The Disappearing American Grad Student (nytimes.com) 268
There are two very different pictures of the students roaming the hallways and labs at New York University's Tandon School of Engineering. At the undergraduate level, 80 percent of the students are United States residents. But that number, The New York Times reports, falls below the 20 percent mark when you move to the graduate level (Editor's note: the link could be paywalled). From the report: The Tandon School -- a consolidation of N.Y.U.'s science, technology, engineering and math programs on its Brooklyn campus -- is an extreme example of how scarce Americans are in graduate programs in STEM. Overall, these programs have the highest percentage of international students of any broad academic field. In the fall of 2015, about 55 percent of all graduate students in mathematics, computer sciences and engineering were from abroad, according to a survey by the Council of Graduate Schools and the Graduate Record Examinations Board. In arts and humanities, the figure was about 16 percent; in business, a little more than 18 percent. The dearth of Americans is even more pronounced in hot STEM fields like computer science, which serve as talent pipelines for the likes of Google, Amazon, Facebook and Microsoft: About 64 percent of doctoral candidates and almost 68 percent in master's programs last year were international students, according to an annual survey of American and Canadian universities by the Computing Research Association. In comparison, only about 9 percent of undergraduates in computer science were international students (perhaps, deans posit, because families are nervous about sending offspring who are barely adults across the ocean to study).
Everyone is getting an MBA (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Everyone is getting an MBA (Score:5, Interesting)
As one of those STEP MBA, it comes down to a bunch of factors.
1. Ageism: As a Gen-Xer, I am getting too old to be attractive to the hot new tech companies. They look at skills such as SQL, C, C++, FORTRAN, SOAP, Unix systems as skills of a bygone era. While GO and Swift and No-SQL, RESTFUL Services as the future, Even if I put this new stuff on my resume, it is covered by the fact that I know the Old stuff too, and people think I am just padding my Resume.
2. Skill sets gap: What you study in Grad school vs. what the industry needs is quite different. If you code stuff too advanced then what the others can comprehend, then your code is mostly useless, because you will be stuck maintaining it, and not moving onto the new product, So you need to keep your skill at a level where the others can cover for your.
3. Limited Promotion Chain: As a tech worker, you can only get so far up, until the company decides you are too expensive for what they need. So you need alternate non-tech skills to keep yourself as a valuable asset.
4. Able to Talk the Talk: Having a technically competent MBA on your team is quite useful, as they can often explain things on how the bosses see things. Here is an actual Cost Benefit analysis of making your program run 10x faster, by fixing the indexing, at the cost of an 1 hour downtime. Present new ideas in terms of the company strategy. And being able to isolate the tech workers from a lot of the Executives bad decisions.
5. A way out of tech: As part of ageism, there may get to a point where I will not be able to adapt to the new technology. So with my MBA I can go directly into management even in a different sector all together.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Even if I put this new stuff on my resume, it is covered by the fact that I know the Old stuff too, and people think I am just padding my Resume.
Just omit the unnecessary skills.
If you're serious about job hunting, you should be sending a custom resume for each opening.
Personally, I found it easiest to write up a huge "master" resume with all of my history and highlights. I update whenever I change jobs, undertake a meaningful new project, get promoted/transferred, or whatever. I trim it down and tweak it for each opening.
Dropping from 5+ pages to a typical resume of 1-1.5 pages takes a bit of thought, and it forces me to think about how I present m
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
I even went to the school in TFA, and I can say for a fact that Grad students in their programs were kind of held hostage (used to be anyway). I have heard this is a common practice all over the US. Prof's would do anything possible to drag out their service and only students on visa's had to put up with it. All of us with citizenship would either rush out the door with our degree...or without, after what we deemed a reasonable course-load.
The problem is this: employers largely need highly educated AND high
Re: (Score:3)
They don't want Computer Science Grad students either. They want someone who can implement the stuff that the Execs had purchased from a vendor who lied threw their teeth to sell. It uses "Advanced AI" to do stuff your existing product already did.
