The Story Behind National Reconnaissance Office's Octopus Logo (muckrock.com) 133
v3rgEz writes: When the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) announced the upcoming launch of their NROL-39 mission back in December 2013, they didn't get quite the response they hoped. That might have had something to do with the mission logo being a gigantic octopus devouring the Earth. Researcher Runa Sandvik wanted to know who approved this and why, so she filed a Freedom of Information Act with the NRO for the development materials that went into the logo. A few months later, the NRO delivered.
Hail Hydra (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
I was thinking more along the concept of tentacle rape.... a large organization screwing everyone within reach. Maybe it was a Freudian slip.
Re: Hail Hydra (Score:2)
I didn't make the tentacle porn until your post, I love it!
Re: (Score:2)
I did not know that Tentacle Porn even existed... ... holy cow ( well tentacle ) google search link
so i did a google search
https://www.google.com/search?... [google.com]
Re: (Score:2)
I envy the combination of your low user ID and your until-now ignorance of tentacle hentai. This sort of shit was a go-to shock link in college (not because it was the most shocking, which it isn't, but because it combines "someone worked hard on this" with "why on earth" pretty solidly- other topics would actually have a victim or something sad).
In any event, welcome to one of the sillier dark punctuation points for humor on the net. And remember- anything you find in that search category has been fapped
Re: (Score:2)
Don't be Envious ( I had a user id in the 147K range that I lost in 2000 ). Get into the habit of citing sources, makes slashdot more educational for all of us. and yes, I am rather sure that all types of people have flapped to all sorts of things
great example : car sex
https://www.google.com/webhp?s... [google.com]
WTF???
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I did not know that Tentacle Porn even existed... so i did a google search ...
Enjoy your new nightmares.
Re: (Score:1)
That would be the NSA..and DHS...and CIA...and ATF.
Re: (Score:1)
Turns out it was a bit like those silly hacker in-jokes that end up in open source names and logos.
Re: Hail Hydra (Score:2, Informative)
Exactly, it was a joke on the engineering team about a malfunctioning octopus harness.
Everybody came up with some BS reason for the octopus as the "official" explanation (majestic intellIgent animal, etc), but it's all basically an inside joke.
waste (Score:2)
And the cost of the design and execution of the artwork, the paint or decal or whatever it is.
Then add more time for someone to redact a bunch of stuff to comply with the FIA request.
Re:Hail Hydra (Score:5, Informative)
Hydras are supposed to have lots of heads on one body. Not one head on one body with lots of arms.
Stupid secret Hydra organization. That's why you keep getting beaten.
Re: (Score:2)
They're not making that mistake. [wikipedia.org]
That whole page is amazing.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Hydra keeps getting beat because they'll let guys like Bob join. With that sort of quality control on your personnel, what other outcome would you expect?
Re: (Score:2)
At least I am not Bob. Hail Hydra! :D
Re: (Score:2)
The article mentions SPECTRE the James Bond villain organization, though I to couldn't help thinking of the hydra logo first...
Re: (Score:2)
Looks like... (Score:2)
Hydra!
I like it (Score:5, Funny)
Re:I like it (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
I thought my coffee tasted odd.
Re: (Score:2)
Personally, I think it's pretty badass. (Score:5, Insightful)
I'd love to have that on a sticker on my laptop or a patch on my punk rock hoodie.
Re:Personally, I think it's pretty badass. (Score:5, Informative)
Honestly, a lot of their patches are badass [wikipedia.org]. The octopus isn't even the most... interesting, that'd probably be this thing [wikipedia.org].
Re: Personally, I think it's pretty badass. (Score:3)
OK, I have a little more respect for them now. They have either a dark sense of humor, big brass balls or both.
Re: Personally, I think it's pretty badass. (Score:4, Interesting)
Or they are patriots desperately trying to get some kind of reaction. How else do you explain using an angry dragon with red eyes gripping the world - and especially North America - in its talons [wikipedia.org] as a logo? Even in a nation where Evangelical Christianity - and thus the Book of Revelation - wasn't a big deal that is a villain logo.
