Amazon To Take On UPS, FedEx Via 'Shipping With Amazon' (arstechnica.com) 60
According to a report by The Wall Street Journal, Amazon is planning to take on UPS and FedEx with a new shipping service named "Shipping with Amazon" (SWA). The new service will reportedly roll out in Los Angeles in the coming weeks. Ars Technica reports: Aside from first starting in LA, SWA will first serve third-party merchants that already sell on Amazon. The company plans to send drivers to pick up shipments from these businesses and deliver the packages for them. While shipping and delivery will mostly go through Amazon, anything outside of the retailer's reach will be given to the USPS and other shipping services for the "last mile" portion of the delivery. In the future, Amazon reportedly wants to open up SWA to businesses that aren't affiliated with the site -- meaning Amazon could ship and deliver packages from companies of all sizes. Amazon also believes it can compete with UPS and FedEx by making SWA more affordable for business customers, but its pricing structure hasn't been revealed.
Yeah right (Score:4)
It will probably be more "dropping your valuable item on your front porch in view of everyone - by Amazon"
Re: (Score:2)
It will probably be more "dropping your valuable item on your front porch in view of everyone - by Amazon"
Solution: Put a lock box on your porch, bolted to the concrete.
I have had one for years. The delivery guys always use it.
It only works for the first delivery of the day, but I have never had a stolen package.
I also have a locking mailbox [amazon.com]. The mailperson can put mail in, but I use a key to get it out.
Re: (Score:2)
Could you post where you live? No seriously that way everyone can avoid living there. I can leave a $20k roller cabinet full of tools sitting in my front yard and nobody will even touch it.
Re: (Score:2)
Everyone can decide where they want to live. Even those of us who started in abject poverty and climbed our way into middle class.
Re: Yeah right (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You must live in a real shit hole that no one wants to go to. Or, on the flip side, you are the poorest in a rich neighbourhood.
Think you got that backwards. If I can leave something out and people don't steal it because it's not nailed down, doesn't make it a shithole or 'poorest in a rich neighborhood.' Try thinking on this really hard and you should figure out where you went wrong.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Another reason (Score:1)
to avoid this all-compassing octopus....
Any search for something you do on a search engine, this name pops up on top. Me hates it!
Convenience is one thing, to do the right thing is something else and our world would be a different place..
Can they doo eet ??? (Score:1)
Will be intresting if Amazon can out-logistics UPS & USPS ...
i dont think they can but will be an interesting endeavor to watch .
Re:Can they doo eet ??? (Score:4, Informative)
Have you actually seen the internals of UPS? Their technology is actually an absolute fucking JOKE. USPS and FedEx are both light years ahead of UPS, which isn't saying much, since they all use old and clusterfucked technology.
Re: (Score:3)
I don't want to see inside anyone's underwear and I don't give a shit about what's behind UPS's curtain.
All I want is delivery.
I get that from any of the services I use.
Re: (Score:1)
USPS and FedEx are both light years ahead of UPS, which isn't saying much, since they all use old and clusterfucked technology.
Have you used UPS's and FedEx end-user shipping products? I have, for the past fifteen years or so, and neither of them have changed much. FedEx may have slightly better internal tech, their web based stuff may be slightly better, but the primary software they ship their larger customers to use to directly create and manage shipments simply gets left in the dust by the stuff UPS ships, particularly so when it comes to managing batch shipments. It is mind-numbing how much more time it takes to work with the
Re: Can they doo eet ??? (Score:2)
Re:Can they doo eet ??? (Score:4, Informative)
Will be intresting if Amazon can out-logistics UPS & USPS ...
For UPS, that is easy. Their operations are not very efficient. Ask anyone who has worked there ... or dealt with them daily. For a fun activity, try to get your incompetent and arrogant UPS driver fired for negligently causing thousands of dollars of damage to deliveries. Despite dozens of video recordings from your loading dock security camera documenting his behavior, he will keep his job, and his attitude and surliness will get even worse.
USPS is much better run, and Priority Mail and Media Mail are great deals for delivering small packages. But for anything big, or express, they are not so good.
Re: (Score:2)
Your lawyer could get the insurance coverage paid, but not this person fired. We only know they didn't get the latter. They may already have the former.
