Fake News Prompts Gunman To 'Self-Investigate' Pizza Parlor (arstechnica.com) 789
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: A rifle-wielding North Carolina man was arrested Sunday in Washington, DC for carrying his weapon into a pizzeria that sits at the center of the fake news conspiracy theory known as "Pizzagate," authorities said Monday. DC's Metropolitan Police Department said it had arrested 28-year-old Edgar Maddison Welch on allegations of assault with a dangerous weapon. "During a post arrest interview this evening, the suspect revealed that he came to the establishment to self-investigate 'Pizza Gate' (a fictitious online conspiracy theory," the agency said in a statement. "Pizzagate" concerns a baseless conspiracy theory about a secret pedophile group, the Comet Ping Pong restaurant, and Hillary Clinton's campaign chief, John Podesta. The Pizzagate conspiracy names Comet Ping Pong as the secret headquarters of a non-existent child sex-trafficking ring run by Clinton and members of her inner circle. James Alefantis, the restaurant's owner, said he has received hundreds of death threats. According to Buzzfeed, the Pizzagate theory is believed to have been fostered by a white supremacist's tweets, the 4chan message board, Reddit, Donald Trump supporters, and right-wing blogs. The day before Thanksgiving, Reddit banned a "Pizzagate" conspiracy board from the site because of a policy about posting personal information of others. Alefantis, the pizzeria's owner, told CNN, "What happened today demonstrates that promoting false and reckless conspiracy theories comes with consequences. I hope that those involved in fanning these flames will take a moment to contemplate what happened here today, and stop promoting these falsehoods right away."
Spinning even now (Score:5, Informative)
Jesus wept, this country is doomed.
Re:Spinning even now (Score:4, Insightful)
Almost all "pizzagate" supporters do not actually believe it. They promote it because they think it's funny.
This is 4chan, after all. They do it "for the lulz".
People who actually believe it are in the minority and are simpletons or mentally ill.
Re:Spinning even now (Score:5, Insightful)
Unfortunately, Poe's law.
There is nothing in the way of satire any more that is outrageous enough that some fraction of the people won't believe it's true.
Michael Flynn Jr believes it (Score:5, Informative)
The son of Trump's likely National Security Advisor is one of those gullible simpletons
http://www.independent.co.uk/n... [independent.co.uk]
Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it (Score:4, Insightful)
Even worse, Michael G. Flynn, member of the Trump transition team and son of the next National Security Adviser might be a 4chan shitstain and is spreading this story just for the keks.
Either way, it does not speak well of the Trump transition team. I see this morning Trump nominated a medical doctor who thinks dietary supplements can cure cancer, AIDS and multiple sclerosis to be the next Secretary of Housing and Urban Development.
IANAL, but (Score:3)
doesn't the hard-working small business owner, who is now getting death threats and business disruptions, have a really good libel case?
Re: (Score:3)
I don't know how you go about suing a Reddit user called, "u/DumbScribblyUnctious" but there have already been legal actions filed against certain websites that pushed the stories.
Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it (Score:5, Informative)
No need to investigate. Michael G. Flynn's OWN WORDS:
https://twitter.com/mflynnJR/s... [twitter.com]
http://www.slate.com/blogs/the... [slate.com]
Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it (Score:4, Informative)
Literally none of the story is true. Not only did the whole thing start as an online hoax by pranksters, but the images in the supposed Instagram are from people who "liked" the pizza restaurant's page. None of the "FBI charts of code words" are from the FBI. None of the information that the #pizzagate morons point to is true. It is 100% false.
Here is a comprehensive, detailed rundown with citations on the history of this hoax and whether a single fact or assertion about pizzagate has been proven true or is possible to be proven true:
http://www.snopes.com/pizzagat... [snopes.com]
Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Literally none of the story is true.
So you bought that fake news narrative without checking?
Not only did the whole thing start as an online hoax by pranksters
How do you know that? Some things are pranks, some things are conspiracy theories (that may even have some truth behind them).
but the images in the supposed Instagram are from people who "liked" the pizza restaurant's page
Here's where you are dead wrong. Some of the images are from associations, but some very creepy ones involving children were found directly on the owner's Instagram account, "jimmycomet", including [archive.is] the young girl taped to the ping pong table with a male standing suggestively behind her. Ha ha, very funny?
None of the "FBI charts of code words" are from the FBI.
But the symbols [wikileaks.org] are.
None of the information that the #pizzagate morons point to is true. It is 100% false.
Mayb
Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it (Score:4, Funny)
This is the image he's talking about.
https://img1.steemit.com/0x0/h... [steemit.com]
Clearly evidence of a secret pedophilia ring reaching into the corridors of power.
Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it (Score:5, Insightful)
In all seriousness, I think that Ben Carson is an intelligent and accomplished man.
Ben Carson has single-handedly put to bed the notion that brain surgeons are smart people. And it was done pretty much by his own words and actions.
The fascinating part is that we now know you don't actually have to be very bright to do brain surgery. It's almost as if a person could be good at one thing and yet still be a total imbecile at everything else...
He might be a good brain surgeon, but I wouldn't let him fix my computer, tune my car, or hem my pants. And I sure as shit wouldn't let him "educate me" on what the pyramids of Egypt were built for.
Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it (Score:5, Insightful)
The fascinating part is that we now know you don't actually have to be very bright to do brain surgery.
No, you have to be very intelligent. You spend a good chunk of your life learning about nothing but brain surgery.
The opportunity cost being that you don't have that time to spend on learning other things.
He might be a good brain surgeon, but I wouldn't let him fix my computer, tune my car, or hem my pants. And I sure as shit wouldn't let him "educate me" on what the pyramids of Egypt were built for.
Why would you? What ever made you think you could trust a doctor with a computer?
Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it (Score:5, Funny)
Why would you? What ever made you think you could trust a doctor with a computer?
Good point. Wait... then why wold we trust a real estate developer and pyramid marketing purveyor to run a country again?
Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it (Score:5, Informative)
Because Hillary Clinton sent emails not only from an email server, but also received emails on that same server. *Including* emails from some one named Huma Abadein, a foreign sounding name.
Plus, if you vote for her instead of the game show host, your balls will shrivel and fall off.
Re: (Score:3)
> Bullshit, unless... well, how intelligent is a library, anyhow??
A library has zero intelligence. It can't learn or apply what it learned. It also doesn't have the requisite physical skills to carry out surgery.
Your kind of stupidity actually makes look like all of your claims and those of your cabal are pure nonsense. You completely undermine the liberal narrative.
Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it (Score:4, Insightful)
Listen to interviews with him back when he was a surgeon. He had that same slow, even mannerism, but spoke clearly about his profession. Either he's afflicted with some kind of dementia, or more likely, he's one of those people who's so focused on their field he doesn't know anything else, but so egotistical he thinks he knows everything.
Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it (Score:5, Funny)
If he is not an intelligent man... how did he reach the top of his field as he did?
Whatever it is, he certainly put an end to using brain surgeon as a synonym for really smart.
I wonder when a former rocket scientist will run for president.
Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it (Score:5, Insightful)
Good. The quicker Trump fucks up irrecoverably, the quicker he gets replaced. Won't be long now.
Problem is his immediate replacement is Mike Fucking Pence. The cure may be worse than the disease.
Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it (Score:5, Insightful)
I see this morning Trump nominated a medical doctor who thinks dietary supplements can cure cancer, AIDS and multiple sclerosis to be the next Secretary of Housing and Urban Development.
Good. The quicker Trump fucks up irrecoverably, the quicker he gets replaced. Won't be long now.
LOL, that's the funniest thing I have heard this MONTH. Trump is a reality show buffoon with absolutely no qualifications or experience for this job. Do you really think the people who saw this and voted for him anyway will suddenly realize what a horrible mistake they have made? People tend to rationalize their choices in politics rather than admitting a mistake. That is why Congress always has an abysmal approval rating as a whole but each district tends to rate their own representative highly. Every time Trump opens his mouth and says something stupid there are plenty of people that instantly go to bat for him and try to "explain" what he really meant. Whether it's complete ignorance of diplomatic relationships on his phone calls with Pakistan and Taiwan, telling Duterte that extrajudicial executions to deal with his drug problem is a great idea, or just grabbing women by the pussy, the people who voted for him instantly rationalize it in their brains as "being presidential" or "a tough new diplomatic tack" or "locker room talk". These are the people who shut the government down and prompted a downgrade of the US credit rating because they were throwing a fit about raising the debt ceiling and paying for the shit they already budgeted for. They did demonstrable damage to the finances of the country and their supporters voted them right back in.
You're delusional if you think Trump supporters will ever acknowledge a fuck-up. As Trump himself said, "I could stand in the middle of 5th avenue and shoot someone and I wouldn't lose voters".
Re: (Score:3)
Well said. I think he's a shoe-in for re-election.
Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it (Score:5, Insightful)
[1] The only way he can fuck up is if he ends up being just like Hillary or Obama.
Really? Is that REALLY the only way he can fuck up?
