Floating Pacific Island Is In the Works With Its Own Government, Cryptocurrency (cnbc.com) 168
An anonymous reader quotes a report from CNBC: Nathalie Mezza-Garcia is a political scientist turned "seavangelesse" -- her term for an evangelist in favor of living off the grid -- and on the ocean. Mezza-Garcia spoke with CNBC's Matthew Taylor about what she sees as the trouble with governments, and why she believes tech startups should head to Tahiti. This seavangelesse is a researcher for the Blue Frontiers and Seasteading Institute's highly-anticipated Floating Island Project. The project is a pilot program in partnership with the government of French Polynesia, which will see 300 homes built on an island that runs under its own governance, using a cryptocurrency called Varyon.
"Once we can see how this first island works, we will have a proof of concept to plan for islands to house climate refugees," she said. The project is funded through philanthropic donations via the Seasteading Institute and Blue Frontiers, which sells tokens of the cryptocurrency Varyon. The pilot island is expected to be completed by 2022 and cost up to $50 million. As well as offering a home for the displaced, the self-contained islands are designed to function as business centers that are beyond the influence of government regulation.
"Once we can see how this first island works, we will have a proof of concept to plan for islands to house climate refugees," she said. The project is funded through philanthropic donations via the Seasteading Institute and Blue Frontiers, which sells tokens of the cryptocurrency Varyon. The pilot island is expected to be completed by 2022 and cost up to $50 million. As well as offering a home for the displaced, the self-contained islands are designed to function as business centers that are beyond the influence of government regulation.
They forgot to mention AI. (Score:5, Funny)
Along with a cryptocurrency, it has to use AI to keep the island afloat and manage it to be a winner.
Blockchain (Score:1)
Along with a cryptocurrency, it has to use AI to keep the island afloat and manage it to be a winner.
And blockchain. They will be using a Blockchain to anchor it.
Re: (Score:2)
So, the folks, some of whom have managed to have stable societies for decades to hundreds of years are laughable, but the folks with zero track record who are rejecting what we've already learned are the ones who are going to have everything work better?
I suppose it's possible, but I don't understand why someone would think this is the way to bet.
Re: (Score:2)
Waitaminute! (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
You're right of course. Just think of all of the diesel fuel these guys are going to be churning through trying to fight global warming by generating arbitrary ones and zeroes. The least they could do is relocate from French Polynesia to someplace like northern Oregon where they can use that all waste heat to keep warm at night.
Uhmmm. isn't this another word for boat? (Score:3)
Why not just get a boat as register it in Liberia. You can still make up your own crypto currency.
even better, don't get a boat but tell everyone you did get a boat. Call it your own country, so you don't have to register it. Then no one can determine the boat does not exist. take the money and run.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Uhmmm. isn't this another word for boat? (Score:2)
Or it's an imaginary boat you paid for that turns out doesn't exist
Re: (Score:2)
In all seriousness thou, I fail to see what benefits the floating AI controlled crypto-haven will have over your traditional island tax-haven. Many of those Islands are high enough above the current sea-levels to not have to worry about disappearing under the waves.
Re: (Score:2)
The Seasteading institute proposed an idea some years back for a business ship in international waters, just of the US coast, so employees could live on the mainland but commute by ferry each day and work in a place free of things like a minimum wage, mandated health coverage or income tax. It didn't take.
Re: (Score:2)
I forget what the issue what with makes that 24 mile tether a problem but as an engineer that makes way more sense to me than
One good typhoon (Score:2)
One good typhoon and one has to ask, were will the inhabitants go?
Defence (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
"the self-contained islands are designed to function as business centers that are beyond the influence of government regulation."
Works as designed, unless you mean "beyond the influence of government regulation except for the regulations that we like," in which case one must ask "who gets to decide which regulations we like?"
In a world beyond the influence of go
Re: Defence (Score:1)
Exactly. Libertarians just don't understand that a lack of government is impossible. As soon as one of these rich dudes noticed his neighbor is annoying, he'll form a home owner's association.
Fifty years later, the home owner's association is executing people who aren't patriotic enough, and you've got people saying taxes are unconstitutional and the liberals have ruined everything and they need to start their own floating island with equally questionable poo disposal services.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
You left out the dolphins. Armed dolphins (don't ask me if they're Soviet made weapons) who have been picking up all those signals. They would demand that we show them who this Alexa is, and that all package deliveries will be signed, floating island or not.
And today's captcha is pacifier
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
No, because the dolphins would kill the sharks if they feel threatened.
It is much better to have two squads: dolphins as scouts and sharks as infantry.
Better keep them separated.
(That is actually not a joke, the dolphins would kill a shark if they think it is attacking them)
Re: (Score:2)
Or a 200kg (440lb) Tongan king leading an invasion force of prisoners and a brass band [alternet.org].