Tuition reimbursement, is a good way for a company to keep their staff from leaving the company. They will be working as long as they are in school, and may be up for promotion by the time they are done. If they are not up to promotion, then they will quit the
Re: (Score:2)
They chuck molars?
Re:Everyone is getting an MBA (Score:5, Interesting)
That's the position that I find myself facing. I have a MS in a technical field but in order to advance my career, I'm looking at having to get an MBA that will only open career paths that I don't really want.
I prefer to remain technical but there's a ceiling that's difficult to break through without going that route.
LK
Re: (Score:2)
I don't have an MBA, and I'm a manager.
Re: (Score:2)
He wants to be a good one.
Re: (Score:2)
MBA doesn't mean a whole lot for an engineering manager. MBA doesn't mean a lot for most managers.
Re: (Score:2)
apartment or trailer park?
Re: (Score:2)
Why don't you do it, then?
Now, let's assume you did. What do you do next?
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Back when I worked a retail job, one of my co-workers was trying to be a student, hold down a nighttime job, and still do things for his church on the weekends. I caught him falling asleep on his feet twice in the first week.
He was in early 20s. Some people just can't do that shit, no matter how young they are. Okay, he wasn't a grad student... he was a full-time undergrad, so he wasn't scheduling any significant time for sleep, but I think my point still stands.
If you're working a full time job, it isn't a
Re: Everyone is getting an MBA (Score:3, Interesting)
There's also a lot more time suck than your job. You also have to maintain all sorts of other crap regularly be it a vehicle, house, investments, family, relationships...
The simple fact is that a graduate degree does not necessarily give high ROI compared to alternative career options. Sometimes, I regret studying a science at all because our economic system isn't really designed to reward these behaviors very well considering the work involved. There are so many other better options out there. Graduates ar
Re: (Score:2)
A full time student takes 3 or 4 courses. How is half the load draining? If you're a 20-24 year old, you can manage to do both job and grad degree.
No, that's a full time student who doesn't work will do at least 3 courses per semester in order to keep the "full-time" status. For those who work full/part time and want a full time status as well must do at least 2 courses per semester. And who in their right mind early 20s would have a functional job and go to grad school at the same time? They should either secure the job first and then go to school later (either by themselves or companies pay for), or go directly back to school and finish it before ge
Re: (Score:2)
a person with that ethic shouldn't be concerned with the "observations" of nothing more than an internet troll, easy to throw shit when you are behind a keyboard, go back to reddit, loser
Not sure if it is worth it (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Because your grandfather didn't found the company.
Next!
Cost (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Cost (Score:5, Insightful)
The cost of education has skyrocketed to the point that it may have just become a bad investment. The cost of graduate degrees if one is required to get student loans to complete leaves you with years and years of debt. If you aren't lucky enough to land a high paying job as soon as you complete you degree you are left struggling to make the investment in education worth it. Basic economics-high cost means people won't buy. Numbers will most likely continue to fall as cost rises.
Wish I had mod points to mod this up. I think this is it plus I've worked my whole work career in IT after graduating with a BS in Computer Science and I've never seen a real need even for people with a master's degree, let alone a PhD. I've known of cases where PhDs actually can be detrimental and people won't get hired because they are "overqualified". So with no real pressure to have to get advanced degrees to get jobs and some pressure against the most advanced graduate degree, yeah, pretty much it's only going to be rich foreigners and a small number of really determined Americans who are going to do this. Of course if you want more Americans with advanced STEM degrees, actually stopping the devaluing of the American IT worker might be a really good way to accomplish that.
Re: (Score:3)
Speed of deployment usually isn't worth sacrif
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Cost is a factor, agreed 100%. I have a masters in Chemical Engineering, but couldn't get a job in that field. I've know 4 other Chem Eng. with the same problem. I now work it the IT field. And I'll tell you grad student is a fancy term for the word slave.
