Microsoft Tests New Tool To Remove OEM Crapware (arstechnica.com) 117
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: Windows 10 already includes ways to clear out applications and data to repair misbehaving systems or prepare them to be sold, courtesy of the Refresh and Reset features added in Windows 8. Microsoft is now adding a third option: a new refresh tool. Currently available only for Windows Insiders, the new tool fetches a copy of Windows online and performs a clean installation. The only option is whether or not you want to preserve your personal data. Any other software that's installed will be blown away, including the various applications and utilities that OEMs continue to bundle with their systems. Ars Technica points out that the tool isn't perfect. For example, "it installs a preview build from the fast track, but Microsoft notes that the new tool can sometimes install a version older than the one currently installed. When this kind of version mismatch occurs, the option to preserve your files is removed."
If it installs windows... (Score:1, Funny)
... it's not doing its job very well, now is it?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
You know how many linux machines you used just to post this?
Re: (Score:3)
He wasn't using Linux, he was using his Android phone. :P
Re: (Score:1)
Zero.
Re: (Score:2)
How about the routers, servers, controllers? ..
Re: (Score:2)
Still zero.
Re: (Score:2)
I didn't say otherwise.
Re: (Score:2)
The OP did not say Linux does not 'power the web'.
Re: (Score:2)
Heh. Actually you quoted the specific bit that proves my point. Oopsie.
Re: (Score:2)
Think about what 'false ignorance' actually means. ;) You were far better off pretending you were defending the post below it. Now you're stuck in front of a pedant with your foot in your mouth.
Oh and dont worry about your other post, we're covered here, too. No need to reply to both.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't run Slashdot.
Re: (Score:2)
Just for fun I have a hypothetical question for you: Where do your configure your desktop to say "don't use Linux at any step..."? Networking control panel maybe? Or would it be a browser configuration?
Re: (Score:2)
So he's not choosing to utilize Linux, correct?
Re: If it installs windows... (Score:3)
Wow, a bit angry aren't we? I'd refine your argument as most people don't want Linux on their primary computer. True. Most people know what Windows is and how it works. Linux is great at most things but the fragmentation and level of customization creates complexity that is a turn off to an awful lot of computer owners.
Re: (Score:1)
If you want to use Linux but don't want to use systemd, you're forced to use a niche distro like Devuan, Gentoo or Slackware. Or you're forced to try to hack it out of your installation, which is error prone and can impact future updates. Of course, neither of these is an option for somebody who wants a usable, reliable Linux installation without systemd.
Just FYI Ubuntu 14.04 is a LTS release and uses upstart, and still has support for ~2 years, so somebody can use that.
That being said, I don't see anything wrong with Gentoo or Slackware, other than time required to compile things? It's not difficult, just time-consuming. Gentoo by nature is designed to give you as much choice as possible. I fail to see how they're unreliable. You know, ChromeOS is based on Gentoo, just saying. Also, personally, I use Void Linux and I'd say it's pretty rock solid. See cha [reddit.com]
Welcome to the future... (Score:5, Interesting)
So, basically giving users the original OS disk? Like they did in the early days? I guess this is a good sign, moving away from the current model of "media free" on the HDD images, with no recourse to removing all of the crapware.
Re: Welcome to the future... (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
For added nostalgia value, it also takes over an hour to install.
About the same as installing Solaris 2.5.1 from a single speed CD-ROM drive on my SPARCstationLX in 1996.
Re: Welcome to the future... (Score:1)
You presumably intentionally just provided a comparison which shows windows in a good light.
Re: (Score:1)
Excuse my ignorance but something definitely looks wrong with the summary. It makes it sound like Windows doesn't have a signed package manager/repo structure? From the summary (!):
"but Microsoft notes that the new tool can sometimes install a version older than the one currently installed."
How is this possible if all the packages are versioned and keyed? For all this "crapware" stuff they're talking about isn't it simply executing the Microsoft equivalent to apt-get purge?