(Though the island was tiny and unoccupied, there was nonetheless one casualty ;) )
Re: (Score:3)
That is when they will suddenly remember that they are citizens of some other country (the one they didnt want to pay taxes to) and would like to be rescued at great tax payer expense.
Re: (Score:2)
It sounds like they hope to rely on contracts with local governments for protection:
https://www.blue-frontiers.com... [blue-frontiers.com]
"Pirates? Piracy is only a real problem in a few areas we are not going to. Regular crime can generally be handled by some combination of onboard security and government forces, widely depending on the location and agreements in place."
Re: (Score:2)
Why would they have no way of defending themselves? Do you think the libertarian anti-government types that will likely inhabit this settlement are somehow afraid of guns and will enact gun control legislation?
Re: (Score:3)
No, they'll be able to collect money from all of their citizens, to use for the common defense. This collected money will be collected through a compulsory transaction cost on all traded cryptocurrency, and used in a centralized fashion. Eventually, if those in control of this common fund want, they could use this for things other than physical defense, like education, social programs, or specific use cases. They might even levy charges against non-crypto-transactional things, like how big of a boat you hav
Re: (Score:2)
You need more than "a gun" to defend against a pirate attack.
You probably need something that originally was called a gun, not a simple hand arm.
Re: (Score:2)
Torpedo. Or limpet mine.
Might only need a small one, in the right place, but why not go full overkill just for comedy value.
Re: (Score:2)
OP (to whom I was responding to) wasn't talking about invasion by US Army. He was talking about "mafia and pirates". For defense against Somali pirates or Tony Soprano's goons, yes a thousand people with some guns is sufficient.
Re: (Score:2)
Soomali pirates have cheap boats.
But they also have RPGs and state of the art assault rifles.
Re: (Score:1)
While an RPG might be an issue, a "state of the art assault rifle" isn't really that big a deal. 5.56mm or 5.45mm (a glorified .22) isn't actually all that useful in that sort of situation. You'd generally be better off with a 12ga shotgun for close work, and a .30-06 (or 8mm Mauser, .303 Lee-Enfield, or any good hunting rifle) for distant work....
Re: (Score:2)
You'd generally be better off with a 12ga shotgun for close work, and a .30-06 (or 8mm Mauser, .303 Lee-Enfield, or any good hunting rifle) for distant work....
On a pirate boat? Or when you have entered the target?
Re: (Score:2)
They are still floating around in French Polynesia.
Good luck with your petty pirate fleet versus a frech frig or destroyer.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Having weapons means no one will suddenly decide to join the "other side" because it has a bigger pay off, would it?
Why, every small country always survive purely because of the availability of weapons! Because weapons are magic! Because they'll have weapons, they'll magically hold off other people who also have weapons, and also can keep trying and trying again.
Re: (Score:2)
There is a large demographic of tech utopianists who are convinced since they own guns and like go target shooting every week that they are in fact useful in a firefight. Their self-regard is largely undeserved; most are suburban kids who have never been in an actual fight.
Re: (Score:2)
I do agree that they are deluding themselves.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
They're own government? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Perhaps they will adopt a variant of English where there==they're==their
php bot asks (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
No, he does not speak JavaScript or ECMAScript, sad, isn't it?
Re: They're own government? (Score:2)
It's going to be a lightly regulated capitalist economy, they'll have monarchs and serfs by different names whether anybody likes it or not.
Re: (Score:1)
Good thing you posted as an AC or your micro-aggressing bigoted post would have killed your karma! It should be zheirs or, xeirs, or some other all-gender-inclusive way of spelling...
/sarc
Seasteading ist nonsense. (Score:2)
The most feasible thing is building a community in the savanna or desert. Which is what most Projects of this kind do. If you have money enough to build and run a floating island, you'll have 5 times the money to do that. But I guess Peter Thiel has consumed to much like to realise that.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Such a community was promoted a few years back as "Galt's Gulch Chile". Chile isn't a libertarian country, but it is one of the best countries for a middle class person to try to become rich, rating quite high on most rankings by libertarian economics.
The promoters turned out to be con-men. Some of the people involved have regrouped and are attempting to build another Chile based project with a cryptocurrency based economy.
Re: Seasteading ist nonsense. (Score:4, Funny)
with a cryptocurrency based economy
In other words: more con-men
Have they forgotten the purpose of government? (Score:5, Informative)
"If you don't want to live under a particular government," she said, "people will be able to just take their house and float away to another island."
I think this organization does not quite understand the primary purpose of government: to provide protection of life, liberty, and property. Does this self-governing island have that ability? Who will citizens turn to if someone is murdered on their island? Or if someone invades their island? Or sinks it? Or if power fails? Food supplies fail? Water supplies fail? Currency becomes destabilized?
