Samsung Takes Out Full-page Ads on WSJ, NYTimes, and WaPo To Apologize For Note 7 Defects (theguardian.com) 98
Samsung has taken out a full-page advert in multiple US newspapers to apologise for the faulty Note 7 phone, which has now been subject to a worldwide recall. From a report on the Guardian, shared by an anonymous reader:The advert in Monday's Wall Street Journal, New York Times and Washington Post, is signed by Samsung's North America chief executive, Gregory Lee. It offers an apology for falling short on the company's ambition to "offer best-in-class safety and quality. We will re-examine every aspect of the device, including all hardware, software, manufacturing and the overall battery structure," Lee wrote. "We will move as quickly as possible, but will take the time needed to get the right answers." The apology focuses on the Note 7, which was supposed to be Samsung's flagship extra-large phone until it was revealed that it had a dangerous tendency to overheat and catch fire.Earlier this month, ahead of Microsoft unveiling Microsoft Teams, rival app Slack also did a full-page ad, mocking Microsoft. Perhaps, these ads will keep newspapers afloat in the years to come.
Batteries (Score:5, Insightful)
Allow your batteries to be replaced by mere mortals and all will be forgiven.
Re:Batteries (Score:5, Insightful)
Eventually the company you have chosen will make a mistake as well. You will be forced to accept it or have to move on to the next manufacturer. With that mentality you'll eventually run out of options and will have to get a Windows Phone. I pity you.
Re:Batteries (Score:5, Interesting)
When the first generation Macbook airs showed up with defects that caused overheating leading to the machine throttling what did Apple do? Point you at their overpriced Apple Care solution. When the iphone 4 showed up with a defective antenna design? You're holding it wrong!
False Equivalence, anyone? (Score:2, Interesting)
When the first generation Macbook airs showed up with defects that caused overheating leading to the machine throttling what did Apple do?
You're literally comparing mild overheating on the Apple notebook with the Samsung product that the FAA has asked removed from planes because it's a danger to passengers.
Right on. I see where you're coming from!
Re:False Equivalence, anyone? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
The difference in how customers are being treated could be due to the severity of the issue, though. Samsung has never been highly rated in terms of customer service, but having phone batteries catch fire/explode on people requires a company to step up if they want any chance at salvaging their reputation.
Re: (Score:2)
Apple support has always treated me well.
When I had a problem with my Mighty Mouse ball (out of warranty), they gave just me a new one on the spot at the Apple Store.
When they made a screwup with my developer account, they gave me a free peripheral of my choice (I asked for a second Macbook Pro charger).
When I had a problem with my iMac (under warranty) they sent me boxes and shipping labels and offered to have it picked up to my house.
Apple has given me among of the best customer service of all the compan
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You're literally comparing mild overheating on the Apple notebook with the Samsung product that the FAA has asked removed from planes because it's a danger to passengers.
You Apple cultists really break me up. How about comparing Samsung battery fires to Apple electrocuting kids in their sleep? [mirror.co.uk] Sure, Apple blames it on knockoff chargers, but Apple can't deny providing the deadly conductive path from battery to case that made these (multiple!) electrocutions possible.
Hey, did Apple ever take out a full page ad to apologize for that? (Rhetorical question.)
Re: (Score:1)
Wow, you paid shills are really something. A knock off charger electrocutes someone, and it's Apple's fault, because there's an iPhone in there. It's electricity man. It takes the path of least resistance. Do you also blame Apple for lightning strikes because of their lightning cables?
Re: (Score:2)
And.. don't forget when iPhones catch fire, they blame third-party chargers, completely glossing over the fact that it is up to the device (the phone) to cut off current to the battery pack once the target voltage has been reached.
Lawsuits and Bribes for the Galaxy Grenade (Score:2)
Does "bending over backwards" include lawsuits and bribes [news.com.au]?
Re: (Score:2)
I'd be interested in how we know Samsung was bribing people, and what the details of the bribe actually were. How many of them have any sort of evidence backing up the claims or bribery and coverup that are being made here? Are the accusations being made on the basis of hard evidence, or are they being made on the chance that someone could get a payday?
Samsung: lying is business. Business is good. (Score:2)
http://www.cultofmac.com/254695/for-samsung-stealing-cheating-and-lying-are-business-as-usual/
Re: (Score:2)
cult of mac
Seeing some strong bias in your sources. Is there one that isn't known to be a staunch Apple supporter?
Re: (Score:2)
At no point did they try to shift blame off of themselves or downplay the problem.
Oh yes, in the beginning they did. Please peddle your apologist bullshit somewhere else.
Re: (Score:2)
Sure, they'll exchange your phone before it starts on fire. However, if it's already started on fire - taking some of your house with it [theverge.com] - they wont return your phone calls.
Psst. Fandroid. Yes, you. Check this out for a second [tumblr.com] and count the number of Samsung devices on the first page. Now, what you were you saying with the iPhone 4?
Re: (Score:2)
Eventually the company you have chosen will make a mistake as well. You will be forced to accept it or have to move on to the next manufacturer. With that mentality you'll eventually run out of options and will have to get a Windows Phone.
Not sure why this is modded Insightful.
If we choose a company that makes poor replacement batteries, we will move on to the next company, and the first one will either improve the quality of their batteries, or cease to exist. New companies may choose to get into the business as well if there is market demand, giving the consumer more choices.
If we can't find a good Samsung replacement battery company, we might choose another handset maker that does not have as many issues.
If you want evidence to support th
Re: (Score:2)
I bought a Pixel and I'm not looking back.
Great, because your money isn't looking back either.
Re: (Score:2)
No it won't. I'll never own a Samsung product again, phone or otherwise.
I bought a Pixel and I'm not looking back.
