Firefox Is Now Available On Amazon's Fire TV, Bringing YouTube Access With It (techradar.com) 49
Mozilla has announced that its Firefox web browser is now available on all Fire TV devices. While navigating web browsers on televisions isn't the most user-friendly experience, it could be the only way users can access YouTube. Earlier this month, Google pulled YouTube off the Fire TV and Echo Show since Amazon stopped selling several Google products. TechRadar reports: Though there's no explicit 'hey, this is a convenient workaround' section in Mozilla's announcement of the news, there is a section of the blog post which states that users can "go to YouTube and other sites directly from the Firefox for Fire TV home screen" and another which promises access to videos from "YouTube and other popular sites." While the companies are currently in talks to resolve their disagreements, Google's threat to pull YouTube access from the Fire TV line on January 1, 2018, is still hanging over Amazon. This threat is, however, now carries slightly less menace if Firefox browser access remains a workaround.
Will Firefox be a workaround for long? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
That wouldn't stop addons that changed the user agent string.
Re: Will Firefox be a workaround for long? (Score:3)
Remember, most people who look for a work-around use Google or YouTube. As Alphabet/Google controls both entities, it can affect how accessible work-arounds are.
Re: Will Firefox be a workaround for long? (Score:2)
They just need to use the same User-agent string as the PC.
Re: Will Firefox be a workaround for long? (Score:3)
Right now Google owns the largest provider of "free" streaming content on the internet. Restricting a hardware provider from accessing that content isn't neutral.
Although, I had forgottent that Amazon is guilty of a terms of use violation. This all began because Amazon was selling an "ad free" device without any other means of compensating Google/YouTube and channel owners for the service itself. Firefox may indeed be a work-ar
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The problem with saying 'the spirit of Net Neutrality' is that in the US 'Net Neutrality' meant 'regulating ISPs under Title II as Common Carriers'. Since neither Amazon nor Google were not ISPs them blocking each other wouldn't violate the FCC's rules.
Laws don't have a 'spirit', all that matters is the details of the law. And in fact if people are trying to convince you to support a law because its 'spirit' they're probably trying to draw your attention away from some of those details.
Re: Will Firefox be a workaround for long? (Score:2)
The spirit of a law is in the goals or ideal it was created to uphold. The hope it was created to protect.
Focusing on the letter of the law is a concession of the many failures of humanity.
Re: (Score:2)
My thoughts about NN may have missed the mark, but the "spirit" or "intent" of a law matters.
Well it does indicate your knowledge of what Net Neutrality actually is which helps us judge the merit of your other posts related to this topic.
Focusing on the letter of the law is a concession of the many failures of humanity.
Would you feel the same if you were arrested for violating the "spirit of the law"?
Re: Will Firefox be a workaround for long? (Score:2)
Amazon's removal of the Google device from the online store doesn't match with NN.
However, Google's blocking of a device from accessing their site is remarkably similar, and potentially has the same implications. If devices can't connect, except to authorized resources, then how is that any different from a tiered web?
I'll admit, NN remains a greater concern, but the question is, by how much?
Re: (Score:2)
Oh there's clearly a broader "spirit" of most laws, the general mindset that would extend the principles of a law to related areas not explicitly covered. However to believe that Google gives a crap about the spirit of net neutrality when it serves their interests to go the other way and the letter of the law allows the is naive.
Case in point, all this went down when net neutrality was formally the case and ostensibly when Google's rhetoric about net neutrality being a good thing was at a peak. That would
Re: (Score:2)
Both Google and Facebook were involved in this project which was non Net Neutral.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Basics [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
They are acting like Firefox is the only workaround for getting to YouTube. There is, of course, Kodi which has a Kodi supported (in their repository) YouTube plugin. That is if YouTube is worth it these days. I haven't done anything on YouTube at all this year.
Re: (Score:2)
They are acting like Firefox is the only workaround for getting to YouTube. There is, of course, Kodi which has a Kodi supported (in their repository) YouTube plugin. That is if YouTube is worth it these days. I haven't done anything on YouTube at all this year.
That was my thought. I wonder if FF on FTV even has a use-able 10 ft interface, on YouTube or in general.
Re: (Score:2)
Net Neutrality meant 'regulating ISPs under Title II'. It doesn't have anything to do with Google and Amazon blocking each others products on their platforms.
In fact both Google and Amazon wanted ISPs - though of course not themselves - regulated under Title II.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Is Google not in a position to block the user agent string for Firefox for Fire TV? Net Neutrality has been repealed, any other rules in place to prevent this?
Net Neutrality would not have prevented Google from doing that anyway. It only prevented ISPs from doing it, not content providers from blocking access. If it did something like that, Google, Facebook, Twitter, Amazon and the other big providers would never have supported it.
you can pay $1500 for a TV (Score:3)
One day the whole concept of advertisement will be forbidden as transfats in food or ganja from the stores, that is as a vile violation of human health. In this case: mental health.
Endless repetition (hundreds of times) of the same utterly useless crap to the ears of the same person should be declared a crime.
I hope to live to that day when you can enjoy the site of the Flatiron building without flashy animated posters splattered over all corners of Times Square, so I can turn TV on and watch a full episode of Frasier in 20 minutes instead of one hour.
Try turning off ADP and NoScript on your Firefox for a day. It's like if you put your glasses on in They Live. Myriad of annoying visual and audio pests coming at your face with persistent of steppe locusts. Incessant barrage of useless repetitions.
It's your brain, people. Protect it at all costs, don't get it washed by Pepsi Cola concoctions.
They all need to grow up (Score:2)
and stop involving innocent consumers in their stupid school playground squabbles. There is no technical reason I should have to have a Google box, an Amazon box and an Apple box because the childish fucks are determined to shut each other out. It's wasteful (energy, material and money), it's unnecessary clutter and I don't even have that many HDMI sockets. There should be enforced standards.
Re: They all need to grow up (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
That is indeed capitalism and why it needs some degree of government control to tame it (see also net neutrality)
Re: (Score:2)
like fucking 8 hour work days, you stupid troll.
Re: (Score:2)
If you think it's bad now, just wait until Disney gets their new streaming service and pulls all their content and their new Twenty First Century Fox subsidiary's content off of all the other services...
Re: (Score:2)
Name a legal, non-proprietary way of watching, say, Star Trek Discovery. I'll wait.
Another plug for Waterdfox (Score:2)
History repeats itself (Score:2)
This is the same crap that google pulled on windows phone with its youtube app.
Bottom line is these companies are jostling for position, and users are just fodder. Google has gone full microsoft!