But even when I was in grad school and trying for the doctoral program, I ran into a cost problem. Not my cost either. The foreign students pay more than American. To get into the doctoral program at the school I went to (Texas A&M), you have to a take
Re:Cost (Score:5, Insightful)
Ah, this misconception keeps being put out there. I agree that graduate education is generally a poor investment, but it's not because of the cost.
A PhD in STEM typically does not require any student fees paid by the student. If your university is requiring you to pay fees out of pocket to do graduate research, you're at the wrong place. Run away very quickly. Not to put to fine a point on it, but in the US, the vast majority of STEM grad students are paid to go to grad school. More than that, if you're a potential immigrant to the US, the visa you need to be a student is much easier to get than what you need to work, and is almost always sponsored by the university.
There is a cost to getting a PhD, though. You'll spend 3-8 years making a very low salary, working on a project that may not go anywhere, for a degree that in the end you may not get. Your experience will not directly translate into marketable skills, and may not translate into a higher salary.
I have a PhD, and employ many scientists in PhD and non-PhD positions at a company. Our good junior scientists don't go to grad school because 1) they're paid at least double what they'd make as a grad researcher and 2) they see that in the real world, having a PhD does not translate directly into a better job.
There is a societal cost to subsidizing STEM grad students. First is an over-supply of labor. Again, very simply: we have too many PhDs. We produce many more PhDs than there are PhD level jobs available. This has been discussed many times on Slashdot in the last few years. Second, universities gain extraordinarily cheap labor that is generally paid for by external sources (grants). This creates a strong downward wage pressure. It's very easy for a company to go to a very good university and pay a research team a fraction of the market cost for performing a study. I have to justify the value of keeping our IP in house to maintain our internal professional science team.
The result is a job market that disadvantages higher education, and a higher education system that values grant winning more than job skills. In my field (physics) we've been on this downward spiral of growing disconnect between market and academy since the 1970s.
Re:Cost (Score:4, Interesting)
I'm working full time while pursuing a PHD. As a result, I'm getting paid significantly more than the cost of attending school but trading off a complete lack of time. I may not survive to graduation but so far the experience alone is worth it.
Re: (Score:2)
A bad investment for the individual perhaps, but society is in trouble if the supply of highly skilled workers decreases. That's why in most developed countries the cost is heavily subsidised for everyone.
The idea of paying for someone else's education seems to upset a lot of people in the US, and increasingly in the UK too. They are usually the same people who complain that they have to wait a long time to see a doctor and then that doctor is foreign, but for some reason don't connect the dots.
Re: (Score:3)
I did the math, and even though I went to school a long time ago, when things were far cheaper, and even though I got 1.5 out of 2 graduate degrees paid for, it's still barely worth it. If I had gone on to be a master electrician, I'd out-earn my current career trajectory until my mid-50s. After that my education will likely put me quite a bit ahead, especially if I stick around working until I'm 70.
With the student loans and the time spent in school earning negative money, making $15 an hour as an apprenti
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
just saying that it is the cost is a one dimensional argument.
It's an economics argument, of course it's one dimensional. (sarcasm)
ivory tower vs job skills vs trade schools (Score:2)
Lot's universities still have at least some level of the ivory tower / teaching you to work in the universities / ivory tower system.
But at the same time real job skills don't really fit with the loads of theory and you have lots of professors that have been in the ivory tower there full life and have little real work place exp in there fields.
At the same the the trade / tech schools have been both push to offer degrees and get held down by the accreditation systems as they do poorly with the gen edu / theo
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Grad schools discriminate (Score:4, Interesting)
Grad schools discriminate in favor of international students.