Yeah, the good thing about Android is that you have plenty of phones to chose from if a manufacturer messes up.
I for one find Samsung's efforts acceptable for now. I expect they'll keep me and other Samsung customers updated until they've figured out what went wrong with the Note 7.
I don't think I will ever again buy a Samsung phone in the first 6 months or so after release. (I bought the S6 a few months after it came out. I did not buy the Note 7.)
Re: (Score:2)
There
Re: (Score:2)
Removable batteries would not solve this problem (Score:2)
Allow your batteries to be replaced by mere mortals and all will be forgiven.
Why do you persist in thinking this would have solved the problem? It wouldn't have solved or even mitigated this problem. 1) Even if the battery were removable you aren't going to remove it while it is actively burning. 2) If the problem were merely a bad batch of batteries it would have been an easy fix. 3) Having the battery being removable does not prevent combustion nor does it meaningfully slow the process. 4) Removable batteries introduces the problem of shoddy third party batteries which could
Re: (Score:2)
I don't. I do think this would have mitigated the problem though. It likely would have kept millions of phones from hitting the landfill. And, I know I won't buy a phone where I can't replace the battery. It doesn't have to be S5-Easy. But, it doesn't have to be glued to the backplane rendering several pieces broken simply removing it.
Re: (Score:2)
If the batteries were replaceable Samsung could have just sent out new batteries via UPS.
Re: (Score:2)
1) Most recalled devices never burned up
2) Its not an easy fix if you cant remove the battery yourself
3) See answer 1
4) If the problem is a third party removable battery the manufacturer is not responsible.
5) How much cost $5-$10???? and how come the less expensive phones all have removable batteries if the issue is cost????
And while you're at it... (Score:2)
I'm going to have to save photos from a European trip on a smashed Galaxy Active in the near future. I would not be doing this if there was an sd-card. I am sorely upset that I will need a guitar pick and a new digitizer, and I am saying unkind things about the Galaxy Grenade line peddled by Samsung. These phones should not be sold.
Re: (Score:2)
Thats why I just bought zte zmax. Not a top of the line phone by any stretch but affordable and the batteries are replaceable and cost $20 each
Comment removed (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
Schwing!
And a miss!
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Proactive apology (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
They should. I don't think they have that much self awareness though.
(not that most companies do)
That'll cover ~ 5M people (Score:2)
It's interesting how the full-page newspaper ad still holds so much gravitas. Doing it in these papers will apparently reach about 5 million people upper-middle-class and financial types. Not a bad move for damage control.
WSJ - 2,378,827
NYT - 1,865,318
WP - 474,767
Total 4,718,912 average circulation.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, but they'll have to spend an ADDITIONAL roughly $500k to reach them.
Re: (Score:1)
Yeah, but they'll have to spend an ADDITIONAL roughly $500k to reach them.
Maybe next time they'll put that $500k to better use: Designing a battery charger that doesn't overheat their batteries!
Re: (Score:2)
Or a lid that doesn't fly off their washing machines.
Re: (Score:1)
It's interesting how the full-page newspaper ad still holds so much gravitas. Doing it in these papers will apparently reach about 5 million people upper-middle-class and financial types. Not a bad move for damage control.
WSJ - 2,378,827 NYT - 1,865,318 WP - 474,767
Total 4,718,912 average circulation.
But they all use iPhones; so all they'll do is shrug and chuckle a bit.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm continuously shocked whenever I hear about how many paper newspaper subscribers there are out there. I want news journalism to succeed somehow, but I very much want paper to go away. It's horribly wasteful and terrible for the environment, not just for the paper but primarily for the ridiculous delivery infrastructure it requires and all of the carbon emitted by it. We really need to figure out how to get people to pay for digital journalism that is a level above the typical Buzzfeed drivel.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Well, if they just kept churning out exploding phones and flying washing machine lids they'd have the opportunity to reach many more.
Re: (Score:2)
No, the batteries will be fixed, but they'll have removable/replaceable battery regulation circuits. Feel better now?
What Samsung has to do (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
"..rekindle the fire in the hearts and minds and pants of its customers"
Yea, right, corruption. (Score:2)
Rail Gun (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
800,000.00 per round, on that new rail gun.
Actually that's not the rail gun, it's a 155 mm LRLAP cannon. The 800K is for the guided smart projectiles it's designed to use. The rail guns just fire metal slugs ballistically, like the naval cannons of old, but at a much, much higher velocity. Progress on the rail guns and the insane cost of the LRLAP is the reason the Navy is scrapping them. The Army has a system with similar capabilities to the LRLAP that "only" costs 70K per round. That system may be adoptable in the interim if the Navy decides it
They broke my jaw (Score:1)
Now I understand why! (Score:2)
You know, it's sad... (Score:2)
This is very likely going to work, and people are going to gobble up the Galaxy S8 or whatever they're calling it as they have done for years in the past, regardless of how inferior a product it might be. People, particularly U.S. Americans, have a remarkably short attention span.
We won't fire you (Score:2)
I once joked to my (then) director of engineering that if I'd screwed up the analysis on a particular sensor mount, I would have to brush up my resume before they fired me. He looked me dead in the eye and said, "Oh, no - I won't fire you. I'll make you stay and fix it."
Samsung - fix your shit, and I'll be back for the Note 8 (codename: Phoenix).
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
You can just say appropriate, or apt. You don't have to be a shit.
Re: (Score:2)
Apology accepted, Captain Needa! (Score:1)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
Great for my BBQ! (Score:2)
WSJ in print (Score:2)
I think anyone that still reads the WSJ in print was not the market audience for the Note 7.
air jordan pas cher pour femme (Score:1)
curso NR 10 (Score:1)