Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Australia Earth Transportation

Commercial-Mining Drones Keep Getting Attacked By Eagles (abc.net.au) 136

An anonymous reader summarizes an article from ABC News: The world's seventh-biggest gold producer has lost more than nine drones because of eagle attacks. "People couldn't believe I was able to get such a good photo of an eagle airborne," complained surveyor Rick Steven at a conference sponsored by the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. "But I didn't... Another eagle took that photo... I was getting attacked by two eagles simultaneously." The specially-constructed drones carry a $10,000 camera for high-resolution photos and equipment that produces high-detail contour maps of potential mining areas, and so far the company estimates they've lost more than $100,000 worth of technology to eagle attacks. They've tried camouflage -- including disguising the drones as another eagle -- but unfortunately, according to Stevens, the eagle is the "natural enemy" of the drone.
One drone's video is interrupted by the sudden appearance of an eagle, followed almost immediately by footage from the ground by a sideways drone camera. That video -- included in the article -- ends with a reminder that "Eagle attacks on drones have been documented across the world, to the point where some European police forces are now training them to take down unauthorized aircraft."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Commercial-Mining Drones Keep Getting Attacked By Eagles

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday November 19, 2016 @08:40PM (#53323909)

    I'm only worried about them and don't give a shit about the drones. Can they get hurt by the attacks?

    • Let's be thankful that the eagles are protected, or they'd be mounting air powered rifles on the drones to take them out. No hesitation or misgivings about it whatsoever either.
    • by EvilSS ( 557649 )

      I'm only worried about them and don't give a shit about the drones. Can they get hurt by the attacks?

      Not likely. The drones in the article are lightweight, mostly plastic and composites. Without seeing them up close it's hard to appreciate just how big an eagle can be, and those talons are no joke. The drones wouldn't stand a chance.

      • by Jimbookis ( 517778 ) on Saturday November 19, 2016 @09:05PM (#53324051)
        A friend used to do hang gliding and would have wedge tail eagles either soar with him or attack him. He's had one eagle run it's claws along the leading edge of the glider to try tear it and get him out of the sky.
      • How about attaching some blank rounds to electrodes on the drone. I wonder if the very lound bang would be enough to change their mind.
      • by Anonymous Coward

        You have no idea how much damage lightweight plastic can do. These things are essentially flying lawnmowers. Go look at R/C forums for pictures of the tissue carnage these things can cause. The motors are extremely powerful and the props are very strong. They can chop you up easily without even phasing them. They aren't toys and can be quite dangerous.

        • by Nehmo ( 757404 )
          <quote><p>.... They can chop you up ...</p></quote>
          An eagle's talon may win in a match with a small plastic blade, but the contest isn't always set up that way. (BTW, searching on this subject allowed me to discover egg, claw, and talon sets https://goo.gl/qHyUsm ) Myth Busters does a demonstration https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MgeRchTHxVk
          Birds are fragile. Sure, some have threatening talons and beaks, but the rest of their bodies are optimized for flight.
        • They can chop you up easily without even phasing them.

          That's "fazing [dictionary.com]". Seriously. Please don't use words you've only seen other children use on the internet. You don't know what they mean.

          They aren't toys and can be quite dangerous.

          You don't have feathers, which are quite protective. The birds are going for the centers of the drones, because that's what they do to other birds. There is a risk, but it is not as large as you suggest.

          A good-sized heli is far more dangerous than a quad of the same mass because of the inertia of the single rotor.

          • >A good-sized heli is far more dangerous than a quad of the same mass because of the inertia of the single rotor.

            They are also more fragile themselves. Back in 1992 or so, during the unrest in that phase between F.W. De Klerk announcing the end of appartheid and Nelson Mandela winning the election - there was a front page story in South Africa after a kid brought down a police chopper with a sling-shot. Rock hit the prop - prop broke in half.

    • by Anonymous Coward

      Don Henley is certainly doing just fine. Glenn Frey, however... not so much.

  • by Anonymous Coward

    I wonder how much eagle habitat the mining company has destroyed.

    • That depends. How much power did you use to boot up your computer and post that you resource using hypocrite!

      • To be fair - these are gold prospectors, and very little mined gold goes into electronics (and less every year). Frankly if we limited gold use to actually doing stuff with it, we could supply ourselves for the next 5000 years or so with what we've already mined. Nearly all the gold they find will get dug out at great energy and cost, smelted down at great energy and cost... then after going to all that trouble to get it out of the ground... locked up in an underground vault and guarded at great energy and

        • Are you sure about that? Diamond mining has got to be right up there too. Digging up the ground and brutalizing Africans just so some stupid bitches can have shiny rocks on their fingers.

