NYC Transit Boss Unveils Sweeping 10-Year Subway Modernization Plan (nbcnewyork.com) 63
The Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) on Wednesday unveiled a sweeping plan to modernize the city's subway system over the next 10 years. From a report: The proposal, which new New York City Transit President Andy Byford called "Fast Forward," centers on overhauling the mass transit network's signaling system -- some of which dates back to the early 20th century -- 30 years sooner than current Subway Action Plan.
But it won't come without a good bit of pain: sources told News 4 that Byford's plan would require entire lines to be taken out of service during overnight and weekend hours for extended periods. Byford -- who took over the task of running the city's subways and buses earlier this year -- said in an MTA meeting Wednesday that the work would be split into two five-year chunks. Over the first five years parts or all of the 4,5, 6, E, F, M, R, A, C, E and G lines would receive modern signaling systems. That would include the entirety of the Lexington Avenue line, which carries the 4, 5 and 6 trains and is the most-used mass transit line in the United States.
But it won't come without a good bit of pain: sources told News 4 that Byford's plan would require entire lines to be taken out of service during overnight and weekend hours for extended periods. Byford -- who took over the task of running the city's subways and buses earlier this year -- said in an MTA meeting Wednesday that the work would be split into two five-year chunks. Over the first five years parts or all of the 4,5, 6, E, F, M, R, A, C, E and G lines would receive modern signaling systems. That would include the entirety of the Lexington Avenue line, which carries the 4, 5 and 6 trains and is the most-used mass transit line in the United States.
In soviet Russia... (Score:1)
Ten year plan unveils YOU
Re: (Score:2)
. . . and the taxi companies increase rates along the closed subway lines . . .
. . . oh, wait . . . that's Über!
BACK TO THE FUTURE.... (Score:1)
Trains just like good old 1899.
Re: (Score:3)
Extended Periods? (Score:1)
"Byford's plan would require entire lines to be taken out of service during overnight and weekend hours for extended periods."
Every time I've visited NYC on the weekend, a line is down, or a station, or a platform, or a train, or *something*, pretty much everywhere. How would this be different?
Re: (Score:3)
For a smoother ride... (Score:2)
I have an idea: replace the existing octagonal wheels with ten-sided wheels!
Think of the costs (Score:2)
25Hz power? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:1)
Does the NYC subway still use 25Hz power for lighting in some stations ? I remember when I use to take the subway to school that I could see the incandescent lights flicker due to the 25Hz power being supplied to them.
More like 25 HURTS
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
First, on the IRT, now called the "A" Division of the NYC Subway, the feeders are 11,000 at 60 Hz which is converted to 120 volts AC and also to 600 volts DC. The lights in stations are 120 volts. The lights in the tunnels run on 600 volts DC. Near ticket booths, stairways, and other critical areas, there are lamps lit from the 600 volt DC track circuit.
All of the Northeast Corridor south of New York Penn Station is 25 Hz. So is SEPTA, but the former Reading Railroad side of SEPTA which has its own conve
Re: (Score:2)
Re: How many billions? (Score:1, Informative)
By unions 'bleeding' you mean people get fair pay and humane working conditions for a hard job? How about we take away the cars, limousines and helicopters from wealthy 1% in Manhattan and see how quickly the MTA gets fixed. It's a really fucking busy system that got deluged by a hurricane not that long ago. The narrative that the MTA is a financial sinkhole is a conservative lie. Millions of people depend on it daily, and while sure, it isn't perfect, it's been underfunded for decades and STILL works.
Re: (Score:3)
Also, only a few lines of the subway was deluged, and those are being repaired over the next few years. The changes discussed in TFA are separate.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah? How about when they DO have a line shut down and STILL have warning crews (apparently 3 people on either side) doing nothing? Well, there's technically one guy holding the orange flag so that counts as doing something until they inevitably wedge it somewhere and go back to doing completely nothing.