Two key factors why:
1) international students generally pay more money to the schools
2) the people selecting admissions for grad school think "if I admit this unfortunate international student then they won't be sent back to their home country where conditions are much worse than the US"
I have heard that second one straight from the mouth of an Associate Dean in a large US university's CS department.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Well if one person said so then clearly evey grad school program in every college must be exactly the same. *rolls eyes*
Re:Grad schools discriminate (Score:5, Insightful)
I have heard that second one straight from the mouth of an Associate Dean in a large US university's CS department.
Good old anecdata.
gop fix is to make us students pay the same and lo (Score:2)
gop fix is to make us students pay the same and have uncapped loans with no bad credit discrimination
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Grad schools discriminate in favor of international students.
Two key factors why: 1) international students generally pay more money to the schools
At the undergrad level, where students are actually paying tuition, this is true: universities go out of their way to recruit international students who pay full freight. Without such students, domestic tuition would be even more than it is. Really.
However, this article is about graduate students in fields where most of them are supported by assistantships, so the school gets teaching or lab minion time out of them rather than money. So: not relevant to this discussion.
By the way, this is in no way n
It's all cost/benefit analysis (Score:5, Insightful)
Education is no longer about advancing human knowledge or you making a contribution to that unless you started out independently wealthy. Getting a higher education is largely about being more valuable in the job marketplace to obtain more income. The value proposition of a PhD or a Doctorate in this context is suffering due to the Law of Diminishing returns. The cost of college education has increased dramatically due to the high availability of student loans and the amount of additional income you get from having such a credential is not proportional to the cost. It seems to me, some people depending on their needs consider a Bachelors Degree or an MBA to be the sweet spot in terms of garnering the income for their life's needs.
And you know... college is not the uber source of knowledge. If what you really seek is knowledge, you will always learn more from self-directed, focused study on the areas that you want to know more about. College is actually not the best source of information in my experience. Those with self drive will accumulate more knowledge faster without the college curriculum getting in their way.
Re:It's all cost/benefit analysis (Score:5, Insightful)
The cost of college education has increased dramatically due to the high availability of student loans and the amount of additional income you get from having such a credential is not proportional to the cost.
I think you've got it a bit backwards. The increase in the need for student loans is because of the reduction in state support for public universities and colleges and a concomitant increase in the tuition necessary to pay for the education. Back in the early '70s and before, state government support paid for 70 to 75% of the cost of the education of in-state students with the remaining coming from tuition. Tuition was generally affordable by middle class families and there was not very costly financial aid for qualified students from less wealthy families. Out of state students paid the full cost, though some may have had scholarships to pay some of the tuition. For in-state students the largest cost was probably for housing and food. Things have changed dramatically since then with state government support generally amounting to about 20% of the cost of an education, if not less. Obviously, tuition for both in-state and out-of-state students has increased to make up the balance. Universities have also found a revenue source from international students who pay the full cost of their education who often get complete support from their governments. This source of income is particularly important for graduate programs in the laboratory natural sciences. Private schools have similar situations and students from not wealthy families need to find some kind of financial aid to attend them.
When state governments find that revenue projections can't meet proposed expenditures the first thing that faces cuts is support for higher education. IIRC, this is exactly what happened last year in my home state, Colorado, when the proposed expenditures were something like $300 million short on the revenue side. This was the first thing out of the mouth of our Democratic governor. I guess legislature and governor managed the situation somehow.
Re: (Score:2)
> The increase in the need for student loans is because of the reduction in state support for public universities and colleges and a concomitant increase in the tuition necessary to pay for the education.
That's certainly a part of it. But haven't costs risen dramatically [huffingtonpost.com]?
If government support had stayed the same, would costs NOT have risen dramatically?
> Back in the early '70s and before, state government support paid for 70 to 75% of the cost of the education of in-state students with the remaining c
Re: (Score:2)
Financial aid and scholarships are more like a gift w
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
Disagree. If you're brilliant and interested in academic research as a career then you can live reasonably comfortably by getting a Ph.D. and pursuing that goal, even if you aren't starting from a position of wealth. "Reasonably comfortably" does not mean lavishly.