I think I'll stick with my own home country, thank-you-very-much. Sure, they're far from perfect, but at least I know they can provide for me the securities I need.
Re: (Score:3)
The reality is that the more "micro" the state, the more you can expect them to become a haven for "Bad Things(TM)". Think of all of the Fritzls and the like you'd have when people feel free that there's no authority out there to stop them. Any crime you can imagine, expect it to happen abundantly when the group size is small and there's reason to feel confident in a lack of repercussions.
Floating microstates used to be common on the high seas, where a group of like-minded people decided that they had no
Re: (Score:1)
Floating microstates used to be common on the high seas, where a group of like-minded people decided that they had no interest in the laws and rules imposed on them by outside authorities, and that they were going to do whatever they wanted, in their own rational self-interest. These were known as "pirate ships".
Pirates actually had a rather complex and robust sociopolitical system of their own. They had formal systems of voting, minimum wage, dispute resolution, criminal investigation, foreign policy, extradition and more. Pirates were surprisingly political, they're not the drunken anarchists they're often portrayed as in fictional accounts. It's quite fascinating, and an example of how government is an unavoidable inevitability of human nature. Even when people try to escape it, it always comes back.
Re:Have they forgotten the purpoUse of government? (Score:2)
I think this organization does not quite understand the primary purpose of government
Would that be "the primary purpose of government" as we wish it to be... or as it actually has been throughout history? Wee bit of a difference.
Re: (Score:2)
Those that didn't were overthrown either internally, or by another government that had its shit together.
Re: (Score:2)
Who will citizens turn to if someone is murdered on their island? - The mob
Or if someone invades their island? - The mob
Or sinks it? - The sharks
Or if power fails? - The mob but for different reasons
Food supplies fail? - The sharks, but for different reasons
Water supplies fail? - The mob but for different reasons
Currency becomes destabilized? - France, hoping for a bailout.
Re: (Score:2)
It is a floating island. ....
They send a distress signal:
MAYDAY MAYDAY MAYDAY
This is: Floating island
My position:
Any vessel receiving the distress is obliged to help or relay the distress ...
If they are big enough they can handle local crimes themselves ... ...
And: obviously, outside of war zones the rate of "murder" is quite low
Re: Libertarian Paradise! (Score:1)
'Atlas Shrugged' is more of a young adult novel.
(by the time you're 24 you have outgrown it)
Re: (Score:2)
Bing Tsher E noted:
'Atlas Shrugged' is more of a young adult novel.
(by the time you're 24 you have outgrown it)
I was 17 when I read it - and I had already outgrown it by then ...
Re: (Score:3)
There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs.
John Rogers [wikiquote.org]
Re: (Score:1)
I prefer that any day to you idiots who treat all adults as if they were perpetual children.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Waste of money, energy (Score:5, Informative)
It would be better to spend the money replacing existing fossil fuel generation with renewable generation, and there's no point in switching to a monetary system that consumes 7 GW producing new money. Yes, there will be climate refugees, but it's cheaper to build a home on solid ground. Unless you really want your house floating around in a cat 4 or cat 5 hurricane...
Re: (Score:2)
arche, the pointed out:
Yes, there will be climate refugees, but it's cheaper to build a home on solid ground. Unless you really want your house floating around in a cat 4 or cat 5 hurricane...
FWIW: in the Pacific, they're called "typhoons" ...
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe they should go full-on fantasy and make it submersible.
This is NOT autonomy. (Score:5, Informative)
As they will be setting up under French jurisdiction, they will be subservient to French laws and protections.
France already lets many islands in Polynesia govern themselves -- as long as they don't have any impact on other islands & generally respect french laws so if it actually comes to pass this will be generally more of the same.
There are islands in Polynesia where no non-inhabitant is allowed to stay the night. One in particular is about a 2 hour boat trip from Bora Bora. -- The islanders want to keep their culture pure but appreciate the tourist money.
Another island not too far away saw a few boatloads of Gendarmes come ashore about 10 years ago to put an end to another society that was "attempting to return to their polynesian values" and were treating the women as chattel so there are limits and the french Government will not hesitate to intervene if they judge it necessary.
Nothing new here...
Re: (Score:2)
So what you're saying is that they're on their own but get a 30% discount on baguettes?
Re: (Score:2)
Whereas if they setup in the U.S. or one of it's overseas territories they'd get free Big Macs? For the more obese among us I can see the advantages.
This can work (Score:4, Insightful)
Galt's Gulch (Score:2)
Galt's Gulch became Ayn's Atoll.
Where's the enabling technology? (Score:2)
"If you're struggling to do business" - yes, this will become easier by limiting yourself to a market of 300 households! Oh, wait, no, they're thinking they're going to sell to the world, somehow? Do they have some sort of robotic manufacturing? Is there some sort of thing which enables them to not operate differently from the various other tax havens? No?