Disclaimer, I was not a Trump supporter, but I'm willing to give him a chance. But if you think being "more of the same" is the worst way he can fuck up I truly wonder how far your head is buried in the sand. What about wars, foreign relations, economy? As much as some people may not like it, the US does not exist in a vacuum. Things we do and say (and by "we" I mean our leadership) can have direct and severe consequences. What do you think is going to happen when the administration places a %50 tariff on Chinese made goods? Do you think our country is magically going to find the money to buy non-Chineese made goods, or come up with the extra cash to pay for them? Or worse, how is the world going to react when Mad Dog decides it's time to "finally do something" about North Korea or Afghanistan?
Yeah, I know, the likelihood of either of those happening is pretty slim, but WW3 is never not a possibility. And we just elected someone with zero political experience, and he's filling his cabinet with unstable and inexperienced people. Yeah, now that I think about it, Status Quo is definitely the worst thing that could happen.
Re: (Score:3)
Good. The quicker Trump fucks up irrecoverably, the quicker he gets replaced. Won't be long now.
The mainstream media has been saying that for the last year, and now he's heading for the White House.
Re:Michael Flynn Jr believes it (Score:4, Informative)
That reminds me. Trump's nominee for Secretary of Housing and Urban Development also believes the pyramids were built to store grain and the mummies were just put there to act as scarecrows.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/11/05/... [cnn.com]
There's also an embedded video of him actually saying that in case you think this is also fake news.
Re: (Score:3)
If an adult neurosurgeon is just repeating wild notions that he learned in Sunday school when speaking to public gatherings, then he might not be the guy you want in a presidential cabinet.
Re: (Score:3)
Also, the cure for cancer is at least in part based on the Hunza mountain people who live an average of 120 plus years and do not get cancer.
The longest ever documented lifespan of a human being was that of Jeanne Calment, who died in 1997 being 122 years old. She was no Hunza, but a french woman from Arles. Most other persons being named as the oldest person currently living die between 114 and 117 years old.
I thus seriously doubt any information about people getting older than 120 years on average. You need a very strong proof for that claim.
Re:FTFY (Score:5, Informative)
The great Hunza secret to old age turned out to be its absence of birth records. The illiterate elders didn't know how old they were, and they tended to overestimate their ages by a decade or two, as I discovered by comparing their recollections with known historical events.
Read yourself: The Optimists Are Right [nytimes.com].
Re:Spinning even now (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
but I've seen it in the media (mainstream and alt-right) as a serious story
Perhaps your notion of mainstream is a little off there. Even Fox News don't seem to have covered this as anything other than a conspiracy theory.
Re:Spinning even now (Score:4, Insightful)
People who actually believe it are in the minority and are simpletons or mentally ill.
Who can own guns in North Carolina apparently.
Re:Spinning even now (Score:5, Interesting)
People who actually believe it are in the minority and are simpletons or mentally ill.
Sadly I know a guy who really full-on believes this... and that Roswell was real, 9/11 was faked and a bunch of other conspiracies. Wouldn't be surprised if he believes in chemtrails and owns a tin foil hat either. But he's pretty good with words and is neither retarded nor obviously crazy. It's like he's just decided the world is a sham, we're all puppets dancing according to some agenda and that warps his perception of everything else. It's like he's just waiting for Morpheus to show up and offer him the red pill. Even if you manage to push back and disprove one little bit of his ramblings it's like okay maybe that was wrong but the other 99.9% is still on.
It reminds me of some of those otherwise seemingly functional people who've been in ordinary jobs but end up fixed on some crazy idea that a Nigerian prince is offering them money or that they have an online girlfriend they never met who totally loves them and totally lose it. Many of these don't fit the "simpletons or mentally ill" who could never hold down a job profile. I saw someone else here mention Ben Carson, brain surgeon but thinks ancient aliens built the pyramids. No matter how smart you are, you see what you want to see. You believe what you want to believe. Then you use your brains to wrap reality around your beliefs, not the other way around.
That's how you end up with scientists with a religion full of facts science has refuted. It turns out people don't have to have one coherent set of thoughts. We actually live quite well doing a day job and believing in the first woman was made from a rib bone at the same time. It's just that for some the last kind of "facts" take over and consume them, to the point where they can't accept reality as reality anymore. Mainstream media (MSM) is fiction, my alt-news is reality. Mainstream medicine is fiction, my homeopathy is reality. And Internet is the greatest boon to alternate realitys ever, here they all meet to agree on how right they are. Most are pretty harmless though.
Re:Spinning even now (Score:5, Insightful)
Sure, but conspiracy theory after conspiracy theory keeps coming true. If 20 years ago you were rambling about government mind control experiments, the CIA letting crack into black neighborhoods and the government recording all your phone calls people would think you were crazy. All that stuff was true though.