Re: (Score:2)
By unions 'bleeding' you mean people get fair pay and humane working conditions for a hard job? How about we take away the cars, limousines and helicopters from wealthy 1% in Manhattan and see how quickly the MTA gets fixed. It's a really fucking busy system that got deluged by a hurricane not that long ago. The narrative that the MTA is a financial sinkhole is a conservative lie. Millions of people depend on it daily, and while sure, it isn't perfect, it's been underfunded for decades and STILL works.
You really have no clue...or are a union shill.
The MTA hemorrhages money yet every time something doesn't work because they failed to modernize it 30+ years ago they come with their hand out for more money. Also, they are a private agency so their books are closed and no one can examine them to see what they're actually paying/spending.
A living wage, sure. I support that. $100k+ for someone who can't even make clear announcements on the newer PA systems? Yeah, nope. Or how about the countless examples
Re: (Score:2)
The standard rule of thumb for public projects is that the final cost will be three times the initial approved budget, and the schedule will slip by a factor of two. Unfortunately, we are "locked in" to this system of unrealistic lowballing. If the actual cost was used in the initial proposal, people would would assume the "real" cost was three times that, and the project would never get approved.
So if the public is being told 10 years and $19B, the final outcome will likely be about 20 years and $57B.
10 years, Yeah RIGHT (Score:5, Insightful)
The CBTC (aka the signal improvements) on the 7 train, which were supposed to take 7 years (chosen because it was the 2nd easiest line to do) has taken 10 years (aka 3 years late) and STILL not working
The 7 train extension, started in 2007, supposed to be finished in 2013 had one station dropped, and STILL took till Sept 2015 (aka about 50% over)
We won't talk about the fact that the Second Ave Subway took 99 YEARS from when it was first proposed till when it opened, and was "fully funded" by bond issues at least 3 times
NOTHING gets done in 10 years by the MTA
Re: 10 years, Yeah RIGHT (Score:2)
Approval for rollout 1991, last turnstyle 1997, sounds like 6 years to me, and that doesn't count buses
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Meanwhile, for the past 7ish years, the exact same section of I85 has been "
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Overdue and not enough (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Another person who doesn't live in NYC explaining to everyone 'how things work'.
Yah, they run 24/7/365 ... except when they don't. Except for the dozen or more closure, re-route, skipped station, etc. posters you see in every announcement area. Except for trains that run every 20-30 minutes on a modified route that requires 2 or 3 train changes to get where one direct train normally would during the late hours of that '24'. So that 45-60 minute trip can become 2+ hours at night. It's literally faster to
Re: (Score:2)
Unlike many European/Asian countries, our subways weren't bombed during the unpleasantness about 75 years ago.
While it may seem counter-intuitive, being bombed is one of the better ways to get your infrastructure modernised....
Re: Overdue and not enough (Score:2)
Sorry, but thatâ(TM)s bullshit. Londonerâ(TM)s hid in the Tube because it was safe from the bombing. Itâ(TM)s the oldest system in the world, but it makes NYCâ(TM)s system look antiquated. For example, WTF is it with having to still use physical tickets, or why isnâ(TM)t the ride from Hoboken to Manhattan (1 stop) integrated in to the same system?)
Re: (Score:3)
riding the subway in New York feels like you're in a 3rd world country
If only. Even the 3rd world has nicer subways than we do.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Compared to Europe, Australia, and I imagine most developed countries, riding the subway in New York feels like you're in a 3rd world country. I get that "cars are king" for most of the US, but in New York City, where there's an obvious need for mass transit, and insanely expensive real estate above those tracks, it's shocking that the state of mass transit below ground seems stuck in the 20th century.
Australian trains aren't that good, but most Australians will not travel on them because they live nowhere near a station. Its relatively easy to run a train network no-one uses.
Can we fix BART also? (Score:2)
(n/t)
what can you do? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Ride a bike because it's often faster.
Except who has a gym to shower off in their office when real estate is so expensive businesses are building 'open seating plans' under the outright lie that employees favor that when it's simply an excuse for higher density seating? Bicycle 'parking' in a garage/secure place is about $200/month. Offices don't have bike parking...and if you leave a nice bike chained up for a day it's not unusual to have it stolen or at least damaged significantly...even in heavily popu