Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Bitcoin Republicans Communications Network Networking The Almighty Buck The Internet News Politics Technology

Fake Hacker Found Guilty Following Gutsy Mitt Romney Extortion Scheme (softpedia.com) 108

An anonymous reader writes: "Michael Mancil Brown, 37, of Franklin, Tennessee, faces up to thirty years in prison, a fine up to $250,000, and orders of restitution to victims, because of a daring stunt he pulled off in 2012 that involved fake hacking the PricewaterhouseCoopers consulting firm, and US presidential candidate Mitt Romney. Back in 2012, Brown had the bright idea to write a letter alleging to have hacked PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) servers and stolen tax documents prior to 2010 for Mitt Romney and his wife, Ann," writes Softpedia. The "hacker" asked for $1 million in Bitcoin, and after publishing details about his fake hack online, he almost received it from a "third-party," but not before the FBI arrested him and then uncovered his lie. Last Friday, Brown was found guilty and then convicted of six counts of wire fraud and six counts of using facilities of interstate commerce to commit extortion.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Fake Hacker Found Guilty Following Gutsy Mitt Romney Extortion Scheme

Comments Filter:
  • by raymorris ( 2726007 ) on Tuesday May 17, 2016 @03:14AM (#52126069) Journal

    I'll be curious to see what kind of sentence he gets in August. The "faces up to" maximum theoretical penalties are less useful than Comcast's "up to 50 Mbps*" advertising.

    * speed may be significantly lower during peak periods, business hours, evenings,nights, weekends, maintenance windows, and other times.

    • It makes more sense when you change "up to" to "not more than".

    • by Anonymous Coward

      The password to the encrypted files were posted on pastebin 4 years ago, if anyone still has the encrypted files, why not open them up again and let us know what the tax returns actually said. The password was qGre452ohxb0JptvQIzvA7wdCS9r0vP54iVefEynM10ApLnfw6HgB9QTkR0MMRP for the files, did anyone ever write a story about what was in them? I think the password is still cached in search engines today.

    • * speed may be significantly lower during peak periods, business hours, evenings, days, nights, afternoons, weekends, maintenance windows, and all other times.

      FTFY

      • > You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office

        Isn't it interesting that Alzheimer's Reagan was one of the best presidents of the last 50 years. People complain about presidents Obama and Clinton not doing anything, but I'm starting to really think that's a good thing in a president; just not screwing things up and causing problems. Clinton came into office as the economy was starting to grow nicely and rather than mess with it

        • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

          by Grunschev ( 517745 )

          "Reagan was one of the best presidents of the last 50 years"

          You can't be serious. I'd put him in the bottom three of that period.

          His was the most corrupt administration in my lifetime. Have you forgotten Ollie North's conviction for destruction of evidence? Have you forgotten all the pardons George H. W. Bush granted for Reagan's people, including the Secretary of State?

          When he wasn't corrupt, he was just horrible. His AIDS policy ("let the queers and drug addicts die") resulted in the poisoning of the bloo

        • the fact that you consider Reagan to be one of the best presidents in 50 years actually shows the downside to Alzheimers and other mental problems.
        • Isn't it interesting that Alzheimer's Reagan was one of the best presidents of the last 50 years.

          You're either ignorant, stupid or a troll. There is no other reasonable conclusion.

  • Gutsy? (Score:5, Informative)

    by TapeCutter ( 624760 ) on Tuesday May 17, 2016 @03:19AM (#52126079) Journal
    Gutsy would imply an act of bravery, what we have is an act of stupidity.
    • Not just "Gutsy" (Score:5, Insightful)

      by mi ( 197448 ) <slashdot-2017q4@virtual-estates.net> on Tuesday May 17, 2016 @09:02AM (#52126939) Homepage Journal

      Gutsy would imply an act of bravery

      Committing a crime in a country with robust law enforcement takes bravery...

      But this extortionist is not merely "gutsy" — the "stunt" is also described in the write-up as "daring"... Carefully selecting terms and adjectives for (not so) subtle spin — while remaining factually correct — is what they teach in journalism classes. But some people are just natural — Vladimir Putin's weaponized propaganda organization [observer.com] would be most interested.