Doesn't mean this is true, of course. But I just think we're kind of past the point where one can say "lol conspiracy theory" and have that be an argument.
Re: (Score:3)
And you know these people on twitter were there how exactly?
Re:Spinning even now (Score:4, Interesting)
There IS something weird on those emails.
But people are jumping on too much conclusions or being pushed into too much conclusions.
I bet its something boring like regular corruption.
Re:Spinning even now (Score:4, Informative)
Your concept of "fairly reasoned and straightforward" is completely nuttery. Pictures of kids with pizza is not evidence.
Re:Spinning even now (Score:5, Insightful)
"Of the more than 11,800 endangered runaways reported to NCMEC in 2015, one in five were likely victims of child sex trafficking. Of those, 74 percent were in the care of social services when they went missing. " ...absolutely damning statistic IMO...
Not really sure why that's damning. Social services generally only gets kids in the worst of circumstances, so almost all of the kids in the charge of social services will be messed up.
Nah! (Score:5, Funny)
No one on Slashdot would ever promote right wing conspiracy theories! How absurd...
Re: (Score:3)
I am always concerned when I see the term "goatse" in a post that also includes the words "Trust me."
I don't think he understands trolling (Score:2)
...the pizzeria's owner, told CNN, "I hope that those involved in fanning these flames will take a moment to contemplate what happened here today, and stop promoting these falsehoods right away."
If only.
Re:I don't think he understands trolling (Score:4, Insightful)
If it wasn't incriminating, then why did they change it when it was exposed
A) If I found out I accidentally used a pedo logo, I'd change it too.
B) If I found out alt-right nutjobs were spreading shit around the internet about my shop, I'd get off my ass to change it because I don't want my customers or employees shot by fucking morons like you.
Seriously, you need to go see a shrink.
Conspiracy theorists at work. (Score:5, Insightful)
This is fairly typical thinking from conspiracy theorists.
They are the most gullible of people and just believe any crap that is put up on the internet. They like to believe that everyone else has no idea what is going on but in reality they are just eating the shit that other people make up.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
The problem with conspiracy "theories" is there's usually a smidgen of truth to them such that the gullible and true believers will believe it without a second thought to any veracity.
One can see all kinds of nutjob whackery over the 9/11 attacks, the most notable being "fuel can't melt steel beams". Which is true, the fire from jet fuel can't melt steel beams but what it can do is weaken the steel such that all the weight it's supporting causes the beam to warp. This has been shown in recent accidents inv
Re: (Score:3)
Want a good laugh? Someone (who will remain nameless because I am embarrassed that I know someone that stupid) recently told me that all space travel is impossible and I am a fool for believing it. Astounded I asked him why he thought that and he pointed me to this website with "inconvertible proof";-
http://heiwaco.tripod.com/moon... [tripod.com]
I want to know where my €9.000:-/month for life is for lying about it?
But yeah, like I said, conspiracy theorists are gullible.
Re: (Score:3)
Complete lack of understanding of simple Newtonian physics he should have learned in high school. He honestly believes that when you stop applying thrust to something in outer space, it stops moving. Amazing.
Deinstitutionalization + Social Media + Guns = ? (Score:5, Insightful)
It's interesting how much these fake news social media campaigns are drawing out the nutcases. It makes sense, social media tools are designed to reinforce one's beliefs and continuously show you things that interest you -- as well as relevant ads of course! I could definitely see a conspiracy nut get hold of an idea from Facebook or Twitter, then have it keep popping up in his feed over and over again, then have his friends repost it, then see streams of tweets reconfirming their beliefs.
Social media in this case is kind of like conservative talk radio, in that the most devout listeners to it seem to get locked into a feedback loop over certain ideas, never to change them again. Their host is angry, gets the listeners riled up and the audience feeds on the anger.
That said, this whole story is a pretty sad statement on how we treat mentally ill people these days. New York (where I live) is completing the process of shutting down almost all of their custodial-care institutions and dumping people out onto the streets. Basically, you'll need to be Hannibal Lecter to get an inpatient psych bed, so you'll likely end up in prison instead -- or if society's unlucky, you'll just sit there stewing for years until something makes you snap and shoot up a pizza place. I'm not saying we should go back to the bad old days of locking people up for depression, giving them lobotomies or abusing them...but I do think deinstitutionalization went way too far. People should be able to seek a diagnosis for mental illness without stigma, and get treatment if they need it. I'm convinced this is why we have so many mass shootings in the US. Look at Adam Lanza (the Newtown guy) -- according to all accounts, his mother basically hid his developing mental illness for years and refused to accept there was a problem. But, the sad thing is that even if she had sought help for him, she wouldn't have been able to get it.
