Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
News Technology

Bill Gates Endorses Water From Human Waste 245

theodp writes: GeekWire reports that Bill gates is certainly leading by example, appearing in a video in which he sips "a glass of delicious drinking water" produced from human waste processed by Janicki Bioenergy's OmniProcessor, which can take sewer sludge and turn it into clean drinking water, electricity and clean ash. So how was it? "The water tasted as good as any I've had out of a bottle," said Bill. "And having studied the engineering behind it, I would happily drink it every day. It's that safe."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Bill Gates Endorses Water From Human Waste

Comments Filter:
  • A Natural (Score:3, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 06, 2015 @08:24PM (#48751173)

    I mean the guy already excelled at selling SHIT to people for years...

    • Re:A Natural (Score:5, Insightful)

      by westlake ( 615356 ) on Tuesday January 06, 2015 @08:43PM (#48751341)

      I mean the guy already excelled at selling SHIT to people for years...

      Cheap shot gets an instant mod-up, to "Insightful," no surprise there.

      • Re:A Natural (Score:4, Insightful)

        by Barny ( 103770 ) on Tuesday January 06, 2015 @09:17PM (#48751545) Journal

        And such is the fickle nature of the mods.

        On topic, people would have to note statistically, every molecule of H2O has at some time been inside a creature. So we are all drinking sewage/waste/carrion water.

        • Re:A Natural (Score:5, Interesting)

          by BarbaraHudson ( 3785311 ) <barbara DOT jane ... T icloud DOT com> on Tuesday January 06, 2015 @09:56PM (#48751733) Journal

          And it doesn't seem to be hurting the astronauts on the ISS [nasa.gov] (from the year 2000)

          The ECLSS Water Recycling System (WRS), developed at the MSFC, will reclaim waste waters from the Space Shuttle's fuel cells, from urine, from oral hygiene and hand washing, and by condensing humidity from the air. Without such careful recycling 40,000 pounds per year of water from Earth would be required to resupply a minimum of four crewmembers for the life of the station.

          Not even research animals are excused from the program.

          "Lab animals on the ISS breath and urinate, too, and we plan to reclaim their waste products along with the crew's. A full complement of 72 rats would equal about one human in terms of water reclamation," says Layne Carter, a water-processing specialist at the MSFC.

          It might sound disgusting, but water leaving the space station's purification machines will be cleaner than what most of us drink on Earth.

          "The water that we generate is much cleaner than anything you'll ever get out of any tap in the United States," says Carter. "We certainly do a much more aggressive treatment process (than municipal waste water treatment plants). We have practically ultra-pure water by the time our water's finished."

          • How many rats does it take to match the output of the US Congress?
          • like most things once it's a large scale business somebody is going to look to cut corners. You don't do it directly. You just cut everybody's budgets until it happens "out of sight, out of mind". Heck, you don't even need to cut their budgets, just don't _raise_ them and wait for inflation to do it for you. At 2-5% every year that's a nice profit margin increase.

            So you don't check/change the filtration equipment as much anymore. Your guys are working 16 hour shifts for 20% less than minimum wage 5 year
        • by lgw ( 121541 )

          statistically, every molecule of H2O has at some time been inside a creature. So we are all drinking sewage/waste/carrion water.

          Statistically, every glass of water has at thousands of water molecules from the Shit of Jesus (or the prophet of your choice), which makes it all holy water, right?

          Let's check the math. There are about 1.4 * 10^21 L of water in the oceans (1.4 billion km^3). There are about 5.5 moles, or 3.3 * 10^25 molecules of water in a liter. So one liter of water mixed evenly in the oceans gives about 2 * 10^4 original molecules per liter of oceans. Heck, by holistic standards, it's all hyper-turbo-super-holy wate

        • Not every molecule. Comet based asteroids have water, and do enter Earth's ecosphere constantly. There's also slight quite slight amounts of water in ancient rock being exposed to the surface, and volcanic vents that may bore through rock that predates life. It would be quite difficult to measure and there may not be even a molecule of it in a typical glass of water, but they do exist on Earth.

          I'm afraid such is the fickle nature of using absolutes.

