Location of Spilled Oil From 2010 Deepwater Horizon Event Found 73
Chipmunk100 writes: A study published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (abstract) claims to have identified the location of two million barrels of submerged oil thought to be trapped in the deep ocean following the 2010 Deepwater Horizon spill. By analyzing data from more than 3,000 samples collected at 534 locations over 12 expeditions, they identified a 1,250-square-mile patch of the deep sea floor upon which 2 to 16 percent of the discharged oil was deposited. The fallout of oil to the sea floor created thin deposits most intensive to the southwest of the Macondo well. The oil was most concentrated within the top half inch of the sea floor and was patchy even at the scale of a few feet."
Re: (Score:2)
Free Internet?
You're the reason we can't have nice things like a free Internet.
Re: (Score:2)
I'll join if you pay me.
Re: (Score:3)
LAURA says you're just friends.
No Worries (Score:5, Funny)
According to leading chiropractors, oil is not only not harmful to marine environments, but is in fact highly beneficial! In fact, we should be dumping millions of barrels every year into the Gulf of Mexico, and should pay back all the money BP has to pay out back to them at one trillion percent interest!
Tune in next week, when I explain how the Koch Brothers are in fact the reincarnation of Jesus Christ.
Re: (Score:2)
This is also confirmed by homoeopaths who also add that adding oil to marine environments will cure cancer in anyone that lives between 10k and 100k from the sea and will give you more get up and go!
Re:No Worries (Score:5, Interesting)
This reminds me, apropos of nothing and completely offtopic (sort of): I walk the dog early in the morning, before 6am while listening to the news on my portable radio. Due to some strange meteorological phenomenon, I am able to pick up a 500watt station out of an exurb that's 20 miles away, and carries Alex Jones' show (the station calls itself, "Freedom Radio").
So anyway, as you can imagine, the big story the past week has been Ebola and how it's no coincidence that Ebola is from Africa and the President is from Africa. That Ebola is being used to take away our freedoms (but not "Freedom Radio" for some reason).
The "expert" that Alex Jones has on every single morning is a naturopath from Arizona who has developed an "anti-viral" tonic made from colloidal silver and antioxidants ("equivalent to 10,000 blueberries!"). Of course, the 800 number is given throughout the show where for a limited time, with every order you get the doctor's book about the things "The Medical Industry Doesn't Want You To Know". Then they take calls from listeners, and just thinking about the voices of the people who call in makes the little hairs on my arm stand up. I mean, these people are skeered to death that weaponized Dominican kids are being shot up with Ebola by ISIS and sent to their little Utah town by the Democrat/Catholic cabal (I'm not making that up). One lady who said she was getting chemotherapy for cancer was crying on the phone she was so terrified that the Ebola was going to come to her home near Lake of the Ozarks and kill her because the chemo has lowered her immune system. Just sobbing. Saying that hearing Alex Jones and going to Infowars is the only thing keeping her going because she knows it's God's Truth. And Alex Jones and this witch doctor are telling her that if she orders some of this colloidal silver tonic with antioxidants it's going to build up her immune system, bless her heart. And I don't know if any of you have heard Alex Jones lately, but he now sounds exactly like Sam Kinison. The same accent, the same timbre, the exact same dynamic range from hoarse whisper to hoarse scream.
Alex Jones likes to say, after he's gotten people completely apoplectic with fear, that we shouldn't worry, because he's read the book (bible) and he knows how the story ends (victory for the righteous and all patriots), So nobody should worry. This exact sequence, with small variation, goes on every single morning. I hear that stuff and really feel sad. My wife tells me I shouldn't listen, even though it's not really having an effect on me besides making me sad (except for the hole I've started digging in the back yard). Ok, that last part is a joke, but really, the whole thing is about as unfunny as it gets.
I'm sorry that I threw all that in here as a reply to a mild joke, but hearing "homeopaths" and "cancer" made me think of it, and when I'm half in the bag I start making random associations from a need to unburden my sorrow at the state of humanity OK, I think the second period of the Blackhawks game is starting, so I've gotta go.