Re: (Score:3)
Re:Deinstitutionalization + Social Media + Guns = (Score:5, Informative)
If anyone is trying to revise history, it's you.
Yes it was Reagan.
No, it wasnt a democratic congress.
No, the democrats in congress at that time could not be considered progressive (much as you like to use the word as an invective).
Deinstitutionalization began in California, just before Reagan became governor. It was a response to a set of legitimate problems, originally as a concept of trying to get patients into more local care, with less federal and state funding. But that didnt happen, patients instead began ending up on the streets or in privately run (for profit) facilities.
And then Reagan as governor continued it, expanded it, oversaw the increasing privatization of it, and got paid by the people who profited off of the privatization.
At the national level, Carter and the Congress (the one you mistakenly say was to blame...) crafted a law, just before Reagan became president, to roll back deinstitutionalization, and provide federal funding to be gin getting a handle on the growing problem.
and Reagan along with a Republican controlled Congress killed the law as soon as he became president.
From American Psychosis [amazon.com]:
In November 1980, Republican Ronald Reagan overwhelmingly defeated Jimmy Carter, who received less than 42% of the popular vote, for president. Republicans took control of the Senate (53 to 46), the first time they had dominated either chamber since 1954. Although the House remained under Democratic control (243 to 192), their margin was actually much slimmer, because many southern “boll weevil” Democrats voted with the Republicans.
One month prior to the election, President Carter had signed the Mental Health Systems Act, which had proposed to continue the federal community mental health centers program , although with some additional state involvement. Consistent with the report of the Carter Commission, the act also included a provision for federal grants “for projects for the prevention of mental illness and the promotion of positive mental health,” an indication of how little learning had taken place among the Carter Commission members and professionals at NIMH. With President Reagan and the Republicans taking over, the Mental Health Systems Act was discarded before the ink had dried and the CMHC funds were simply block granted to the states. The CMHC program had not only died but been buried as well. An autopsy could have listed the cause of death as naiveté complicated by grandiosity.
President Reagan never understood mental illness. Like Richard Nixon, he was a product of the Southern California culture that associated psychiatry with Communism. Two months after taking office, Reagan was shot by John Hinckley, a young man with untreated schizophrenia. Two years later, Reagan called Dr. Roger Peele, then director of St. Elizabeths Hospital, where Hinckley was being treated, and tried to arrange to meet with Hinckley, so that Reagan could forgive him. Peele tactfully told the president that this was not a good idea. Reagan was also exposed to the consequences of untreated mental illness through the two sons of Roy Miller, his personal tax advisor. Both sons developed schizophrenia; one committed suicide in 1981, and the other killed his mother in 1983. Despite such personal exposure, Reagan never exhibited any interest in the need for research or better treatment for serious mental illness.
[..]
California has traditionally been on the cutting edge of American cultural developments, with Anaheim and Modesto experiencing changes before Atlanta and Moline. This was also true in the exodus of patients from state psychiatric hospitals. Beginning in the late 1950s, California became the national leader in aggressively moving patients from state hospitals to nursing homes and board-and-care homes, known in other states by names such as group homes, boarding homes
Re: (Score:3)
People should be able to seek a diagnosis for mental illness without stigma, and get treatment if they need it.
They already do, depending on the "diagnosis". It seems like having aspergers, ADHD, or being on some part of the spectrum is almost a badge of honor in some circles, especially in tech:
http://nymag.com/news/features... [nymag.com]
And just think about the amount of people getting prescribed Xanax, Prozac, or Adderall nowadays.....seems like people are getting what they want (whether or not this is "treatment", or course, is debatable).
Look at Adam Lanza (the Newtown guy) -- according to all accounts, his mother basically hid his developing mental illness for years and refused to accept there was a problem. But, the sad thing is that even if she had sought help for him, she wouldn't have been able to get itc
Hogwash. She was fairly well-off financially, and it's been said that what set him
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Far left for a long time, really? It's not like we have elected anyone that really believes in socialist concepts, like Bernie does.
Last 5 presidents:
- Reagan (right wing Republican)
- Bush I (centrist Republican)
- Clinton (centrist Democrat)
- Bush II (right wing Republcan)
- Obama (elected as slightly left of center but wound up pretty close to Clinton if not a bit to the right of him)
- Trump (who the fuck knows but he sure isn't a lefty)
You could fix FIX DISHONESTY IN GOVERNMENT AND MEDIA by at least prete
The US hasn't had a leftist prez since FDR (Score:5, Informative)
What we consider "left" is somewhere between centrist and moderate right in the rest of the first world.