          • by rtb61 ( 674572 )

            You should have just pointed out what plants do with water, they split it into hydrogen and oxygen and so that is the only time water is really truly actually consumed. It then requires combustion of one form or another to turn those atoms of hydrogen and oxygen back into water. So new water that has not been used by anything is being created as we speak and old water is disappearing either by being split into it's component parts or as is want to happen, being turned into new molecules by the addition of

        • Hmm, is that true? Granted that many of the water molecules in my body have been inside many, many living animals and passed through one way or another, surely there are (a LOT of) water molecules being made and unmade every day through ionic dissociation. It might be more accurate to say that every atom of H and O in your body has been through a creature, but not necessarily bonded into water. Then there is "new water" produced when primordial hydrogen or methane are oxidized. Finally, I haven't done t

    • Anyway, as an American, he's been used to Pepsi and other Colas from birth. So, the "delicious" in "a glass of delicious drinking water" is very relative...
  • by Defenestrar ( 1773808 ) on Tuesday January 06, 2015 @08:26PM (#48751193)
    Water's water - given the diffusion time we're probably all drinking King Tut's piss today (not to mention plenty of other peoples/animals).
    • Pretty much a slam dunk. It's a popular demonstration in Stats courses -- though the subject is usually Oliver Cromwell.

    • On the up side you are also breathing the same air as Jesus Christ breathed.
  • Ever wonder why water treatment plants smell so bad?

    • They shouldn't. Modern clean water treatment plants with effective odour control tanks and sludge processing techniques should really have much of a scent.

      Even WWTP are reasonable clean smelling these days.

    • by jbengt ( 874751 )

      Ever wonder why water treatment plants smell so bad?

      The chlorine?
      Or did you meant sewage treatment plants? Which, however, don't provide potable water to municipal water works already.

  • Bear Grylls (Score:5, Funny)

    by mjwx ( 966435 ) on Tuesday January 06, 2015 @08:32PM (#48751237)
    Bear Grylls could not be reached for comment.
    • The sun is going down.

      Better make Bill Gates drink my piss

    • College drop-out nerd takes over the world of computers, becomes richest man in the world and spends billions on charities.
      Now best known for drinking his own piss!
  • by matthiasvegh ( 1800634 ) on Tuesday January 06, 2015 @08:35PM (#48751281)
  • by msauve ( 701917 ) on Tuesday January 06, 2015 @08:40PM (#48751307)
    Fish poop in it.

    (attr: William Claude Dukenfield)
  • by notsoclever ( 748131 ) on Tuesday January 06, 2015 @08:40PM (#48751309) Journal
    Remember, that delicious tap water was once pooped in by a dinosaur.
    • by WillKemp ( 1338605 ) on Tuesday January 06, 2015 @09:42PM (#48751667) Homepage

      Remember, that delicious tap water was once pooped in by a dinosaur.

      Maybe. But dinosaurs didn't take pharmaceutical drugs.

  • by Harlequin80 ( 1671040 ) on Tuesday January 06, 2015 @08:41PM (#48751315)

    Where do people think their water comes from? Dependent on your location it is either pulled from a dam / river / ocean which has shit, corpses (animal and human), bacteria and all sorts of nasties or it comes from a waste water treatment plant after the solid waste has been removed.

    The process is the same, ram the water under pressure against a membrane. Water goes through, other stuff doesn't. The biggest challenge is actually the medication that goes into the waste water system. It generally means that the solid waste that is removed by your treatment plant can't be used directly without additional treatment.

     

    • Re: (Score:2, Informative)

      by Anonymous Coward

      People are idiots. I remember a story a year or two ago about some drunk guy getting caught peeing in the local reservoir and they had to drain it or something.

    • Where do people think their water comes from?

      They probably think it falls out of the sky or something.

    • A modern still can be used to get quite pure water. If it boils below 212F or only boils above 212F. then it is routed away from the end product. So how many chemicals can match that exact boiling point? Further, how many harmful chemicals will pass that boiling point? If somehow a bacteria or virus gets through a distillation process it would tend to be eliminated by UV light or by chlorine.
  • by NuttyBee ( 90438 ) on Tuesday January 06, 2015 @08:46PM (#48751363)

    Yes, it creates electricity, water, and activated sludge... What heats the sludge? Do they start an oil based fire, and then use off-gassing from the sludge to continue the reaction?

     

    • Activated sludge isn't mentioned in either article. Ash is. Presumably they have filters such that they get a relatively dry sludge, which they can then indeed burn to ash and produce power.

  • This is a great development in a field that will likely save billions of lives. But do they really need to portray it as "produced from human waste", rather than "filtered out of sewage"? The former makes me imagine some sort of artificial process that involves bleaching poop until it's transparent then bottling it.
    • by itzly ( 3699663 )

      This is a great development in a field that will likely save billions of lives

      Why ? Water treatment plants have existed for many years. The fact that they aren't used in some places of the world can't be fixed by making yet another water treatment plant.

      • Of course it can -- make them where they don't exist yet.

        But then, what HAS to be fixed first is corrupt governments that take the money for themselves instead of building necessary infrastructure.