Re: (Score:3)
If you truly have 'thousands' of dollars worth of damage on video, and UPS has done nothing, it's time to lawyer up.
UPS has reimbursed us for the damage, so we have no grounds to sue. But they didn't fire the guy despite our videos clearly showing him tossing packages out of the back of the truck in an arc with an apogee more than 8 feet AGL.
I understand that UPS is unionized, but there is still no excuse for keeping this jerk on their payroll. He still does our deliveries, and he no longer tosses our packages, but he does look up at the cameras and sneer almost everyday.
Re: (Score:1)
UPS has reimbursed us for the damage, so we have no grounds to sue. But they didn't fire the guy despite our videos clearly showing him tossing packages out of the back of the truck in an arc with an apogee more than 8 feet AGL.
8 feet? Yes, sue his ass for not really even trying.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
For a fun activity, try to get your incompetent and arrogant UPS driver fired for negligently causing thousands of dollars of damage to deliveries.
You're trying to get a dues-paying Teamster fired. You may prefer playing the lottery. Your odds will be better.
Re: Can they doo eet ??? (Score:2)
This is the real elephant in the room:
https://www.bizjournals.com/da... [bizjournals.com]
Bezos and Buffet have buddy buddy in some interesting ways lately, if the blockchain supply chain fires up under Amazon, it's a done deal. Forbes on same thing:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/b... [forbes.com]
Re: Can they doo eet ??? (Score:2)
Probably just buy the USPS (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
The postal service is doing just fine. Well, it was doing just fine until the Bush-era neocons passed a law mandating it to fully fund pensions for 70 years. That's right, your pro-corporate welfare Congress is busy sabotaging the USPS because it actually works and it's against the narrative for government to do anything right. So when government does do something right, especially with good employee benefits and such that actually manages to fund itself without tax money, offers useful (and nationwide t
This'll suck (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
Wait, hang on... you think Amazon is too big, so you're recommending that people use Walmart?
Walmart posts almost 4X the sales volume per year that Amazon does.
Re: (Score:2)
Welcome to the new economy.
In the new economy, none of these jobs will exist, because robots will do all of them. And good riddance. FedEx destroyed a radiator I had shipped so that delayed a repair job four days. Put a big fat hole through the side of the box. UPS tried to destroy the replacement, but they only managed to accordion the box around the edges a bit, and not to actually penetrate it, and the packaging was sufficient that this doesn't seem to have broken anything. It's not necessarily the workers' fault, they may just no
Re: (Score:2)
I've had pretty much all of those things happen with AMZL delivery. I have my street number posted in FOUR places around my corner lot and they still manage to screw things up regularly. I don't have much faith in Amazon competing with existing carriers. Not with the caliber of their current drivers.
Re: AMZL already here... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Of the packages I've had shipped by AMZL, at least 50% were either late or damaged. They have more mechanical problems than any company I've ever seen.
Mostly, they just have unexpected issues that cause a day or two delay. However, both AMZL and UPS will change your package tracking information after the fact, which is rather dishonest. They'll say it went out for delivery, but when it doesn't make it, all that info will be wiped. Amazon has "guaranteed two day delivery" but their guarantee is worthless bec
Meanwhile in the middle of the country (Score:5, Insightful)
Your Amazon packages will still come in the mail
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Sometimes their app notifies you it was delivered. About 15% of the time, that is. Their delivery service is really bad, and I didn't think anyone could remain in business being as bad as FedEx, but they proved me wrong.
AWS (Score:2)
I like Amazon's delivery model. They sent me a router in its box, rather than a box in a box. They have options for sign on delivery which is a hassle compared to they don't quibble about packages not received. I ordered a router that didn't do what I thought it would and they paid for the return shipping and when it was scanned into UPS my refund showed within the hour. (Still hate them for the 1-click patent). Compare that with driving to a box store and getting raped on price and getting raped on return
Ah finally improvement. (Score:2)
Fedex doesn't deliver at all here.
Amazon gets it right every time.
*shrug*
Brilliant Branding of "SWA" (Score:2)
Ethnic man calls in to SWA
Customer Server: "How can I help you?"
Ethnic Man: "Who can I make a complaint to?"
Customer Service: "What seems to be the problem sir?"
Ethnic Man: "One of your delivery drivers left a fucking SWA stickah on mah door!"
Too big (Score:1)