Re: (Score:3)
The Internet and dumb people (Score:5, Insightful)
Fuck this guy (Score:3)
There should be an internet license (Score:3)
There should be training, perhaps like going through drivers ed or hunters ed, to get a license to get on the internet.
These dipshits, these FB idiots who believe every bizarre and completely unverified story or anecdote they see online should not have the ability to even be there in the first place.
MSM still primary source for fake news (Score:3)
Is the mass media responsible for fabricating stories and inciting riots? Seems to me the media routinely fans the flames of racial division by releasing false information.
Remember the Charlotte riots? The media first reported that Keith Scott was unarmed. This was a major factor that led to the riots. Turns out, Keith Scott was armed. Is this a case of media fabrications causing riots?
In the 2014 shooting of Michael Brown, the media first reported that Brown was on his knees with his hands up. Turns out, that was another media fabrication which also led to riots.
In the Ahmed Mohamed clock incident, the media first reported that Ahmed was just building a clock, as a project for his electronics class, but the principal called the police because Ahmed was a Muslim. Turns out, that was another media fabrication. Ahmed used a clock that he bought at a department store, along with a briefcase and other props, to make a fake bomb. In a post-Columbine world, what should the principal have done? What if it had been a bomb? BTW: although he was richly rewarded for this stunt, Ahmed has been posting extremely anti-American rants: he called the 9/11 attacks self defence, he supports BLM, and much more.
When George Michael Zimmerman shot Trayvon Martin, the media first posted photos of an 11 year old Trayvon. Months after the incident, some people still believed that Zimmerman attacked a small child, which was not the case. Trayvon was an athletic 5'11" and 160 lbs. and was beating the snot out of Zimmerman. Maybe Zimmerman was not justified in shooting Trayvon, but Trayvon was not an 11 year child, and the media tried to insinuate.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Maybe possibly some people know what satire is...
This is like defending some armed fucking nutjob because of Onion articles.
Re:Fake News? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Fake News? (Score:5, Insightful)
The funny part is that the Daily show often contained more news than the actual news [techdirt.com]
And at least the Daily Show is sometimes funny. Right wing fake news is always angry. I wonder why that is?
Re: Fake News? (Score:5, Insightful)
They believed one of Trumps tweets about removing citizenship from people.
Yes it is fucking stupid to believe something Trump has written but he's getting into a position where some of the stuff he writes is going to have to be taken seriously no matter how stupid it is.
Re: Fake News? (Score:5, Insightful)
Furthermore, I don't think we've ever a generation that was so hated by their parents, nor one that had to face roadblocks being placed in at every step of the way decades in advance.
Grandparents, not parents.
Millennials are large enough to challenge the political power of the Baby Boomers. The Boomers, having utterly dominated politics and been the focus of the vast majority of marketing for their entire lives, are not taking this transition well.
Normally each subsequent generation is larger than the previous, so the power transition is more gradual and less shocking to those being replaced. For example, GenX's political and social beliefs are between the Boomers and Millennials. But GenX is too small to displace the Boomers so the Boomers retained power.
The big gulf between the generation losing power and the generation gaining power has created a lot of acrimony, especially because the side losing power can't do anything about it. Their loss of power is as inevitable as death, mostly because death is the primary cause of it. So they rage, lash out, and abuse while they still can. But soon they won't have the influence to do so. And they know it.
Re:Fake News? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Fake News? (Score:5, Insightful)
I'm not going to knock Jon Stewart, he did an excellent job. But he was a comedian who was less of a joke than the rest of the news. That is what our problem is.
Re: (Score:3)
there are good reasons someone can change their mind, but to do so and claim you haven't is wrong).
If I learned anything from the Bush-Kerry election, it's that to change your mind for any reason, even a good one, is also wrong.
Re: (Score:3)
Fake "news show" not "fake news" show.
Good lord, man. Take 30 seconds to think before you write something.
Re:Fake News? (Score:5, Informative)
fake (news show)
NOT a
(fake news) show
Big difference.
Re: (Score:2)
"Self-investigate" while carrying a high-velocity, rapid fire, large magazine rifle, pointing said rifle at hapless employees, and firing a shot into the floor = alt right.
Re: (Score:3)
Who happened to walk into a business and shoot because he was goaded on by GOP propaganda spread not just by random trolls, but party leaders. The Republican party has a real mess on its hands. This will not end well.