Re: (Score:2)
There are something like 25x the number of PhDs graduating than there are slots for new people in academia. Having as a goal becoming a tenured professor has become like having as a goal becoming a professional athlete: don't plan on it (which doesn't mean don't try).
If your goal is a job in industry then a graduate degree can help with some jobs
If your goal is a green card, then a masters degree is a definite win. Why is anyone surprised than most people getting masters degrees are prospective immigrants?
it fail at professional athlete then get free scho (Score:2)
it fail at professional athlete then can make the college team and get free schooling.
But fail at becoming an tenured professor end up on food stamps with big loans over your head.
http://www.chronicle.com/artic... [chronicle.com]
Re: (Score:2)
The point of College isn't just to get people to read textbooks and other material at their own pace, which is what self-study is all about, but rather be a more structured way of learning things and ensuring that students actually learned what was taught and didn't just skim read the material f
student loans need bankruptcy (Score:2)
student loans need bankruptcy and then you will see lot's of change for the better.
Re: (Score:2)
I've always been under the impression that the purpose of college was to instill strong problem-solving and critical-thinking skills. Unfortunately, greed has pretty much destroyed that notion.
I'm not sure if you're being serious or being a troll but anyone who has attended a university knows that only some majors would actually involve that. Literature, History, Art, etc. don't really afford that specifically as a discipline. STEM majors certainly focus on strong problem solving as do business and legal majors.
Re: (Score:2)
It's a distorted market influenced by easy money from government backed loans.
This precisely. For reference [wikipedia.org]:
Nearly all students are eligible to receive federal loans (regardless of credit score or other financial issues). Federal student loans are not priced according to any individualized measure of risk, nor are loan limits determined based on risk. Rather, pricing and loan limits are politically determined by Congress. Undergraduates typically receive lower interest rates, but graduate students typically can borrow more. This lack of risk-based pricing has been criticized by scholars as contributing to inefficiency in higher education.
It's the visas (Score:5, Insightful)
Let's say you're in China/India, and want to work in the US.
You get your undergrad degree locally, and then come to the US to get a Masters. You then get to work for a few years on a visa (I think OPT-1), after paying for just 2 years of school. They could come as an undergrad in the US, but then you have to pay for 4 years of US school, which is not as good of a deal. This is the cheapest way to get a guaranteed work visa in the US--I would expect for some students, the schooling itself doesn't really matter, they are basically paying for the visa. And schools love it since they can get these students to pay full price for their Masters programs. The article itself mentions this visa program at the end in passing--but they miss the whole point.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
More than just full price...a lot of these students pay a premium, in some cases as much as 3X what the average American student would pay. And a lot of these students are on a full ride, whether it's paid by their nation of origin or their family. It's enough of a financial incentive for the education institution that they actively reserve slots and recruit students into these programs.
It was enough that a close friend of mine had to shut down a very successful paid internship program for a defense contrac
Re: It's the visas (Score:2, Interesting)
This ^^ and, a number of people Iâ(TM)ve worked with used it as a means to get a degree recognized in the US. Their original school in their home country may be decent there but has zero name recognition here. Or the educational standards are different. So they get into a masters program here to get the visa and to get a degree that is marketable here.
Buying Credibility too (Score:2)
It's cheaper to do it somewhere else (Score:5, Interesting)
It's cheaper to go to Germany and get it than it is to get it here in the USA, for example. And there's universities all over central and south america that are also excellent and maybe a goddamned order of magnitude cheaper. Maybe back when our schools were the envy of the world, it was worth it, but they were also a lot cheaper then, and that was also a long time ago.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, this is why people from all over the world are coming to the US for schooling.
