YouTube Is Full of Easy-To-Find Neo-Nazi Propaganda (vice.com) 378
An anonymous reader quotes an exclusive report from Motherboard: Through a software-aided investigation, Motherboard has found that while YouTube has managed to clamp down on Islamic extremists uploading propaganda, the video giant is still awash with videos supporting violent and established neo-Nazi organizations, even when, in some cases, users have reported the offending videos. Clips of neo-Nazi propaganda operations, hate-filled speeches, and extremists pushing for direct action have remained on the site for weeks, months, or years at a time. Arguably, many if not all of these videos may fall under YouTube's own policy on hate speech, which "refers to content that promotes violence against or has the primary purpose of inciting hatred against individuals or groups based on certain attributes," including race or ethnic origin, religion, and sexual orientation, according to the policy.
Motherboard built a tool to monitor YouTube and make a record of when the platform removed certain videos, and limited the clips to propaganda for established neo-Nazi and far-right terrorist organizations like Atomwaffen, rather than people in the so-called "alt-right." Most of the videos were discovered through simple YouTube searches of relevant organizations' names, or sometimes through the "recommended videos" sidebar after Motherboard had built up a browsing history of neo-Nazi material. For the sake of comparison, over a week-long period Motherboard also tracked pro-ISIS videos uploaded by the group's supporters and then distributed through a network of Telegram channels. Typically, YouTube removed these Islamic extremism videos in a matter of hours, including those that did not contain images of violence, but were instead speeches or other not directly violent content. But YouTube is playing catch up with neo-Nazi material. YouTube removed only two videos that Motherboard was monitoring: two identical clips of a speech from UK terrorist organization National Action.
Motherboard built a tool to monitor YouTube and make a record of when the platform removed certain videos, and limited the clips to propaganda for established neo-Nazi and far-right terrorist organizations like Atomwaffen, rather than people in the so-called "alt-right." Most of the videos were discovered through simple YouTube searches of relevant organizations' names, or sometimes through the "recommended videos" sidebar after Motherboard had built up a browsing history of neo-Nazi material. For the sake of comparison, over a week-long period Motherboard also tracked pro-ISIS videos uploaded by the group's supporters and then distributed through a network of Telegram channels. Typically, YouTube removed these Islamic extremism videos in a matter of hours, including those that did not contain images of violence, but were instead speeches or other not directly violent content. But YouTube is playing catch up with neo-Nazi material. YouTube removed only two videos that Motherboard was monitoring: two identical clips of a speech from UK terrorist organization National Action.
You can find anything on YouTube (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:You can find anything on YouTube (Score:4, Interesting)
True, but here's a crazy thought (Score:3)
Nazis have lost their meaning (Score:5, Insightful)
When so many on the left refer to anyone who disagrees with them as a Nazi the term has becoming meaningless. Maybe calling anyone with an R next to their name a nazi is a joke. I really don't know. It certainly won't end well at the polls when regular people vote for a 'correction' like they did in 2016, Brexit, and most recently Italy.
Newsflash, Trump is nothing like an actual Nazi.
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe calling anyone with an R next to their name a nazi is a joke.
OK, I'll bite. Find me a critical mass of people seriously calling Michele Bachmann or John McCain a nazi.
Weev is a nazi. Richard Spencer is close enough to a nazi that the difference is sampling error. Paul Ryan is not a nazi. "So many on the left" (whoever that refers to) don't need to call people nazis just for having an "R" next to their name when there are enough actual nazis around.
It certainly won't end well at the polls when regular people vote for a 'correction' like they did in 2016, Brexit, and most recently Italy.
You forgot France, and probably ignored the rather important points that Obama was seen as an outsider in 2008, and that
Re: (Score:2)
Spoken like a true Hillbot, still trying to gaslight people that the 2016 primary wasn't rigged. Long before we knew about the Victory Fund money laundering or Hillary outright calling the shots at the DNC, the slashed-to-the-bone debate schedule told anyone with a functioning cortex the scales were being tipped to the candidate with the greatest name recognition.
