Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Education The Almighty Buck

38 Community Colleges Launch Entire Degree Programs With Open Educational Resources (washingtonpost.com) 48

Danielle Douglas-Gabriel, writing for The Washington Post: A community college reform group has selected a handful of schools in Virginia and Maryland to develop degree programs using open-source materials in place of textbooks, an initiative that could save students as much as $1,300 a year (could be paywalled; alternate source). Such open educational resources -- created using open licenses that let students download or print materials for free -- have gained popularity as the price of print textbooks have skyrocketed, but courses that use the materials remain a novelty in higher education. Achieving the Dream, an education advocacy groups based in Silver Spring, Md., aims to change that by offering $9.8 million in grants to support the development of open-source degree programs at 38 colleges in 13 states.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

38 Community Colleges Launch Entire Degree Programs With Open Educational Resources

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward

    What is the reason, beside greed, why the public school core curriculum text books are not fully open source? Seems to me the public would be best served with open source subject material and simple competition between publishers to print what is needed at lowest cost.

    Would seem to me a pretty simple National Education Initiative to develop and keep up to date a set of core curriculum texts and videos. With the content public domain school boards could then have the right to edit them to their own "standard

    • Would seem to me a pretty simple National Education Initiative to develop and keep up to date a set of core curriculum texts and videos.

      While I agree, this would be an excellent use of U.S. Department of Education resources. I'm afraid such a program would only become highly politicized like the Common Core [wikipedia.org] The U.S. congress is simply too dysfunctional to perform this simple task. Some politician will declare the text books invalid because they don't have a grasp [huffingtonpost.com] on the concept, or they simply don't agree with it. [wikipedia.org] The program would eventually get scrapped.

  • by Anonymous Coward

    Unless you show me how much money your education costs, your education cannot be anywhere as good as mine!
    We should make education be as expensive as possible so only a few snotty super rich kinds can get an education!
    I mean we cannot have everyone educated or else poor people may rise up and be smart, get jobs and even be productive members of society!
    -- the one percent.

  • by bluefoxlucid ( 723572 ) on Thursday June 16, 2016 @01:36PM (#52330327) Homepage Journal

    I'm trying to sort out books that cover all the material in fewer pages, lower book cost, and appreciable organization. I'm finding that some books for things like programming language design or computer science cost $20 or $50 and have clearer, more concise explanations than 1,000-page McGraw Hill tomes that cost $348.

    ...I don't care to study compsci in college; I dropped out. I'm looking at my local college's curriculum and syllabus for each class, snagging my own books, and self-studying. This may be more or less efficient (I can *certainly* learn 4 years of material in 6 months's time; however some of these courses have a discussion format, which I can only approximate [rubberduckdebugging.com] by myself [audible.com], and so some insights will grind in a lot less smoothly). Mathematics is also a lot harder to self-teach in a high-quality manner; most material is college text and, as mentioned above, most college textbooks are hunks of shit.

    Education incurs cognitive load. Bad education curriculum and bad materials increase cognitive load. Good study strategies decrease cognitive load. Approaching material using strong study methods--Cornell notes, SQW4R/OK4R study methods, self-testing, group discussion--increases the rate of learning and memorization while reducing cognitive load. Using better material decreases the cognitive load incurred by using those study methods (or not using any study methods). With better study strategies, better material, or both, education is faster and more successful.

    • Since you are learning the material anyway, and don't have a college degree, have a look at Western Governors' University. For most courses, you only need to pass a test to complete the class, and where applicable they are industry certification tests. For example, I'm currently doing a networking course which consists of passing the Cisco CCNA .

      You can study as much as you want before enrolling and paying the (low) tuition. It's a really good setup for people who like self-study. They ALSO include stud

      • Holy shit this is legit and created by governors as enacted law.

        • Yeah, it was created by 19 state governors . In some (all?) participating states, it's a state school just like University of Texas or Texas A&M.

          Something unusual is that they don't charge per credit. Instead, you pay based on time. If you complete 24 credits in one term, it doesn't cost you any more.

          Their technical courses are fairly rigorous. Using the network (CCNA) example, the new CNNA covers most of what CCNP used to cover.

          The "general education" humanities type courses are more easy credit. I h

          • Yeah but they're all just IT, not computer science, so nothing interesting to me.

            IT people are the fast food workers of the future.

            • I hope you enjoy your studies and get some good use of them. For me, my degree is in the field with the fastest-growing salaries of all, information security. Each of my last two job changes doubled my salary, so I'm not worried about the future of my field before I retire.

              • Infosec isn't a bad field, although most infosec people I meet are in the whitehat camp. You get people who are overly concerned with audits and compliance, and they don't build threat models; they get hacked and they say, "Well, our anti-virus didn't work! We have all the right stuff!" when all they have is a checklist of industry best practices and off-the-shelf products.

                If you're going infosec, get yourself some penetration testing and some risk modeling training while you're in there. Operational r

                • > You get people who are overly concerned with audits and compliance

                  In experience (20 years in the field), that's more coming from management. It frustrates those of us in the field, and we laugh at it, but we do have have to provide the executives documentation that they can use it court when the company is sued. Plus of course PCI and such is required by external contracts.

                  • Where I sit, it's always been the people I worked around. They had these fancy degrees and talked a lot about things like access controls, 2-factor authentication, and training the user to recognize phishing; since ~2008, I've rarely heard anyone talk about trust zones, threat models, risk analysis, or anything else beyond "turn on password complexity" and "patch the servers". That includes people with 15 years in the industry.
      • They seem to have a lot of IT stuff but not Computer Science stuff. Kind of boring.

  • Only 38 exploiters??!!

Love may laugh at locksmiths, but he has a profound respect for money bags. -- Sidney Paternoster, "The Folly of the Wise"

Working...