Two words: Student visa [internationalstudent.com] , which makes you eligible to get a year of work visa, which then establishes eligibility to get a longer-term work visa, and is thus also a path to eventual citizenship. The USA is still a better place to live than a lot of other countries. School is also an important place to do networking, so it's a draw even for people in more affluent or up-and-coming nations in certain fields.
Re: (Score:2)
Except that people from all over the world go to all kinds of countries for schooling. USA is not nearly the only country with international students.
Re: (Score:2)
It's cheaper to go to Germany
Yes but how's that help you overcome American elitism and visa issues?
Not a new phenomenon (Score:5, Interesting)
When I was in EE grad school, back in the early 1980s, I was one of six US-born EE graduate students, out of 102 grad students at my major state university. When a friend of mine went through the same program in the late 1980s, he was the only US-born Ph.D. candidate in the same EE department.
As a rule, the foreign-born graduate students with which I was familiar were smarter than I was and worked like dogs, frequently sleeping in the lab to avoid wasting the time needed to travel back to married student housing. They had and have my complete respect.
Re: (Score:3)
If it's not going to increase my pay, why get it? (Score:4, Insightful)
If I got a CS Masters degree, it wouldn't significantly affect my pay or my ability to get another job. If I got a PhD, it might, but the odds are not all that good.
So why get one? "Love of learning" is handled by side projects that don't require sending off large tuition checks, and I can do that on a schedule that fits with the rest of my life.
Want more STEM graduate students? You're gonna have to pay them more when they're done.
Re: (Score:2)
Most people pursue Ph.D.'s because they want to do academic research as their "day job" or because they're eying one of those fancy NFL money [nytimes.com] jobs in AI or finance.
Re: (Score:2)
I found that a Master's degree helped me get jobs. Especially early on when I didn't have a ton of experience.
This is even more true when the economy is doing poorly and the job market is competitive, like it was for ~4-7 years after the 2007 recession (depending on the field). Students then were riding out the economic recovery period in grad school and improving their resume with an MS. The economy is doing relatively well again and STEM-field companies are hiring BS degrees, so having an MS in today's job market isn't as valuable.
Well, personally... (Score:2)
It's just economics (Score:3)
It's just economics: Grad school has become an export commodity. Since it's one of the few areas where the US has a positive trade balance with the world, I wouldn't complain too much. From my experience, foreign grad students are frequently paid for in their entirety by their government. Meanwhile as a US student, funding grad school was entirely my responsibility.
It really depends on whether we are producing enough grad students, and if we feel grad degrees are important for our economy going forward. Foreign governments obviously feel American grad degrees are important to their economic growth and are willing to invest in them. If we agree, then we have to invest as well. If we don't, then we can consider grad degrees as mostly an export product, which is the direction we are headed in.
Re: (Score:3)
It's economics, but you're using the wrong economics.
Back when the recession was at peak, we had news of more students going to grad school to avoid a job market with no jobs for them. Ride out the financial aid as long as possible and hope for the best. This is part of the labor force contraction effect.
When the job market recovered, people started exiting college early--even without degrees--to get into now-open jobs. Now there's no reason to stay in school.
This is part of the corrected model of M
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yup, and it happened in 2012 [sbstatesman.com].
The Malthusian theory of population has largely been abandoned for good reasons [economicsdiscussion.net], although we've seen population growth rate booms [gerrymarten.com] as a direct result of things like the Green Revolution in the 1920s--a time when we were reaching the limits for, of all things, food production and then released a whole bunch of agricultural technology only to have population suddenly double.
Rather than play whack-a-mole, I simply point out a few things:
First, that production scales until it hi
keep these guys (Score:4, Insightful)
Transcript Scams (Score:5, Funny)
One of the main causes is that overseas transcripts are often outright lies. Bought and paid for, no questions asked.
I have had many classmates and colleagues over the years whom I trust who were originally international transplants. Each any everyone of them when asked about the credibility or overseas transcripts of resumes has simply laughed and indicated they have no credibility. One of my friends recently had an issue with someone he hired from his own school back in India. The resume turned out to be fake, and the person who interviewed and showed up on day 1 were different people.