Re: (Score:2)
Remember, these people think they're heroes... (Score:2)
...While destroying the whole meaning behind the constitution.
Their vision of the future is a boot on a face; forever.
They want it to be their Boot, but that's not how it usually ends up.
Re:Personally, I think it's pretty badass. (Score:4, Funny)
My thoughts as I looked through the list-
Awesome
Awesome
Statue of Liberty in Space
Awesome
Cute fuzzy brown bear
Awesome
Re: (Score:2)
I by awesome you mean super creepy and fucked up, then yea:
http://vigilantcitizen.com/vigilantreport/top-10-most-sinister-psyops-mission-patches/
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Personally, I think it's pretty badass. (Score:4, Insightful)
I'd love to have that on a sticker on my laptop or a patch on my punk rock hoodie.
I'm with you on this. Patches are a chance for crews to add some fun and enjoy and inside joke. Our boat had its official patch and an unofficial one. The unofficial one was a lot better at capturing the spirit of our crew. The brass, however, nixed it as our official one because it wasn't serious enough. We were serious about our mission but a little humor goes a long way to build espirt de corps...
Re: (Score:2)
it seems the brass on this was serious about the octo and that "they have fingers everywhere" and all that.
frankly, a guy like that shouldn't be running a program like this.
(also he seems to oversell the capabilities of the system as well, which makes for bad pr)
Holy crap! (Score:1)
Holy crap! You're right!
Take for example this one [wikipedia.org], which shows the American flag over a *burning planet* with the logo "melior diabolus quem scies" ("better the devil you know") around the edge.
Or this one [wikipedia.org], which is effectively the emblem of the Klingon Empire.
Or the demonic inverted pentagram [wikipedia.org].
Or a demonic mask [wikipedia.org] showing planes coming back from having DROPPED AN ATOMIC BOMB ON THE PLANET!!! (Caption: "we own the night")
Ye gads!
Re:Holy crap! (Score:4, Insightful)
showing planes coming back from having DROPPED AN ATOMIC BOMB ON THE PLANET!!! (Caption: "we own the night")
Pretty sure that's a sunrise, but it's still badass. This is a reconnaissance organization, remember.
Re:Holy crap! (Score:5, Informative)
"over a *burning planet* "
That is a phoenix arising from it's own ashes (possibly disturbing, but in a different way).
"effectively the emblem of the Klingon Empire."
That is an eagle's foot, with 4 talons pointed in. The Klingon Empire's emblem has three knife blades facing out. The only thing in common is that there are some points.
"planes coming back from having DROPPED AN ATOMIC BOMB ON THE PLANET!!! "
That is the sun just visible over the horizon as the planes are crossing the night face of the earth, which they claim to own the in the motto which you cite.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
"A little sinister!!" (Score:2)
Good. It always helps to put some good, healthy fear into the enemy.
Re: (Score:2)
Good. It always helps to put some good, healthy fear into the enemy.
With us US citizens being the enemy, I guess...
Re: (Score:2)
With us US citizens being the enemy, I guess...
You guess wrong. (That's the NSA. The NRO is just satellites.)
Re: (Score:1)
You guess wrong. (That's the NSA. The NRO is just satellites.)
It's adorable how people think that only one agency is involved with mass internet & telecom surveillance.
The NRO has a budget comparable to the NSA and they have already been caught hiding billions of dollars of their budget for undeclared purposes.
Oh yeah, and the NRO sends people to DEFCON.
Re: (Score:1)
Oh yeah, and the NRO sends people to DEFCON.
Who doesn't? It is the largest infosec conference, not a very informative one, but the networking opportunity is worth every cent.
Nutria said the NRO was "just satellites" and wasn't involved in internet surveillance. Nobody who was doing "just satellites" would have that much use for infosec skills, even taking into account the need for secure authentication and encryption. (That may be a huge problem on the internet, but everything gets simpler and much more robust when both sides can be stateful with preshared secrets. You can use OTPs to inject noise into any cryptographic process.)
