Facebook Messenger Launches 6-Screen Group Video Chat (techcrunch.com) 16
An anonymous reader quotes a report from TechCrunch: Facebook Messenger is launching its own split-screen group video chat feature. Six users can appear in split-screen at the time and don Snapchat-style selfie masks, while 50 total can listen and talk over voice while sending text, stickers, emojis, and GIFs. Group video chat starts rolling out worldwide on iOS, Android, and web, today, though Android will have to wait for the MSQRD-powered selfie masks that might not ever come to desktop. It's free on wi-fi but standard data charges will apply on cellular connections. The launch makes Messenger the first popular western messaging app with group video chat. It's managed to beat FaceTime/iMessage, Google Duo, and Snapchat to the punch. U.S. teens might be most familiar with the format from the recent rise of Houseparty, the new app from the makers of Meerkat. Messenger group video chat works a little differently, but with a similar design. Instead of simply logging into an ever-present video chat room that notifies friends like on Houseparty, you deliberately select friends or a group text thread to invite to a video call. Once in, up to 4 Messenger users can share big slices of the screen, while Houseparty accommodates 8. Between 4 and 6 callers, the Messenger screen switches to a gallery format, with whoever is speaking taking up the bulk of the screen with little thumbnails of everyone else at the bottom. And everyone beyond the first 6 up to 50 callers will only be able to listen, speak, and send content but won't appear in the video gallery.
Future (Score:2)
It's too bad the present generation of VR sucks. But in 15 to 20 years, when they can finally squeeze a 5K per eye display into a VR headset .. that will take video chat to the next level. Autonomous vehicles may be widely available too, so I imagine that could make things crazy.
Up to 6, huh? (Score:2)
Is that supposed to be impressive? Doesn't Skype already support a lot more simultaneous participants on video chat?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Is that supposed to be impressive? Doesn't Skype already support a lot more simultaneous participants on video chat?
Yes, this is just a PR news release.
The current winner right now is Google Hangouts, with 9 participants, plus an unlimited number of live viewers.
The problem with Skype is that if you have one person with a slower connection, everyone's connection will slow down to that lowest common denominator. In the case of Google Hangouts, the video-audio feeds get all merged into one stream on the server-side, so even if you have one person with a slow connection, only that person's video will seem choppy without deg
Re: (Score:2)
Cisco's Spark and WebEx can way more. :P
Kik (Score:2)
Kik released a version with group video chat last week.