STEM isn't seen as a viable path (Score:3)
I'm an IT guy with a background in science...got a BS in chemistry way back in the day. The problem is that science is losing a lot of smart domestic people to investment banking, web startups, management consulting, etc. Foreign students come from places where scientists are revered, and that just doesn't happen in the US. When I graduated, there still was some room for a good career in the sciences, and I did consider it. But ultimately, I was kind of done with school at that point, had relevant work experience and chose to go with IT -- rather than slog through years of Ph. D. work to maybe possibly get a tenured faculty position.
Tell your average 22 year old that they have the choice of spending years as a researcher and a tiny sliver of hope for a permanent position, OR, go spend 2 years getting an MBA, work for Goldman Sachs and never worry about money again, OR, go work for Facebook/Google and devise new algorithms for getting people to click on ads, OR, go work for Accenture/PwC/other management consulting firm and get paid handsomely to deliver PowerPoints to executives. Which would you choose?
The only thing I can think of that might change this is a major world war with China or India that cuts off the supply of scientific talent willing to pursue this path.
No surprise there (Score:5, Informative)
And on top of that a lot of grad schools conveniently forget to tell their students that junior faculty - not that many grad students make it that far - are averaging eighty hour work weeks at the big research universities right now when they are getting started. 40 hours goes in to the tasks you associate with junior faculty - teaching, research, assembling and running a lab - while another 40 hours per week goes in to preparing grant proposals. At many schools the junior faculty who don't pull in a substantial grant by their third or fourth year are promptly shown the door.
The money isn't there, the job security is nonexistent, the job prospects are slim. Not many Americans are masochistic enough to go that way any more. Plenty of job tracks exist for those with 4 year degrees (or even less) that pay better and have better job security than those that open up for those with advanced degrees.
Re: (Score:2)
the university takes a percentage off the "substantial grant" a faculty gets, in the name of "overhead".
Absolutely right. Fortunately most granting organizations (or at least the ones I am most familiar with such as NIH and NSF) are familiar enough with that expectation that they let you write it right into your proposal. Basically you say you need $X per year to keep the lights on and $Y per year to pay your grad students and you put it into the proposal.
Unfortunately if you are new faculty at an expensive university that ends up counting against you as you are then competing against faculty from othe
GOP Attacks the Tuition Waiver Grad (Score:5, Informative)
In the current GOP Tax plan, they are seeking to tax Grad students on the Tuition waiver (usually in the range of 25k to 50k). This would wipe out the meager stipends that middle-class and disadvantaged students require to live.
My son a Grad Student has a stipend of 20K at a school where the tuition waiver is worth 50k. He will have to pay taxes as if he were making 70K. He will have to drop out because he can't make it.
https://twitter.com/ClausWilke... [twitter.com]
They are attacking the middle-class and education all the while giving the rich a huge tax break by repealing the Estate Tax.
