Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Android Businesses Google The Almighty Buck

Google's Android Pay Mobile Payments Service Arrives In US 101

An anonymous reader writes: Google is rolling out its digital payment system Android Pay in the U.S. today. The new system will allow users to make payments in stores using their phone. Existing users of the Google Wallet app can access Android Pay through an update. According to the blog post: "Android Pay works with all NFC-enabled Android devices (running KitKat 4.4+), on any mobile carrier, at every tap and pay ready location across the US. Android Pay will support credit and debit cards from the four major payment networks: American Express, Discover, MasterCard and Visa. These cards are issued by many of the most popular US banks and credit unions, including American Express, Bank of America, Discover, Navy Federal Credit Union, PNC, Regions Bank, USAA, and U.S. Bank. Wells Fargo will be available in the next few days, Capital One and Citi are coming soon, and we're adding new banks all the time."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Google's Android Pay Mobile Payments Service Arrives In US

Comments Filter:
  • by TechyImmigrant ( 175943 ) on Thursday September 10, 2015 @07:17PM (#50499533) Homepage Journal

    This sounds like Google Wallet, with a different name. Same technology.

    What is new?

    • by DogDude ( 805747 )
      What is new?

      It's a new piece of software, a new income to deal with in accounting, a new security vector, a new expense, and all in all, a new headache that will bring merchants little to no added value. It's going to die just like all of the new payment methods that have come out recently and are due to come out so
      • Except as far as the merchant is concerned, it is no different than a regular NFC card transaction, so no new headaches, no new expenses, no security worries for anyone except Visa/Mastercard/etc. Their current contactless terminals will work with out changes.

        • I've recently moved to Denmark, and am surprised how popular paying "by mobile" (by online banking, using a mobile app) is. And that is a new, incompatible method.

          Places like hot dog stands accept it, or a bar for a $3 drink.

        • Except as far as the merchant is concerned, it is no different than a regular NFC card transaction, so no new headaches, no new expenses, no security worries for anyone except Visa/Mastercard/etc. Their current contactless terminals will work with out changes.

          I'm a merchant. Our payment terminal has a big sticker on the bottom saying "Triple DES" like that's a good thing.
          64 bit block sizes! The 1970s called and they want their bad crypto back.

      • It's a new piece of software, a new income to deal with in accounting, a new security vector, a new expense, and all in all, a new headache that will bring merchants little to no added value. It's going to die just like all of the new payment methods that have come out recently and are due to come out so

        Not to mention that I'd as soon sweep tiger cages for a living as do financial transactions through Google.

        • Not to mention that I'd as soon sweep tiger cages for a living as do financial transactions through Google.

          Why? Do you think it would be worse than paying by presenting the plaintext credentials on a magstripe card through a terminal that uses ancient crypto to communicate the transaction over the open internet?
           

      • On the merchant side, it is compatible with existing Tap and pay [wikipedia.org] point of sales. As far as the vendor is concerned, it is no different than any other credit card transaction. They are already quite popular in Europe.
    • Re: (Score:2, Informative)

      by Anonymous Coward

      Google Wallet is being split into this for tap-and-pay and a new version which only handles sending/receiving cash via email.

    • by cdrudge ( 68377 )

      Didn't Google Pay require carrier's blessing? I seem to remember TMobile not allowing Google Pay to be installed/function on my Galaxy S4 and instead wanted Isis Mobile Wallet (later renamed Softcard) to be the mobile payment method so that the mobile carriers would retain/resell the marketing data from the transaction and not Google. I had to install a unofficial ROM after rooting to get Google Pay to install and work.

      In the end it wasn't worth it. It was faster to run my credit card than pull out phone,

      • by viperidaenz ( 2515578 ) on Thursday September 10, 2015 @09:32PM (#50500131)

        USA will catch up some day, the rest of the world has a crap-load of contactless terminals. I bought my lunch using one half an hour ago.

        • by cdrudge ( 68377 )

          It's not that we don't want contactless terminals, it's that EVERYONE wants a cut of the action and wants to cut out the competition. Google wants people to use their service using Android phones. Apple wants people to use Apple Pay with iPhones. Samsung wants people to use Samsung Pay. Carriers want you to use ISIS/Softcard and not any of those. Merchants don't want you to use any of them because they have their own service, CurrentC, that can do nothing but never actually launch.

          • Carriers want you to use Softcard. Sorry doesn't exist anymore?
            Google acquired them back in Feb, so carriers want you to use Android Pay now.

