copies of his own emails showing his alleged attempts to raise the issues through official channels? Now I wonder why that might be?

    You don't think it could be because even if he did "raise the issue" of legality he was given the reasons why they were legal and chose to steal the documents anyway?

  • by wierd_w ( 1375923 ) on Sunday July 13, 2014 @03:32PM (#47444117)

    It has been my observation that the people who have blistering hatred for Snowden, are the kinds of people who totally embrace jingoism.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J... [wikipedia.org]

    They see any kind of "restriction" on government's ability to secure "advantage" and "interest" as allowing "The terrorists to win" (or whatever is the current buzz phrase), As such, they view actions like snowden's as being completely un-american, because he undermined the interests of an american intelligence agency, who was collecting abhorrent amounts of information about everyone and everything--presumably to secure american interests, over foriegn interests. These are the same kinds of people that would support creation of a literal planet-killing super weapon, just to secure american military dominance, and would think nothing of it.

    People that chug the jingo-laid come in all colors, all races, all creeds, and all genders: Liberal, Libertarian, Fiscal conservative, raging pinko, and gun toting whacko alike. The unifying feature is that they have bought into the "America is NUMBER ONE!!!!eleveltyone!" mantra.

    Seeing that supporting "American interests" without question or hesitation is leading to somethig that is not the america they were promised, with real proof, and real scnadals, with real consequences (FOR THEM), is about the only way to get through to them, short of having them experience the stazi first hand, up close and brutal.

    The bullshit needs to stop, and an anti-jingoism movement needs to sweep this country.

  • by philip.paradis ( 2580427 ) on Monday July 14, 2014 @04:26AM (#47447159)

    To clarify my last response, I once wore a uniform for this nation and swore an oath uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic. I have no interest in staying in a nation full of people who are completely ignorant of their rights and obligations as citizens, a nation where the majority of the population is far too apathetic to care about those rights being trampled. I'll be here as long as it takes to build a solid foundation elsewhere, which is a work in progress, and I'm gone after that. I'm a fairly smart guy, and I have fairly diverse skills that I can utilize anywhere on the planet to provide for my loved ones. There are still a few places left where people care about individualism and rights. Not many, but a few.

  • by philip.paradis ( 2580427 ) on Monday July 14, 2014 @04:48AM (#47447187)

    A federal judge has ruled the mass (meta)data collection activities of the NSA to be unconstitutional. The RNC has pushed for legislation to explicitly declare it so. The more disturbing point here is that the Constitution, which explicitly defines limits to the powers of government, existed long before the NSA. It has simply been ignored, and entirely too many people seem to be ignorant of this fact or simply don't care. Given the protections afforded in the Constitution, I challenge you to justify the legality of massive collection of private information on United States citizens by government agents without warrant or due process.

Never say you know a man until you have divided an inheritance with him.