      When the subject is described as "gutsy" and "daring", the punishment seems excessive — even if only to subconsciousness. Were it "plucky" and "outrageous" and a "crime" (or, better yet, a "felony"), rather than a "stunt", you'd be less likely to develop any sympathy for the criminal.

      It also helps prevent any sympathy for the victim of the crime — see, it is Mitt Romney's own fault, according to many posters here, not all of them anonymous. (Should not have worn so short a skirt, if he did not want to be raped. [rationalwiki.org])

    • by tnk1 ( 899206 )

      Bravery and stupidity are not mutually exclusive, despite the fact that bravery has a much better connotation.

    • by shanen ( 462549 )

      Ballsy is the correct word for the title. Confronting Romney doesn't require any intestinal fortitude.

  • by janinl ( 789710 ) on Tuesday May 17, 2016 @04:16AM (#52126245)
    I'm wondering what the "victim" had to hide, to be willing to pay $1 million for it...
    • by Anonymous Coward

      It said a "third party" almost paid him. That could be anyone including a wealthy member of the opposite political party.

      But the news here is always misleading baiting crap these days.

      There are precious few articles here these days that you can really trust the headline or summary to be exactly what it sounds like.

    • by wiredog ( 43288 ) on Tuesday May 17, 2016 @07:05AM (#52126557) Journal

      From the sound of things ("he almost received it from a "third-party,"), the victim wasn't willing to pay anything for it.

      • by rhazz ( 2853871 )
        The article mentions he "entertained" offers from the "Romney-PwC", but that could easily have been part of the FBI sting or even just self-interest to find out how he got in.
    • In the grand scheme of an election--and the fact that Mitt Romney's net worth is 250 million--1 million isn't a lot of money. It would likely be worth paying that sum just to have control on when and how the tax information was released.
      • by dwye ( 1127395 )

        I thought that his net worth was supposedly $520 million, putting him on an inflation adjusted value about half of JFK's worth and just over Washington's estimated worth.

    • by tomhath ( 637240 ) on Tuesday May 17, 2016 @07:27AM (#52126603)

      I'm wondering what the "victim" had to hide, to be willing to pay $1 million for it..

      Apparently nothing, since Romney refused to pay and the "third party" was almost certainly an FBI trap.

    • by Anonymous Coward

      Clinton is a square shooter

      • by Anonymous Coward

        Hey, SuperPAC man, you're going to have to try harder than this.

    • by Anonymous Coward

      I'm wondering what the "victim" had to hide, to be willing to pay $1 million for it...

      That's like, what, 1% of what Crooked Hillary! would pay to get her illegal email server back from the FBI?

    • What makes you think Romeny was willing to pay? The "third party" was almost certainly an FBI agent.

  • by Overzeetop ( 214511 ) on Tuesday May 17, 2016 @06:48AM (#52126517) Journal

    Maybe he should have filmed it and put it on his youtube channel. Then it wouldn't have been a real crime, right?

    • I think his real mistake was the attempted extortion. Had he claimed that a copy of the tax records fell in his lap and "boy are they juicy" - wait ... I suppose that is slander (or is it?)

      "oh yeah sure I stole them" would make somebody nervous. But demanding money is still a crime.

  • This guy is facing a 25 year prison sentence and yet banksters who took down our economy by their playing in the casino got no prison time. We have 2 kinds of justice in this country, one for the uber rich and one for the rest of us.
  • by ScentCone ( 795499 ) on Tuesday May 17, 2016 @10:30AM (#52127353)
    I remember how Joe Biden, in describing the huge undertaking by hundreds of intelligence and support people, along with the on-the-scene deployment of SEAL Team 6 to actually do the deed of killing Bin Laden in his Pakistani sanctuary ... Biden described Obama's decision to follow the intel team's advice as "the gutsiest thing I've ever seen." That word appears to be in danger of no longer meaning anything at all like it used to, and might be worth a second thought on the part of editors and public figures, if this is how it's going to be put to use. Thank you for reading this gutsy comment.
  • Didn't slashdot cover this when it happened? Where's the link to the original slashdot story?

"If it ain't broke, don't fix it." - Bert Lantz

Working...