Right, as evidence b
Re: (Score:2)
It's unfortunate that the handling of domestic terrorists has become a partisan issue. The left has bomb throwing SJWs, the right has torch wielding Nazi thugs. In the face of their behavior - where they beat, maim, and kill innocent Americans - we're left paralyzed, unable to respond, unable to even quantify the problem in consistent language.
In short, we're fucked.
You mean Dems. Dems != "left" (Score:2)
Democrats aren't the left - they're just another variety of right-wing asshole, and as often as not are more extreme than the Republicans they claim to oppose.
Re: Nazis have lost their meaning (Score:5, Insightful)
If you think 50% of the nation is nazi because they voted for Trump, why haven't you started the resistance yet?
This kind of comment is exactly why the left has lost the common ground. By demonizing everyone you don't agree with, you've lost your cause.
There are Nazis and their sympathizers, they make up 0.2% of the population. In the world stage they are irrelevant, they have no relevant political presence, party or organization. Muslims and Christians make up the majority of the world population, if they start spouting off their religious nonsense as fact it's actually dangerous.
Re: Nazis have lost their meaning (Score:4, Insightful)
For the record, 50% of the nation did not vote for Trump.
48% of registered voters didn't participate in the last election; of the 52% who did, 8% voted third party. The other 44% was fairly evenly divided between D and R; so at best, any one candidate actually only received around 23% of the total overall vote, if we bother to include the disenfranchised.
The big takeaway for me in that case is the knowledge that our President is usually elected by less than a quarter of the overall voting populace.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Carlin: If you vote, you have no right to complain [youtube.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The "resistance" is nothing but a bunch of authoritarian leftwing extremists: http://www.latimes.com/local/l... [latimes.com]
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
Re: (Score:2)
If they talk about how Hitler and Mussolini were great men, then it's extremely likely they're neo-nazis.
Such as icon of modern Left FDR, who did so much good, and was a great admirer of (and admired by) both?
Google, say, "FDR Mussolini" or read, e.g., http://dailycaller.com/2016/12... [dailycaller.com]
So, what were you saying again?
Re: (Score:3)
An insightful discussion of that question:
https://www.reddit.com/r/badhistory/comments/3hi61p/the_fascists_didnt_want_to_overthrow_fdr_because [reddit.com]
And a statement about fascism from the horse's mouth (FDR himself):
http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=15637 [ucsb.edu]
Are you a Neo-Nazi? (Score:5, Insightful)
how Jews and Latinos (and anyone who isn't aryan, basically) are all scum and should be exterminated, then they're very likely neo-nazis
The DNC leadership STRONGLY supports Louis Farrakhan who is an outspoken anti-semite. He got in the news this week giving a speech about how Jews are his enemies along with many other anti-semetic remarks.
By your definition, since the DNC refuses to denounce his comments, the DNC leadership are Neo-Nazis. Which seems appropriate since they are the ones who let Robert Byrd, a KKK leader, be one of the top senators for 6 decades.
I understand you were trying to paint all Republicans/Trump supporters as nazis, but using your own words I can only conclude you believe the DNC leadership are the real Nazis. Are you ready to denounce Pelosi, Shumer, Clintons, and the rest? Or will you stick up for them showing us you also are a Neo-Nazi.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Louis Farrakhan? Seriously,
Yes, seriously. Why is it acceptable for Obama and other Democrats to embrace Farrakhan, when he has called for the deaths of Whites and rails against Jews? http://dailycaller.com/2018/01... [dailycaller.com]
that is your rebuttal of Trump saying that "being a nazi and fighting against them is the same thing"??
That's a strawman.
Re: (Score:2)
That's just dumbfuckery, given how fast Dems flee the room (Obama included) when Farrakhan's name is dropped.