Re: (Score:3)
Does this mean you are willing to accept responsibility on behalf of Dem propaganda for the 2010 shooting at the Family Research Council where a guy walked into a business with a gun, bag full of chick-fil-a and a list of 'hate groups' from the SPLC and shot someone?
No?
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
The guy showing up at a pizza restaurant with a gun to "investigate it" is a retard, but this case is yet another entry in the list of things that has been bugging me about the "fake news" thing.
Why are we calling this "fake" news instead of "incorrect news" or "wrong news" or "wacko conspiracy theory"? My guess is that deep down, the people that are pushing back against what they call "fake" news doesn't care about truth or falsehood, only the messenger.
Re: (Score:3)
Re:"self investigate" == alt.right (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:"self investigate" == alt.right (Score:5, Insightful)
Why are we calling this "fake" news instead of "incorrect news" or "wrong news" or "wacko conspiracy theory"?
Because "fake news" has a very clear meaning that should be apparent to anyone who knows what the word "fake" means. Where do you use the word "fake"? You use it in places where something that is known to be false by the originator has the appearance of truth.
That's different from "wrong" or "incorrect" because those can result from simple errors. "Fake" implies that the person who creates the "news" KNOWS it's fake.
Fake news can have lots of different motivations.
-- It can be satire or parody, like the Onion.
-- It can be produced by people who just want to make money -- as it apparently were in this past campaign by some Balkan teens (who are hawking this fake news just like people hawk fake watches or "designer" purses).
-- It can be deliberate propaganda, made up by someone with a particular perspective intended to energize (or outrage) other people with that perspective.
-- It can even be a hoax created by those who want to embarrass their opponents by getting them to "take the bait" and then reveal that it's BS all along (again, something that multiple people have admitted doing to try to sabotage the past election).
All of these things are encompassed by the clear and unambiguous word "fake," i.e., something KNOWN TO BE false that looks like the real thing.
There are lots of folks who have been reading headlines about "fake news" recently and assuming it's about something else -- e.g., partisan sites spreading biased propaganda. But that's NOT FAKE NEWS. That's opinion or biased reporting or whatever. It may have its own problems, but biasing or distorting news by selectively choosing what to report or how to report it is NOT FAKE NEWS.
Actually making something up and knowingly publishing something literally false ("Person X did Y in city Z" when you know that didn't happen) *IS* fake news.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
> "Fake" implies that the person who creates the "news" KNOWS it's fake.
So which of the people reporting on the weird Podesta email about the "pizza-related map" the realtor found and offered to return to Podesta believe the email doesn't exist? Which of the people who found the jimmycommet Instagram (now only available as archives...) believed the photos weren't creepy? Which of the people who saw the photo they tagged as #chickenlovers believes they didn't see that?
See, if you actually want to debunk
Re:"self investigate" == alt.right (Score:4, Insightful)
So which of the people reporting on the weird Podesta email about the "pizza-related map" the realtor found and offered to return to Podesta believe the email doesn't exist?
The "fake" here is:
Which of the people who found the jimmycommet Instagram (now only available as archives...) believed the photos weren't creepy?
The fake here is the "creepy" was created by the conspiracy: The pictures of children enjoying pizza are creepy because of the pedophilia claims. ...Unless you want to claim Chuck-E-Cheese's entire marketing for the past several decades is creepy.
Which of the people who saw the photo they tagged as #chickenlovers believes they didn't see that?
And which of the people who saw they photo actually have any relevant information about said photo?
This entire "scandal" is an updated version of the McMartin preschool hysteria.
Re:"self investigate" == alt.right (Score:4, Insightful)
See, if you actually want to debunk this, these are the questions you have to answer. These are the claims you have to shoot down.
WTF? I was mildly interested in this story and looked at the facts. None of the "facts" lead to anything terribly interesting. I am reminded of the (supposed?) words of Cardinal Richelieu: If you give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest of men, I will find something in them which will hang him.
It is up to YOU to provide proof that YOUR interpretation of the facts is real. There are no facts like actual children disappearing or reporting things to the police. There are no facts like pictures of people doing bad things to children. There are no facts at all that directly support this theory in any way. It is all grasping at possible interpretations and running with them. Until YOU can show that YOUR interpretation has something real behind it, this is a fake news story.
No wonder you are anonymous.
Re: (Score:3)
So are you agreeing Pizzagate is not fake news? It's a conspiracy theory. Nobody just made it up. They found weird emails with weird statements that no one would make that look like some kind of code and weird social media accounts with weird stuff posted to them. And nobody's bothered to explain "oh...this is what a pizza-related map handkerchief is, don't you feel silly now?" Or explain how one...I can't remember what it was "plays dominoes better on pizza or pasta" or whatever that weird message was.
