Unity 8 And Snaps Are Conquering The Ubuntu Desktop After Ubuntu 16.10 (softpedia.com) 78
prisoninmate writes: Today is the last day of the Ubuntu Online Summit 2016, and the Ubuntu developers discussed the future of the Ubuntu Desktop for Ubuntu 16.10 (Yakkety Yak) and beyond. It looks like Snaps (Snappy) and Unity 8 with Mir are slowly conquering the Ubuntu Desktop, at least according to Canonical's Will Cooke, Ubuntu Desktop Manager. Work has already begun on pushing these new and modern technologies to the Ubuntu Desktop, as Ubuntu 16.04 LTS has just received support for installing Snaps from the Ubuntu Snappy Store. Canonical's Will Cooke has mentioned the fact that the Unity 7 desktop enters its twilight years, which means that it gets fewer features and it's being reduced to only critical and OEM work. This is because Unity 8 desktop is getting all the attention now, and it will become the default desktop session somewhere after Ubuntu 16.10 (Yakkety Yak).
If Unity 8 is the future... (Score:1)
why did this rush this LTS release? What a mess.
Re:If Unity 8 is the future... (Score:4, Interesting)
The release was DOA if you had skylake w/nVidia, for example. It was a known bug and went out the door. For the first time in years Ubuntu didn't "just work" on my computer. Worse, even if you asked it to take updates while installing, one of which would have fixed the issue, it failed to do so.
Perhaps the problem is that it was set for April 2016 and shipped in April 2016 when maybe it needed to be in May.
Re: (Score:2)
The issue was bad code from an llvm toolchain generating bad instructions, I don't think the nvidia proprietary problem alone would have fixed it. What I had to do instead was boot with "nomodeset", get to a terminal, then do dist-upgrade. Then it will boot (and I can install proprietary drivers or whatever too).
I have been using linux for years so this sort of thing is a throwback to 2002 (before that just getting X to run at all was an experience). I would not want someone who is a novice to computers to
Wait for 16.04.1 in third quarter (Score:2)
Canonical is aware that sometimes even the best informal* testing procedures miss things, and defects get included in the install image of an LTS version. So usually in July or August or thereabouts, they fix the defects and put out another install image numbered 16.04.1 or thereabouts. That's also when the LTS is offered to users of the previous LTS as an in-place upgrade.
* Formal verification is generally considered cost-prohibitive for a consumer product that is not safety-critical.
Re: (Score:2)
Canonical is aware that sometimes even the best informal* testing procedures miss things
It was not missed. It was known as early as February, and found several times again several weeks before they shipped it. And it was two bugs: one with llvm emitting bad code (this caused my issues), then the second bug is the installer was not pulling updated modules correctly.
Re: (Score:2)
I watched this one carefully - from the outside, of course. I belong to all the mailing lists and have the team's mailings all filtered and, other than the flavor that I prefer, it did actually seem like this was more rushed than others. I think it's that the *.10 release is done just prior to the holiday season so you've got the *.04 release right after. The point release being LTS and right after that means that people have some time constraints.
I wonder if it might be better to move the LTS builds to the
Re: (Score:2)
If Unity 8 is the future... why did this rush this LTS release? What a mess.
If it's the future (it might not be) what's best? Rushing into an LTS or testing for two years then putting it in an LTS?
Republicans like it up the elephant. Democrats... (Score:2)
How does a half-assed establishment manage to be 100% ass?
If it's U.S.-based, by running articles that support the Democratic Party [infoplease.com].
Re: (Score:2)
Does anybody actually still believe
Torvalds [slashdot.org].
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Who Cares? (Score:5, Insightful)
Millions (billions?) of users disagree.
I think this is a misinterpretation. Yes, millions are using Windows. This is not an active vote for Windows over Linux. The fact is that millions of computers are shipped with Windows pre-installed, and most buyers go with the flow and use what's in front of them. They're not going to install a different OS and probably aren't any more capable of doing so than they would have been with installing Windows if it hadn't already been done for them.
Whether Linux is "ready" or "as good as" Windows is an entirely different question. Quite a few people think it is. But I won't get into that argument here. But Windows' high market share doesn't prove very much.
Re: Who Cares? (Score:1)
Interesting, how about cause and effect ...:
Car makers with 90% market share are better than those with 2% market share, same with newspapers, builders, tyres or even sunglasses. Better involves a cost value assessment and when an option is free
Used laptops with a no longer valid volume license (Score:2)
Windows is also "free", in the sense that you have already paid for it (and cannot avoid it) if you buy a computer.
It's very possible to end up buying a PC without a properly licensed copy of Windows: buy a Mac.
