White House To Host Tech Giants For AI Meeting (axios.com) 88
The White House will hold a meeting Thursday with major tech corporations to discuss artificial intelligence, according to media reports. Axios: America finds itself in a race with other countries, most notably China, to advance AI technologies. What they're saying: "In order to maintain America's leadership on AI, the administration should continue to invest in research and development, and advance programs that equip the workforce with skills of the future," said Dean Garfield, the president of the Information Technology Industry Council, in a statement. The guest list includes companies like Facebook, Amazon, Google and Nvidia, per the Washington Post, which first reported the meeting.
First things first (Score:4, Funny)
Getting natural intelligence there should be a higher priority.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
42
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
We did that back in 2016; Trump is more "naturally" intelligent by a mile than Obama ever was.
Trump may be less *technically educated* than the average technologist, but there is no questions since Trump has actually had to deal with many real world technical issues in building development that he's also much more educated than Obama, just less credentialed.
Re: (Score:1)
Ah, I don't think so. He's very good at telling the world how great he is. He even had a book written that said the same. But his business acumen... not so great. It's been said that if he'd just invested his inherited fortune in index stocks he'd have eight billion by now, not his two billion. So his investment acumen is about one quarter the market average. Certainly his company is not so much a make money shop, as a personal whim boutique. He's very much a natural at that showmanship thing, certainly mor
That's an exceptionally stupid argument (Score:2, Insightful)
It's been said that if he'd just invested his inherited fortune in index stocks he'd have eight billion by now, not his two billion
If it's still more than he had, you can play guessing games about rate of return all day long. It doesn't change the absolute fact he built up a huge multi-national corporation, far more than you will every do even if you live to be 500.
But also I would say that snide remark about how much money Trump has is ignoring the massive long term value Trump has in real-estate holdings
Re: (Score:2)
What accomplishments does Trump have that would back up the claim that he is "more 'naturally' intelligent by a mile"?
When did he read law? (Score:2)
Reading law doesn't require tons of intelligence. It does requires hard work and a particular knack for dealing with stuffy dusty lawbooks
Obama worked on just 30 cases in four years [latimes.com]. He was absolutely terrible as a lawyer, this indicates he had no knack for it at all.
You do have to put in a lot of work memorising stuff, though. So a smidgen extra intelligence
Memory has nothing at all to do with intelligence.
is what gets you "magna cum laude" from harvard law school.
That just means he graduated [sfgate.com] along with 9
Re: (Score:2)
he graduated Harvard Law school magna cum laude
Which still means he could have been in the lower half of the class. At the time he was there most graduates attained that "honor".
Re: (Score:2)
My original question to my parent does still stand.
That's what I said (Score:2)
First of, regarding Obama's natural intelligence, he graduated Harvard Law school magna cum laude.
Yes, I said he was highly credentialed. What classes did he take? Getting in was either affirmative action or family connections; just getting a degree from Harvard says very little about actual intelligence when diversity quotas come into play.
What accomplishments does Trump have that would back up the claim that he is "more 'naturally' intelligent by a mile"?
Huge multi-national business and a successful run
Re: (Score:1)
Trump's success came from family inheritance. Obama had to work for his. Trump can't even finish a sentence without rambling incoherently. Obama was able to speak and articulate what he meant.
You have it backwards.
That being said, there is no data you can present that can validate your conclusions. Besides let's be honest for a second. Your entire argument is based on race baiting bs. If you really believe that Trump is a genius rather than a wealthy buffoon, then more power to to you. But please st
bu twill they teach him to "code"? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Fine, he should have kept his day job and finished mastering the gaudy gold-plated look.
Re: (Score:2)
We did that back in 2016; Trump is more "naturally" intelligent by a mile than Obama ever was.
Citation?
Here is the only comparison I could find: Trump's own twitter feed [twitter.com], which is obviously a reliable source, since we all know that Trump is not prone to overstatements [politifact.com]
. What we know for sure is that he speaks at fourth grade levels [newsweek.com] We can all agree that there are very clever fourth-graders, but they are not 71 years old.
The smarter man speaks to be understood (Score:1)
What we know for sure is that he speaks at fourth grade levels
If you are writing for Twitter and not using fourth grade levels of speech you are obviously less intelligent; the smarter man moderates speech to account for audience, something Obama could not do.
As for the citation, you provided it.
Re: (Score:1)
Absolutely he is street smart as well, but that only gets you so far. I would say Obama is actually much more street smart.
Re: (Score:2)
If they make it auto-build walls, coal powered, and filter out CNN, he's sold.
AI has reached peak hype (Score:1)
When politicians get involved, you know it's almost run its course.
Now if we can just get Donald to buy a 3d printer.
Re: (Score:1)
Just a ball of filament and real time CGI.
The computers are a long sunk cost (to hide the reptilians) touching up the hair is easy.
probably about weaponization (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The Information Dominance Center [theguardian.com] can't be complete without some kind of interactive AI system.
Re: (Score:3)
No Intel, IBM? (Score:1)
Technology really evolves quickly.
No RTFA? (Score:2)
The White House on Thursday plans to convene executives from Amazon, Facebook, Google, Intel and 34 other major U.S. companies as it seeks to supercharge the deployment of powerful robots, algorithms and the broader field of artificial intelligence.
Many, many new jobs (Score:2)
Hmm. What would happen when it comes to the point. the programmers programmed themselves out of a job?
You may have programmed themselves out of THAT job but what you are overlooking is the many new jobs devoted to diagnosing why the AI black box is doing unexpected things - basically a robopsychologist. And that will need technical expertise from programmers...
The rule of conservation of programmers, is that any work they produce will always create more programming work.
Better yet.... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Curious Is It Not? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Modern Day Terminator (Score:4, Funny)
....
The Terminator: Yes. It launches its missiles against the targets in Russia.
John Connor: Why attack Russia? Aren't they our friends now?
The Terminator: Because Skynet absorbed all of the Huffington Post when it became self aware, and is obsessed with Russian hackers and interference.
Re: (Score:2)
Skynet learns how to play Chess really well.
Skynet learns how to play Go really well.
People realize that AI programs are just programs trained to do one thing really well and don't translate to other problem domains.
Next hype cycle begins.
Re: (Score:2)
A Man should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently and die gallantly. Specialization is for insects.
-- Lazarus Long (Robert A. Heinlein, "Time enough for Love")
Re: (Score:2)
always be learning. i can't imagine how people go through life without learning the next skill/trade/trick
Didn't they activly piss off these companies? (Score:2)
That is a lot of ego's and strong personalities in the same room.
Re: (Score:2)
That is a lot of ego's and strong personalities in the same room.
Trump is going to challenge them all to take an intelligence test.
Begging for money (Score:2)
What they really mean... (Score:2)
...and by "Tech Giants", they mean Barron. ...and by "AI meeting", they mean Donnie's forgotten his Twitter password again.
Replaced cabinet members with AI (Score:2)
Congress accidentally confirmed 3 cabinet members without knowing they were actually AI bots. The problem is that they can't figure out which ones. The Turing Test doesn't work to find them since politicians aren't actually human.
What AI (Score:1)
Seriously, what AI? Factory robots? Kiosks which aren't AI at all? Self driving cars? Autopilot?
So the AI will move against you first... (Score:2)