Re: Are you a Neo-Nazi? (Score:2)
If by flee the room, you mean have photo-ops and call each other by their pet names. Sure.
The DNC leadership is refusing to denounce the man because he brings in cash and they would have to eat their own words.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Nazis have lost their meaning (Score:4)
When so many on the left refer to anyone who disagrees with them as a Nazi the term has becoming meaningless.
So, basically, you're a neo-nazi/white supremacist/right-wing-militant/neo-fascist/racist sympathizer?
OH MY GOD! At least TRY to to play directly into his fucking hand. Listen man, you're not helping our side. You're making us look bad. I understand it's important to you, and yes there are real actual honest-to-god nazis out there and they've been emboldened by recent politics. But immediately jumping out and accusing this guy of being all those terrible things is EXACTLY what he's talking about, and it just reinforces his point. Get your shit together Rick.
Is this staged? Is it rigged? Are Nacho and Rick actually friends and coordinating this level of face-palming?
If you think the half of the country that didn't vote for, and don't support Trump,
And get your stats right. 80.5% of America didn't vote for Trump. 80.2% didn't vote for Hilary.
Re: (Score:2)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
I accept your surrender, regardless of your obfuscating it with insults against me.
Re: (Score:2)
"Left" and "right", "conservative" and "liberal", these words have all lost their meanings. We've decided that everyone can be assigned into two inherently contradictory political clusters.
Sounds better to me than alternative (Score:5, Insightful)
What you rather happen:
A) Real actual nazis spend all free time making YouTube videos.
B) Angry nazis pushed off YouTube go outside and... do things.
You all seem to be angling for the "lets drive Nazis to take action" camp which sounds exceedingly unwise. YouTube is the greatest honeypot/time sink ever built by mankind, you are all absolutely wasting the potential there by pushing anyone away from it.
Re:Sounds better to me than alternative (Score:5, Insightful)
No the troll mod is appropriate. How is generalizing millions of people to a caricature and a stereotype in any way not a troll?
Also, wtf do you mean "dealt with"? That alone is retarded trollery. Are you going to have a Final Solution to the "nazi" problem? Seriously, are you one of those morons that think that the only way to have free speech is to restrict free speech for opinions you don't like? You do realize that the point of free speech is to protect the speech that is hated not what is universally accepted? You do realize that in that last half century that allowing nazi's/kkk/racists/whateverlabelyoubemoan to speak has had their numbers decreased? You and people that think like you are fuckin moronic.
Karma be damned but you are a idiotic troll.
Actual stats? (Score:5, Insightful)
I rtfa and there were no numbers, well they mentioned 4, but 4 doesn't seem like enough to make an 'awash'.
All that being said, I prefer to have a forum where its easier to point out the extremists because they are dumb enough to tell everyone just how well dumb they are and everyone can see it and who associates and or agrees with them too. Rather than hiding it in the shadows and pretending its not there, then being all surprised later when get clubbed over the head by some event and start crying.
But whatever, it appears that the blocking is mostly being used to silence anything deemed disagreeable anyways so the secondary effect of blocking some idiots just has to be accepted.
Alex Jones keeps dog whistling on Blood Libel (Score:2)
Seriously, I'd like to see these jerks that use euphemisms for neo-nazi talking points called out on it more.
Re: (Score:2)
First, go to YouTube and search for things like the "Jewish question" and you will find plenty of neo nazi material. Then try searching for things like AntiFa and you will find only more neo Nazis.
It would be great if YouTube did actually throw up some counter views. They are out there... But the Nazis have been working hard to crowd them out, down vote them and are good at gaming the system.
In addition, YouTube lacks almost any tools for blocking that stuff. There is YouTube Kids but that's about it, and e
Re: (Score:2)
Sadly blocking em just make em move to underground shit where they will rake on all the free victimization that was given.
Probably the best way youtube could deal with it is to just recommend the best voted debunk video of that subject it can find.