          • Tough call - but I think more diamonds actually get used for things than gold. Those hard things actually have some practical uses - glass cutting and the like.

            • Yeah, but the industrial diamonds are tiny, and also I thought that with natural diamonds being so expensive, the lab-made diamonds were actually cheaper and that industrial ones came from there now. In fact, I just looked it up on Wikipedia [wikipedia.org] and it says "It is estimated that 98% of industrial grade diamond demand is supplied with synthetic diamonds."

              • So call it a tie then... two of the biggest mining industries - and among the deadliest (gold alone kills well over 3000 people a year) - ... and done for absolutely no useful purpose.

  • by ThatsNotPudding ( 1045640 ) on Saturday November 19, 2016 @08:55PM (#53323991)
    Big eyes on the top like you put on a hat. Have to do the same thing with Mississippi Kites. If they can track motion, even better.
  • by Anonymous Coward

    Were they golden eagles?

    • Were they golden eagles?

      If it's in Australia then they're probably Wedgetails, Aussie relative of the Golden Eagle.

      .

      • by pedz ( 4127433 )
        I think (but not sure) it was a joke. It was a gold mine that is having problems.
  • Even the birds are pro USA! and they are good at killing the junk from china

    • by lucm ( 889690 )

      they are good at killing the junk from china

      On the other hand, if someone told the Chinese that eagle feather is rare and difficult to obtain, the eagle would disappear quickly. See what a good job they're doing with the elephants - 50 years old elephants that weigh a ton or more get killed for 40 pounds of ivory that gets sold in Beijing; in 10 years elephants will be a thing of the past. If they could do that to eagles it would save those mining companies a lot of money. Win-win, except for the animals.

  • Capture an eagle and put it in an MRI or something and expose it to drone stimuli to see what's upsetting the eagle.
    • My guess would be... the annoying drone buzzing around in its territory?

      • But which elements of the drone and the drone sounds are most annoying to the eagle and what can we do to make it less so? We have to do some research to figure out the best answers to those questions.
        • I don't think it's a matter of the characteristics of the drone so much that it's intruding on it's territory. Birds can be quite territorial. I've seen smaller birds spend days attacking a "rival male" in its territory, banging into a window over and over (and over and over... I was getting close to pulling a shotgun on the little bastard).

          Honestly, I'm not really convinced there's much of anything to be done short of making a stealth drone so quiet and tiny that it won't be noticed (good luck with that,

          • by Nehmo ( 757404 )

            ...I'm not really convinced there's much of anything to be done short of making a stealth drone so quiet and tiny that it won't be noticed (good luck with that, as there's a reason for the phrase "eagle-eyed"), or using a drone so large and intimidating it won't be attacked.

            Making a camera-drone tiny may be hard, but making it big wouldn't. If you didn't need to fight the wind, hanging the drone from a balloon would increase the size without a weight penality. Perhaps a strobe at the right frequency and color would work. I agree with hackwrench. A little research would solve the problem.

  • by Chris Mattern ( 191822 ) on Saturday November 19, 2016 @09:33PM (#53324143)

    Your mining drones [chruker.dk] just have to be protected. If you want to use scout drones, Hobgoblins [chruker.dk] are generally regarded as the best.

  • Excellent (Score:5, Interesting)

    by iggymanz ( 596061 ) on Saturday November 19, 2016 @09:36PM (#53324157)

    No worries about getting in trouble using a gun against damn drones over your property, just take up falconry or have a sympathetic neighbor who does

    • Falconry is a lot of effort for keeping the rare drone out.
      • But birds of prey have other uses for these times. Like ripping the hair extensions out of looting and rioting thugs. Grabbing megaphones of protester leaders.

  • by Anonymous Coward

    Or, is someone just bad at using-hyphens?

  • We just awoke our planet's soul and it's fighting back... Jokes aside, this article makes me think about how we are used to having our technological creations interfere with our complex world without much opposition from nature. If there exists something like karma, it should look like this.
  • The eagles are right (Score:5, Informative)

    by Required Snark ( 1702878 ) on Saturday November 19, 2016 @09:50PM (#53324197)
    The eagles attack the drones because they are defending their territory. In this case the intruders are "commercial mining" interests. If the miners find anything they will inevitably destroy the local ecology and the eagles will suffer a great population loss or even be wiped out in the mining area. So the eagles are doing the right thing by making it harder for land exploitation businesses to destroy their homes.

    I'm on the side of the eagles on this one.

    • by wbr1 ( 2538558 ) on Saturday November 19, 2016 @10:04PM (#53324241)
      I call bullshit. The eagles are potentially defending territory, or confusing drones for prey items. They are probably also getting injured in these attacks.