  • by Immerman ( 2627577 ) on Tuesday January 06, 2015 @08:51PM (#48751391)

    "The water tasted as good as any I've had out of a bottle,"

    That's a pretty low bar, as anyone accustomed to drinking fresh mountain spring water can tell you. I suppose it frequently tastes a better than metropolitan city water though...

    • by Livius ( 318358 ) on Tuesday January 06, 2015 @09:03PM (#48751457)

      I suppose it frequently tastes a better than metropolitan city water though...

      Unlikely, since it frequently is metropolitan city water.

    • That fresh mountain water tastes good due to the impurities it carries. Things like desolved iron or a small hint of beaver poop are items to consider.
  • This has been going on for billions of years.

  • Extra! Extra! Read all about it! Inventor of steaming shit is ok with drinking piss!

  • by Framboise ( 521772 ) on Tuesday January 06, 2015 @09:05PM (#48751469)

    From BG blog one can conclude that the author belongs to the category of people unclear about the difference between a quantity of energy and a rate of energy production. To his excuse the common poor choice of kWh instead of the SI J (Joule J, 1 kWh = 3.6 MJ) as energy unit is just making energy discussions more confusing.

     

    • I see this so much these days. I wish all software guys also took some basic course in electronics.
    • by flippet ( 582344 )

      From BG blog one can conclude that the author belongs to the category of people unclear about the difference between a quantity of energy and a rate of energy production.

      If you're reading the same bit I am, are you sure?

      ...will handle waste from 100,000 people, producing up to 86,000 liters of potable water a day and a net 250 kw of electricity.

      The "waste from 100,000 people" is a rate of input, and "86,000 liters a day" and "250kw of electricity" are rates of output. This is entirely consistent an

  • RTFA. (Score:5, Informative)

    by westlake ( 615356 ) on Tuesday January 06, 2015 @09:06PM (#48751475)
    I have grown more than a little weary of the geek's lame attempts at humor at Gate's expense.

    Why would anyone want to turn waste into drinking water and electricity?

    Because a shocking number of people, at least 2 billion, use latrines that aren't properly drained. Others simply defecate out in the open. The waste contaminates drinking water for millions of people, with horrific consequences: Diseases caused by poor sanitation kill some 700,000 children every year, and they prevent many more from fully developing mentally and physically.

    If we can develop safe, affordable ways to get rid of human waste, we can prevent many of those deaths and help more children grow up healthy.

    Western toilets aren't the answer, because they require a massive infrastructure of sewer lines and treatment plants that just isn't feasible in many poor countries.

    One idea is to reinvent the toilet, which I've written about before.

    Another idea is to reinvent the sewage treatment plant.

    Today, in many places without modern sewage systems, truckers take the waste from latrines and dump it into the nearest river or the ocean --- or at a treatment facility that doesn't actually treat the sewage. Either way, it often ends up in the water supply. If they took it to the Omniprocessor instead, it would be burned safely. The machine runs at such a high temperature (1000 degrees Celsius) that there's no nasty smell; in fact it meets all the emissions standards set by the U.S. government.

    Before we even started the tour, I had a question: Don't modern sewage plants already incinerate waste? I learned that some just turn the waste into solids that are stored in the desert. Others burn it using diesel or some other fuel that they buy. That means they use a lot of energy, which makes them impractical in most poor countries.

    The Omniprocessor solves that problem. Through the ingenious use of a steam engine, it produces more than enough energy to burn the next batch of waste. In other words, it powers itself, with electricity to spare. The next-generation processor, more advanced than the one I saw, will handle waste from 100,000 people, producing up to 86,000 liters of potable water a day and a net 250 kw of electricity.

    From Poop To Potable: This Ingenious Machine Turns Feces Into Drinking Water [gatesnotes.com]

    • Re:RTFA. (Score:4, Interesting)

      by Areyoukiddingme ( 1289470 ) on Tuesday January 06, 2015 @09:36PM (#48751639)

      Because a shocking number of people, at least 2 billion, use latrines that aren't properly drained. Others simply defecate out in the open. The waste contaminates drinking water for millions of people, with horrific consequences: Diseases caused by poor sanitation kill some 700,000 children every year, and they prevent many more from fully developing mentally and physically.

      And the ancient Romans figured this out, and solved it.

      It does not require the massive infrastructure that starts with Western toilets to solve this problem. It can be done with wood and stone and gravity, assembled using nothing more than muscle power. The fact that 2 billion people (with far more muscle power at their disposal than the ancient Romans ever had) haven't speaks volumes about the 2 billion people.

      • Re: (Score:2, Informative)

        And the ancient Romans figured this out, and solved it.