Re: (Score:2)
Pretty sure they do command and control for those satellites. They also might have design documents and operations manuals kicking around.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Nobody who was doing "just satellites" would have that much use for infosec skills, even taking into account the need for secure authentication and encryption.
How do you think they move the photos they take? Control the satellites? Lots of things need infosec.
Re: (Score:1)
But I do want to say... why on Earth do so several of you seem to believe they have a super-limit
Re: (Score:1)
You don't really have a good understanding of much of this, especially if you think much of any of this is "child's play".
The Hubble space telescope has sent well over 45 terabytes of data back to earth. It is probably the case that NRO satellites are Hubble++
NRO isn't the only intelligence agency that has nothing to do with internet surveillance. What would they do if they did? Take pictures of the phone lines? Pictures of the cable routes?
NRO has limited scope because it has a particular mission - tak
Re: (Score:1)
1.The NRO does signals intelligence (SIGINT). You have repeatedly implied that they do nothing but take pictures. Go look up SIGINT if you don't understand what all that entails. It will be important later on in this reply, but I wanted to highlight it right away as a massive misunderstanding on your part, particularly in the light of your "take pictures of telephone lines" joke. The NRO doe
Re: (Score:2)
It's adorable how people think that ...
satellites are somehow useful in tapping fiber optic cables.
Re: (Score:1)
It's adorable how people think that ...
satellites are somehow useful in tapping fiber optic cables.
Yes. They have nothing but satellites at NRO facilities. Satellites and satellite dishes. No computers or telecommunications equipment whatsoever. The eggheads deep in their secret underground bases haven't even heard of fibre optics yet. Our intelligence community is rigidly segmented with absolutely no overlapping activities or duties whatsoever, conducted in complete transparency and cooperation, definitely with no dark projects whatsoever being funded by $1.5+ billion that the CIA noticed the NRO was
Re: (Score:1)
NRO takes pictures using satellites. .
Re: (Score:1)
There's no reason to suspect the NRO would not engage in any sort of internet surveillance. The FBI does, the NSA does, the CIA does... why would you assume that the NRO does not?
Re: (Score:1)
You've asked essentially the same questions in the other thread where I've answered them.
I will add this: I don't think you are reallly thinking about this, or know enough to ask good questions.
You really can't think of why NSA, CIA, and FBI would be naturals to engage in internet surveillance at varying levels, but the NRO which puts very expensive satellites into orbit around the earth to take pictures is "somehow" different than the others? Expensive? Orbit in space? Do you think that is connected wi
Re: (Score:1)
The NSA and NRO both predate the internet. The NSA expanded its role to include internet surveillance. The NRO obviously did the same, but it doesn't appear to be as widely known or admitted to the
Re: (Score:2)
https://fas.org/spp/military/p... [fas.org]
""When the American government eventually reveals the [full range of] reconnaissance systems developed by this nation, the public will learn of space achievements every bit as impressive as the Apollo Moon landings. One program proceeded in utmost secrecy, the other on national television. One steadied the resolve of the American public;
Re: (Score:2)
I'm always impressed with thinking like that. If they're so smart, how come they've made so many intel mistakes over the years? At this point, it should be more like ... excuse me, there is someone at the door.
'no sparrow shall fall'
Re: (Score:1)
The NSA was not created for internet surveillance. The internet did not exist when the
Re: (Score:2)
Oh yeah, and the NRO sends people to DEFCON.
"Your bullshit octopus is really sending me to DEFCON, Jerry! My anger is at DEFCON 2 right now and if you don't have a serious patch design on my desk by the end of the day, I'm gonna go to DEFCON 1 and nuke your chances of not working the weekend."
Re: (Score:1)
I suppose there's technically supposed to be a space there. My mistake. I can see how the ambiguity would be very troubling.
Re: (Score:2)
Given the audience, I think the conference is probably the first thing that came to mind for everyone else who read your post.