I'm
Re:"self investigate" == alt.right (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
He had whiteness to protect him.
If this guy had been black, the pizza parlor would have been nuked from space.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
If this guy had been black, the pizza parlor would have been nuked from space.
Useful tip: You're more likely to be shot by police if you're white while carrying a weapon. It's in all the crime stats you'd care to look at. [themarshallproject.org] Don't let that fake media narrative get you down.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Good, point, but unfortunately, you're Mashiki. So, based on previous actions the link is:
* 65% probability: doesn't say what you claim
* 25% probability: from some very dubious site that also doesn't say what you claim
* > 9.9% probability: a broken link
* < 0.1% probability: actually backs up your claim. Note that 0.1% is an upper bound. We don't have any past data in this category.
Re:But bringing an assault rifle??? (Score:4, Informative)
Re:But bringing an assault rifle??? (Score:5, Insightful)
That would only be relevant if there were a 50:50 ratio of black and white people. In fact your own link doesn't suggest what you are suggesting, it instead accepts that black people are more likely to get shot by cops and blames it on them being violent criminals.
Re: (Score:3)
It's almost as bad of a conspiracy theory as the US Govt claiming the Russians were behind the Podesta leaks. Just make up evidence!
Any nutbar who would like to go to Russia to "self investigate" the Kremlin at gunpoint has my full support
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Yeah, I never really saw this reported as "news" anywhere (not that it wasn't eventually picked up on several blog sites). This was more of a discussion board/twitter "investigation." I never really gave it much credibility, but when all the MSM sites start yelling "fake news" in unison, it does peak my curiosity. It's not like pedophile scandals are that rare among people in power.
It might be inaccurate news, but I have no doubt that the people looking into this believe its real.
Innumeracy for the fail (Score:5, Insightful)
> It's not like pedophile scandals are that rare among people in power.
Uh, yes they are fucking rare.
Just because you've seen a handful of them busted on the news doesn't make it common, it just means you are yet another innumerate. How many people in power are there? Tens of thousands - celebrities, congress, their staffs, corporate officers, millionaires, etc. Add them all up and then compare them to the number of cases of pedos among them. Its no different, probably less in fact, than the ratio of pedos to non-pedos in the general population.
Its precisely your kind of stupid-ass logic, completely untethered from reality, that let idiots like the shooter convince themselves that pizzagate is real.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
I'm calling BS on this.
First, no military in the world issues AR-15 rifles as standard equipment. The AR-15 design was the basis for the M-16, M-4, and other rifles but the AR-15 as available to the civilian population is far from common in any military.
Second, an "assault rifle" is a class of weapon that is capable of burst and/or fully automatic fire. There are some true assault rifles in private possession in the USA but the people that own them would not carry them into a pizzeria to put holes in thei
Re:These wackos are cows with guns (Score:5, Insightful)
He was a nutcase, just like in this instance.
Apply Occam's Razor.
One nutcase, wound up by online trolls.
Re: (Score:3)
Most gun violence is perpetrated by low income people living in high crime areas. The people in those particular high crime areas tend to vote overwhelmingly Democrat (when they do vote).
Liberal news media outlets only care about gun violence when people outside of that demographic are involved. They usually focus on weapons that only account for a tiny minority of gun mayhem.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
The exception, not the rule. Any more stupid questions?
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
https://goo.gl/maps/Lvj4ec9pE9... [goo.gl]
It's not actually as exciting as it sounds.
Re:These wackos are cows with guns (Score:4, Informative)
Nidal Hassan, No political registration in either Texas or his prior state of residency Virginia, because neither requires registering as a member of a particular party.
Seung-Hui Cho, resident alien with no voting rights. As such he never registered to vote, party affiliation not known.
That's just a couple examples off the top of my head. The list you pulled these from was debunked years ago. Nutjobs come from both sides of the political spectrum.
Re: These wackos are cows with guns (Score:3, Interesting)
Violent crime is down significantly from the 1970s. How does that jive with your theory?
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
Have you read the stickied list of so-called "proof" at the Voat Pizzagate page?
Sentences deliberately taken out of context, obvious office in-jokes, tons of dad humor that I recognize from all the places I've worked.
People are reading a hell of a lot more into this than it warrants. E-mail correspondence taken out of context can be interpreted in a lot of ways, especially if it was related to conversations, text messages or chats that happened beforehand. People are only seeing maybe only the 20% of the co
Re: (Score:3)
it's an open carry state, holster or sling up and stop by for pizza
WTF? First DC is NOT a state; second, DC does NOT allow open carry. Here's your cheat sheet: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]