Re: (Score:2)
This is why I buy any new desktop of mine through a small boutique computer shop that specializes in custom computer builds. They're rather pricey, but essentially you get a computer that looks exactly like as though you'd put together a custom machine yourself. Actually, probably even better, to be honest, since these guys really know what they're doing, and they'll recommend the components that they've deemed to be the most reliable. And yes, you get the original OEM install disk, as well as a disc wit
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
No, it's still media-free. Basically it downloads and installs a new copy of Windows in-place, so you don't have a chance to make a USB stick or anything first. It just downloads Windows and unpacks it.
Re: (Score:3)
OEM key hotstamped in "BIOS" (Score:2)
in an effort to prevent OEM keys from getting loose MS and OEMs figured out how to embed the key into the "bios" so yes currently a Generic Copy of WinX can be used to install and OEM copy of WinX (some OEM files will be grabbed when it can get online)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm trying to figure out how this differs from the Media Creation Tool.
Your experience with the Lenovo has been standard for large manufacturers for many years. Been that way at least as far back as XP. The BIOS contains the validation/authentication info.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
For Lenovo i created a boot medium via windows, then reinstalled ... and it reinstalled the crap as well.
Somebody has to ask (Score:4, Insightful)
What about drivers?
Re: (Score:3)
Thought you were going to say "Windows 10".
Re: (Score:3)
Run Double Driver [boozet.org] before the MS tool. This would be a nice combo (to get back to 1987, as others have mentioned).
Only Microsoft bloat remains (Score:2)
Bios embedded bloatware? (Score:3)
I have heard that Lenovo has embedded bloatware into the BIOS of systems, and it uses official protocols so that Windows 8+ will automatically install that software. Will this step do anything against such software?
Re: (Score:3)
If you reinstall a fresh copy of windows, the extension in the bios will just look for it and reinsert it on the next boot.
If you really want to get rid of the Lenovo embedded BIOS bloatware, then just go to the Lenovo site and update your BIOS. Their method of installing the bloatware via bios breaks the Microsoft OEM agreement, and Microsoft called them on it.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The best kind of kill, overkill! (Score:3)
Perhaps more importantly, Windows comes with quite a bit of stock crapware; I have to suspect that Microsoft would reinstall all of that, meaning that after using this "tool", you'd need to spend a couple hours disabling all the various telemetry hooks (not to mention the time it takes to install all your non-MS apps again).
Instead, people would do far better to just run something like Deep Freeze, where every time you boot you revert to a known good state of your own choosing.
Re: (Score:2)
As a slightly off-topic query / warning in relation to your suggestion:
While of no importance to businesses, anyone who plays multiplayer online games might have problems when using Deep Freeze. If your machine is actively frozen when you start a game protected by PunkBuster you will be kicked off the game after about 3 seconds for 'cheating' ... or, at least, this used to be the case.
Does anyone know if this is still true, and / or if it applies to other anti-cheat mechanisms?
Eliminating the competition (Score:2)
Of course to users this sounds superficially like a great idea. Dump the dozen bits of crap installed on a new PC and put it back to a clean OS install.
In reality, MS wants to eliminate the data harvesting competition. OEMs add crapware because they get paid to add it. Crapware installers pay for this because they want you to buy their crapware, but even if you don't it's worth the cost to gather data on you and your computer, sometimes for years when naive users don't ever uninstall it.
Microsoft's move
Re: (Score:2)
So one parasite killing off the other parasites? Sounds good. It's easier to remove the remaining bug than to deal with a dozen.
Class Action Lawsuit Coming? (Score:2)
Re:Class Action Lawsuit Coming? (Score:5, Insightful)
Stop subsidizing my PC, charge me what it costs and leave that bloat out.
Thanks.
Re: (Score:2)
Really? How does this work? (Score:2)
There's a ton of preinstalled crapware in Windows 10 that I'd like to get rid of.
Re:Really? How does this work? (Score:4, Informative)
Let's see if this makes it past the lameness filter:
I run this remove_crapps.ps1 script after every new Windows Insider build, to remove the stuff I don't want (including OneDrive).