Re: (Score:2)
While NPR doensn't have too many advertisers, you certainly don't hear the local rent to own place supporting their pledge drive.
Re: (Score:2)
At some point, I stop blaming people for not being educated. I know, to us it seems like anyone should be able to hop online and get all the information they need to make sensible decisions, but when you start looking at the money and the power that is lined up to misinform and screw with peoples' heads, I just can't blame the victim.
For a whole lot of peo
Re: (Score:2)
weaponized Dominican kids are being shot up with Ebola by ISIS
Im amazed people can say that with a straight face. I had to pause 3 times because my eyes were rolling too hard to focus on the rest.
No Worries mate! (Score:2)
Re:No Worries (Score:4, Interesting)
You joke, but the equivalent of a few million barrels of oil enters the gulf of Mexico every year through naturally-occuring seeps [wikipedia.org].
Downvoted by trolls for mentioning Corexit (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
Yup, just like adding up all the blood Americans lose to papercuts ever year. Assume 1 drop of blood is lost per papercut, or .06 ml. A highly conservative guess is 1/1000 americans get papercuts in a year. (300,000,000/1000)*.06=18 liters of blood. So obviously it wouldn't hurt you if you suddenly lost 18 liters of blood, since that amount is lost in minor little papercuts every year.
Scale matters, and concentrating a huge amount of oil, (or in the above example blood loss) makes a big difference.
Re: (Score:1)
That argument is so dumb that my head hurts (Score:1)
http://www.theguardian.com/env... [theguardian.com]
Re: (Score:2)
You may want to re-read my post if you think I'm saying the oil is harmless. Or did you think a human being losing 18 liters of blood all at once is harmless?
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
That's a bit of exaggeration. They found (back in 2010) layers in the water column that had tiny suspended particles/droplets of oil. It's not like it was a 100m-thick layer of mostly oil. It was traces. And it's unlikely there's any sign of that suspended oil left in the water column by now, years later. It's either been biologically degraded completely (a process already in progress at the time of that article) or settled onto the sea floor as a thin layer mixed with sediment.
As of that article the w
Re: (Score:2)
Thank you, I will be using the analogy in the future! Where are my mod points when I need them?
Re: (Score:2)
Drill baby drill?
Re: (Score:3)
Wow, my post was not meant to be political at all - just an interesting bit of data.
I learned about the natural seeps during the Deepwater Horizon disaster, actually. The natural seeps were complicating the job for the people whose job it was to stop the blown-out well.
Re:No Worries (Score:4, Informative)
I think you just experienced backlash that stems from BP trying to use natural seeps to downplay the magnitude of the Deepwater Horizon event. Living on the gulf coast I experienced first hand their spin doctors at work telling us about natural seeps and microbes that eat crude oil.
From the large tar balls washing up on our beaches, the residue that stayed in our marshes, the deaths of marine animals and the increased erosion from the death of grasses and trees along the waterline, only a fool would have fell for their bullshit.
I know that you only meant to bring up a natural phenomena but bringing up the topic of natural seeps in a story about the Deepwater Horizon does make you look like a shill for BP.
Re: (Score:2)
"I know that you only meant to bring up a natural phenomena but bringing up the topic of natural seeps in a story about the Deepwater Horizon does make you look like a shill for BP."
Or a fucking moron.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Massive oil spills do increase wildlife viscosity:
http://www.theonion.com/articl... [theonion.com]
"Today's wildlife revs at higher r.p.m.'s," Gedman said. "So when you're a gray seal swimming after a fish at over 200 strokes per minute, you can't afford any excess friction on your fins or tail. You need a quality motor oil to keep them as loose as possible."