Re: (Score:2)
Any enemy intimidated by a drawing of a cartoon octopus is unlikely to be dangerous to begin with. Meanwhile, letting an organization - especially one that's by nature difficult to oversee - get used to mocking the idea that they might be the villains makes it easier to ignore any such accusations even when they're warranted, thus making it easier for them to go bad. So there's little if any benefit and a significant risk, thus this octopus does
What no Cthulhu reference? (Score:2)
Re: What no Cthulhu reference? (Score:2)
Cathulhu for the win!
Re: (Score:2)
ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
Not to worry (Score:2)
I'm sure we'll get to this soon: http://theswca.com/duncan-images/Buttons,Badges/BADG-369.JPG
Internal subversive (Score:2)
SO, perhaps there is a person, or small clique, who feels that things are out of control. They may have obligations which prevent them from quiting or believe in their mission but not the execution of it. So they create these images, or acronyms, codenames (Carnivore?) etc., to sound the alarm bell but to stay innocuous.
That's just a thought.
Re: (Score:2)
They aren't doing a very good job. Most people just don't care about it.
Re: (Score:2)
You did.
Mystery octopus harness? (Score:3)
This? [berkeley.edu]
It's not like this news is new anyways [collectspace.com]. It took me about a whole minute to find these.
It's not like I should expect much better.
Re: (Score:2)
Also, an actual summary instead of a teaser would have been nice.
For the Love of God, follow the link (Score:4, Insightful)
The two paragraph statement written by some drone to justify the selection of the octopus as a logo is priceless. It reads like something a Grade 6 kid would put down when they get their first hundred-word research assignment.
Re: (Score:2)
I especially like the quip about the exclamation marks.
It reminds me of a Flight of the Conchords episode.
Greg: Murray?
Murray: Yeah.
Greg: Uh, I wanted you to okay the new subway poster.
Murray: Oh wow, Greg. What about another exclamation mark?
Greg: I don't think that's necessary.
Murray: Not necessary, no.
Greg: That's good.
Latin scolars at the NRO? (Score:2)
Maybe it's a conspiracy! Perhaps the NRO is a cover for the Illuminati. Or is it something far far worse?
Re: (Score:2)
It's the Roman Empire 2.0. Now with Internet.
Re: (Score:2)
More likely, it's that in any large organization there's somebody who knows a priest or a lawyer.
Move over NASA (Score:2)
There is a new King of U.S. govt logos.
Octopus, huh? (Score:2)
Haters gonna hate (Score:1)
I think they're just mad they don't have as cool a logo.
Coming up with new logos and slogans and other stuff is important for group morale at any job.
Yes, they're launching a spy satellite to spy on other people in the world. An Octopus grappling with the planet is apt. Plus it looks slick.
Reminds me of That Mitchell and Webb Look sketch (Score:1)
http://thatmitchellandwebb.wik... [wikia.com]
TL;DR (Score:1)
Like a teddy bear is better? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
They have a Teddy Bear, too:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
So basically (Score:2)
The NRO has come out as criminal like the rest of the US alphabet soup.
What is even remotely surprising about them being criminals like the CIA, NSA, and every other TLA you can think of?
Impressive that this rather cool badge actually admits it though...
Two things wrong (Score:2)
One, as it notes in the article, it's also the logo of SPECTRE.
The other... there's an attitude among folks of a certain, ahh, bent. They want to be the BADDEST DUDES.
The earliest example that I read about was during 'Nam. Lord of the Rings had, by the late sixties, been translated into 27? 57? languages... including Vietnamese. So, one division, I think it was, of the "South Vietnamese" army took as its logo... the Lidless Eye of Sauron.
Right, and against them, little guys in black pj's, with furry feet, n
Makes sense (Score:2)
I Have A Weakness, See ... (Score:2)
for scandalous and funny nose art (on bombers especially). And outrageous military patches.
This one is great, and I think the whole issue is funnier than hell. I'm glad the background information has been released.