Ubuntu 14.04.4 LTS Officially Released 61
prisoninmate writes: Ubuntu 14.04.4 LTS (Long-Term Support) builds are available for download in the form of Live and Installable ISO images for Desktop, Server, Cloud, and Core products, on both 64-bit and 32-bit platforms, and that existing Ubuntu 14.04.3 LTS users can now update their systems. But not only Ubuntu 14.04 LTS (Trusty Tahr) users can update, as all the official flavors have been updated as well, so users of Kubuntu 14.04 LTS, Edubuntu 14.04 LTS, Xubuntu 14.04 LTS, Lubuntu 14.04 LTS, Ubuntu Studio 14.04 LTS, Mythbuntu 14.04 LTS, Ubuntu GNOME 14.04 LTS, and Ubuntu Kylin 14.04 LTS can also update their systems today or grab the new ISOs.
Re: (Score:2)
No idea why they're off the mirrors, but if you really want it, you can torrent it. I know there's at least one seeder out there.
Re: (Score:1)
I have pretty much all of the official flavors, going back a long time, seeded - I also do the same thing for a few other distros or those that I encounter and might like to try in a VM. It's not the fattest pipes but they're on their own, disparate, connection and they're stable. The LTS builds go back as far as '07 as I recall. I can look if it's really needed but KAT should have them all linked.
Why? Why not? I've got the hardware, the connection, and it might as well do something that's potentially usefu
Re: (Score:2)
15.10.4lyfe
Re: (Score:3)
15.10.4lyfe
Or at least the next 5 months.
Kubuntu is better than Ubuntu (Score:1)
As a long term Kubuntu user, I do not consider changing to plain Ubuntu an upgrade. Kubuntu fixes a bit of the crap in the main Ubuntu releases and provides a more user friendly interface. Gnome sucks. When I am introducing Linux to older people, that are familiar with Windows, KDE is a much easier for them to accept and start using right away.
Re: (Score:1)
As a long term Kubuntu user, I do not consider changing to plain Ubuntu an upgrade. Kubuntu fixes a bit of the crap in the main Ubuntu releases and provides a more user friendly interface. Gnome sucks. When I am introducing Linux to older people, that are familiar with Windows, KDE is a much easier for them to accept and start using right away.
Check out Cinnamon. It's what Gnome 3 should be.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Well, except for Konqueror. Dolphin still feels like a dumbed-down version of Konqueror to me.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Konqueror was a great OS... it's just a shame it was missing a decent file manager.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
My Ubuntu server doesn't have Gnome. I'm not sure what you're talking about. Or are you using an LTS release for the desktop? In which case why?
Re: (Score:2)
I use LTS 14.04 on my desktop. As a software and hardware developer I want a stable and productive environment that isn't changing all the time. I value things "not going wrong" more than I value having the latest version of something. I also use Gnome as it happens, but I'm running flashback so I have what is basically a Gnome 2 experience on my Ubuntu installation.
I don't like or want Unity, I find it to be a jarringly odd place to work (and I've tried on more than one occasion to use it for weeks at a ti
alright alright alright (Score:1)
existing 14.04ers (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
The proper command to update is in the LTS Enablement Stack wiki: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel... [ubuntu.com]:
sudo apt-get install --install-recommends linux-generic-lts-wily xserver-xorg-core-lts-wily xserver-xorg-lts-wily xserver-xorg-video-all-lts-wily xserver-xorg-input-all-lts-wily libwayland-egl1-mesa-lts-wily libgl1-mesa-glx-lts-wily libgl1-mesa-glx-lts-wily:i386 libglapi-mesa-lts-wily:i386
Re: (Score:1)
apt-get update && sudo apt-get upgrade
good enough for normal users (like me)?
Re:existing 14.04ers (Score:5, Informative)
That doesn't update you to 14.04.4, that installs the backported kernel and Xorg drivers. That's not necessary if all your hardware is already supported in vanilla 14.04. If you are already running 14.04.3, the upgrade process is transparent and will happen when you next run dist-upgrade or click the "install updates" button when it next nags you. The ".4" part of the version number has no real meaning beyond, "It has been about 6 months since we last incremented the version number so, let's do so and refresh the images so people are downloading the latest bits". Since the LTS versions have 5 years of support, not refreshing the download images means that, as time goes on, the originally packages are so out of date that you have to upgrade almost all of them immediately after installing. It's really just an arbitrary timestamp rather than what most people would consider an upgrade.
It's Funny! After The Tears. (Score:1)
I did two 12.04 to 14.04 upgrades yesterday. The first installed 14.04.3 and the second, just a few minutes later, installed 14.04.4.
The not so funny part was that while the first upgrade was flawless and installed kernel 3.13.0. The second upgrade seemed to go great, but installed 3.13.36, which caused the server to boot with no network.
No problem, right? Wrong! This kernel also rendered the mouse and keyboard inoperable! My only way back was to boot from a LiveUSB, chroot the server and install an older k
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Gosh.
"Update may break things"? Er... yep.
"Someone in charge of server didn't bother to properly account for potential downtime for an upgrade, didn't keep the old kernels around for booting into, didn't diagnose past 'it doesn't work', etc.?" Er... nope.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not sure I understand your problem. I first assumed that you were doing a remote update. However, seeing you were able to fix the problem using a LiveUSB, it appears you do have physical access to the machine. Did you somehow attempt a remote upgrade, and after that fa
Java 8 (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
There is, you need to grab the Java 8 PPA explicitly, and then install java 8. It's not in the default repos because I suspect that cannot guarantee perfect backwards compatibility, and ubuntu releases are meant to be stable.
Re: (Score:1)
As near as I know (and I kinda communicate with a few of the folks who maintain things) that is the exact reason.
I seldom understand those types of complaints. I picked an official Ubuntu flavor exactly for this type of thing - the opposite of their claim. I picked it for the breadth of the ecosystem and the ease associated with that. You can often find exactly what you want and not even have to compile it yourself or anything like that.
What about the server distribution? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
16.04? (Score:3)
Re:16.04? (Score:5, Funny)
My guess would be the fourth month of 2016...
Re: (Score:2)
My guess would be the fourth month of 2016...
A prototype / preliminary / pilot version is already up. When was the official 14.04 version posted? 2014/04/01? 2014/04/30? Or maybe 2016/02/19? When do we trust our servers to a '16.04' binary?
Re: (Score:2)
I personally wouldn't trust any of my servers on 16.04 until 2017. Let someone else beta test it.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
I tend to do that. If there's not a pressing need to upgrade, I leave servers on whichever LTS was most current when I installed them. On my cluster, I skipped 12.04 and went straight from 10.04 to 14.04
On my laptop, I tend to keep current with the LTS releases, since while there's rarely a pressing need to upgrade, there are a lot of small niggles associated with having software that too far from current.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I always test a new release by putting it on all our production servers, then if there are no complaints, I know its good enough for my personal laptop.
Re: (Score:1)
I hear that but I've never encountered it in the wild - and, just so I'm clear, I'm actually an avid user of new hardware. I'll try to explain?
I do a bunch of stupid things just because I'm easily amused. One of those things that I do is that I replace and refresh hardware at a stupidly fast rate. As I don't really save any data locally, this is not really a problem. No, I don't even get faster hardware every time. No, I don't even *keep* the faster hardware every time - I'll often set up a box, play with i
*buntu (Score:2)
Re: *buntu (Score:2)
Slashdot Bug? (Score:2)
News from 2014 in the RSS today?