Police in UK Warn About Dating Apps After Serial Killer Conviction (betanews.com) 40
Mark Wilson, writing for BetaNews: Police are warning people who use dating sites and dating apps to take extra precautions to ensure their safety. The advice comes after serial killer Stephen Port who contacted his victims through apps such as Grindr and Gaydar. While people making use of dating services have always been warned to take safety precautions, police are concerned that sexual predators are increasingly using such sites and apps as a way of finding potential victims. The UK's National Crime Agency has noticed an alarming increase in the number of people reporting cases of rape after meeting someone through a dating site or app. In 2009 the number was just 33, while in 2014 it had jumped to 184. Clearly things such changes to the reporting of sexual assault need to be factored in, as do considerations such as whether the number of reported incidents represents an increase in actual incidents in real terms.
Re: (Score:2)
Perhaps there should be a rating system to weed out the naughty boys. Five stars = best bottyshag ever. Three stars = if it's in a hole you scored a goal. Zero stars = totally murdered me and dumped me in a lay-by on the M6.
Also.. (Score:5, Insightful)
They should also warn about the dangers of meeting people at bars, parties, friend's homes, outdoor areas, malls, indoor areas, businesses, parks, playgrounds, movie theaters, civic centers, post offices, forests, etc etc etc.
Re: (Score:2)
But especially on the Internet. That's even more dangerous.
Where men are men, women are men and children are FBI agents.
Re: (Score:2)
Sometimes being an introvert who doesn't like social events isn't such a bad thing.
Re:Also.. (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Is there? Was there the same tendency back in the days when you had to write to a box number at the newspaper? I ... ummm ... heard it used to work like that.
Re: (Score:2)
It didn't stop frauds and assaults, but it did discourage them.
(*) Remember - every column inch of "content" in a public newspaper or magazine exists solely for the purpose of sell
Re: (Score:1)
You left out catholic churches and (topically) football clubs.
Re: (Score:2)
You left out catholic churches
Good point.
Re: (Score:2)
They should also warn about the dangers of meeting people at bars, parties, friend's homes, outdoor areas, malls, indoor areas, businesses, parks, playgrounds, movie theaters, civic centers, post offices, forests, etc etc etc.
First off, this is just the UK Police. They're just putting out a public service announcement after a few cases have been reported even though it's just stating the bleeding obvious. Its their way of showing everyone they're Doing Something(TM).
Secondly, its difficult for a predator who looks rats to get a girl into their home from a bar, parties, outdoor areas, supermarkets, B&Q's and what not. You do have to admit that the internet, especially hook up applications like Tinder have made it easier fo
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Secondly, its difficult for a predator who looks rats to get a girl into their home
Gee whiz, I forgot that most rapists and predators and bad people look "rats" or are unattractive.
The UK Police should have just put out a PSA saying, "Only date attractive people! You have nothing to fear from attractive people because none of them have ever done anything bad."
Re: (Score:2)
you are misunderstanding the meaning of looks rats
Enlighten me, please. What exactly does the phrase mean?
Conviction Convention (Score:2)
Reasonable Precautions (Score:5, Interesting)
Pretty much anyplace you meet someone (online or offline) has the potential of the other person being a creep or a criminal. This is why you never meet the person alone and in a private area for the first time. My wife and I met online (Yahoo Chat Rooms). We spoke for a month before meeting in person, but even then, my wife and I took precautions. We met in a very public place (a busy shopping area half way between where we each lived) and we each brought people with us to help "rescue" us if the other person wasn't who they said they were online. Thankfully, it all worked out nicely that day. (Except for having to leave each other at the end of the day. We clicked so well that we didn't want to separate.) Had it turned sour, though, we would have had precautions in place to ensure our safety.
Re: (Score:1)
Thankfully, it all worked out nicely that day.
That's not what she said...
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
That's illegal in the UK. That's illegal in the UK. Even assault sporks and big pencils are banned there
Stop reading the Daily Mail.
It's a Welsh regiment, see (Score:2)
Perhaps he should start reading the post he's responding to instead? Didn't see any mention of weapons in Jason Levine(196982)'s post.
Re: (Score:3)
Perhaps he should start reading the post he's responding to instead? Didn't see any mention of weapons in Jason Levine(196982)'s post.
Yes, the AC was sarcasm. But it wasn't very good sarcasm so it's ended up at -1 where it belongs.
For those in the UK who would actually like to know about the reality of self defence in the UK, I strongly recommend parting with 2 squid for this e-book.
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Self-Defence-Law-Practical-Understanding-Defending-ebook/dp/B00V44TZ2U [amazon.co.uk]
50 pages that explains the self defence laws in very simple language.
Realistically, I don't feel the need to have a weapon to feel safe in the UK. Most peop
Re: (Score:2)
Depends whether they like you or not. The corrupt masonic twats confiscated my kubotan when I lamped a car driver who'd knocked me off my bike and made the mistake of getting out to try and finish the job.
And I wasn't even using it!
That was before riding a bike was trendy. In fact, it was practically illegal - it meant you were poor or a greenie.
Re: (Score:3)
Depends whether they like you or not. The corrupt masonic twats confiscated my kubotan when I lamped a car driver who'd knocked me off my bike and made the mistake of getting out to try and finish the job.
Actually, that one is explained in the book. OK, but I'll save you the 2 quid and explain it.
It didn't matter if you used your Kubotan for defence, you were carrying a weapon so the plod had to seize it regardless. If you had of used it, you still wouldn't have been in any more trouble if you could demonstrate that you felt you needed to use it for defence (he attacked you, so yes you would have been justified). That's the crux of self defence laws in the UK, its based on what you, the victim felt was th
Re: (Score:2)
Does, it had my keys attached to it. Tucks nicely through a combat belt.
P.S. I'd query the wisdom of carrying a Leatherman. Not quick to deploy and it doesn't really have the right handle for use as a weapon. But still it's a knife, and walking around with such (unless you can prove you're a chef on your way to work or whatever) is going to get you in hot water.
Where's the control group? (Score:1)
Numbers without references are so, so meaningless.
Numbers in the 100s sound really low to me.
First, I wonder how many that is out of. Seems like I've seen numbers of 20% + of dates having internet origin today. So, wouldn't that then be 184 out of millions?
What is the total number of reported rapes by dates? Is this more than 20% of that total?
As much as 70% of adults report having been sexually abused or assaulted at some point in their lives. The percentage that are raped just within the few years of coll
Re: (Score:1)
It was obvious from the user interface. (Score:2)
You swipe right/left on pictures of windowless vans.