Re: (Score:2)
I agree that the best option would be promoting rebuttals, but as a general point blocking is very effective.
The far right gets very upset when they are kicked off popular services because they know that no one reads gab.ai, no one watches Vimeo. They need to be on Twitter and YouTube and Facebook to get their message out of the bubble.
That's why they have made YouTube a target.
Normal people won't seek this stuff out, the neo Nazis need to get it on to mainstream platforms and near the top of search results
Re: (Score:2)
The actual far right as far i can see generally recruits more on places like chans, where they can post their cute infographics and chip people to their side little by little.
And every time someone bans em from something, a brand new thing for the infographic to sell ideas like white genocide and the terrible control of the jews.
If you want to stop em, you need to show their potential victims that they're full of shit.
Re: Actual stats? (Score:2)
You can say the same about the far left. The message is hard to find and get out through any platform.
I have never run across Nazi content on YT, but the occasional Sarkeesian-type or Muslim rant does get promoted in a feed. Reporting them as extremism doesn't seem to work, I just ignore them.
The problem with YT right now is the demonetization of random content. If enough people don't agree with the content the creator doesn't get the money YT collects. It makes YT a pretty penny, but when game reviews and
I am sick of the negative news/info/verbiage... (Score:2)
Just asking folks,
Is there anything that YouTube does well?
I haven't seen positive news on Slashdot in a long time.
Request: Can you at least post some good news. Please..
Re: (Score:2)
Re:I am sick of the negative news/info/verbiage... (Score:4, Insightful)
YouTube makes it easy for anyone to post video about anything and for other people to find that video and watch it. It does a really good job at this.
Of course, you are going to have all kinds of people posting all kinds of video. If you don't like it, don't watch it.
You don't have to watch Nazi videos.
Re: (Score:2)
Totally agree, you can find anything on YouTube. I watch tons of brilliant university science lectures on YouTube, these are mostly public talks or bang up to date colloquia on things like genomics, virology, gravitational waves, astronomy, geology, cosmology, particle physics. I pay nothing to listen to the greatest teachers in the world, it is I would say the most wonderful thing on the Internet.
YouTube for some is the great library of Alexandra delivered to your desktop, you don't have to watch knob head
Re: (Score:3)
Some good channels:
Tested
AVE
Cody'sLab
Applied Science
Practical Engineering
Scott Manley
ElectroBOOM
Periodic Videos
NileRed
NurdRage
Re: (Score:2)
This old tony
EEVblog
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
YT only removes extreme right wing content (Score:5, Informative)
Comment removed (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Actually it doesn't even need to be extreme. Maybe just not left wing and political.
But what is neo-nazi? (Score:2)
What ever happened to defending unpopular speech (Score:5, Insightful)
1. I'd rather know what they are saying
2. I'd rather know who they are
3. I'm not cool with demands for censorship
Now, I'm about as liberal as you can get, but censorship, government or otherwise always rubs me the wrong way. Maybe it has to do with the fact that my family has been here since the beginning and has served in every conflict our country has ever had. I believe in free speech, even for the idiots who spout white supremacy/nationalism crap.
“What is freedom of expression? Without the freedom to offend, it ceases to exist.” Salman Rushdie
Re: (Score:2)
Keep your friends close, keep your enemies toaster. https://youtu.be/oLBojtg22nk [youtu.be]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
They may be asshats, delusional, and crazy, but they have a right* to be on Youtube just as much as we do. This is a disturbing trend I've been seeing in my party of late. Just because the other guy is using "free speech" as a defense and talking point doesn't mean he's wrong or that we should start tearing it down. If we seriously only supported Hippy's right to free speech when it was convenient, then we're the exact sort of person the hippies were protesting again. If our views and political ideas and ci
Islam is the only remaining ideology (Score:2)
That's because collective Western elite hivemind realizes that Islam is the only viable alternative ideology to dominating Western anti-ideology of liberalism.
