US Accuses China of 'Super Aggressive' Spy Campaign on LinkedIn (reuters.com) 50
The United States' top spy catcher said Chinese espionage agencies are using fake LinkedIn accounts to try to recruit Americans with access to government and commercial secrets, and the company should shut them down. From a report: William Evanina, the U.S. counter-intelligence chief, told Reuters in an interview that intelligence and law enforcement officials have told LinkedIn, owned by Microsoft, about China's "super aggressive" efforts on the site. He said the Chinese campaign includes contacting thousands of LinkedIn members at a time, but he declined to say how many fake accounts U.S. intelligence had discovered, how many Americans may have been contacted and how much success China has had in the recruitment drive. German and British authorities have previously warned their citizens that Beijing is using LinkedIn to try to recruit them as spies. But this is the first time a U.S. official has publicly discussed the challenge in the United States and indicated it is a bigger problem than previously known.
Hey! Don't bash the free market! (Score:2)
No, really, just because it once works against you? Why do you hate capitalism? They just make better offers!
Re: (Score:2)
Seriously, I'm thinking I should create a network of fake profiles and get myself recruited. There's nothing illegal about providing false intelligence to foreign agencies for compensation right?
Re: (Score:2)
If they are offering real jobs, then how are they "fake"?
Microsoft is an international company, not beholden to only the US government, and should have no obligation to acquiesce to these demands.
TFA only gives a single example, and in that case the "victim" knew he was dealing with foreign intelligence agents, and make a deliberate choice to sell them classified info.
Re: (Score:2)
Seriously, I'm thinking I should create a network of fake profiles and get myself recruited. There's nothing illegal about providing false intelligence to foreign agencies for compensation right?
Especially if you could get paid for the bad information! Then you could rat out the people paying you to the FBI in return for reward money. You'd get paid on both ends of the deal.
Re: (Score:2)
Social media. (Score:1)
Just say no.
...requests from India... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
To be a B1H?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
No, he meant B(1)h, the "opposite" of H(1)b
Some people are not good targets for jokes. They would be the "humorless" segment of the population...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
I must confess, I don't get the parentheses joke.
Re: (Score:2)
To be a V1H?
That's why America doesn't lead the world in culture anymore. We used to have music videos on television, now we have music television with no music.
But India has VH1. With real music videos on it. And who was responsible? MTV. Go figure.
Obviously, we should blame China for this.
Re: (Score:1)
/s/anymore//
Re: (Score:1)
s|/s/|| :/
Re: (Score:1)
*sigh*
*deletes slashdot account*
Kind of open about it, really.... (Score:2)
I suppose what is a bit concerning about this is the relatively blatant nature of the contacting.
It's as if they suspect that tech workers think they're getting screwed by their employers via outsourcing and such and are trying to make a play based on that resentment.
I'm shocked - SHOCKED!.
Re: (Score:2)
Make Linkedin Great Again!
Shhhhh (Score:3, Funny)
Maybe the US gov't doesn't shut it down because it sends China fake experts to muck them up by say putting them on Oracle Cloud and Comcast.
Re: (Score:2)
It sounds like a good plan until you realize that they copied and re-implemented the API, and it all works fine when you're not suffering under Oracle.
Really ? (Score:2)
Really, worried about someone scraping linkdein ? Why bother just search for the data: securityweek.com [securityweek.com]
Only one company to blame for this, it is not China
What ! They're not blaming Russia ? (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Hello? Russia is elections and other 'hacking.'
Can't they just be ultra agressive? (Score:2)
It's a shame that these emerging markets don't know how to spend trillions on an espionage agency, like we do, so that we can come and go without being noticed. They keep using this "lowest hanging fruits" style of espionage on a budget that isn't as transparent. It makes our professionals so embarrassed for them.
The more you know... (Score:1)
Why bitch about it? (Score:1)
Instead of calling attention to it, just put honeypot accounts on LinkedIn. Send real agents to the interviews. When the foreign recruiters ask for something illegal, arrest them on the spot. Or be--shall we say--"super aggressive" with them? Mua-ha...mua-ha...mua-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha!
Re: (Score:1)
*strokes cat*
Stupid (Score:1)
Just stupid.
Dont list (Score:2)