It's also possible even without Apple. A few months ago, I bought a used ThinkPad laptop on eBay for $101 shipped, and the copy of Windows 10 that shipped on it turned out not to be activated because it couldn't reach the LAN with the volume license server. I looked at the bottom and the COA had been peeled off. I guessed that it was part of a corporate fleet, and the Windows license was valid only within that co
Re: (Score:2)
Interesting, how about cause and effect ...:
Car makers with 90% market share are better than those with 2% market share, same with newspapers, builders, tyres or even sunglasses. Better involves a cost value assessment and when an option is free
The critical difference is that Windows is not being chosen; it comes pre-installed on the overwhelming majority of PCs. When you buy a car you make a choice. A car isn't delivered to you as part of a larger, more expensive bundle. So your analogy doesn't work.
The AC above who said
"Until some flavor of Linux can be preloaded on OEM systems and sold at mass market retail "
was right but didn't take it far enough. Linux would have to be preloaded on an overwhelming majority of (non-Apple) systems sold. That's
Re: Who Cares? (Score:1)
It is being chosen to be preloaded, by multiple companies, companies with a strong vested interest in selling a lot and profiting a lot.
I'm not weighting into the which is better argument, in saying cause and affect are a data point of strong value
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
I'm on Linux now for more than 15 years. Never looked back.
Re:Who Cares? (Score:5, Informative)
Does anybody actually still believe Linux is a viable desktop platform any more?
My customers and family love Kubuntu, so yes. Even Steve Ballmer admitted that Windows is so bad that it would have died a long time ago if Microsoft hadn't suckered the world's developers into programming directly to the Windows API.
Re: (Score:3)
I only use Windows for running Windows only software, like VSTs and DAWs; only use my mac for running music software. All else I use Linux. Having to use the mouse to launch my main apps, rather than a two-key combo is a real annoyance when going back to them. Likewise, not being able to write short scripts with ease is again an annoyance. Not being able to install to a USB stick, taking it from machine to machine without activation problems is another annoyance.
Re: (Score:2)
By "short scripts" do you mean in sh or Python? Both are available on OS X, PowerShell is included on Windows, and Python can be installed on Windows.
Re: (Score:1)
Does anybody actually still believe Linux is a viable desktop platform any more?
Well I am writing this comment from Chrome which is running under Fedora 23 which in turn is running on the latest Skylake Core i7 chip-set which took me a time consuming 30 minutes to install without any issues. I also have Android, Mint and SteamOS virtual machines. Does that count?
I have looked for MS Windows but my green parrot gets sick at the mere mention of it.
Remix OS, an Android distribution (Score:2)
Jide publishes Remix OS [jide.com], a distribution of Android/Linux (as opposed to GNU/Linux) customized for use on desktop and traditional laptop computers.
Re: (Score:2)
I use it, quite happily and successfully, as my desktop OS. On the other hand, I'm not one of the crazy zealots that thinks everyone should use it. I don't care if there's a year of the Linux desktop. I don't care what OS you use. I never have. I use what works best for me and fills my needs the best. I have things I want to accomplish. My OS is a tool to let me do that. The tool that gives me the greatest ease, choice, and function is the desktop I will use.
If that is Windows, then I'll use Windows. If tha
So by "conquering" (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: So by "conquering" (Score:1)
You don't have to use it but if you do you have to respect their decisions. You can allways fork it and fix it yourself if you could actually be bothered. I've used Ubuntu for years and it just works for me.
Re: So by "conquering" (Score:3, Insightful)
Your comment "I've been using Ubuntu for years and it works for me." speaks volumes. How have you dealt with Gnome 3? Unity? Ever had non-PAE support yanked out from under you? How did you like when Canonical blindly followed Debian and ripped out ffmpeg?
You may enjoy telling others to go build their own car when
A proud user... (Score:5, Insightful)
of Xubuntu. Centos with XFCE is ok too. Really, the only thing that XFCE is missing for me (and probably others) is a set of pre-canned layouts to select from in order to prevent more of the esoteric configuration.
I'm all for adding new types of applications in new and novel ways until the cows come home, but the way I launch applications hasn't changed since '95. Call me old fashioned, but it fcking works and I love it.
Re: (Score:2)
Tell me about it... I've been using KDE on and off, the 4.x series had almost become as usable as 3.5 was, then my distro of choice (openSUSE) went to 5.x (if you can call it that, something about plasma seems to be involved?) - pile of buggy slow steaming dung trying to pretend my monitor is a mobile phone. Been back on XFCE for a week, some rough edges (getting session switching working took a bit of research) but so far it Just Works.