During the height of Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, 40,000 volunteers from 80 countries (BBC reported it, with a map infographics - good luck finding it now) came to Iraq and Syria to fight for ideals of Islam, for the establishiment of Islam
Re: (Score:3)
Okay, you're definitely a Muslim, practicing the jihad of words via taqiya.
I prefer to deal in hard facts. Here's a good compilation:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
Re: (Score:3)
I find it really concerning when you have a video of white patriots holding guns and making speeches against anyone that is not white.
white/black and this is pretty much the historic definition of your average black panther rally. Would you suppress that group as well?
Re: (Score:2, Flamebait)
I find it really concerning when you have a video of white patriots holding guns and making speeches against anyone that is not white.
white/black and this is pretty much the historic definition of your average black panther rally. Would you suppress that group as well?
Big difference! White people in the US don't have a history of oppression, slavery, and Jim Crowism.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
There is an implicit threat of violence and intimidation at that point.
Are you concerned about rap?
You know the sort of music videos I'm talking about. What do you think youtube should do with these rap videos?
Re: (Score:2)
I find it really concerning when you have a video of white patriots holding guns and making speeches against anyone that is not white. There is an implicit threat of violence and intimidation at that point.
In the US you don't need the government to protect you if you think there is a wave of racism or threat of violence out to get you even with government complicity. Everyone can be or is armed. It's one thing to say "X people are inferior therefore genocide". It is quite another thing to actually try and commit that genocide especially when the people you want to get rid of are armed and can shoot back.
Everyone that is threatened by any racist can defend themselves. Everyone that feel they need to defend the
On the subject of neo-nazis and similar: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Your monomania is showing.
Also, you don't need to worry about the religious right any more. They did not support Trump in 2016, and Trump won anyway. Your problem now is the post-religious right. Enjoy.
Counter Point! (Score:5, Insightful)
Let the Nazi Freak Flag Fly.
Then we can publicly point out the wrongness AND contradictions of the true believers.
Banning lends a bit of anti-hero legitimacy it does not deserve.
TRUTH nails their crazy ass beliefs to the village square for all to see.
Often TRUTH changes the minds of the young and easily mislead followers before they get very far down the path of wrongness.
Actually no, it doesn't (Score:3)
Counter-point? What's the point? (Score:2)
What's the point of banning Nazi videos?
I can only guess that there are people who see "Nazism" as a growing and serious threat to the political order and that if YouTube Nazis are allowed to be on YouTube, they will achieve recruitment and thus further political success.
I think this is a crazy argument, but it seems to be the basis of wanting to stop Nazis from being on YouTube. Personally I think that most people will see them as people who fetishize swastikas and violence and not find them appealing.
I d
Re: (Score:3)
That is it. The whole point of all these russia, hatespeech, nazi and fakenews campaigns is that we should agree that Youtube , twitter and others take full control over content and put in place an array of tools to enforce the rules. Youtube itself doesn't care, it will go along with it. Then later at any time it can be decided again and again what is acceptable content and it will be enforced.
There will be possibilities for correction but these will be ineffective statistically unless the interests being
Easy to find ... (Score:2)
... Through a software-aided investigation ...
It gets worse... (Score:3)
Communist videos? (Score:5, Insightful)
Yet communist/marxist propo vids don't trigger the SJWs like the nazi ones do even though the nazis were amateurs compared to the communists/maxists when comes genocide, repression and subjugation.
Oh boy, I wish I didn't have to keep saying this (Score:2, Funny)
This is not to say communism works. It doesn't. You never get past the Dictatorship of the Proletariat because sooner or later some violent psycho like Mao or Stalin seizes power. The problem is the large transfer of ownership.
We solved this problem with Democratic Socialism. Instead of mandating equality you regulate it. You skip the massive transfer of ownership
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
even though the nazis were amateurs compared to the communists/maxists when comes genocide, repression and subjugation.