Re: Really? How does this work? (Score:1)
God even their commands are ass ugly. Wtf is all that for, so verbose.
What's so hard about app-rm appname or some shit.
Re: (Score:1)
When writing Powershell scripts, I usually use the long form for future maintainability and ease of understanding; but, when writing a quick script at the command prompt, I'll almost always use the short form.
Dear Microsoft.... (Score:3)
Want to solve the problem? Yank the "windows certification" of every single PC seller and maker that adds crap to the install and make them pay full retail proce for every copy of windows they sell on their machines.
Suddenly the problem of added garbage goes away overnight. And I mean it, it will stop by 8am the next business day you announce that.
Re:Dear Microsoft.... (Score:5, Informative)
They tried that. Up until around 1999, Microsoft wouldn't allow a new PC to be shipped with anything but stock Windows (and before that, DOS). Pre-installed software was forbidden by the licensing agreement.
An antitrust lawsuit in the late 90s claimed that this practice was anticompetitive because OEMs couldn't put alternative web browsers on PCs. So Microsoft was forced by the courts to allow OEMs to install whatever they wanted on prebuilt PCs.
Only this "NEW Microsoft" could be so obtuse... (Score:1)
...and coercive. And backwards. Unnecessarily complex, too.
The simplest solution is best: Allow a second form of the Control Panel | Program and Features, with a check mark box in front of every entry. Now, let the Administrator use that view to click on all items that should be removed, and do it all in one session (with as many automatic reboots as necessary). The code can figure out the dependencies and adjust the order to do the independent stuff first, and so-on down the tree.
An example is at http [techattend.com]
Good, but.. (Score:2, Troll)
They should also let users easily remove all of the Microsoft crapware
Candy Crush? XBox? (Score:2)
Over the years I have worked with fairly cutting edge companies. It boils down to a simple fact: if the company is using windows, they a
Microsoft clearly understands users don't want it (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
How would MS deal with this if the OEM has physical access to the hardware and does need to provide drivers and supporting software for many combinations of components?
All they can do is make life complicated to all their sales channels and have more machines sold without a "MS approved" sticker. Not a winning proposition. It is best to sell Surfaces without crapware, and Xboxes with Windows 10 compatibility. Essentially, to be more like Apple and Google and sell vertically integrated product/services.
Re: (Score:2)
How would MS deal with this
Simple, Microsoft sez: If you license Windows, no crapware. If you do install crapware, you are breaking the legal agreement and you lose your right to license Windows.
Re: Microsoft clearly understands users don't want (Score:2)
I think than MS likes to sell loads of licenses and the make a software fix rather than having the extra costs from policing every OEM under the sun. :)
Re: (Score:2)
I think than MS likes to sell loads of licenses and the make a software fix rather than having the extra costs from policing every OEM under the sun.
Microsoft should care about the Windows brand not being associated with crapware. Although with the recent events showing that Microsoft is making Windows 10 look like malware, I would have a difficult time convincing anyone that Microsoft does indeed care about the Windows brand.
. :)
Never mind.
Re: Microsoft clearly understands users don't want (Score:1)
Apparently anti trust lawsuits from the OEMs.
Re: (Score:2)
Because Microsoft is a software company.
Let's face it, if the story here were that Microsoft is forbidding the installation of any software by vendor even if value added or wanted by the end user, even in cases of specific requirements (think education software, think automated delivery of the OS and apps) then we'd all be asking for their heads for abuse of their monopoly.
The cure is worse than the disease. Also where do you draw the line? No pre-shipment of software? What about drivers? What about softwar
Re: (Score:2)
$$$?
New Computer (Score:1)
Well (Score:2)
They used to say that the best gamekeepers were former poachers.
Of course with Nutella's tribe of buggerbastards there's no "former" about it. They're no doubt trying to play both ends against the middle.
Can it be used ... (Score:2)
To remove Windows 10?
Re: (Score:1)
No, but there's 300 distros of Linux that can do that.
If it really removed crapware... (Score:1)