"just live under your country's administration" - yes, this will become easier by removing yourself to a location which is entirely dependent on the o
sounds like smooth sailing (Score:2)
A dream that is decades/centuries old (Score:2, Insightful)
Manmade floating "island" states are not a new concept. If anything, people have thought about them for centuries, and talked about the implementation details for many decades now. They never happen because they're wildly impractical.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Floating_cities_and_islands_in_fiction
*Sigh*, here we go again... (Score:1)
Of course. (Score:2)
Naturally it has a cryptocurrency. If it had been conceived fifteen years ago it's constitution would probably have been written in XML. Twenty-five years ago and it would have had a domain consisting of a common English noun and ".com".
Sounds like a good idea to me (Score:2)
Sealand (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
Wait.. what ? (Score:2)
"...we will have a proof of concept to plan for islands to house climate refugees"
I thought that is where they came from....
Next chapter (Score:2)
Free from government influence (Score:2)
I assume that "free from government influence" means not paying taxes. The logical consequence is that such an entity should not benefit from free government protection from pirates. Will french navy send a bill each time them help here?
China (Score:2)
Occupancy Requirement? (Score:2)
So you'll have a couple of maintenance folks and data-center geeks on a from-the-mainland shift-rotation schedule. The rich folks may stop by in their yacht once a year. They may not even stop in to check on their money-launde...er, offshore accounts.
Climate refugees...hahaha! Waste. Of. Money.
Oh,
Forget the island (Score:2)
So, do words mean anything any more? (Score:2)
The project is funded through philanthropic donations ...
This seems like a pretty expansive view of what the term "philanthropic" means.
Re: I've heard this one before (Score:1)
There was a makeshift floating island called "the raft" in Stephenson's "Snow Crash"
Re: I've heard this one before (Score:1)
There's a good China Meiville book that also explores this sort of city.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: I've heard this one before (Score:2)
Is a man not entitled to the HODL of his coin?
Re: (Score:2)
The urban myth about an man-made "island" that would be self-sufficient, and free of all government regulation, has been around since - at least - the 1970s.
Re: (Score:2)
You would need a quite big island, regardless of floating or not.
I doubt 300 households (lets assume 2 adults and 1 or 2 kids) manage that.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:government regulation? (Score:5, Informative)
And that's not the only one. The is also the "Republic of Minerva" [atlasobscura.com].
Two key differences, it is not "beyond the influence of government regulation" since it is explicitly part of Frencb Polynesia [wikipedia.org] which is in turn actually part of France. Some interesting points in the Wikipedia article about French Polynesia:
"Political life in French Polynesia has been marked by great instability since the mid-2000s"
Always a good sign... and
"Despite a local assembly and government, French Polynesia is not in a free association with France... As a French overseas collectivity, the local government has no competence in justice, university education, security and defense. Services in these areas are directly provided and administered by the Government of France, including the National Gendarmerie (which also polices rural and border areas in European France), and French military forces. The collectivity government retains control over primary and secondary education, health, town planning, and the environment. The highest representative of the State in the territory is the High Commissioner of the Republic in French Polynesia"
Overseas Collectivities [wikipedia.org] are integral parts of France and the supreme local power is the French High Commissioner, and its ultimate head of state is President of France Emmanuel Macron.
So the notion that this little project will be "beyond the influence of government regulation" is delusional (or else pure hype).
But hey! It is being funded with an ICO! What could go wrong with that?
My projection: the only thing floating here will be the money people invest in the cryptocurrency which will float away.
In other news you can still send money to Mars One to see a colony be not built on Mars. Mars One really missed the boat (err... spaceship) in not creating the chance to invest in the new Martian cryptocurrency. But that may be coming if, their gullible (err... optimistic) contributors have dried up.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
They *already* have to have some form of agreement regulating how the residents help contribute to maintaining the place, hence they have a rudimentary government. Disputes will arise, mechanisms for dealing with future disputes will be agreed upon and it goes from there.
Beyond governing issues, the physical and logistical challenges of maintaining the islands will be enormous. It remains to be seen if they will be able to generate enough revenue to maintain it.
And of course, all they have to do is piss o
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
So this person wants to be away from government regulation, such as regulation on carbon dioxide emissions, ...and is preparing for climate change refugees. This seems highly contradictory as one would normally expect such a person to be in favour of regulations to prevent climate change.
There are certainly people who reject science because of the regulatory implications [helsinki.fi]. In that case they are selecting for facts based on a desired conclusion. That is the irrational position. Surely one should base a conclusion on the available facts.
Nathalie Mezza-Garcia, on the other hand, accepts the best available science even though she is opposed to the regulatory implications. That is rational. In addition, she proposes an alternative to regulation. That is also rational.
This is really the deba