Our capitalist benefactors are weathy with the current status quo, and have paid quite a large sum for that line you spout. Communism is their biggest threat after all. They have successfully copied the evil from corrupt dictatorships onto that threat, the prediction of communism from marx.
Better dead than red, right?
Re: (Score:2)
Communism is shit. It destroys wealth and people. Yes, there are rich capitalists. Yes, there is income inequality. And ordinary people are STILL better off than they ever were under communism. How many more millions do you want to kill before you decide the experiment is a failure?
Re: (Score:2)
You still don't understand what communism is. And you likely will never even bother, just parrot what you've heard. Its not the same as failed dictatorships. But of course you'll believe anyone that tells you they're communist or socialist, instantly and without question.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
I was away from slashdot for couple months and now a top comment is basically complaining that NAZI videos aren't an issue because there are commie videos, and the commies killed more people back in the day.
I'm not going to debate the difference. I'm just going to stand in awe at the lack of self awareness and eloquence is packed into one statement. I stand in awe that there were 4 other slashdot people with votes who agreed.
"Hitler wasn't that bad people - because Stalin!" What the fuck, we got invaded by
Re: (Score:3)
I'm going to stand in awe at your own lack of self-awareness. Motherjones is a lefty rag. GooTube is overtaken by lefty social justice warriors. The attack on neo-Nazis, while ignoring even worse communism, shows what the true agenda is: neo-Nazis first, then the "alt-right", then the "alt-light", etc.
It wasn't even subtle. "A UK anti-refugee protest and speech, which includes a participant holding a flag from National Action, a neo-Nazi group the UK government banned as a terrorist organization last year.
Re: (Score:3)
Read the rest of the posts here and carefully, understand them, this isn't about supporting nazis, this is about mislabelling people who disagree with practically anything to virtually any extent as Nazi.
Censorship far beyond "just blocking Nazis"
Re: (Score:2)
Probably because that's a million megatons of horseshit capitalist propaganda. Communism/marxists freed hundreds of millions from elitist tyranny, colonialism, generation poverty. Oh, and they also defeated the actual Nazis and ended the holocaust.
You're welcome.
neo ? (Score:2)
Neo-Nazis have been around for about 70 years now. Many are retired or dead. 'Neo' means 'new' and they aren't new. Many living ones don't know or care much about the original Nazis, they just wanna hate. They need a new name.
It's not sexy, but I'm happy calling them 'hate groups'. A universal term we can apply to white Americans, Moslems, Hindus and anyone else who prefers that lifestyle. Let's include loyal followers of Kim, Assad and other petty dictators around the world and in Washington DC.
Re: (Score:2)
It's not sexy, but I'm happy calling them 'hate groups'. A universal term
I call them assholes -- much simpler, and also universal.
Re: (Score:2)
- "I call them assholes"
Lots of assholes don't hate- you haven't identified the specific group. And if you give them a 'sexy' name such as nazi, jihadist, IS, genocidists, yadda- you only create a rallying point for them. A boring name like 'hate group' may be less likely to draw more recruits.
Remember that time... (Score:4)
Hey guys, remember that one time we had that crazy idea where people could say whatever they wanted and censorship was considered a bad thing?
That was crazy, right?
How about not letting others invade our countries (Score:2, Interesting)
How about not letting others invade our countries in the first place?
I'm from Sweden which have had the most extreme immigration politics and where this together with Germany may be the hardest subject to discuss whatsoever but even here the people have always been more for less immigrants rather than more and with our current immigration politics the EU "worries" that we'll make it permanent.
What is this EU / that person / organ and why it worries about it?
Sweden has been the most pro-immigration in the EU
Re: (Score:3)
With you entirely, there's an endless supply of articles and videos out the with clear evidence that letting in millions of unchecked immigrants from horrific counties has resulted in massive crime increase, these people are simply different culturally. Not all of them, most though.