        How did all that lead in the plumbing work out for them again?

        • How did all that lead in the plumbing work out for them again?

          Vastly better than dying of cholera, that's for sure. Anyway the Romans knew that lead pipes had problems even if they didn't fully understand why and clay pipes were often preferred.

      • And the ancient Romans figured this out, and solved it.

        Not really. Water supply was a major problem throughout the Roman period and a major limit on the growth of cities.

        It does not require the massive infrastructure that starts with Western toilets to solve this problem. It can be done with wood and stone and gravity, assembled using nothing more than muscle power.

        Presuming you have mountain springs or other sources of water at a higher altitude than your city - many places don't. A steady suppl

      • It does not require the massive infrastructure that starts with Western toilets to solve this problem. It can be done with wood and stone and gravity, assembled using nothing more than muscle power.

        The essential requirement was a constant flow of fresh water in roughly the same volume as consumed daily by a modern European city.

        There were eleven aqueducts supplying water to Rome that --- after serving drinking, bathing, sanitation and other needs --- was flushed through the sewers.

        Over time, the Romans expanded the network of sewers that ran through the city and linked most of them, including some drains, to the Cloaca Maxima, which emptied into the Tiber River. Sanitation in ancient Rome [wikipedia.org]

        Is it nec

  • by TsuruchiBrian ( 2731979 ) on Tuesday January 06, 2015 @09:24PM (#48751591)

    Did anyone really think Bill Gates would have the opinion "We can never drink water molecules that used to have poop next to them. That's just gross."

    People can be skeptical whether a particular water purification process is adequate, but anyone who thinks water can't be purified is just an idiot and probably also homophobic (i.e. the category of people who are compelled to irrationality regarding things that seem gross to them).

    Say what you want about Bill Gates, but he doesn't seem like the type to be idiotically irrational.

  • With that, Gates opened himself up for Windows jokes wider than goatse

  • Who cares if you can distill clean drinking water from human excrement? What matters is, is it economical?

  • He would endorse that. In the movie Water World, Bill Gates pees into what appears to be a Mr. Coffee, gets what appears to be water out of it and drinks it.

    :-P

  • Bill Gates Endorses Water From Human Waste
    --

    Bill endorsing it is a start. If perhaps the pope could also bless it, that might make it potable.

  • by Koatdus ( 8206 ) on Wednesday January 07, 2015 @01:10AM (#48752475)

    I guess I expect more intellegence from slashdot readers, it used to be that way any way.

    Comments about "Gates selling shit" and "its faked" do nothing except show that you are ignorant and childish. What comes out of that unit is both distilled and then filtered (probably some sort of reverse osmosis filter that could do an ok job of cleaning the water on its own.) Since it is distilled there is no bacteria in it unless it it has been recontaminated further down the line.

    The whole point of this is that there are plenty of places in the world with not much in the line of clean drinkable water. People live in those places. Poor people living in poor countries that can't afford (or chose not to) provide clean drinking water to thier people. Those peoples health and well being would be greatly improved by having safe clean water available. Their lifestyle and economic well being would be greatly improved if that water was available somewhere close to where they live.

    Here is a solution that will take something that is found in abundance everywhere humans and their animals live and turn it in to something that is needed and desired enough that a person may be able to make a living running the thing. It is a solution that a small company (or village) could afford, as opposed to something costing tens of millions of dollars.

    Here is a link to the web site of a small town in the US that just spent $21 million on a treatment plant plus another 30 million on sewage lines:

    https://www.gocolumbiamo.com/P... [gocolumbiamo.com]

    How many little third world villages do you suppose can raise $51 million?

    Way to go Mr Gates!

    • There are several problems which have caused what you refer to as childish comments.

      1) Gates is involved. Gates is a proven corporate rogue who, while a significant section of the World's population admire him (generally those more ignorant of his history, some even thinking he invented computers), he only generates dislike and cynicism among those concerned about his history of cheating and extortion. They see his "green" and "humanitarian" activities merely as an attempt to repair his bad reputation
  • I expected bodies hurled in a mechanical squeezer the soylent green way.
  • Growing up in SE lower Michigan, most of the municipal water was provided by the Detroit metro water supply, which for years was considered one of the best (quality) water systems in the country. (perhaps not so anymore, based on some recent news articles) The water is collected from the middle of Lake Huron, north of Port Huron. There are thousands of cottages along the lakeshore, with many of them having septic systems which empty into the lake. However, sunlight is good at sterilizing water (eventuall

  • In other news:

    Windows 10 gets released this week.

Money will say more in one moment than the most eloquent lover can in years.

Working...