      However, implying that the eagles are attacking due to the mining interests possible future actions is ludicrous. Also, mining is necessary to maintain the lifestyle yo enjoy. Otherwise go post on the internet with two sticks and some fur. I am all for protecting the eagles and the environment, but recognize our human needs too. And, I for one think flying a drone over prospect areas is much less intrusive than larger aircraft, and even less negative than slashing a road into a prospect area.

      • Re: (Score:1, Insightful)

        by lucm ( 889690 )

        implying that the eagles are attacking due to the mining interests possible future actions is ludicrous.

        Eagles are apex predators, they never eat dead meat and they're also the most advanced teachers in the animal world, dropping their kids from high in the sky and catching them over and over on their open wings until they figure out how to fly. They're as badass as it gets, more than many people I know.

        If they're against mining, I'm selling all my shares in those mines because they're fucked.

        • by Anonymous Coward

          I volunteer at a raptor rehabilitation center. I promise you from first hand experience, eagles will eat dead meat if available. Not only is that the number 1 way they get lead poisoning, but it's also how we feed them. I have video of a bald eagle eating pre-killed rat.

        • "they never eat dead meat". Better tell David Attenborough that - Planet Earth 2 took some amazing footage of a golden eagle fighting off birds (crows, I think) that were pecking away at a dead animal. It then had to fight off another eagle.

        • I have to agree with some of these siblings. Eagles most definately eat dead meat, they are scavengers and will eat whatever is available. When camping with the scouts, we often toss the fish carcases into the lake and watch the eagles grab them to eat them.

      • by Required Snark ( 1702878 ) on Saturday November 19, 2016 @11:22PM (#53324495)
        Wow, you have real anger issues. Calm down.

        No where did I imply that the eagles were consciously recognizing that their future as a species was endangered. I was pointing out that their natural instinct to defend their turf happened to impede intrusion from humans as well as their natural opponents, other birds.

        As for "human needs", given that this is Australia it's very likely that these are going to be huge mining operations that alter the landscape radically by moving cubic kilometers of rock. The easy picking are gone when it comes to minerals, so that is what happens in most of the world these days.

        After this kind of mining the landscape is so torn up that there is not much left for any form of life after the mines are closed. That includes humans. Just look at the mountain removal for coal in the US Appalachians. They leave a shattered toxic landscape where the locals are stuck with horrible pollution.

        Even without open pit or removing entire mountains there can be serious environmental consequences for more traditional mines. Take the toxic discharge from the Gold King Mine [wikipedia.org] mine in Colorado. Abandoned since 1924, it had been filling with acidic water with high heavy metal concentrations. In 2015 it burst open during an attempt by the EPA to clean up the sight. Significant amounts of toxic water spread downstream into New Mexico affecting Navajo lands where people subsist of locally grown produce and sheep herding. They depend on the river water for their livelihood.

        So when you talk about human need, are you including or excluding the people who have to live where the mining happens? Do the Navajo count? Do the people of Appalachia count? What about the people in Oklahoma who are experiencing earthquakes for the first time in their lives? Remember that a lot of time when the word "need" is used, the real word is "greed".

    • So your immediate reaction is to go against the miners despite the fact that mining is the means of getting the materials necessary for modern civilization. Mining can certainly be a messy business and miners have something of a reputation for being environmentally dodgy, but it's still necessary.

      • Gold mining is hardly needed. Very little gold is actually used in anything resembling modern society, and is for the most part used as decorative items.

    • "....In this case the intruders are 'commercial mining' interests. If the miners find anything they will inevitably destroy the local ecology...."

      I say one for the 'Little guy' but the little guy is one of the world's largest eagles with a wing span of 1.8 to 2 metres.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]

      A mining company like this will take all the gold out using open cut mining and leave a huge scar in the ground.
      'Rape and Pillage' of the enviroment on a grand scale. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/. [wikipedia.org]
  • by NetFusion ( 86828 ) on Saturday November 19, 2016 @10:12PM (#53324269)
    After flying RC planes/helicopters/quads for decades you learn that flying above a bird of prey is considered an aggressive dominating move and they will almost always counter to defend their territory and reestablish dominance. If you fly below them like the other smaller birds they consider you prey and rarely attack because you are not their familiar favorite meal.
    • by 50000BTU_barbecue ( 588132 ) on Saturday November 19, 2016 @10:38PM (#53324355) Journal

      Me it's RC boats. I live in a city so it's the cheapest, quickest way to get my RC nerdery done. Apparently, for a dog's visual cortex, this:

      https://i.ytimg.com/vi/OdtfMNj... [ytimg.com]

      looks like the most delicious roast chicken a dog could ever want. As soon as I put the boat in the water, every dog around will jump into the water and desperately swim after the stupid thing. Now I warn dog owners before I put the boat in the water!