In the old days, with tighter borders, much lower immigration, the "quality" people from these regions who were educated, with good values, would escape the riff Raff and leave to other countries. Now the riff Raff practically h
Youtube's excuse for brazen censorship (Score:3)
Why was Pat Condell's most recent video censored? Why was Mark Dice demonetized? Why have PragerU videos been censored? Why did Sargon of Akkad have his channel removed, and I could go on.
None of those channels post anything close to "hate speech" and certainly never call for violence.
Youtube censors any content that does fit google's far left agenda. Even the moderate left has there videos censored.
Then they come up with this bullshit about armies of neo-Nazis posting hate speech to justify politically biased censorship.
I can only hope that people are not stupid enough to believe that crap.
Re: (Score:2)
Why did Sargon of Akkad have his channel removed, and I could go on.
Huh? Sargon is alive and well on Youtube - Here's the cite for a playlist: https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
Might as well ban Jordan Peterson if Sargon gets dinged.
Although you went over the top, there is no question that Youtube itself has been a little overboard lately, and some of the targets have been dinged unnecessarily. Weird thing is there isn't a rational basis for much of it. David Pakman was demonetized - with almost half a million followers - and it's hard to imagine anyone thinking of h
So? (Score:2)
There's tons of propaganda from all sorts on youtube. The trick is to realize it's propaganda and take it with large chunks of salt. At the very least, think for yourself and ask "Do they make any valid arguments, and if so, what parts are still bullshit?" and compare it with other events and ideas you have read/seen/experienced.
Censorship just lends legitimacy to it in the eyes of uninformed viewers. There's also simple Streisand effect. People want to see what they're not allowed to. This is especially p
USA still having difficulty (Score:2)
Bias (Score:2)
What's wrong with neo-Nazi propaganda? (Score:2)
Either we live in a free state or we do not.
In the meantime, it makes sense to expose people to a range of political thought. If they drift toward the extremes, it means that the middle is failing, not that the extremes are somehow inherently "seductive" or "infectious."
Neo-Nazism, after all, is in the middle of the political spectrum, just turned up to 11.
On the Left you have egalitarians who believe that society "progresses" from a natural state to a Utopia based on equality; on the Right you have people
Re: (Score:2)
If Google used machine learning then all those Hitler parodies would be flagged as hate speech as well the that edition of the Sweet / Blockbuster which had one person wearing a swastika
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Right to Free Speech (Score:4, Insightful)
"protected speech" Don't play word games. The specific term "freedom of speech" goes back at least to 1689 and the idea goes all the way back to 600 BC in old Athens. If you feel the need to invent new terms to try and replace what everyone is already using and understands, you're likely full of shit.
Calls to specific violence is a conspiracy to murder and that's illegal. "Let's go give a wet willie to Locke2005 (849178) next monday after work". That's trying to form a mob for an act of violence (of the most heinous of sorts). Generally advocating violence, like suggesting we tar and feather anyone who doesn't comment their code, that's not illegal. And yeah, these asshats really walk that line don't they? And it sucks that this shit gets down to technicalities. But it's IMPOSSIBLE to keep people from FEELING threatened. Hell, your post makes me feel threatened that my personal rights are going to get taken away and that my political party no longer supports the ideas born out of the age of enlightenment. That winds have changed and times are dark. It sucks. But I'm not advocating we ban you from Slashdot.
Re:It's a trap! (Score:4, Interesting)
Motherboard not familiar with the concept of a "honeypot"? The best thing to do is leave these pages up, then pass the IP address of anybody watching them to the NSA, because watching them is adequate justification for a wiretap warrant.
So having an unpopular opinion makes you a 'fair target' for government scrutiny?
Do you feel the same way about Antifa supporters?
Re: (Score:2)
So they should ban Communism? That'll be the day; every other Google Doodle is celebrating a communist.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Conveniently ignored... (Score:5, Interesting)