            • by cdrudge ( 68377 )

              I'm not talking about the situation now. I was talking about the situation then, before Google grabbed SoftCard, back before Softcard wasn't Softcard, it was still Isis, and it was still a joint venture between Verizon, AT&T, and T-Mobile.

      • Didn't Google Pay require carrier's blessing?

        According to the blog post cited in the summary above, this works on all carriers.

        • by cdrudge ( 68377 )

          I meant to say that the old Google Wallet service/app required the carrier's blessing in some cases. I mixed up my names. And yes, the cited post the "new" service is suppose to work regardless of carrier, the way it should be.

      • I think the net neutrality rules prohibit carriers to block this, as it's a legal service.

        • by cdrudge ( 68377 )

          The carriers weren't preventing the application data access, nor were they preventing it from being installed. They ordered Google to block the app from installing based on the devices build properties for "security reasons" since it had to use the secure element for storing card info.

          More info here [androidpolice.com].

    • From what can see, former Google Wallet tried to pretend to be a digital version of your physical wallet, holding your credit card details. This new version instead functions as a payment service gateway and injects a unique account # instead to the requestor, hiding your actual account details (instead, using the actual android pay account). I'd actually prefer this myself, sharing my real cc details with less folks.
      • by thsths ( 31372 )

        No, Google Wallet was a payment service just like Paypal, but not as good.

        Of course Google has a tendency to join an already established market with inferiors products. They tend to linger for years before they are finally retired. Google is just not a fast follower.

        The problem with Android pay is that I have a phone (my previous one) with NFC which is stuck on Android 4.0. My current phone has Android 5.0, but no NFC. Why can't they just use a bar code instead?

        • You have no idea what you are talking about. Google wallet has been the leader in this payment system. It does function as described above, all payments are actually made with the Google MasterCard account (who gets those points?). It is highly secure, far better than paypal, and it works and has worked well for years now. With versions of Android before 4 there were problems at times but from original KitKat on it has worked quite well.

          And is available on Android 5 and higher. I used it just the other
    • by tlhIngan ( 30335 )

      This sounds like Google Wallet, with a different name. Same technology.

      Completely opposite, actually.

      Google Pay works like Apple Pay - i.e., it's an implementation of EMV.

      Google Wallet works with Bank of America. What happens in this case is when you set up Google Wallet, BoA creates a debit card in your name for your account. Whenever you use Google Wallet, the debit account details are sent to the merchant, who tries to debit the account. Since the account has no money, BoA forwards a money request to Goo

      • Thank you. That makes sense. Nothing new is really happening on the terminal end. The phone, NFC and terminal are doing what they've always done. The changes are at the other end with the payment processing.

        We have a new payment terminal with all the interfaces (swipe, C&P, C&S, NFC) but the latter three often don't work because the customer's bank can't handle it, even though they issued the card with the chip.

      • Thanks, this is the most informative comment in the thread.

    • by Krojack ( 575051 )

      Google Wallet is a stand alone app thus you had to first open it to make a tap payment. This is more or less built in and just tap your phone and it pays.

      I'm assuming there will also be more flexible options at some point like an API that apps can use to access and use the Android Pay, if there isn't already one.

    • Google Wallet still exists (for P2P payments), but it was split out from Android Pay so that Google could strike up these agreements with the payment networks. Without removing P2P payments, none of the big banks or credit card networks would make it easy for Google to do NFC payments, because they are all building P2P payment networks of their own.
  • by Dorianny ( 1847922 ) on Thursday September 10, 2015 @07:19PM (#50499549) Journal
    Starting with long lines and ending with rude, overworked, less-then-knowledgeable cashiers the payment method whether cash, plastic or nfc is the least of the annoyances.
  • by TheGratefulNet ( 143330 ) on Thursday September 10, 2015 @07:24PM (#50499565)

    mastercharge and bank americard?

    how did they miss the big two?

    how odd!

  • Go Google! (Score:4, Funny)

    by Maury Markowitz ( 452832 ) on Thursday September 10, 2015 @07:24PM (#50499567) Homepage

    > The new system will allow users to make payments in stores using their phone

    They just keep hitting it out of the park!

    • Re: (Score:2, Insightful)

      HOW many android handsets are technically unsecure? most? more than half? at least half won't ever get critical updates.

      but google CARES about you! yes sir, yes they do.