      One day a guy shows up with a Husky. He tells me not to worry, Huskies don't like the water. OK, fine. After he told me he never thought he'd see his dog chest-deep in the water! It was true however that this dog didn't go any further and didn't actually swim for it. But he also didn't expect to have to towel down his dog!

      • looks like the most delicious roast chicken a dog could ever want.

        LOL. Dogs are bred from wolves, which chase their prey down [youtube.com] - sometimes for miles - until it tires or stumbles and they're able to make the kill. So they're genetically predisposed to chase after things that move - squirrels, cars, tennis balls, thrown sticks. A boat in the water is a moving (chase-able) object with no distracting background, so triggers this chase instinct.

        Cats likewise are stealth pouncers, so turning your back on th [youtu.be]

      • probably more like a roast duck than roast chicken.

    • A nesting pair of Cooper's Hawks in the back yard killed a crow, and they were batting around a dismembered crow's head to entertain their fledgling.

      The crows will mess with a raptor, especially since they are more numerous. Like with the horse's head in the bed scene, I think the hawks were sending a message that this is not a good idea.

      • by Raenex ( 947668 )

        The crows will mess with a raptor, especially since they are more numerous.

        I once had a flock of crows settle on my lawn, like hundreds (I had a big front yard). It was like something out of a Stephen King novel.

  • mother nature has won.

  • by sootman ( 158191 ) on Saturday November 19, 2016 @11:27PM (#53324521) Homepage Journal

    ... I've hated this retarded construction: "More than" + some weird number -- high, specific, not round.

    "The world's seventh-biggest gold producer has lost more than nine drones because of eagle attacks."

    So... ten drones, then?

    I just heard "over 46" somethings earlier tonight. That would be 47, I suppose?

    • You're not the only one who feels that way. It drives me up the wall.
      It's got to be some psychological thing; "if I say 'more than,' it'll seem more substantial than if I just say 'ten.'"
    • Yes, this bugs me too, as it just seems like a cumbersome way to quantify things. I would have said "ten," or "at least ten", or maybe even something like "They're tally of drones lost to eagles has hit double digits."
    • by Calydor ( 739835 )

      I completely agree, the last more than 17 times was the final straw.

    • by thegarbz ( 1787294 ) on Sunday November 20, 2016 @07:20AM (#53325657)

      It's an easy way of making an article still relevant given a lack of a timeline.

      Over 46 will still be over 46 tomorrow.
      47 may not be 47 tomorrow

    • I have the same thing with time information.

      "The event occurred last week (local time)"

      Sure, I know about timezones. But is "last week" really so specific that we must be told that it happened at a 'local time'? Whose local time is that anyway: mine, or the time of the place where the event happened?

    • "The world's seventh-biggest gold producer has lost more than nine drones because of eagle attacks."

      So... ten drones, then?

      Actually, no. It's more retarded than that. In this case, "more than nine" means exactly nine:
      One crashed as a result of human error, while nine have been taken down by wedge-tailed eagles

  • ... we can't get eagles to attack unneeded hyphens.

  • How retarded are people in our times?

    Like every animal of prey Eagles are very territorial. Of course they attack any other eagle, or bird of prey in their territory. Camouflaging a drone as an Eagle is like painting a big cross hair on it.

    On top of that: the drones are pretty big. It is no surprise that a eagle is concerned about it and attacks drones, too.

  • I want to try using that mirror paint on the inside of a lexan body shell. I'm planning to vacuuform bodies for my quads because I can't find good protective shells for them otherwise. I wonder what a bird would think of that... maybe stop to admire itself in the reflection ;)

  • Surely a mining machine can crush things with it's mining gear? Makes you wonder how a bird can knock over such heavy machinery? Oh, wait, it's only a surveying drone!

  • I don't know why this is a problem. Just kill all of the eagles. Not like they will have a place to live once the mining company is done.
  • We just need Gandalf to whisper a few words to a moth and the eagles will go away.
  • Can be rather off putting. They tend to hit the leading edge of the wing, trying to break it, but come off second best. Sometimes they go for the canopy.

    Eagles are generally good for fining thermals, and so we often join them in flight, which is a wonderful thing. But if they look aggressive, time to move on.

    I was once attacked by a Magpie (size of a crow). The little bird flapped his way up a thousand feet to my height above a ridge and then dived at my canopy. I then dived after him, but was no contest of

  • "Moria... You fear to go into those mines. The Dwarves delved too greedily and too deep. You know what they awoke in the darkness of Khazad-dum... shadow and flame."

    Sounds like Gandalf is finally learning that he should just call the Eagles first and let them sort it out... :)

Software production is assumed to be a line function, but it is run like a staff function. -- Paul Licker

Working...