Re: (Score:2)
For the Future (Score:5, Funny)
This will now get covered with silt and eventually become an oil reservoir for future generations a million years down the line. Bravo to BP for thinking so far ahead!
nonsense (Score:1)
crude became what it is under very different conditions.
this will now get eaten and otherwide gradually decay into the biosphere.
laugh it up, people, zoom zoom zoom.
Re: (Score:2)
I question how much it's still "oil". Oil, outside of reservoirs, evolves. The volatiles slowly separate out; their ultimate fate is evaporation and photodegradation. The shortest chains are lost rapidly, but the longer they get, the longer they take to disappear. As volatiles are lost, the oil thickens. It eventually becomes tar, and then basically asphalt.
So that's where they went (Score:1)
Along with 30,000 pair-less socks
Summary or Extract? (Score:2)
Summary:
Extract
Re: (Score:2)
They are comparing slightly different things.
Re: (Score:2)
Seeps and uncontrolled weeks-long pressure-driven explosion of oil are not the same thing.
But I tell you what. Since arsenic occurs in small amounts in many water sources, I'm going to give you a gallon of it to drink, because your logic indicates that should be perfectly alright.
Re:Should be enough (Score:5, Interesting)
But I tell you what. Since arsenic occurs in small amounts in many water sources, I'm going to give you a gallon of it to drink, because your logic indicates that should be perfectly alright.
Don't fall for this trap -- Arsenic is a solid at room temperature, if he gives you a gallon to drink, then it's around 1500 degF, and if you drink it, you'll die of massive burns before the Arsenic has a chance to kill you.
Re: (Score:1)
Mix it with *elderberry wine spiked with strychnine and "just a pinch of cyanide"*.
Re: (Score:1)
Ugh, I hate elderberries.
I shall taunt you a second time (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, seeps are basically forever, but weeks-long pressure driven explosions are over in...weeks.
Re: (Score:3)
Take a lifetime intake of Vitamin A in a week and tell me how that goes.
Think about it (Score:1)
Hasn't anyone yet realized that oil is lighter than water and would not, therefore, sink to the bottom? I don't know what these geniuses really found.
Re:Think about it (Score:5, Informative)
Evaporation and emulsification; evaporation leaves behind the heavier components of oil, emulsification creates a seawater-oil mixture that will sink.
There's also all the dispersants that BP flung at the leak, whose long-term effects probably still aren't fully understood.
Re: (Score:2)
Evaporation and emulsification; evaporation leaves behind the heavier components of oil, emulsification creates a seawater-oil mixture that will sink.
This is interesting, as there has been a huge fight in Canada about whether heavy oil sinks or floats (the answer seems to be: sinks, at least after some processing by sun/wind/flotsam/etc) but it has been presented to the public as if there was something special about that.
Whereas these results seem to indicate that a very substantial fraction of ordinary light crude sinks, so there is no particular additional danger posed by bitumen.
Re: (Score:3)
evaporation leaves behind the heavier components of oil,
This is the portion of the barrel that ends up
1. getting burned in the engines of massive cargo ships
2. turned into asphalt
3. being used as feedstock for industrial chemistry
/Before asphalt, the tar leftover from the pyrolysis of coal was used for the same purposes.
The Corexit "dispersant" BP used made it sink. (Score:2)
Where is the location? Where is the map? (Score:2)
As someone who was out there in the gulf documenting the effects of the spill, I'm disappointed that there is no actual details or data or maps indicating where actually the oil is located? Where are the details?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Don't forget the conspiracy nuts. They're also in every thread.
Prepare for the next oil spill (Score:1)
The Wikipedia article [wikipedia.org] on the Deepwater Horizon oil spill says, "The US Government estimated the total discharge at 4.9 million barrels ...." This article [api.org] says, "The largest tankers trading today are comparable in size and can carry up to 2 million barrels of oil." So almost 5 million barrels were spilled in 2010, and the largest oil tanker can carry 2 million barrels.
The next time oil comes up uncontrolled from the sea floor, maybe this will work: Take an empty super-tanker, and cut a 100-foot hole in the