Re: (Score:3)
pretty much the same here. fvwm 1.4 (iirc) user since I 'upgraded' from twm.
that's not a desktop; it just lets me bring up a menu (that goes away after I unclick) and run an xterm or whatever. usually I will run a term and then use that to do things, including running gui apps. stdout is often useful! why hide it?
do a 'ps aux' and you see very little cruft on my installs. do that ps on an ubuntu 'desktop' and there's 10x as many procs running. no one needs that kind of waste, I don't care if you are o
Xfce changed how I launch apps (Score:2)
With xfce, for common apps, the procedure:
1. Think of what key combination is most obvious
2. If it is not used, bind the app to that key combo
3. If it is used, add a modifier key, else choose next most obvious
Super-T for terminal, Super-B for browser, Super-E for file manager (inherited from Win95), Super-hash for virt-manager or x2goclient, and so on.
Re: (Score:1)
"A set of pre-canned layouts to select from".
Xubuntu 16.04 now have this option. Its called Xfce Panel Switch.
Re: (Score:2)
God, this is literally be best thing I've heard on Slashdot in a long time, Kudos!
Re: (Score:2)
XFCE also has the best GUI task manager out there. At least it's the best one out of the ones that I've found.
sudo apt-get install xfce4-taskmanager
Then just set it as the default and whatnot (if you like it) and it is good to go. I'm going to be working on a way to set a switch so that you can automatically installed it and swap it out for the LXtask for the on-click function for LXpanel.
I used LXpanel to build myself a nifty little dock that only appears when I mouse over the top of the screen (it disappe
linux desktop platform (Score:2, Interesting)
In response to anyone who questions whether Linux is a viable desktop, I have this to say:
My father's first and only computer, at the age of 86, was Linux Ubuntu. He did just fine with it for 4 years.
Windows was not even a consideration for my efforts to bring computers to him. Ubuntu simply worked for him with minimal support from me. If you prefer Windows or Mac that is fine. Just skip criticizing Linux for what it is.
Re: (Score:2)
An App Store. With all the drawbacks that come with it, such as giving up your privacy:
Please note that to install and remove snaps, you'll need an Ubuntu One account.
Exactly this attitude stopped me from buying a Jolla Phone as a successor to an old Maemo phone.
ugh... (Score:3)
the Unity desktop is so terrible they should just call it Overunity because that's a name that matches the level of ridicule it deserves.
Re: (Score:2)
And it seems fine. OK, there are some things that need getting used to, but on the whole I find it usable.
Re: (Score:2)
Your opinion on desktop interfaces is not universal. I would not say I HATE simple desktops like Mate or XFCE or LXDE, but the straightforwardness of Unity and the fact that it's mostly set up in a pleasant way out of the box make it more ideal for me. The trade-off is they seem to have a fear of supporting large amounts of interface tweaking, but every desktop has strengths and weaknesses.
Re: (Score:2)
I prefer "Un(usabil)ity".
Re: (Score:1)
I run MATE over UBUNTU. Auto-update & *synaptic package manager* do 95% of chandler chores; *apt-get* or PPA snatch odd-apps. That's sufficient for my three Linux boxes.
What a minute you can't say that since we all know that modern computer users will get a brain aneurysm at the mere mention of the words "command line" ... Woops.
You should have mentioned the GUI application that allows people to maintain the software on their computer. We have probably lost a few modern computer users here .... Oh well. :-)
Wait! I can fix this. (Score:5, Funny)
... according to Canonical's Will Cooke, Ubuntu Desktop Manager.
apt-get remove ubuntu-desktop-manager
Are they? (Score:3)
I don't know anyone who's used Unity longer than I have and I've just switched to Xubuntu/XFCE and Lubuntu/LXDE because I couldn't bear compiz slowing my system Quad-Core 2,5 Ghz + 18GB RAM + 256GB SSD System + NVidia Quadro GFX to a grinding halt.
Fix compiz and Unity rendering and all will be fine.
Until then, my patience with default Ubuntu Desktop finally is up.
Clean design, bold new concept, convergence planed in - all fine and dandy - but Unity is broken and simply still not ready for primetime / real-world everyday usage. That's a simple fact. (I've been using Ubuntu since v.9 btw.)
Re: (Score:2)
Sounds like an nvidia problem? (check the drivers?)
Re: (Score:2)
"Sounds like an nvidia problem? (check the drivers?)" ...and there you have in one comment the reason why Linux on the desktop is a fail, for ordinary non-techical computer users.
Q: My computer is hosed. It keeps slowing to a crawl. What can I do?
A: Just recompile the kernel with the whatchamacallit option disabled, after upgrading your gcc compiler and setting the flags just so, then try to find the exact right video driver on an obscure backwater page of some tech support website, upgrade your OS packages
Re: (Score:2)
I think Gnome 3, Unity and so on are meant to work on Intel graphics, such as on many laptops. Have anything else? Feel lucky if that works, or get lost if you don't have the "right" kind of hardware.
Three Cheers for Cinnamon! and Mint! (Score:3)
Cinnamon and Mint are the future of the Linux Desktop.