      I'd certainly co-mingle my money and the google goliath. yup. what would possibly go wrong?

      seriously - I'm gobsmacked by how trusting people are when new risky technology 'solutions' come out. its like they can't WAIT to get raped and fucked over by some security bug or hacker break-in.

      and no, I would not trust apple, either, with my

      • Just to be clear... our current payment systems are incredibly insecure right now. That being said, I completely agree that I'm going to let others who like to jump on these new fads to be the ones to beta-test things and find out how insecure things really are over the next few years before I sign up. They can put their own finances and credit scores on the line, and I'll just wait until all the bugs and security issues are worked out.

        • Just to be clear... our current payment systems are incredibly insecure right now.

          Yep! This is why I still stick to the trusty old barter system. And if you're listening, Timothy, I've got two sacks of potatoes for some mod points!

    • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

      This feature has been around for over a decade in Japan. I've been keeping tabs on how long it takes for Japanese technologies to reach the west. It varies, but on average I'd say about 10 years. For some things like broadband internet access it's longer, for other things (like 3D city models in sat nav) it's a bit less. But on average I'd say 10 years.

      • So, what techno wizardry are they sporting in Japan right now that I can look forward to in 2025?

        • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

          Really high speed rail. Washlet toilets (we are like 25 years behind on that). Japanese lighting is so far ahead of western lighting it's not even funny. Small but spacious cars. Oh, and ever OTA TV channel has been HD for years, and they are planning to start 8k (not 4k, 8k) broadcasts in 2020 for the Olympics.

  • by turkeydance ( 1266624 ) on Thursday September 10, 2015 @07:29PM (#50499589)
    and your entire existence?
    • by linuxguy ( 98493 )

      Is your entire existence in your phone? Or are you being ridiculous?

    • My phone has a guest account. Also the payment applications have distinct passwords. That said, the only time in the last decade someone asked to use my phone, and I let them, it was apparently to try to score some xanax. Lesson learned: you may not borrow my phone. Homeless people have cell phones these days, if you don't have one (for some bizarre reason) ask one of them. I'll consider exceptions to this rule if I know where you sleep.

  • by linuxguy ( 98493 ) on Thursday September 10, 2015 @07:42PM (#50499661) Homepage

    There have been a couple of times when I left home without my wallet and went to the store and realized, oh crap, no wallet. But I had my phone on me. For those times, it certainly would be convenient to have the ability to pay with my phone.

    Oh and another big one. Receipts. Freaking lots of them. I would much rather have all that in a neat list inside my phone that I can pull and review. Between multiple credit cards, cash and checks etc, I would not be able to figure out how much money I spent last week or last month. But with completely electronic payments, things get a lot more manageable.

    This service is obviously not for the paranoid who think that Google and Feds already have too much of their information. They probably should stick to paper money.

    • Are you trying to budget, or retain the receipts. Cause I would love to get computer readable receipts.

      Not that I would love it enough to let Google have all that information. The Feds are fine. Google is a for-profit corporation that pretty much only makes money selling my information (although I suppose it makes a ton off the app store as well).

    • To channel Linus, only wimps keep receipts, pay with bitcoin and let the blockchain mirror them.

    • just imagine you get stopped by a cop and he ruffles thru your phone.

      would you feel ok with him grabbing (copying!) any and all data (including receipts) on your phone?

      you 'phone guys' are WAY TOO TRUSTING of your own phones. fine for you, I guess, but you could not (literally) pay me to engage google any more than I'm already forced to (by virtue of it being a losing battle to even block google domains from simple browsing; and I know, I keep trying and its an uphill battle).

      yeah yeah, I did nothing wrong

      • by umghhh ( 965931 )
        I do not think that can save you from them. After all if there are only few refuseniks like you then it should be rather easy to find and trace them. OC that makes it more difficult but it is then still possible to trace you by virtue of some aspects of you being invisible whiling your warm body still being where you are.
        So what can be done besides bitching here about this?
      • It's right and well that you've been modded down. First of all, the obvious. Encrypt and lock the phone. You were doing that in case of loss or theft anyway, right? Secondly, there was just recently a high profile supreme court case where it was found unconstitutional for cops to stop you and just start going through your phone so I wish they would do that. I'd subsequently beat the case with a public pretender.

        • you have not been hearing or reading about the devices cops have to entirely go around any 'phone locks' you THINK you have?

          phone locks are cute but the black hats that work for the man have done their work and have it all figured out. any mainstream phone has an unlock protocol that the man can call up simply by connecting a usb device.

          yeah, they have those. and yeah, you'd stupid to trust some vendor who has no choice but to give in to L.E. on such things.

          your phone is NOT safe during a traffic stop. l

  • The app is still unavailable as of 9:00 PM EST, and in fact I actually got an email from Google saying it is NOT rolling out today.