In CS, This Reflects The Need (Score:2)
Employers are hiring STEM BS degrees (Score:2)
The economy is doing relatively well now and employers are hiring STEM students with a bachelor's degree, so the expense of getting an MS doesn't make the person much more competitive in the job market. I work for an engineering company and have been involved in hiring new staff prior to and after the 2007 recession. Prior to 2007 when the economy was doing well, entry-level applicants and hires were mainly BS degrees. Post-recession entry-level applicants and hires were mainly MS degrees, because students
Sounds like my Master's class in 2006 (Score:2)
My employer offers tuition reimbursement so they paid for most of my Master's. The process wasn't to onerous, I had to get my department VP to sign a form and I had to take "job related" classes, pay for them upfront and then get reimbursed when the grade came in. So I used my credit card, paid a little interest and did night school. At the rate of one class a semester it took a few years to get through, but the "sacrifice" was a couple of nights a week of not watching TV and playing video games. Honestly,
Cultures & local econs view degrees differentl (Score:2)
In Asian countries an advanced degree carries far more prestige than it does in the US. In the US, practical skills and team/people skills are weighed more heavily. Titles carry lasting bragging power over there. They tend to defer more to hierarchies and titles. Our "cowboy culture" is that if you can't stay on your horse, you'll eventually be booted off the farm. Loser PhD's still get prestigious do-nothing positions over there, especially in gov't jobs, which there are a lot of because gov't and industry
No Shock At All (Score:2)
NCLB (Score:2)
This is just a consequence of 15 years of No Child Left Behind. The pipeline was sabotaged. Instead of 15%-25% of a graduating class that can actually handle college level classes, they've all infantalized nincompoops who have no more ambition in life than to netflix and chill and tell people they're triggere
Re:Gibberish much? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
With so many foreigners in the hard sciences, and the graduate students in charge of classes and labs, it makes it very difficult for US students to learn because they often can NOT understand what the grad students are saying!!
This was a problem even way back in my college days. I had grad lab students and even a couple of professors tryi
Re:Gibberish much? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
No, the point is, that the foreign students can understand the foreign instructors better than US students can....and it creates a vicious circle.
Re: (Score:2)
Only if the students and instructors come from the same country. If not I can guarantee you the opposite is actually the case.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Not only that, but often the grad students often don't actually know much about the subject being taught, at least when it comes to practical/lab courses.
Back in the days of yore, I was hired by my University to serve as an undergrad TA for a couple of the hands-on/practical courses in our Engineering department. I had done really well in those courses the year before, and the instructor respected my knowledge. It was a pretty good gig for me as well, given that I was one of the lab geeks who hung out at al
Re: (Score:2)
I had a teacher that insisted that we "shouldn't worry about memory bloat, because memory is so cheap".
That was when I realized the difference between teachers who only worked in academia, vs those with real world experience.
Re: (Score:2)
For those that don't know, this was a common practice in Ancient Greek civilization. If the people of Plato's time felt that you no longer deserved to be a citizen, you could have your citizenship revoked by the collective and thus be banished from civilization and treated as if you were dead.
Not really. Ostracism in ancient Athens was for a limited period. And it was not because somebody didn't deserve to be a citizen, it was used to prevent somebody from gaining too much power and as a way of conflict resolution. One did not need to be guilty of anything or unworthy to be exiled. The property of the man banished was not confiscated and there was no loss of status. After the ten years, he was allowed to return without stigma.
Re: (Score:2)
You really don't need to spend three/four years analysing whether Jane Austen was a closet lesbian to be able to construct a correct sentence and write one coherent paragraph.
Get off my lawn, but when I was at college I didn't know anyone, irrespective of their subject, who couldn't write properly.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You go to prestigious undergrad schools for the connections you make. You simply dont make the same connections at a grad level as by then people have friends and are set in their ways. Grad school only makes sense for foreigners who have not made a US network yet.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
In grad school, I got paid a stipend of about $25k a year. There was also $25k my school required in "tuition" from my mentor's federal grants. The proposals coming out of the "We love the poorly educated" [usatoday.com] party would have me paying taxes as if I owed $50k.
Grad students are cheap labor that America's cutting edge science depends on for it's preeminence. It's already priced out of reach fo
Sorry... (Score:2)
...but explain to me how Republicans are making Grad school expensive?
Did they set the compensation rate?
Did they set the tuition for undergrads?
Maybe you should instead look to the University. THEY are the ones that are taking you for all you have as an undergrad and then pay a pittance for your doing the bulk of the research work in the lab.
Re: (Score:2)
This is the modern right anti science, anti education policies in action/
Trump is the the last straw that will break America, sad.
No, our attitude is that science is for Asians, while we're the hipsters off campus shopping for food labeled No GMO.
Re: (Score:3)