    • It is rolling out. It's just Google's typical and annoying incremental rollout, so you may not be selected to receive the app for a few days.

      • by brunes69 ( 86786 )

        That isn't how Google Play works. You can't get the app until it is posted. The app does not exist in Google Play.

  • My issue with Wallet before was credit card rewards. Everything came across as a generic category so say my Amex higher % cash back at grocery stores didn't register properly. Hopefully that is corrected now that the banks are in on it. If so I'll be all over it.
    • by heezer7 ( 708308 )
      Looks like they will work now. https://support.google.com/and... [google.com]
      • They will work on the selected banks that support Android Pay right now. If you were using Google Wallet before with any old Mastercard or Visa (or Amex or whatever) that is not from a supported bank, they will continue to work if you register them to Android Pay. However, your rewards will not work as these are going through a third party bank.

        My guess is that any credit union or bank worth their salt that is currently accepting Apple Pay will likely accept Android Pay as well some time in the near fu

        • My guess is that any credit union or bank worth their salt that is currently accepting Apple Pay will likely accept Android Pay as well some time in the near future.

          Mmmm. With the plethora of credential-stealing Apps and exploits like in StageFright on the Android platform, who in their right mind would use this?

          And before you start the Apple Hate Machine, please point to ONE actual, non-theoretical exploit involving an individual and ApplePay.

  • They are splitting the current Google Wallet app into two different apps; Android Pay, and the New Google Wallet. Google's blurb on this states that they are splitting it into "two simpler apps", which, while correct for the individual apps, actually makes using the functionality more complicated, because you have to remember which app can do which kinds of transactions. They also have a FAQ that answers all of the questions that their pow-wow thought might be frequently asked (Lets not kid ourselves, we all know that these lists are actually MBFAQs), but they did not include the one I wanted to ask: Why are they doing this?

    I think I might have the answer to this, and it is a universal one from Google. As a frequently frustrated user of many other Google services, having asked dozens of questions about why seemingly nonsensical changes have been made to various services, and never having received a reasonable answer for a single one of them, Google's universal answer to the question "Why?" is simply, "Fuck You. That's why."

    I have been slowly transferring my data off of other Google services for the last 6 months. I used Google Wallet just today before reading about this new idiocy. I'm probably going to miss this phone swipe ability, but I'm not changing to the new app. I am tired of the Google culture of disposability. There have been too many things that they made, and that I enjoyed, and that they then trashed. What they need to realize is that not offering any explanation for things like this makes me as a customer feel trashed. Bye Google. You finally broke this camel's back.
    • If you think this is more complicated, you're doing it wrong. Android pay is a single purpose app for commercial transactions: loyalty and CC payments made at a POS machine. Wallet will be the paypal-esque app for sending money between private parties using pre-loaded funds (aka cash) that resides in your Google Wallet account. It actually makes more sense this way and, as someone who does not like linking an account with *my* money to an online payment system, much more secure.

      As for dropping the goog, wha

    • It makes sense if you realize that Google Wallet (New) is just a Paypal-like system, complete with its own physical credit card. Google Wallet can run as a web app, run completely "offline" using the card, or even as an app on iOS (or Blackberry or WinPhone...) if Google releases it there.

      Android Pay is an NFC-based payment system baked into Android. Consider that even if Google wanted to, it is unlikely that Apple would ever allow something like Android Pay in iOS considering it competes directly w

      • Android Pay is an NFC-based payment system baked into Android. Consider that even if Google wanted to, it is unlikely that Apple would ever allow something like Android Pay in iOS considering it competes directly with Apple Pay.

        If someone has an iPhone, why in hell would they want/need Android Pay? There is zero advantage, and considering Google's reputation for Data Mining, there is nothing to recommend it to iOS users, period.

  • Do you have to unlock your phone for it to work?

    Because it would take much longer to grab my phone, unlock it and tap it on the terminal than it is to grab my wallet, get my credit card out and tap it on the terminal.

    I work in the payment business and we're doing a lot of projects for mobile payments, but frankly I don't see the point?

    Anyway I currently have a Moto G so no NFC anyway :-)

  • The Stagefright exploits will no longer have to take a check!

Two can Live as Cheaply as One for Half as Long. -- Howard Kandel

Working...